RFP S-60300-0016292 FINAL-MILE SCALED DIST. PROJECT~1.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-60300-00016292
- Issued by
- Oregon
About this file
This is an Intermediate Procurement RFP issued by the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) for the Food and Agriculture Final Mile/Scaled Distribution Project. The procurement seeks contractor services to conduct structured interviews and field research with Oregon producers, food businesses, distributors, and wholesale buyers to identify logistics pathways connecting producers to regional markets and document barriers to market access. The project encompasses interviews with a minimum of 20 farms and food businesses, at least 10 final-mile distributors and logistics providers, and at least 10 regional grocery retailers and wholesale buyers across Oregon, Washington, Northern California, Western Idaho, and Western Montana. Additional activities include mapping distribution capacity, analyzing logistics options, and evaluating the Distribution First pilot program in the Puget Sound region on May 7-8, 2026. Deliverables include a project workplan (due within 30 days), producer interview summary and distribution partner directory (both due at contract midpoint), distribution pathway mapping, pilot evaluation summary, and a final comprehensive report due by December 1, 2026. The contract term is 9 months with an option to renew for up to 2 additional years. Questions and clarification requests are due April 13, 2026 at 3:00 PM Pacific Time, with offers due April 28, 2026 at 3:00 PM Pacific Time, and anticipated award notification by May 13, 2026.
The ODA has budgeted $68,000 for this project, with compensation structured on a time-and-materials basis with detailed cost breakdowns required. Offerors must demonstrate at least two years of experience in research, market analysis, supply chain analysis, or similar consulting services related to agriculture, food systems, logistics, or regional economic development, and must have prior experience conducting food system partner interviews and industry outreach. Proposals are limited to five pages and must be submitted electronically through OregonBuys. The evaluation criteria consist of relevant project experience (30 points), participant engagement experience (20 points), methodology and work approach (20 points), Oregon food system knowledge (30 points), and cost evaluation (20 points), totaling 120 possible points. The solicitation encourages participation from certified disadvantaged, minority-owned, woman-owned, service-disabled veteran-owned, and emerging small businesses. Commercial General Liability Insurance of not less than $5,000,000 per occurrence is required. Professional liability insurance of not less than $1,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 annual aggregate is required if applicable. The State of Oregon reserves the right to reject any or all offers and may conduct additional evaluation rounds including presentations, interviews, or best and final offers as deemed in the State's best interest.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
STATE OF OREGON
COVER PAGE
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
is issuing this Intermediate Procurement under S-60300-0016292 for
| FOOD | AND | AGRICULTURE | FINAL | MILE/SCALED |
| DISTRIBUTION | PROJECT |
Date of Issue: March 25, 2026
Opening Date: April 28, 2026
Single Point of Contact (SPC): Heather Hawes, Procurement & Contract Specialist
| Address: | 635 | Capitol | St. | NE, | Suite | 100 |
| City, | State, | Zip | Salem, | Or. | 97301 | |
| Phone | (voice) | 503.551.0465 | ||||
| E-mail: | heather.hawes@oda.oregon.gov |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| TABLE | OF | CONTENTS | ||||
| SECTION | 1: GENERAL | INFORMATION | ........................................................................................................ | 3 | ||
| 1.1 INTRODUCTION | .................................................................................................................................................................................................. | 3 | ||||
| 1.2 SCHEDULE | .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. | 3 | ||||
| 1.3 SINGLE | POINT | OF | CONTACT | (SPC) | ......................................................................................................................................................... | 3 |
| SECTION | 2: AUTHORITY, | OVERVIEW, | AND | SCOPE | ............................................................................... | 3 |
| 2.1 AUTHORITY | AND | METHOD | ......................................................................................................................................................................... | 3 | ||
| 2.2 DEFINITION | OF | TERMS | .................................................................................................................................................................................. | 3 | ||
| 2.3 OVERVIEW | AND | PURPOSE | ........................................................................................................................................................................... | 4 | ||
| 2.4 SCOPE | OF | WORK/SPECIFICATIONS | ....................................................................................................................................................... | 4 |
| SECTION | 3: PROCUREMENT | REQUIREMENTS | AND | EVALUATION | ................................................ | 7 |
| 3.1 MINIMUM | OFFER | REQUIREMENTS | ........................................................................................................................................................ | 7 | ||
| 3.2 MINIMUM | SUBMISSION | REQUIREMENTS | .......................................................................................................................................... | 7 | ||
| 3.3 PROCUREMENT | PROCESS | ............................................................................................................................................................................ | 8 | |||
| 3.4 OFFERS | CONTENT | REQUIREMENTS | ................................................................................................................................................... | 10 | ||
| 3.5 EVALUATION | PROCESS | ............................................................................................................................................................................... | 11 | |||
| 3.6 COST | EVALUATION | ........................................................................................................................................................................................ | 13 | |||
| 3.7 NEXT | STEP | DETERMINATION | ................................................................................................................................................................. | 13 | ||
| 3.8 PREFERENCES | ................................................................................................................................................................................................... | 14 | ||||
| 3.9 POINT | AND | SCORE | CALCULATIONS | .................................................................................................................................................... | 14 | |
| 3.10 RANKING | OF | OFFERORS | ............................................................................................................................................................................. | 15 |
| SECTION | 4: AWARD | AND | NEGOTIATION | ................................................................................................. | 15 |
| 4.1 AWARD | NOTIFICATION | PROCESS | ........................................................................................................................................................ | 15 | |
| 4.2 SUCCESSFUL | OFFEROR | SUBMISSION | REQUIREMENTS | .......................................................................................................... | 15 |
| 4.3 CONTRACT | NEGOTIATION | ........................................................................................................................................................................ | 16 |
| SECTION | 5: ADDITIONAL | INFORMATION | ................................................................................................ | 16 | |||||
| 5.1 COMMITMENT | TO | DIVERSITY, | EQUITY, | AND | INCLUSION | ..................................................................................................... | 16 | ||
| 5.2 CERTIFIED | FIRM | PARTICIPATION | ....................................................................................................................................................... | 17 | |||||
| 5.3 GOVERNING | LAWS | AND | REGULATIONS | ........................................................................................................................................... | 17 | ||||
| 5.4 OWNERSHIP/PERMISSION | TO | USE | MATERIALS | ........................................................................................................................ | 17 | ||||
| 5.5 CANCELLATION | OF | SOLICITATION; | REJECTION | OF | OFFERS; | NO | DAMAGES. | ........................................................... | 17 |
| 5.6 COST | OF | SUBMITTING | AN | OFFER | ......................................................................................................................................................... | 18 | |||
| 5.7 STATEWIDE | E-WASTE/RECOVERY | PROCEDURE | ....................................................................................................................... | 18 | |||||
| 5.8 RECYCLABLE | PRODUCTS | ........................................................................................................................................................................... | 18 |
| SECTION | 6: LIST | OF | ATTACHMENTS | .......................................................................................................... | 18 | ||
| ATTACHMENT | A SAMPLE | CONTRACT | .............................................................................................................................................................. | 18 | |||
| ATTACHMENT | B DISCLOSURE | EXEMPTION | AFFIDAVIT | ...................................................................................................................... | 18 | ||
| ATTACHMENT | C OFFEROR | INFORMATION | AND | CERTIFICATION | SHEET | ................................................................................ | 18 |
| ATTACHMENT | D REFERENCE | CHECK | FORM | ............................................................................................................................................... | 18 | ||
| ATTACHMENT | E COST | SHEET | ............................................................................................................................................................................... | 18 | |||
| ATTACHMENT | F COBID | CERTIFICATION | / | OUTREACH | PLAN | .......................................................................................................... | 18 |
| ATTACHMENT | G RESPONSIBILITY | INQUIRY | ................................................................................................................................................ | 18 |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
| The | State | of | Oregon, | acting | by | and | through | the | Department | of | Agriculture, | (“Agency”), | is | issuing |
| this | Intermediate | Procurement | for | Food | and | Agriculture | Final | Mile/Scaled | Distribution | Project. |
| Additional | details | on | the | Scope | of | the | goods | or | services | or | both | are | included | in | the | Scope | of |
| Work | section. |
Work is expected to begin with the contract award and terminate on December 1, 2026.
| Agency | anticipates | the | award | of | one | Contract | from | this | solicitation. | The | initial | term | of | the | |||
| Contract | is | anticipated | to | be | 9 | months | with | option | to | renew | up | to | a | maximum | of | 2 | years. |
1.2 SCHEDULE
| The | table | below | represents | a | tentative | schedule | of | events. | All | times | are | listed | in | Pacific | Time. | ||
| All | dates | listed | are | subject | to | change. | N/A | denotes | that | event | is | not | applicable | to | this |
solicitation.
Event Date Time
Questions / Requests for Clarification Due April 13, 2026 3:00PM
Opening (offer due) April 28, 2026 3:00 PM
Issuance of Notice of Award (approx.) May 13, 2026
1.3 SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT (SPC)
| The | SPC | for | this | solicitation | is | identified | on | the | Cover | Page, | along | with | the | SPC’s | contact |
| information. | Offeror | shall | direct | all | communications | related | to | any | provision | of | the | solicitation, | |||
| whether | about | the | technical | requirements | of | the | solicitation, | contractual | requirements, | the | |||||
| solicitation | process, | or | any | other | provision | only | to | the | SPC. |
| SECTION | 2: AUTHORITY, | OVERVIEW, | AND | SCOPE |
| 2.1 AUTHORITY | AND | METHOD |
Agency is issuing this solicitation pursuant to its authority under ORS 279A.050 and ORS 279A.140.
| Agency | is | using | the | Intermediate | Procurement | solicitation | method | set | forth | in | ORS | 279B.070 |
| and | OAR | 125-247-0270. |
2.2 DEFINITION OF TERMS
For the purposes of this solicitation, capitalized words will refer to the following definitions.
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
2.2.1 General Definitions
Capitalized terms not specifically defined in this document are defined in OAR 125-246- 0110.
2.3 OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE
| The | Oregon | Department | of | Agriculture | (ODA), | through | its | Agriculture | Development | and | Marketing |
| Division, | works | to | support | the | long-term | viability | and | competitiveness | of | Oregon’s | agricultural |
| sector | by | strengthening | market | opportunities | for | producers, | supporting | industry | development, | ||
| and | improving | coordination | across | the | state’s | food | and | agriculture | supply | chain. |
| ODA | has | engaged | producers, | distributors, | and | industry | partners | across | Oregon | through | recent | |||
| supply-chain | assessments, | industry | outreach, | and | the | development | of | the | Oregon | Food | & | |||
| Beverage | Roadmap. | These | efforts | have | identified | distribution | and | logistics | as | persistent | barriers | |||
| affecting | the | ability | of | many | farms | and | food | businesses | to | access | regional | wholesale, | retail, | and |
| institutional | markets. | In | particular, | small | and | mid-size | producers | often | face | challenges | navigating | |||
| aggregation | opportunities, | identifying | distribution | partners, | and | aligning | production | volumes | with | |||||
| existing | transportation | and | logistics | networks. |
| Through | this | project, | ODA | seeks | to | better | understand | current | distribution | practices | ||
| and | identify | practical | pathways | that | connect | Oregon | producers | with | regional | market | channels. | |
| The | project | will | focus | on | documenting | existing | logistics | capacity, | identifying | barriers | to | efficient |
| distribution, | and | highlighting | opportunities | to | better | utilize | aggregation, | transportation, | and | final- | ||
| mile | delivery | infrastructure. |
| The | Oregon | Department | of | Agriculture | (ODA) | is | seeking | a | contractor | for | the | Food | and | ||
| Agriculture | Final | Mile | / | Scaled | Distribution | project. | This | project | is | part | of | ODA’s | broader | effort | to |
| strengthen | Oregon’s | food | and | agriculture | supply | chain | by | improving | coordination, | reducing | |||||
| fragmentation, | and | expanding | scale-appropriate | distribution | pathways | for | small | and | mid-size | ||||||
| farms | and | food | businesses. |
| Additional background | on | ODA’s | supply-chain | strategy | and | the | Food | & | Beverage | Roadmap | is |
| available | here: https://www.oregon.gov/odaroadmap/pages/default.aspx |
The Oregon Department of Agriculture has budgeted $68,000.00 for this project.
2.4 SCOPE OF WORK/SPECIFICATIONS
| The | Contractor | will | conduct | structured | interviews | and | field | research | with | Oregon | producers, | food |
| businesses, | distributors, | and wholesale | buyers to | better | understand | current | distribution | practices, | ||||
| barriers | to | accessing | regional | markets, | and | opportunities | to utilize under-used | aggregation, | ||||
| storage, | and | final-mile logistics infrastructure. | Interviews | will | primarily | focus | on | Oregon-based | ||||
| producers | and | businesses | but | will | also | include | distributors | and | regional | buyers operating | in | |
| Oregon | and | surrounding | regional | markets | that | may | include | Washington, | Northern | California, | ||
| Western | Idaho, | and | Western | Montana. |
| The | work | will identify viable logistics pathways | that | connect | Oregon | producers | to | local | and | |||
| regional | markets | by | aligning | producer | supply | with | distributor | requirements, | documenting | |||
| available | aggregation | and | distribution | capacity, | and | mapping | practical | delivery | routes | and | service | |
| areas. | Findings | will | support | the | development | of | clearer | distribution | guidance | for | producers | and |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| will | be | incorporated | into | the | ODA | Food | & | Beverage | Roadmap | to | improve | transparency | and | access |
| to | scale-appropriate | market | channels. |
1. Task 1: Project Startup and Regional Coordination
a. Activities:
| A. Establish coordination | meetings | with | ODA | to | confirm | scope, | geographic | focus, |
| and | reporting | expectations. | ||||||
| B. Develop a | methodology for | gathering | distribution | and logistics data. | ||||
| C. Identify interview | targets | across | producers, | distributors, | and buyers. | |||
| D. Develop | a | proposed | regional travel | schedule (Oregon | only) for | conducting | interviews. |
b. Deliverables:
| A. Conduct | a | project | kickoff | meeting | with | ODA within | the | first | week | of | contract | execution |
| and | before | any | work | begins. | ||||||||
| B. Provide | a | written | project | workplan | outlining | priorities, | outreach | approach, | and | timeline | ||
| of | activities | (within | 30 | days | of | contract | start). |
2. Task 2: Producer Distribution Needs Assessment
a. Activities:
| A. Conduct one-on-one | interviews (either | in | person | or | via | teleconference) with an | ||||
| approved | list | of | a | minimum | of | 20 | farms | and | food | businesses. |
| B. Document | production | volumes, | shipping | needs, | and | existing | distribution | relationships. | ||
| C. Identify barriers | producers | face | when | accessing | regional | or | wholesale | markets. | ||
| D. Document | producer | interest | in | regional | distribution | opportunities. |
b. Deliverables:
| A. Producer | Distribution | Needs | Summary | describing logistics challenges, | market | access |
| goals, | and | common | barriers. |
3. Task 3: Distributor and Wholesale Buyer Interviews
a. Activities:
| A. Conduct | one-on-one | interviews | with an | approved | list | of | at | least | 10 final | mile |
| distributors | and logistics providers. | |||||||||
| B. Conduct at | least | 10 interviews (either | in | person | or | via | teleconference) with | local | and | |
| regional grocery | retailers and | wholesale | buyers (food | service, | institutions, | and | ||||
| distributors) sourcing | regional | products. | ||||||||
| C. Identify service | areas, | onboarding | requirements, | and | infrastructure | capacity. | ||||
| iv. Conduct | interviews | across | Oregon, | Washington, | Northern | California, | Western | Idaho, | ||
| and | Western | Montana. |
b. Deliverables:
| A. Distribution | Partner | Directory | summarizing | final | mile | distributors, | over | the |
| road | distributors, | and wholesale buyers. |
4. Task 4: Distribution Mapping and Logistics Pathway Analysis
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
a. Activities:
| A. Map | available | final | mile | distribution | capacity | across | the | region (can | be | in | list | format). |
| B. Identify over-the-road | (OTR) | distribution | options | available | to | Oregon | producers. | |||||
| C. Document | aggregation | points, | delivery | routes, | and logistics considerations. | |||||||
| D. Identify potential | supply | chain | matches | between | producers | and logistics partners. |
b. Deliverables:
A. Distribution Pathway Mapping identifying logistics options available to producers.
5. Task 5: Distribution First Pilot Evaluation
a. Activities:
| A. Travel | to | the | Puget | Sound | region | to observe and | evaluate | the | Distribution | First |
| pilot on May 7-8, | 2026. | |||||||||
| B. Document | transportation | first logistics strategies | used | in | the | pilot. | ||||
| C. Gather | feedback | from | participating | businesses | and logistics providers. | |||||
| D. Evaluate | applicability | of | this | model | for | Oregon | producers. |
b. Deliverables:
| A. Distribution | First | Pilot | Evaluation | Summary | including | key | observations, | lessons |
| learned, | and | recommendations |
6. Task 6: Final Documentation and Roadmap Integration
a. Activities:
| A. Compile | findings | from | interviews, | mapping, | and | pilot | evaluation. | ||||
| B. Prepare | materials | suitable | for | inclusion | in | the | ODA | Food | & | Beverage | Roadmap. |
| C. Provide | recommendations | for | strengthening scale | appropriate | distribution systems. |
b. Deliverables:
| A. Final | Summary | Report | including | distribution | partner | directory, | pathway |
| guidance, logistics models, | and | recommendations. |
7. Deliverable Schedule (Summary)
Deliverable: Due date:
Project Workplan Within 30 days
Producer Interview Summary Midpoint of contract
Distribution Partner Directory Midpoint of contract
Distribution Pathway Mapping Following interviews
Distribution First Pilot Summary Following pilot event
Final Summary Report By December 1, 2026
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| SECTION | 3: PROCUREMENT | REQUIREMENTS | AND | EVALUATION |
| 3.1 MINIMUM | OFFER | REQUIREMENTS |
3.1.1 BUSINESS
| To | be | considered | for | evaluation, | Offeror | must | demonstrate | how | Offeror | meets | all | of | the |
| following | business | requirements: | |||||||||||
| o Offeror | must | be | legally | authorized | to | conduct | business | in | the | State | of | Oregon |
prior to contract execution.
| o Offeror | must | have | at | least | two | (2) | years | of | experience | conducting | research, |
| market | analysis, | supply | chain | analysis, | or | similar | consulting | services | related | to | |
| agriculture, | food | systems, | logistics, | or | regional | economic | development. |
| o Offeror | must | have | experience | conducting | food | system | partner | interviews, |
| industry | outreach, | or | field | research | involving | multiple | businesses | or |
| organizations | involved | with | agriculture | logistics | and | agriculture | wholesale |
purchasing/pricing.
3.1.2 TECHNICAL
| To | be | considered | for | evaluation, | Offeror | must | demonstrate | how | the | proposed | solution |
| meets | all | of | the | following | technical | requirements: |
| o Offeror | must | have | the | ability | and | experience | to | conduct | structured | interviews |
| and | industry | partner | outreach | with | producers, | distributors, | and | buyers. |
| o Offeror | must | have | the | ability | and | experience | to | analyze | and | summarize | findings |
| from | interviews | or | field | research. |
| o Offeror | must | have | the | ability | and | experience | to | prepare | written | reports |
| summarizing | findings | and | recommendations. |
3.2 MINIMUM SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
3.2.1 Offeror Format and Quantity
| Offeror | should | follow | the | format | and | reference | the | sections | listed | in | the | Offeror | Content | |
| Requirements | section. | Responses | to | each | section | and | subsection | should | be | labeled | to | |||
| indicate | the | item | being | addressed. | Offeror | must | describe | in | detail | how | requirements | of | this | |
| solicitation | will | be | met | and | may | provide | additional | related | information. | Cost | information | |||
| must | be | submitted | as | a | separate | electronic | file. | |||||||
| OregonBuys | Electronic | Response. | Offeror | should | submit | its | Proposals | no | longer | than | ||||
| five | pages | electronically | through | OregonBuys. | Offeror | should | follow | the | procedures | |||||
| outlined | in | Section | 3.3.2.1 | for | electronic | submission. |
| Failure | of | Offeror’s | authorized | representative | to | sign | the | Offer | may | result | in | rejection |
| of | the | Offer | by | Agency. |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| Offeror | shall | submit | one | electronic | copy | of | its | Offer. | In | addition, | if | Offeror | believes | any | of | its | ||
| Offer | is | exempt | from | disclosure | under | Oregon | Public | Records | Law | (ORS | 192.311 | through | ||||||
| 192.478), | Offeror | shall | complete | and | submit | the | Disclosure | Exemption | Affidavit | |||||||||
| (Attachment | B), | and | Offeror | shall | submit | a | fully | redacted | version | of | its | Offer, | clearly | |||||
| identified | as | the | redacted | version. |
3.2.2 Authorized Representative
| A | representative | authorized | to | bind | the | Offeror | shall | sign | the | Offer. | Failure | of | the | authorized | |
| representative | to | sign | the | Offer | may | subject | the | offer | to | rejection | by | Agency. |
3.3 PROCUREMENT PROCESS
3.3.1 Public Notice
| The | solicitation, | including | all | Amendments | and | attachments, | are | published | in | the | ||
| OregonBuys | e-procurement | system | Solicitation | documents | will | not | be | mailed | to | |||
| prospective | Offerors. | |||||||||||
| Agency | shall | advertise | all | Amendments | on | OregonBuys | e-procurement | system. | Prospective | |||
| Offeror | is | solely | responsible | for | checking | OregonBuys | to | determine | whether | or | not | any |
| Amendments | have | been | issued. | Amendments | are | incorporated | into | the | solicitation | by | this |
reference.
3.3.2 Questions / Requests for Clarification
| All | inquiries, | whether | relating | to | the | solicitation | process, | administration, | deadline | or | |||
| method | of | award, | or | to | the | intent | or | technical | aspects | of | the | solicitation | must: |
| • Be | delivered | to | the | SPC | via | submission | through | OregonBuys | |||||
| • Reference | the | OregonBuys | bid | number | |||||||||
| • Identify | Offeror’s | name | and | contact | information | ||||||||
| • Be | sent | by | an | authorized | representative | ||||||||
| • Refer | to | the | specific | area | of | the | solicitation | being | questioned | (i.e. | page, | section | and |
| paragraph | number); | and | ||||||||||
| • Be | received | by | the | due | date | and | time | for | Questions/Requests | for | Clarification | identified |
in the Schedule
3.3.3 Offer Submission
| Offeror | is | solely | responsible | for | ensuring | its | Offer | is | received | by | the | SPC | in | accordance | with |
| the | solicitation | requirements | before | Opening. | Agency | is | not | responsible | for | any | delays | in | |||
| or | by | common | carriers | or | by | transmission | errors | or | delays | or | mistaken | delivery. | Offers | ||
| submitted | by | any | means | not | authorized | may | be | rejected. |
3.3.3.1 Submission Options
| OregonBuys | Electronic | Response. | Offeror | should | submit | its | Offer | electronically | through | |||
| OregonBuys. | Offeror | should | follow | the | procedures | outlined | in | detailed | instructions | on | how | |
| to | submit | an | Offer | can | be | found | at | OregonBuys | Vendor | Formal | Solicitation | Response.pdf |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| The | cost | sheet | must | be | submitted | as | a | separate | electronic | response | file. | |||||
| Offeror | shall | submit | one | copy | of | its | Offer | and | all | other | submittal | requirements, | with | |||
| Attachment | C | - | Offeror | Information | and | Certification | Sheet | bearing | the | Offeror’s | authorized | |||||
| representative’s | Signature, | in | one | of | the | following | formats: | Adobe | Acrobat | (pdf), | Microsoft | |||||
| Word | (docx), | or | Microsoft | Excel | (xlsx). | If | Offeror | believes | any | of | its | Offer | is | exempt | from | |
| disclosure | under | Oregon | Public | Records | Law | (ORS | 192.311 | through | 192.478), | Offeror | shall | |||||
| complete | and | submit | the | Disclosure | Exemption | Affidavit | (Attachment | B). | Offeror | shall | also | |||||
| mark | as | “Confidential” | in | OregonBuys | all | attachments | to | its | Offer | that | Offeror | believes | are | |||
| exempt | from | disclosure | ||||||||||||||
| The | Offeror | Information | and | Certification | Sheet | (Attachment | C) | must | bear | the | Offeror’s | |||||
| authorized | representative’s | Signature. |
| 3.3.5 | Modification | or | Withdrawal | of | Quotes | or | Offers | |||||||||
| Any | Offeror | who | wishes | to | make | modifications | to | an | Offer | already | received | by | Agency | shall | ||
| submit | its | modification | in | one | of | the | manners | listed | in | the | offer | Submission | Options | section | ||
| and | must | denote | the | specific | change(s) | to | the | offer | submission. | |||||||
| If | an | Offeror | wishes | to | withdraw | a | submitted | Offer, | it | shall | do | so | prior | to | Opening. | The |
| Offeror | shall | submit | a | Written | notice | Signed | by | an | authorized | representative | of | its | intent | to | ||
| withdraw | its | Offer | in | accordance | with | OAR | 125-247-0440. | The | notice | must | include | the | ||||
| OregonBuys | Bid | number | and | be | submitted | to | the | SPC. |
3.3.6 Offer Opening Date
| Offer | and | all | required | submittal | items | must | be | received | by | the | SPC | on | or | before | Opening. | All |
| Offer | modifications | or | withdrawals | must | be | completed | prior | to | Opening. |
| Offers | received | after | Opening | are | considered | LATE | and | will | NOT | be | accepted | for | evaluation. |
| Late | Offers | will | be | returned | to | the | respective | Offeror | or | destroyed. |
3.3.7 Offer Rejection
Agency may reject an Offer for any of the following reasons:
| • Offeror | fails | to | substantially | comply | with | all | prescribed | solicitation | procedures | and |
| requirements, | including | but | not | limited | to | the | requirement | that | Offeror’s | authorized |
| representative | sign | the | offer. |
| • Offeror | fails | to | meet | the | responsibility | requirements | of | ORS | 279B.110. | ||||
| • Offeror | has | undisclosed | liquidated | and | delinquent | debt | owed | to | the | State | of | Oregon | or |
any of its agencies, boards, commissions, departments or divisions.
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| • Offeror | makes | any | contact | regarding | this | solicitation | with | State | representatives | such | as | ||
| State | employees | or | officials | other | than | the | SPC | or | those | the | SPC | authorizes, | or |
| inappropriate | contact | with | the | SPC. |
| • Offeror | attempts | to | inappropriately | influence | a | member | of | the | Evaluation | Committee. | ||
| • Offeror | is | conditioned | on | Agency’s | acceptance | of | any | other | terms | and | conditions | or |
| rights | to | negotiate | any | alternative | terms | and | conditions | that | are | not | reasonably | related |
| to | those | expressly | authorized | for | negotiation | in | the | solicitation | or | Amendment. |
3.3.8 Opening of Offers
| There | will | be | no | public | Opening | of | Offers. | Offers | received | will | not | be | available | for | inspection | |
| until | after | the | evaluation | process | has | been | completed | and | the | Notice | Award | is | issued. | |||
| However, | Agency | will | record | and | make | available | the | identity | of | all | Offerors | after | Opening. |
3.4 OFFERS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
| Offeror | must | address | each | of | the | items | listed | in | this | section | and | all | other | requirements | set | forth | ||
| in | this | solicitation. | Offeror | shall | describe | the | Goods | to | be | provided | or | the | Services | to | be | |||
| performed | or | both. | An | Offer | that | merely | offers | to | provide | the | goods | or | services | as | stated | in | this | |
| solicitation | will | be | considered | non-Responsive | to | this | solicitation | and | will | not | be | considered |
further.
3.4.1 Offeror Information and Certification Sheet
| The | Offeror | shall | complete | and | submit | the | Offeror | Information | and | Certification | Sheet |
| (Attachment | C). |
3.4.2 References
| Provide | at | least | 3 | references | from | current | or | former | client | firms | for | similar | projects | ||
| performed | for | any | clients | within | the | last | 5 | years. | References | must | verify | the | quality | of | |
| previous, | related | Work | (Attachment | D). | |||||||||||
| Agency | may | check | to | determine | if | references | provided | support | Offeror’s | ability | to | comply | |||
| with | the | requirements | of | this | solicitation. | Agency | may | use | references | to | obtain | additional | |||
| information, | break | tie | scores, | or | verify | any | information | needed. | Agency | may | contact | any | |||
| reference | (submitted | or | not) | to | verify | Offeror’s | qualifications. |
3.4.3 Costs
| Submit | a | detailed | Cost | Sheet | (Attachment | E) | electronically | through | OregonBuys | stating | the | ||||
| total | price | for | the | entire | project. | Include | a | breakdown | of | all | labor, | profit | and | expenses. |
3.4.4 Public Record/Confidential or Proprietary Information
| All | Offers | are | public | record | and | are | subject | to | public | inspection | after | Agency | issues | the | ||||
| Notice | of | the | Intent | to | Award. | If | an | Offeror | believes | that | any | portion | of | its | Offer | contains | any | |
| information | that | is | a | trade | secret | under | ORS | Chapter | 192.345(2) | or | otherwise | is | exempt | |||||
| from | disclosure | under | the | Oregon | Public | Records | Law | (ORS | 192.311 | through | 192.478), | |||||||
| Offeror | shall | complete | and | submit | the | Disclosure | Exemption | Affidavit | (Attachment | B) | and | a | ||||||
| fully | redacted | version | of | its | Offer. |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| Offeror | is | cautioned | that | cost | information | generally | is | not | considered | a | trade | secret | under | ||
| Oregon | Public | Records | Law | (ORS | 192.311 | through | 192.478) | and | identifying | the | Offer, | in | |||
| whole, | as | exempt | from | disclosure | is | not | acceptable. | Agency | advises | each | Offeror | to | consult | ||
| with | its | own | legal | counsel | regarding | disclosure | issues. | ||||||||
| If | Offeror | fails | to | identify | the | portions | of | the | Offer | that | Offeror | claims | are | exempt | from |
| disclosure, | Offeror | has | waived | any | future | claim | of | non-disclosure | of | that | information. |
3.4.5 COBID Certification. / Outreach Plan
The Offeror shall complete and submit the COBID Certification / Outreach Plan (Attachment F).
3.4.6 Public Record/Confidential or Proprietary Information
| All | Offers | are | public | record | and | are | subject | to | public | inspection | after | Agency | issues | the |
| Notice | of | the | Intent | to | Award. | If | an | Offeror | believes | that | any | portion | of | |
| its | Offer | contains | any | information | that | is | a | trade | secret | under | ORS | Chapter | 192.345(2) | or |
| otherwise | is | exempt | from | disclosure | under | the | Oregon | Public | Records | Law | (ORS | |||
| 192.311 | through | 192.478), | Offeror | shall | complete | and | submit | the | Disclosure | Exemption | ||||
| Affidavit | (Attachment | B)and | a | fully | redacted | version | of | its | Offer. |
| Offeror | is | cautioned | that | cost | information | generally | is | not | considered | a | trade | secret | |
| under | Oregon | Public | Records | Law | (ORS | 192.311 | through | 192.478) | and | identifying | |||
| the | Offer, | in | whole, | as | exempt | from | disclosure | is | not | acceptable. | Agency | advises | |
| each | Offeror | to | consult | with | it’s | own | legal | counsel | regarding | disclosure | issues. |
| I | Offeror | fails | to | identify | the | protioins | of | the | Offer | that | Offeror | claims | are | exempt | from |
| disclosure, | Offeror | has | waived | any | future | claim | of | non-disclosure | of | that | information | ||||
| (Attachment | B). |
3.5 EVALUATION PROCESS
3.5.1 Responsiveness and Responsibility Determination
| Offers | received | prior | to | Opening | will | be | reviewed | for | Responsiveness | to | all | solicitation | |||
| requirements | including | compliance | with | Minimum | Requirements | section | and | offer | Content | ||||||
| Requirements | section. | If | the | Offer | is | unclear, | the | SPC | may | request | clarification | from | Offeror. | ||
| However, | clarifications | may | not | be | used | to | rehabilitate | a | non-Responsive | Offer. | If | the | SPC | ||
| finds | the | Offer | non-Responsive, | the | Offer | may | be | rejected, | however, | Agency | may | waive | |||
| mistakes | in | accordance | with | OAR | 125-247-0470. | ||||||||||
| At | any | time | prior | to | award, | Agency | may | reject | an | Offeror | found | to | be | not | Responsible. |
3.5.2 Evaluation Criteria
| Offers | meeting | the | requirements | outlined | in | the | Offer | Content | Requirements | section | will | be | |||
| evaluated | by | an | Evaluation | Committee. | Evaluators | will | assign | a | score | of | 0% | to | 100% | for | |
| each | evaluation | criterion | listed | below | in | this | section. |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| SPC | may | request | further | clarification | to | assist | the | Evaluation | Committee | in | gaining | ||||
| additional | understanding | of | offers. | A | response | to | a | clarification | request | must | be | to | clarify | or | |
| explain | portions | of | the | already | submitted | Offer | and | may | not | contain | new | information | not | ||
| included | in | the | original | Offer. |
3.5.2.1 Evaluation Item 1 (Relevant Project Experience) (30 points)
| Have | you | conducted | research | or | consulting | projects | related | to | food/agricultural | supply | |
| chains, | food | systems, | logistics, | or | regional | market | access? |
o If yes, please provide an example of similar study or research project you have completed.
o What was your role in the project and what were the outcomes?
3.5.2.2 Evaluation Item 2 (Participant Engagement) (20 points)
Do you have experience conducting food system partner interviews, outreach, or field
SCORE EXPLANATION
| OUTSTANDING | - | Response | meets | all | the | requirements | and | has | demonstrated | |||
| in | a | clear | and | concise | manner | a | thorough | knowledge | and | understanding | of | the |
| subject | matter | and | project. | The | Offeror | provides | insight | into | its | expertise, | ||
| knowledge, | and | understanding | of | the | subject | matter. |
6-9
| VERY | GOOD | – | Response | provides | useful | information, | while | showing | |
| experience | and | knowledge | within | the | category. | Response | demonstrates | above | |
| average | knowledge | and | ability | with | no | apparent | deficiencies | noted. |
| ADEQUATE | – | Response | meets | all | requirements | in | an | adequate | manner. |
| Response | demonstrates | an | ability | to | comply | with | guidelines, | parameters, | and |
| requirements | with | no | additional | information | put | forth | by | the | Offeror. |
| 3-4 | FAIR | – | Offeror | meets | minimum | requirements, | but | does | not | demonstrate |
| sufficient | knowledge | of | the | subject | matter. |
| RESPONSE | OF | NO | VALUE | – | An | unacceptable | response | that | does | not | meet | the |
| requirements | set | forth | in | the | solicitation. | Offeror | has | not | demonstrated | |||
| knowledge | of | the | subject | matter. |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292 research with producers, distributors, buyers, or food businesses?
| o If | so, | please | describe. | |||||||
| o What | approached | did | you | follow | to | gather | useful | information | from | these |
participants?
3.5.2.3 Evaluation Item 3 (Methodology and Work Approach) (20 points)
Please describe ;our proposed methodology for completing this project.
| o How | would | you | track | and | communicate | progress? | ||||||
| o Describe | what | software | or | reporting | programs | that | you | would | use | in | the | execution |
of this project.
3.5.2.4 Evaluation Item 4 (Oregon Food System Knowledge) (30 points)
Please describe your familiarity with Oregon’s food and agriculture supply chain.
| o Please | describe | any | experience | working | with | Oregon | producers, | food | business, |
| distributors, | or | regional | buyers. |
| o What | do | you | see | as | the | primary | market | access | challenges | faced | by | small | and | mid- |
| size | Oregon | Farms | and | food | businesses. |
3.6 COST EVALUATION
| Following | the | scoring | and | ranking | of | Proposals | for | Project | 1 | based | on | the | qualifications-based | |||
| criteria | outlined | in | Section | 3.5.2, | the | sealed | Price | Proposals | submitted | by | Proposers | will | be | |||
| opened | and | evaluated. | The | pricing | portion | of | the | Proposal | will | be | scored | based | on | the | clarity, | |
| definitions, | and | explanations | of | the | proposed | pricing | and | will | be | worth | up | to | 20 | points | in | the |
| overall | evaluation. |
| • Include | a | detailed | cost | breakdown | of | all | pricing | elements. | ||
| • Describe | the | assumptions | used | to | develop | the | proposed | pricing. | ||
| • Provide | a | clear | explanation | of | the | pricing | methodology | and | overall | value. |
3.7 NEXT STEP DETERMINATION
| Agency | may | conduct | additional | rounds | of | competition | if | in | the | best | interest | of | the | State. |
| Additional | rounds | of | competition | may | consist | of, | but | will | not | be | limited | to: |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| • Establishing | a | Competitive | Range |
| • Presentations/Demonstrations/Additional | Submittal | Items |
• Interviews
• Best and Final Offers
| If | Agency | elects | to | conduct | additional | round(s), | Agency | shall | provide | written | notice | to | ||
| all | Offerors | describing | the | next | step. | At | any | time, | Agency | may | dispense | with | the | |
| selected | additional | round | and: | (1) | issue | a | Notice | of | Intent | to | Award | to | the | highest- |
| ranking | Responsible | Offeror; | or | (2) | elect | to | conduct | an | alternative | round | of | |||
| competition; | or | (3) | cancel | the | solicitation. |
3.8 PREFERENCES
3.8.1 Oregon Supplies and Services
| Agency | prefers | Oregon | goods | and | services, | and | for | evaluation | purposes, | per | ORS | 279A.128, | ||
| Agency | shall | subtract | 10% | from | the | cost | for | any | Offeror | proposing | all | Goods | fabricated | or |
| processed | or | all | Services | performed | entirely | in | Oregon | before | calculating | the | cost | score. |
3.8.2 Recycled Materials
| In | comparing | Goods | from | two | or | more | Offerors, | if | at | least | one | Offeror | proposes | Goods |
| manufactured | with | Recycled | Materials, | and | at | least | 1 | Offeror | does | not, | Agency | will | select | the |
| Offeror | proposing | Goods | manufactured | from | Recycled | Materials | if | each | of | the | conditions | |||
| specified | in | ORS | 279A.125 | (2) | exists | following | any | adjustments | made | to | the | cost | of | the |
| Goods | according | to | any | applicable | reciprocal | preference. |
3.8.3 Tiebreakers
| Oregon | Supplies: | If | Agency | receives | Offerors | identical | in | cost, | fitness, | availability | and | quality | ||
| and | chooses | to | award | a | Contract, | Agency | shall | award | the | Contract | in | accordance | with | the |
| procedures | outlined | in | OAR | 125-246-0300. |
3.9 POINT AND SCORE CALCULATIONS
Scores are the values (0 through 10) assigned by each evaluator.
Points are the total possible value for each section as listed in the table below.
Cost points are calculated as stated in the Cost Evaluation section. Points possible are as follows:
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE : 120
POINTS POSSIBLE 100
3.5.2.1 Relevant Project Experience 30
3.5.2.2 Participant Engagement 20
3.5.2.3 Methodology and Work Approach 20
3.5.2.4 Oregon Food System Knowledge 30
3.6 COST POINTS POSSIBLE 20
EXAMPLE:
| Offeror | A | receives | scores | of | 10, | 9, | and | 8 | for | a | criterion | worth | 50 | points. | The | SPC | averages | 10, | 9, | |||
| and | 8 | for | a | score | of | 9. | 9 | is | used | as | a | 90% | multiplier | to | the | possible | points | of | 50. | 50 | multiplied | |
| by | 90% | is | 45. | Offeror | A’s | points | for | the | criterion | is | 45. |
3.10 RANKING OF OFFERORS
| The | SPC | will | total | the | final | average | score | (calculated | by | totaling | the | points | awarded | by | each |
| Evaluation | Committee | member | and | dividing | by | the | number | of | members), | together | with | ||||
| references, | and | final | price. | After | each | applicable | preference | has | been | applied, | SPC | will | |||
| determine | rank | order | for | each | respective | Offer | and | Offeror, | with | the | highest | score | receiving | the | |
| highest | rank, | and | successive | rank | order | determined | by | the | next | highest | score. |
| SECTION | 4: AWARD | AND | NEGOTIATION |
| 4.1 AWARD | NOTIFICATION | PROCESS |
4.1.1 Award Consideration
| Agency, | if | it | awards | a | Contract, | shall | award | a | Contract | to | the | highest-ranking | Responsible |
| Offeror(s) | based | upon | the | scoring | methodology | and | process | described | in | Section | 3. | Agency | |
| may | award | less | than | the | full | Scope | defined | in | this | solicitation. |
4.1.2 Notice of Award
| Agency | will | notify | all | Offerors | through | OregonBuys | that | Agency | has | awarded | a | Contract | to |
| the | selected | Offeror(s) | subject | to | successful | negotiation | of | any | negotiable | provisions. | |||
| If | Agency | receives | only | one | Proposal, | Agency | may | dispense | with | the | evaluation | process | and |
| proceed | with | the | Contract | Negotiations | and | Award. |
4.2 SUCCESSFUL OFFEROR SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
4.2.1 Insurance
| Prior | to | execution | of | the | Contract, | the | apparent | successful | Offeror | shall | secure | and |
| demonstrate | to | Agency | proof | of | insurance | coverage | meeting | the | requirements | identified | in | |
| the | solicitation | or | as | otherwise | negotiated. |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| Failure | to | demonstrate | coverage | may | result | in | Agency | terminating | Negotiations | and | |
| commencing | Negotiations | with | the | next | highest-ranking | Offeror. | Offeror | is | encouraged | to | |
| consult | its | insurance | agent | about | the | insurance | requirements | contained | in | Insurance | |
| Requirements | (Exhibit | B | of | Attachment | A) | prior | to | offer | submission. |
4.2.2 Taxpayer Identification Number
| The | apparent | successful | Offeror | shall | provide | its | Taxpayer | Identification | Number | (TIN) | and | ||
| backup | withholding | status | on | a | completed | W-9 | form | if | either | of | the | following | applies: |
| • When | requested | by | Agency | (normally | in | an | intent | to | award | notice), | or | |
| • When | the | backup | withholding | status | or | any | other | information | of | Offeror | has | changed |
since the last submitted W-9 form, if any.
Agency will not make any payment until Agency has a properly completed W-9.
4.2.3 Business Registry
| If | selected | for | award, | Offeror | shall | be | duly | authorized | by | the | State | of | Oregon | to | transact |
| business | in | the | State | of | Oregon | before | executing | the | Contract. | The | selected | Offeror | shall | ||
| submit | a | current | Oregon | Secretary | of | State | Business | Registry | number, | or | an | explanation | if | ||
| not | applicable. | ||||||||||||||
| All | Corporations | and | other | business | entities | (domestic | and | foreign) | must | have | a | Registered | |||
| Agent | in | Oregon. | See | requirements | and | exceptions | regarding | Registered | Agents. | For | more | ||||
| information, | see | Oregon | Business | Guide, | How | to | Start | a | Business | in | Oregon | and | Laws | and | |
| Rules. | The | titles | in | this | subsection | are | available | at | the | following | Internet | site: |
http://www.filinginoregon.com/index.htm.
4.3 CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
4.3.1 Negotiation
| After | selection | of | a | successful | Offeror, | Agency | may | negotiate | the | Statement | of | Work | as | well |
| as | following | terms | and | conditions: | ||||||||||
| Agency | will | only | negotiate | the | following | provision: |
• Term of the contract
• Descriptions of goods and services
• Compensation
| In | the | event | that | the | parties | have | not | reached | mutually | agreeable | terms | within | 14 | calendar |
| days, | Agency | may | terminate | Negotiations | and | commence | Negotiations | with | the | next | ||||
| highest-ranking | Offeror. |
| SECTION | 5: ADDITIONAL | INFORMATION | |||
| 5.1 COMMITMENT | TO | DIVERSITY, | EQUITY, | AND | INCLUSION |
| The | State | of | Oregon | is | committed | to | taking | active | steps | toward | increasing | and | promoting |
| diversity, | equity, | and | inclusion | values | across | procurement | processes | for | minority, | women, |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
| emerging | small, | and | service-disabled | veteran | owned | businesses | by | reducing | barriers | to | |||
| compete | for | and | be | awarded | state | contracts. | All | interested | businesses | are | encouraged | to | submit |
| proposals | for | this | contracting | opportunity. |
5.2 CERTIFIED FIRM PARTICIPATION
| Pursuant | to | Oregon | Revised | Statute | (ORS) | Chapter | 200, | Agency | encourages | the | participation | of | |
| small | businesses, | certified | by | the | Oregon | Certification | Office | for | Business | Inclusion | and | ||
| Diversity | (“COBID”) | in | all | contracting | opportunities. | This | includes | certified | small | businesses | in | ||
| the | following | categories: | disadvantaged | business | enterprise, | minority-owned | business, | woman- | |||||
| owned | business, | a | business | that | a | service-disabled | veteran | owns | or | an | emerging | small | business. |
| Agency | also | encourages | joint | ventures | or | subcontracting | with | certified | small | business | |||
| enterprises. | For | more | information, | visit | the | COBID | website | or | COBID. |
| If | the | Contract | has | potential | subcontracting | opportunities, | the | successful | Offeror | may | be |
| required | to | submit | a | completed | Certified | Disadvantaged | Business | Outreach | Plan | (Attachment | |
| F) prior | to | execution. |
5.3 GOVERNING LAWS AND REGULATIONS
| This | intermediate | procurement | is | governed | by | the | laws | of | the | State | of | Oregon. | Venue | for | any | |||
| administrative | or | judicial | action | relating | to | this | intermediate | procurement, | evaluation | and | ||||||||
| award | is | the | Circuit | Court | of | Marion | County | for | the | State | of | Oregon; | provided, | however, | if | a | ||
| proceeding | must | be | brought | in | a | federal | forum, | then | it | must | be | brought | and | conducted | solely | |||
| and | exclusively | within | the | United | States | District | Court | for | the | District | of | Oregon. | In | no | event | |||
| shall | this | Section | be | construed | as | a | waiver | by | the | State | of | Oregon | of | any | form | of | defense | or |
| immunity, | whether | sovereign | immunity, | governmental | immunity, | immunity | based | on | the | |||||||||
| eleventh | amendment | to | the | Constitution | of | the | United | States | or | otherwise, | to | or | from | any | Claim | |||
| or | consent | to | the | jurisdiction | of | any | court. |
5.4 OWNERSHIP/PERMISSION TO USE MATERIALS
| All | Offers | submitted | in | response | to | this | solicitation | become | the | property | of | Agency. | By | |
| submitting | an | Offer | in | response | to | this | solicitation, | Offeror | grants | the | State | a | non-exclusive, | |
| perpetual, | irrevocable, | royalty-free | license | for | the | rights | to | copy, | distribute, | display, | prepare | |||
| derivative | works | of | and | transmit | the | Offer | solely | for | the | purpose | of | evaluating | the | Offer, |
| negotiating | a | Contract, | if | awarded | to | Offeror, | or | as | otherwise | needed | to | administer | the | |
| intermediate | procurement | process, | and | to | fulfill | obligations | under | Oregon | Public | Records | Law | |||
| (ORS | 192.311 | through | 192.478). |
5.5 CANCELLATION OF SOLICITATION; REJECTION OF OFFERS; NO DAMAGES.
| Pursuant | to | ORS | 279B.100, | Agency | may | reject | any | or | all | Offers | in-whole | or | in-part | or | may | ||
| cancel | this | solicitation | at | any | time | when | the | rejection | or | cancellation | is | in | the | best | interest | of | the |
| State | or | Agency, | as | determined | by | Agency. | Neither | the | State | nor | Agency | is | liable | to | any | Offeror | |
| for | any | loss | or | expense | caused | by | or | resulting | from | the | delay, | suspension, | or | cancellation | of | the | |
| solicitation, | award, | or | rejection | of | any | Offer. |
OregonBuys Bid # S-60300-0016292
5.6 COST OF SUBMITTING AN OFFER
| Offeror | shall | pay | all | the | costs | in | submitting | its | offer, | including, | but | not | limited | to, | the | costs | to |
| prepare | and | submit | the | offer, | costs | of | samples | and | other | supporting | materials, | costs | to | ||||
| participate | in | demonstrations, | or | costs | associated | with | protests. |
5.7 STATEWIDE E-WASTE/RECOVERY PROCEDURE
| If | applicable, | Offeror | shall | include | information | in | its | offer | that | demonstrates | compliance | with |
| the | Statewide | E-Waste/Recovery | Procedure | 107-011-050_PR. | Download | the | procedure | by | ||||
| visiting | www.oregon.gov/DAS, | then | enter | the | procedure | number | into | the | search | bar, | and | find |
| the | procedure | in | the | search | results | window. |
5.8 RECYCLABLE PRODUCTS
| Offeror | shall | use | recyclable | products | to | the | maximum | extent | economically | feasible | in | the | ||
| performance | of | the | Services | or | Work | set | forth | in | this | document | and | the | subsequent | Contract. |
| (ORS | 279B.025) |
| SECTION | 6: LIST | OF | ATTACHMENTS |
| ATTACHMENT | A | SAMPLE | CONTRACT |
ATTACHMENT B DISCLOSURE EXEMPTION AFFIDAVIT
ATTACHMENT C OFFEROR INFORMATION AND CERTIFICATION SHEET
ATTACHMENT D REFERENCE CHECK FORM
ATTACHMENT E COST SHEET
ATTACHMENT F COBID CERTIFICATION / OUTREACH PLAN
ATTACHMENT G RESPONSIBILITY INQUIRY
ODA-XXXX-SC
Food and Agriculture Final Mile/Scaled Distribution Project
DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.2 – March 6, 2019 Page 1
PCA 20695
ATTACHMENT A-SAMPLE CONTRACT
State of Oregon
Contract for Services
This Contract for Services (this “Contract”) is by and between the State of Oregon, acting through its Department of Agriculture, (“Agency)” and ________, a [_______][doing business as _____] (“Contractor”) and is effective as of the Effective Date.
Contractor’s Contract Administrator for this Contract is:
Name and Title **Address
**City, State ZIP Phone: (xxx) xxx-xxxx
Fax: (xxx) xxx-xxxx anyname@yahoo.com
Agency's Contract Administrator for this Contract is:
Jim Cupples, Regional Food Systems Coordinator Agriculture, Agricultural Development & Marketing 635 Capitol St. NE, Suite 100 Salem, OR. 97301 Phone: (971) 493-2258 Fax: (503) 986-4737 jim.cupples@oda.oregon.gov
Either party may change its Contract Administrator by providing the other notice in compliance with Section
17.6 of this Contract.
1. Contract Term.
The “Effective Date” of this Contract is the date this Contract has been fully executed by each party and, approved as required by applicable law. Unless extended or terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, this Contract terminates on _____. The termination of this Contract will not extinguish or prejudice Agency’s right to enforce this Contract with respect to any default by Contractor that has not been cured.
2. Contract Documents. This Contract consists of the following documents, which are listed in descending order of precedence:
2.1. this Contract less all exhibits;
2.2. Exhibit A (Statement of Work);
2.3. Exhibit B (Required Insurance), and
2.4. Exhibit C (Independent Contractor Certification)
The foregoing documents and Exhibits are attached hereto and made a part of the Contract by this reference.
3. Services.
3.1. Performance of Services. Contractor shall perform the services (the “Services”) and deliver to agency the deliverables (“Deliverables”) set forth in Exhibit A, the Statement of Work (the “Statement of Work”). The Statement of Work includes the delivery schedule for the Deliverables and Services. Contractor shall perform the Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract.
DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.2 – March 6, 2019 Page 2
PCA 20695
3.2. Submission and Acceptance of Deliverables. When the Statement of Work requires Contractor to deliver Deliverables to Agency, then Contractor shall deliver Deliverables that comply with the requirements and acceptance criteria set forth in the Statement of Work. Contractor shall provide written notice to Agency upon delivery of a completed Deliverables to Agency. By no later than (i) 15 business days after receipt of such notice, or (ii) the date or period for review set forth in the Statement of Work, Agency will determine whether the Deliverables has the characteristics and otherwise meets the acceptance criteria set forth in the Statement of Work. If Agency determines that the Deliverables has the characteristics and meets acceptance criteria set forth in the Statement of Work in all material respects, Agency will notify Contractor in writing of Agency’s acceptance of the Deliverables.
3.3. Rejection of Deliverables; Corrections. If Agency determines that a Deliverables does not have the characteristics or otherwise meet the acceptance criteria set forth in the Statement of Work in all material respects, Agency will notify Contractor in writing of Agency’s rejection of the Deliverables, and describe in reasonable detail in such notice the Agency’s basis for rejection of the Deliverables. Upon receipt of notice of non-acceptance, Contractor shall, within a 15 business day period, modify or improve the Deliverables at Contractor’s sole expense so that the Deliverables has the characteristics described in the Statement of Work and meets, in all material respects, the acceptance criteria, and notify the Agency in writing that it has completed such modifications or improvements and re-tender the Deliverables to Agency. Agency will thereafter review the modified or improved Deliverables within 15 business days of receipt of the Contractor's delivery of the Deliverables. Failure of the Deliverables to have the characteristics or meet in all material respects the acceptance criteria set forth in the Statement of Work after the second submission will constitute a default by Contractor. In the event of such default, Agency may either, (i) notify Contractor of such default and instruct Contractor to modify or improve the Deliverables as set forth in this Section, or
(ii) notify Contractor of such default and pursue its remedies for default provided for by law or the terms of this Contract.
4. Compensation.
4.1. Not to Exceed Compensation. The maximum, not-to-exceed compensation payable to Contractor under this Contract, which includes any allowable expenses, is $***,***.**. Agency will not pay Contractor any amount in excess of the not-to-exceed compensation of this Contract, and will not pay for Services performed before the Effective Date or after the expiration or termination of this Contract. If the maximum compensation is increased by amendment of this Contract, the amendment must be fully effective before Contractor performs Services subject to the amendment.
4.2. Payments. Payments, including interim payments, to Contractor are subject to ORS 293.462, will be made only for completed and accepted Deliverables and Services, and will be made in accordance with the payment schedule and requirements set forth in Exhibit A.
4.3. Invoices. Contractor shall submit invoices to Agency as set forth in the Statement of Work or, if not set forth therein, to Agency’s Contract Administrator. Contractor may submit invoices in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in the Statement of Work or, if no payment schedule is set forth therein, then no more frequently than once per month for accepted Deliverables and Services The invoices must describe all Services performed with particularity, including the dates Contractor performed the…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .