RFP2026-2_-_QASP.pdf

PDF 220 KB Posted

Attached to
Citywide Grounds Maintenance & Landscaping Services - Facilities & Neighborhood Parks
Solicitation number
RFP2026-2
Issued by
Broward County, Florida

About this file

This file is a Quality Assurance and Surveillance Plan (QASP) audit sheet for Cooper City Park, developed by the City of Cooper City, Florida, to evaluate grounds maintenance and landscaping services. The QASP provides a comprehensive inspection framework for assessing park conditions across eight weighted categories: Grounds & Landscaping (15%), Trees & Vegetation (10%), Pathways & Hardscape (15%), Playground & Recreation Areas (20%), Facilities & Amenities (15%), Safety & Compliance (15%), Irrigation & Utilities (5%), and Cleanliness & Waste Management (5%). Inspectors evaluate each category using a five-point scoring system (5=Excellent to 1=Critical) and document whether corrective action is required. The audit sheet includes sections for recording park name, location, inspection date, inspector name, weather conditions, and inspection type (Routine, Complaint, Post-Event, or Other), with space for detailed notes on each line item and a final weighted score calculation out of 100 points.

The scoring interpretation ranges from 90-100 (Excellent condition) to below 60 (Critical, requiring immediate corrective action), with intermediate ratings of Good (80-89), Fair (70-79), and Poor (60-69) designating increasing levels of maintenance requirements. The document includes a Corrective Action Log requiring identification of issues by priority level (Low, Medium, High), assignment to responsible parties, due dates, and status tracking. An Inspector Summary section captures key issues, immediate hazards identified, and recommended actions. This QASP template establishes performance standards and accountability measures for the contractor selected through the City's Citywide Grounds Maintenance & Landscaping Services solicitation (due July 1, 2026), ensuring systematic evaluation and documentation of service quality across all City facilities and neighborhood parks.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Cooper City Park Quality Assurance Audit Sheet

• Park Name:

• Location:

• Inspection Date:

• Inspector Name:

• Weather Conditions:

• Inspection Type: (Routine / Complaint / Post-Event / Other)

Scoring Key

• 5 = Excellent (no issues)

• 4 = Good (minor issues)

• 3 = Fair (moderate issues, needs attention)

• 2 = Poor (significant issues)

• 1 = Critical (unsafe / immediate action required)

• N/A = Not Applicable

1. Grounds & Landscaping (Weight: 15%)

Item Score

(1–5)

Notes Action

Required

(Y/N)

Turf condition (cut, healthy, weed-free)

Irrigation coverage & drainage

Mulch beds & plant health

Litter/debris presence

Erosion or bare spots

Category Score: ____ / 25 × 15% = ______

2. Trees & Vegetation (Weight: 10%)

Item Score Notes Action

Required

Tree health & stability

Dead/damaged limbs

Shrub maintenance

Hazardous vegetation

Category Score: ____ / 20 × 10% = ______

3. Pathways & Hardscape (Weight: 15%)

Item Score Notes Action

Sidewalk/trail condition

Trip hazards/cracks

ADA accessibility compliance

Cleanliness (graffiti, debris)

Category Score: ____ / 20 × 15% = ______

4. Playground & Recreation Areas (Weight: 20%)

Item Score Notes Action

Equipment safety & condition

Safety surfacing

Structural integrity

Courts/fields usability

Entrapment/exposure hazards

Category Score: ____ / 25 × 20% = ______

5. Facilities & Amenities (Weight: 15%)

Item Score Notes Action

Benches/tables/shelters

Restroom condition & supplies

Drinking fountains

Trash/recycling bins

6. Safety & Compliance (Weight: 15%)

Item Score Notes Action Required

Visible hazards (glass, damage)

Lighting functionality

Emergency access clear

Regulatory compliance (ADA, safety standards)

7. Irrigation & Utilities (Weight: 5%)

Item Score Notes Action

System functionality

Leaks or overspray

Water efficiency

Category Score: ____ / 15 × 5% = ______

8. Cleanliness & Waste Management (Weight: 5%)

Item Score Notes Action

Overall cleanliness

Trash removal frequency

Graffiti/vandalism

Category Score: ____ / 15 × 5% = ______

Final Score Calculation

Category Weighted Score

Grounds & Landscaping

Trees & Vegetation

Pathways & Hardscape

Playground & Recreation

Facilities & Amenities

Safety & Compliance

Irrigation & Utilities

Cleanliness

TOTAL SCORE: ______ / 100

Rating Interpretation

• 90–100 = (Excellent condition)

• 80–89 = Good (minor improvements needed)

• 70–79 = Fair (moderate issues)

• 60–69 = Poor (significant maintenance required)

• Below 60 = Critical (immediate corrective action required)

Corrective Action Log

Issue Identified Priority (Low/Med/High) Assigned To Due Date Status

Inspector Summary

• Key Issues:

• Immediate Hazards Identified:

• Recommended Actions:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .