RFQ 1_02 for Engineering and Grant Admin 6_26.pdf

City of Pembroke, Georgia

Request for Qualifications

(RFQ 1-02)

To Provide

Engineering Services and

Grant Management Services

For

Water and Wastewater System Resiliency Projects

July 2026

RFQ 1-02 — CITY OF PEMBROKE — ENGINEERING & GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 2

/9

Table of Contents

1. General Project Information

Project Descriptions & Goals

2. Requirements:

3. RFQ Schedule Of Events

4. Selection Process

Consultant Selection

5. Instructions for Preparing Statements of Qualifications:

A. Description and Resources of Firm

B. Experience and Qualifications

C. Statement of Suitability

6. Submittal of Questions and Requests for Clarification

7. Submittal of Statements of Qualifications

8. Additional Terms and Conditions

Restriction of Communication

Submittal Costs and Confidentiality

Award Conditions

Statement of Agreement

Solicitation No: RFQ 1-02 Qualifications Due: July 30, 2026 12:00 PM EST

RFQ 1-02 — CITY OF PEMBROKE — ENGINEERING & GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 3/9

City of Pembroke, Georgia

Request for Qualifications

Engineering & Grant Management Services for

Water and Wastewater System Resiliency Projects

The City of Pembroke, Georgia (hereinafter “Owner” or “City”) is requesting Statements of

Qualifications from professional firms interested in providing engineering and design services and grant management services. The services requested are for multiple water and wastewater system improvement projects funded in part by the Georgia Environmental Finance Authority (GEFA)

Hurricane Helene Resilience Funding Program. This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeks to identify one or more qualified engineering firms and one grant management firm to provide the above-mentioned services. Potential providers of each service type should have a strong record in successfully assisting local governments with public works infrastructure projects associated with

Federal and/or State grant programs.

One or more firms for each type of service that respond to this RFQ and who are determined by the

City of Pembroke to be especially qualified for each type of service may be deemed eligible and may be invited to discuss and negotiate for these services. All respondents to the RFQ are subject to instructions communicated in this document and additional terms and conditions listed in the

RFQ. Please note: The issuance of this RFQ invokes a Restriction of Communication on potential respondents, which, if violated, may result in proposal rejection (See Section 8 for details).

1. General Project Information

Project Descriptions & Goals

The overall goal of the projects is to address the impacts of Hurricane Helene and promote resilience in drinking water and wastewater facilities in Georgia, including decentralized wastewater facilities. The specific descriptions and goals for each project are as follows:

A. Drinking Water Project No.32 - Proposed Water Well & Power Supplies. The proposed project involves the construction of a new well to replace the existing well, converting the existing one to a dedicated backup supply. Includes drilling, disinfection, and backup power for resilience (at new well and at existing well). Total Project Cost: $2,674,875.00

B. Clean Water Project No.27 - Pump Station Generators & Telemetry. This project will install permanent backup power generators at designated lift stations. A telemetry system will provide real-time monitoring of critical operational data, transmitting status and alarms to City personnel. Total Project Cost: $2,100,000.00.

2. Requirements:

Engineering Firms: The firm must demonstrate experience in successful design and oversight of construction of municipal water systems.

Grant Administration Consultants: The grant administrator must demonstrate grant management experience in compliance with state and federal grant regulations.

The final scope of services will be developed during the negotiation process and agreed upon by the City and awardee(s) prior to the execution of the contract(s).

RFQ 1-02 — CITY OF PEMBROKE — ENGINEERING & GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 4/9

3. RFQ Schedule Of Events

The following Schedule of Events represents the City’s best estimate of the schedule that will be followed. All times indicated are prevailing times in Georgia. The City reserves the right to adjust the schedule as the City deems necessary.

RFQ Issued / Advertised June 29, 2026 TBD

Deadline for questions July 15, 2026 12:00 PM

Deadline for submission of Statements of Qualifications July 30, 2026 12:00 PM

Issue of Notification of Award Aug 11, 2026 TBD

4. Selection Process

A Selection Committee, consisting of representatives of the City, will identify a selection of finalist firms through a qualifications-based selection process. The Selection Committee will receive and evaluate Statements of Qualifications submitted in response to this RFQ using the following criteria:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The City reserves the right to offer an award based on any combination of factors it determines to be in the best interests of the City and the City Residents. Price will be a factor, but it will not be the sole determining factor in awarding the bid. The City may award the bid to the Firm demonstrating the most complete response and demonstrating full compliance with the specifications in accordance with procurement requirements set forth by the State of Georgia and the Federal Government.

4.1. Evaluation Committee & Criteria

The basis of selection will be the lowest responsive and responsible bid, as determined based on the Evaluation Committee’s evaluation of the Proposals, including but not limited to the following evaluation criteria:

• Past performance on similar projects in terms of quality of work, cost control, and compliance with performance schedules. This must be documented by references and other means within the bid response – 30%

• Firm qualifications and experience – 20%

• Project Approach (i.e. methodology, understanding of the work to be performed) – 20%

• Price proposal/Fee schedule (Using Pricing Sheet Provided) – 20%

• Technical approach – quality of package (requested information provided, presentation, etc.) – 10%

The Evaluation Committee shall evaluate each of the Proposals using the criteria and applying the percentages as set forth in the percentages above. The City is not obligated to accept the lowest cost proposal. The City may also award to other than the highest ranked proposer if the price submitted by that proposer is more than the budget available for the project. If made, the award will go to the Proposer providing the most responsive, responsible proposal that provides the best overall value and service to the City. A

Selection Committee, consisting of representatives of the City, will identify a finalist firm through a qualifications-based selection process.

RFQ 1-02 — CITY OF PEMBROKE — ENGINEERING & GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 5/9

The City reserves the right to accept the BEST-EVALUATED RESPONSE as deemed by the Evaluation Committee, which may or may not be the lowest monetary response.

5. Instructions for Preparing Statements of Qualifications:

A single PDF file of the Statement of Qualifications shall be prepared and emailed to clerk@pembrokega.net prior to the submission deadline. Each submittal must include a transmittal letter. The transmittal letter must clearly indicate all services and projects for which the firm would like to be considered. Submittals must be able to print on standard (8

½” x 11”) paper. The pages of the qualification submittals must be numbered. A table of contents, with corresponding tabs, must be included to identify each section. Each

Statement of Qualifications shall provide a straightforward, concise delineation of respondent’s capabilities. Fancy, colored displays, and promotional materials are not desired. Emphasis must be on completeness, relevance, and clarity of content. The content of all Statements of Qualifications must be categorized and numbered as outlined below, and responsive to all requested information:

A. Description and Resources of Firm

i. Provide basic company information: Company name, address, name of primary contact, telephone number, fax number, email address, and company website (if available). If the firm has multiple offices, the qualification statement shall include information about the parent company and branch office separately. Identify the office from which the project will be managed and this office’s proximity to the project site. Provide form of ownership, including state of residency or incorporation, and number of years in business. Is the offeror a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), joint venture, or other structure?

ii. Briefly describe the history and growth of your firm(s). Provide general information about the firm’s personnel resources, including disciplines and numbers of employees and locations and staffing of offices

iii. Has the firm been involved in any litigation in the past five years? Describe your experience with litigation with Owners, and/or Contractors. List any active or pending litigation related to the services requested and explain.

iv. Provide a statement of disclosure, which will allow the Owner to evaluate possible conflicts of interest. Respondents must provide, in their own format, a statement of all potential legal or otherwise significant conflicts of interests possibly created by the respondent’s being considered in the selection process or by the respondent’s involvement in the project. Respondents should include information as to the nature of relationship(s) with parties in such potential conflict.

v. Has the firm ever been removed from a Services contract, had a contract terminated for default, or failed to complete a contract as assigned?

B. Experience and Qualifications

i. Provide professional qualifications and description of experience for principal

Consulting Services personnel. (At this stage, firms are asked for information mailto:clerk@pembrokega.net

RFQ 1-02 — CITY OF PEMBROKE — ENGINEERING & GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 6/9

on lead staff only, but may list qualifications and experience on more than one lead individual who is qualified and available for the proposed project. If the firm is selected as a finalist, the Owner will request detailed information on the exact proposed expanded team and their relevant experience.) Firms that respond as joint teams will be expected to clearly demonstrate their team members’ shared experience, as a joint team, on prior projects of similar magnitude and complexity.

ii. Provide information on the firm’s Engineering or Grant Consulting Services experience (as applicable) on projects of similar type, size, function, and complexity. Describe no more 10 and no less than five projects, in order of most relevant to least relevant, which demonstrate the firm's capabilities to perform the project at hand. For each project, the following information should be provided:

a. Project name, location, and dates during which services were performed.

b. Brief description of project and physical description of facilities, as applicable.

c. Services performed by your firm.

d. Owner’s stated satisfaction level in the Consulting Services and/or overall service of your firm.

e. Owner contact information.

iii. Describe the firm’s experience and qualifications in a leadership role over multiple phases of similar projects as applicable to the role for which your firm is applying. Include any oversight of projects of relevant complexity, including experience in providing leadership in projects that utilize similar methods and applications to that of incumbent projects. Include any certifications, industry ratings, and achievement recognitions, etc., to attest to the level of experience and success. Describe innovations that the firm might have introduced or employed to increase the project’s adherence to technical standards and compliance with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations.

C. Statement of Suitability

i. Provide any information that may serve to differentiate the firm from other firms in suitability for the project. Suitability may include, but is not limited to, the firm’s fit to the project and/or needs of the Owner, any special or unique qualifications for the project, current and projected workloads, the proximity of office to project location, and any services offered by the firm that may be particularly suitable for this project.

ii. Provide any non-discrimination and affirmative action policies of the firm and the firm’s history of W/MBE inclusion in sourcing for projects.

6. Submittal of Questions and Requests for Clarification

Questions about any aspect of the RFQ, or the project, must be submitted in writing (email is preferable) to: clerk@pembrokega.net. Questions will be answered via addendum only.

RFQ 1-02 — CITY OF PEMBROKE — ENGINEERING & GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 7/9

The deadlines for submission of questions relating to the RFQ are the times and dates shown in the RFQ Schedule of Events in Section 3. Proposers are cautioned to review and adhere to the Restriction of Communication (See Section 8) for this Project.

7. Submittal of Statements of Qualifications

A single PDF file of the statement of qualifications shall be prepared and received by the

City prior to the submittal deadline. Late submissions will not be accepted. Each submittal must include a transmittal letter. Submittals must be able to be printed on standard (8 ½” x

11”) paper and the words “Statement of Qualifications” and the services offered must be clearly indicated on the outside of the envelope or in the filename. Statements of

Qualifications must be received by the Owner prior to the deadline indicated in the Schedule of Events (See Section 3). Submissions must be emailed to clerk@pembrokega.net or mailed to the address below:

City of Pembroke, Attn: Arlene Hobbs

PO Box 130

Pembroke, Georgia 31321

8. Additional Terms and Conditions

Restriction of Communication

From the issue date of this (RFQ) solicitation until a successful proposer is selected and the selection is announced, proposers are not allowed to communicate about this solicitation or this Project for any reason with any members of the Selection Committee, the Owner, except for submission of questions as instructed in the RFQ, or as provided by any existing work agreement(s). For violation of this provision, the Owner reserves the right to reject the proposal of the offending proposer.

Submittal Costs and Confidentiality

All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the party submitting the response. The Owner is not obligated to any party to reimburse such expenses. All submittals upon receipt become the property of the Owner. Labeling information provided in submittals “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view. Subject to the provisions of the Georgia Open

Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until final award.

Award Conditions

This request is not an offer to contract or a solicitation of bids. This request and any statement of qualifications or proposal submitted in response, regardless of whether the proposal is determined to be the best proposal, is not binding upon the Owner and does not obligate the Owner to procure or contract for any services. Neither the Owner nor any party submitting a response will be bound unless and until a written contract mutually accepted by both parties is negotiated as to its terms and conditions and is signed by the Owner and a party containing such terms and conditions as are negotiated between those parties. The

Owner reserves the right to waive non-compliance with any requirements of this Request for Proposal and to reject any or all proposals submitted in responses. Upon receipt and mailto:jhall@lyonsga.org

RFQ 1-02 — CITY OF PEMBROKE — ENGINEERING & GRANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 8/9

review of responses, the Owner will determine the party(s) and proposal(s) that in the sole judgment of the Owner is in the best interest of the Owner (if any is so determined), with respect to the evaluation criteria stated herein. The Owner then intends to conduct negotiations with such party(s) to determine if a mutually acceptable contract(s) may be reached.

Statement of Agreement

With submission of a statement of qualifications or proposal, the Proposer agrees that he/she has carefully examined the solicitation, and the Proposer agrees that it is the

Proposer’s responsibility to request clarification on any issues in any section of the solicitation with which the Proposer disagrees or needs clarified. The Proposer also understands that failure to mention these items in the proposal will be interpreted to mean that the Proposer is in full agreement with the terms, conditions, specifications and requirements in the therein. With submission of a proposal, the Proposer hereby certifies:

(a) that this proposal is genuine and is not made in the interest or on behalf of any undisclosed person, firm, or corporation; (b) that Proposer has not directly or indirectly included or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or insincere proposal; (c) that

Proposer has not solicited or induced any person, firm, or corporation to refrain from sending a proposal.