RFP Rating Criteria revision for 2027.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- City of Reynolds CDBG 2027 RFP
- Solicitation number
- PE-33551-NONST-2027-000000055
- Issued by
- Muscogee County, Columbus City, Georgia
About this file
This is an RFP Rating Criteria revision document for the City of Reynolds Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2027 engineering services solicitation in Georgia. The revision document outlines modifications to the evaluation criteria that will be used to assess proposals submitted in response to the City of Reynolds' request for engineering services. The project scope encompasses sewer, water, street, and drainage improvements within the city limits. Proposals are to be submitted to the River Valley Regional Commission office located at 710 Front Avenue, Columbus, Georgia 31901, with a deadline of 10:00 a.m. on August 31, 2026. The contract will be awarded to the most responsible offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the City of Reynolds based on the established rating criteria.
The solicitation designates this as a Section 3 Covered Contract, with Section 3 Business Concerns specifically encouraged to apply, indicating a focus on economic opportunity for disadvantaged businesses and workforce development. The rating criteria revision reflects adjustments to how proposals will be evaluated and scored, though the specific revised criteria are detailed within the document itself. William Griggs is identified as the point of contact for questions regarding the RFP requirements and specifications.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Reynolds RFP Packet 27.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP Evaluation Criteria
100 points possible
· What is your experience with CDBG’s? 15 points are possible in this section. Proposals are evaluated on the number of CDBG projects funded/completed by the offeror 2021-2026.
· 0-2 projects = 0 points
· 3-8 projects = 10 points
· 9+ projects = 15 points
· What is your knowledge of projects similar to the one under consideration? 20 points are possible in this section. Proposals are evaluated on the number of similar type professional projects (i.e. water systems, sewer systems, buildings, street and drainage, etc.) 2021-2026. Note: If the project type is not specified in the RFP, a combination of project types may be used to maximize this score.
· 0-2 projects = 0 points
· 3-8 projects = 10 points
· 9+ projects = 20 points
· How familiar are you with this community? 5 points are possible in this section. Proposals are evaluated on the demonstrated familiarity i.e. projects in the community 2021-2026. Proposals which demonstrate knowledge of the community will rank higher than those demonstrating knowledge of the RVRC 16 County Region.
· No projects = 0 points
· Regional projects = 2 points
· Community Projects = 5 points
· What are the qualifications of your staff? 15 points possible in this section. The total years working as a PE will be used to calculate the score. Please list the name of your most experienced staff member and the number of years the person has held a PE license. Attach a copy of the license.
· 1-9 years = 5 points
· 10-25 years = 10 points
· 26+ years = 15 points
· Is the CDBG Evaluation Sheet completed? The CDBG Evaluation Sheet should be completed and included to aid scoring the proposal. Without it, information can be hard to find or interpret.
· No = 0 points
· Partial = 5 points
· Yes = 15 points
· Local government experience with Firm? 30 points possible in this section. Firms will be rated on quality of past work experience and / or impression of firm. THIS SCORE IS NOT BASED ON INFORMATION IN THE PROPOSALS. 5 = the highest quality and experience. 1 is the lowest.
· 1 = 0 points
· 2 = 5 points
· 3 = 10 points
· 4 = 20 points
· 5 = 30 points
· Other Factors: Factors that are not ranked but will be included in the evaluation include Section 3 preference.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .