RFQ 2025-56 Clarifying Questions 1.pdf
PDF 228 KB Posted
- Attached to
- On-Call Geotechnical Engineering Services
- Solicitation number
- S-C01010-00014028
- Issued by
- Clackamas County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Response to Clarifying Questions for Request for Quotes #2025-56 issued by Clackamas County's Procurement & Contracting Services in Oregon, specifically addressing an On-Call Geotechnical Engineering Services solicitation. The document provides official responses to two submitted questions from potential proposers, clarifying specific details about the RFQ without altering the original published document. The first clarification addresses the evaluation criteria's requirement for proposers to provide examples of past geotechnical on-call task orders similar to those in the scope of work, while the second response establishes a maximum page limit of 15 pages for proposal submissions.
The document does not provide additional pricing, funding, or specific contract details beyond the clarification of submission requirements. The clarifying questions document is dated June 9, 2025, and appears to be part of the procurement process to provide potential bidders with precise guidance on proposal preparation. The document maintains the standard disclaimer that these responses are for clarification purposes only and do not fundamentally alter the original RFQ, ensuring transparency and consistent interpretation of the solicitation requirements for all interested firms.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ_2025-56_On-Call_Geo.pdf | ||
| 2025-56 Notice of Award.pdf | ||
| Attachment F - Responsibility Inquiry~5.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PH: 503-742-5400 WWW.CLACKAMAS.US
REQUEST FOR QUOTES #2025-56
On-Call Geotechnical Engineering Services
RESPONSE TO CLARIFYING QUESTIONS
June 9, 2025
Note that these are questions submitted by interested firms to the above referenced solicitation. The below answers are for clarification purposes only and in no way alter or amend the RFQ as published.
1. Page 4 of the RFQ, Evaluation Criteria C: Project Understanding and Approach. It states to “Provide examples of geotechnical on-call task orders similar to the tasks listed in the scope of work.
Answer: The County is asking Proposers to provide examples of our past work experience performing geotechnical on-call services that are similar to the tasks listed in the RFQ’s scope of work.
2. Would the County please specify a maximum Page Limit?
Answer: The response to this RFQ should be no more than 15 pages.
End of Clarifying Questions #1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .