RFQ Attach 4 - Past Performance.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DFAS Cleveland - CART Services
- Solicitation number
- SOL-HQ010332925
- Issued by
-
Office of the Secretary of Defense
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor providing CART services to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. The questionnaire is to be completed by both the contractor and a customer reference, with the contractor providing details of a prior contract and the customer reference rating performance and answering questions. The contractor must submit the completed questionnaire to DFAS by July 7, 2023. Ratings are to be provided for overall technical performance, quality of work, schedule performance, cost performance. References are also asked if the contractor proactively mitigated risks and if they would use the contractor again. The related federal contract opportunity is for DFAS Cleveland for CART services under solicitation number SOL-HQ010332925 issued by the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ Attach 2 Schedule of Items Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ Attach1 PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ .pdf | ||
| RFQ Attach 3 - Full Text.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Past Performance Questionnaire CART Services (Onsite/Remote) for DFAS Cleveland
INSTRUCTIONS:
QUOTER: Please complete Section A and send the Past Performance Questionnaire to the COR or other customer POC with knowledge of performance.
RESPONDENT: Thank you in advance for completing this questionnaire for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). We understand that your time is very valuable and we appreciate your input. Your rating is essential in successfully evaluating past performance. In reference to the information provided in Section A, please complete Sections B and C of this questionnaire and submit directly to DFAS by 5:59 P.M. EST on 7/7/2023. Email completed questionnaires to miranda.j.amir.civ@mail.mil.
SECTION A: QUOTER INFORMATION
| Company Name: |
| CAGE: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Title: |
| Email Address: |
| Phone Number: |
| Contract Number: |
| Dollar Amount: |
Contract Period of Performance:
Performed as the prime contractor or sub-contractor:
Brief Description of Work Performed:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Company Name:
| Point of Contact: |
| Title: |
| Email Address: |
| Phone Number: |
SECTION C: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Use the below performance ratings and definitions to reflect your evaluation.
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable (NA) |
| No information or did not apply. |
Using the chart above, please place an X in the column with the performance rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. Please respond with a narrative explanation for any ratings of unsatisfactory or marginal.
| Performance Objective |
| Rating |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Overall Technical Performance
Quality of Work
Schedule Performance
Cost Performance
For the questions below, please place an X in the column that represents your response. Please respond with a narrative explanation for any no responses.
| Question |
| Yes |
| No |
Did the contractor proactively identify risk areas, mitigate risks, and respond to emergency and critical situations?
Would you use this contractor again?
Narrative Explanation / Additional Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .