RFP_Lean_Six_Sigma_Trainer_(final).pdf
PDF 598 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DCT/Lean Six Sigma Trainer
- Solicitation number
- 2000018715
- Issued by
- Ramsey County, Minnesota
About this file
This is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the State of Minnesota, Department of Direct Care and Treatment (DCT), seeking qualified trainers to develop and deliver Lean Six Sigma certification programs at four certification levels: Yellow Belt (15-25 participants), Green Belt (12-15 participants), Black Belt (2-3 participants), and Master Black Belt (2-3 participants). Certification programs will be offered in hybrid formats combining virtual instruction via Microsoft Teams with in-person sessions at DCT facilities in Vadnais Heights, Anoka, and St. Peter, Minnesota. The RFP was posted on September 29, 2026, with responses due by 4:00 p.m. Central Time on October 20, 2026. The anticipated contract term is January 2027 through December 2027, with an option to extend up to an additional four years in increments determined by the State. No site visits or bidders' conferences are mentioned in the solicitation. The State anticipates completing evaluation and selection by December 1, 2026.
Responders must submit firm, fixed pricing on a per-participant basis that includes all costs such as instructor services, course materials, manuals, examinations, certification fees, and incidental costs. Minimum qualifications require Lean Six Sigma trainer certification, two years of experience leading and guiding Lean Six Sigma training in healthcare, non-profit, or government agencies, and two years of experience facilitating Continuous Improvement training in similar sectors. The evaluation process awards up to 1,000 points across four criteria: Work Plan for Deliverables (350 points), Qualifications and Experience (250 points), References (100 points), and Cost Detail (300 points), plus up to 120 preference points for eligible targeted group, economically disadvantaged, or veteran-owned businesses. Responses must be submitted through the SWIFT Supplier Portal. The State reserves the right to reject any or all responses, award to multiple responders, negotiate terms, or cancel the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DCT_Lean_Six_Sigma_Trainer.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 1 of 38
State of Minnesota Direct Care and Treatment
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Lean Six Sigma Trainer
SWIFT Event 2000018715
Date Posted: September 29, 2026
• Responses must be received not later than 4:00pm, Central Time, October 20, 2026
• Late responses will not be considered
• As of July 1, 2025, certain terms are unenforceable in state contracts. See Session Laws, 2025 Regular Session, Chapter 39, Article 2, Sec. 45.
Minnesota’s Commitment to Diversity and Inclusion The State of Minnesota is committed to diversity and inclusion in its public procurement process. The goal is to ensure that those providing goods and services to the State are representative of our Minnesota communities and include businesses owned by minorities, women, veterans, and those with substantial physical disabilities.
Creating broader opportunities for historically under-represented groups provides for additional options and greater competition in the marketplace, creates stronger relationships and engagement within our communities, and fosters economic development and equality.
To further this commitment, the Department of Administration operates a program for Minnesota-based small businesses owned by minorities, women, veterans, and those with substantial physical disabilities. For additional information on this program, or to determine eligibility, please call 651.201.2402 or go to the Office of Equity in Procurement home page, at https://mn.gov/admin/business/vendor-info/oep/.
SPECIAL NOTICE: This is a request for proposal. It does not obligate the State of Minnesota to award a contract or complete the proposed program, and the State reserves the right to cancel this solicitation if it is considered in its best interest.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2025/0/Session+Law/Chapter/39/ https://mn.gov/admin/business/vendor-info/oep/
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 2 of 38
This Solicitation requires proposals to be submitted through the SWIFT Supplier Portal. Please note the security changes below that may impact responders from submitting a timely response.
SWIFT SUPPLIER PORTAL SECURITY CHANGES
There are new security measures that the Minnesota Management and Budget implemented on October 16, 2022. It is a new multi-factor authentication (MFA) to enhance the security of the State of Minnesota Supplier Portal. MFA is an authentication method that requires bidders and suppliers provide two verification factors to log into the SWIFT Supplier Portal. The goal of MFA is to create a layered defense that makes it more difficult for unauthorized system access to occur.
For information about these changes, please refer to the SWIFT Supplier Portal Multi-Factor Authentication FAQ document.
If you have not done so already, please make sure to log into the SWIFT Supplier Portal as soon as possible to get this authentication set up early so there are no issues when submitting a response to an RFP.
You are strongly encouraged to set your MFA during business hours of 8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Central Time, Monday through Friday. You may experience delay setting your MFA after hours.
https://guest.supplier.systems.state.mn.us/psc/fmssupap/SUPPLIER/ERP/c/NUI_FRAMEWORK.PT_LANDINGPAGE.GBL?& https://mn.gov/mmb-stat/documents/swift/training/trainingguides/swift-sup-portal-mfa.pdf https://mn.gov/mmb-stat/documents/swift/training/trainingguides/swift-sup-portal-mfa.pdf
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 3 of 38
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Solicitation Content
SECTION 1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDERS
SECTION 2 – SUMMARY OF SCOPE
SECTION 3 – PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SECTION 4 – PROPOSAL CONTENT
SECTION 5 – EVALUATION PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA
SECTION 6 – UNENFORCEABLE TERMS AND SOLICITATION TERMS
ATTACHMENT A: RESPONDER DECLARATIONS
ATTACHMENT B: EXCEPTIONS TO STATE’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS
ATTACHMENT C: COST DETAIL
ATTACHMENT D: RESPONDER FORM
ATTACHMENT E: REFERENCE FORM
APPENDIX A: SAMPLE STATE PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL CONTRACT
Exhibit A: Contract Terms Exhibit B: Insurance Requirements Exhibit C: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work Exhibit D: Pricing Exhibit D, Supplement 1 Sample Invoice and Quote
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 4 of 38
SECTION 1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDERS
Steps for Completing Your Response
Follow the steps below to complete your response to this Solicitation:
Step 1: Read the solicitation documents and ask questions, if any Step 2: Write your response Step 3: Submit your response
Incomplete Submittals
A response must be submitted along with any required additional documents. Incomplete responses that materially deviate from the required format and content may be rejected.
STEP 1 – READ THE SOLICITATION DOCUMENT & ASK QUESTIONS, IF ANY
How to Ask Questions
The contact person for questions is:
Marisa Silbernagel, Contract Administrator marisa.silbernagel@state.mn.us
Questions should be emailed to the contact by October 8, 2026 Other personnel are not authorized to answer questions regarding this Solicitation.
STEP 2 – WRITE YOUR RESPONSE
The Response Content section is in this link to Section 4. Prepare a written response and supply all requested content. Responses should address the requested information and documents detailed in Section 4. DO NOT INCLUDE Non-Public/Trade Secret data (as defined in this link to Minn. Stat. § 13.37).
Review, sign, and include the Responder Declarations with your response.
STEP 3 –SUBMIT YOUR RESPONSE
Where to Send Your Response
All responses to this solicitation (termed an “Event” within SWIFT) must be submitted through SWIFT using the Supplier portal (https://mn.gov/supplier). Training and documentation on how to submit your response is available through the Supplier portal link above. Fax, e-mail, and printed responses will not be accepted or considered. All costs incurred in responding to this solicitation will be borne by the responder.
Late responses will not be considered. Responses received after End Date above will not be considered, even if errors or delays were caused by issues outside of responders’ control. If you need assistance please contact the SWIFT Vendor Assistance Helpline at 651-201-8100, Option 1, and then Option 1.
By submitting a response, your company is making a binding legal offer for the period of time set forth below in Section 6, Conditions of Offer.
mailto:marisa.silbernagel@state.mn.us https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.37 https://mn.gov/supplier
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 5 of 38
SECTION 2 – SUMMARY OF SCOPE
Procurement Overview
Minnesota Direct Care and Treatment (DCT) is seeking proposals from qualified Responders to provide Lean Six Sigma certification programs at the Yellow, Green, Black and Master Black Belt levels. Certification programs will be offered virtually via Microsoft Teams; in-person at DCT facilities in Vadnais Heights, Anoka or St. Peter, MN; or a hybrid model.
The official response to this RFP must be submitted and received in SWIFT no later than the Event End Date and time as set forth in the SWIFT Event Details applicable to this RFP. This RFP does not obligate the State to award a contract or complete the project, and the State reserves the right to cancel the solicitation if it is considered to be in its best interest. All costs incurred in responding to this RFP will be borne by the Responder.
This RFP provides background information and describes the services desired by the State. It delineates the requirements for this procurement and specifies the contractual conditions required by the State. Although this RFP establishes the basis for Responder Proposals, the detailed obligations and additional measures of performance will be defined in the final negotiated contract.
Background
Minnesota Direct Care and Treatment (DCT) provides approximately 200 specialized inpatient, residential and treatment programs and services for people with mental illness, intellectual disabilities, chemical dependency and brain injury that other providers to not serve. Facilities are spread throughout the state. In addition, DCT operates treatment facilities for civilly-committed sex offenders under the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP).
Direct Care and Treatment Includes:
• Community Based Services
• Forensic Services
• Mental Health & Substance Abuse Treatment Services
• Outpatient Care
• Minnesota Sex Offender Program
DCT Vision. A Minnesota where everyone receives the behavioral health services they need.
DCT Mission. We support meaningful lives through specialized behavioral health services others do not provide.
DCT Values. Person-centeredness, quality, safety, partnership, equity, accountability.
Sample Tasks and Deliverables.
Develop and deliver Lean Six Sigma certification programs to employees of DCT on an as-needed basis. Certification programs will be offered in a hybrid model consisting of virtual via Microsoft Teams and in-person at DCT facilities in Vadnais Heights, Anoka, St. Peter, MN or agreed upon community space within the Twin Cities Metro area. Class sizes and requirements per program are as follows:
1. Yellow Belt Certification Program, 15-25 participants
a. Work with DCT to define certification criteria and assessment tools for Yellow Belt level to align with DCT’s strategic priorities and continuous improvement culture.
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 6 of 38
b. Program sessions will include interactive exercises and case simulations. Training material should include real-life examples, theory, and break-out examples.
c. Program sessions will be offered in multiple, flexible training formats, including: in-person, virtual, instructor-led and hybrid models.
d. Provide certificate to participants at the successful completion of the Yellow Belt course.
e. Prepare and provide post-certificate course summary to DCT. The summary should include number of course participants and the number of certificates awarded.
2. Green Belt Certification Program, 12-15 participants
a. Work with DCT to define certification criteria and assessment tools for each belt level to align with DCT’s strategic priorities and continuous improvement culture.
b. Provide pathway for both non-project certification and a project-based certification
c. Program sessions will include interactive exercises and case simulations. Training material should include real-life examples, theory, and break-out examples that apply to participants’ project.
d. Training sessions will be offered in multiple, flexible training formats, including: in-person, virtual, instructor-led and hybrid models.
e. Provide up to six (6) hours of coaching, mentorship and one-on-one project support for each participant, to be scheduled through virtual office hours.
f. Provide certificate to participants at the successful completion of the Green Belt course.
Successful completion determination will be a collaboration between DCT and the Responder.
g. Prepare and provide post-certificate course summary to DCT. This should include number of course participants and the number of certificates awarded.
3. Black Belt Certification Program, 2-3 participants with DCT’s strategic priorities and continuous improvement culture.
b. Must include a project-based certification.
c. Program sessions will include interactive exercises and case simulations. Training material should include real-life examples, theory, and break-out examples that apply to participants’ project.
d. Training sessions will be offered in multiple, flexible training formats, including: in-person, virtual, instructor-led and hybrid models.
e. Provide up to eight (8) hours of coaching, mentorship and one-on-one project support for each participant, to be scheduled through virtual office hours.
f. Provide certificate to participants at the successful completion of the Black Belt course.
Successful completion determination will be a collaboration between DCT and the Responder.
g. Prepare and provide post-certificate course summary to DCT. The summary should include
4. Master Black Belt Certification Program, 2-3 participants with DCT’s strategic priorities and continuous improvement culture.
b. Program sessions will include interactive exercises and case simulations. Training material should include real-life examples, theory, and break-out examples.
c. Training sessions will be offered in multiple, flexible training formats, including: in-person, virtual, instructor-led and hybrid models.
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 7 of 38
d. Provide up to Ten (10) hours of coaching and mentorship for each participant, to be scheduled through virtual office hours.
e. Provide certificate to participants at the successful completion of the Master Black Belt course.
Successful completion determination will be a collaboration between DCT and the Responder.
f. Prepare and provide post-certificate course summary to DCT. The summary should include
Responder Minimum Qualifications.
• Lean Six Sigma trainer.
• 2 years leading and guiding Lean Six Sigma training in a healthcare, non-profit, or government agency.
• 2 years of facilitating Continuous Improvement training in a healthcare, non-profit, or government agency.
SECTION 3 – PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Anticipated Contract Term.
The term of this contract is anticipated to be from January 2027 to December 2027, with the option to extend up to an additional 4 years in increments determined by the State.
Question and Answer Instructions.
All questions should be submitted no later than the date and time listed in Section 1, Instructions to Responders. The State is not obligated to answer questions submitted after the question due date and time.
Only personnel listed above are authorized to discuss this solicitation with responders. Contact regarding this solicitation with any personnel not listed above could result in disqualification. This provision is not intended to prevent responders from seeking guidance from state procurement assistance programs regarding general procurement questions.
If a Responder discovers any significant ambiguity, error, conflict, discrepancy, omission, or other deficiency in the solicitation, please immediately notify the contact person detailed above in writing of such error and request modification or clarification of the document.
SECTION 4 – PROPOSAL CONTENT
Please submit the following information:
1. Work Plan. Responder should provide a description of the deliverables to be provided by the Responder along with a detailed work plan that identifies the major tasks to be accomplished and be used as a scheduling and managing tool, as well as the basis for invoicing. This document should NOT list cost detail. If cost detail is included in this document, the State may disqualify the proposal as non-responsive. Responder should provide a statement of the objectives, goals, and tasks to show or demonstrate the Responder's view and understanding of the nature of the contract, and what makes the Responder uniquely suited for this work. Responder should provide a sample course syllabus for each belt level certification program; the syllabus should include a hybrid course schedule, agenda, and timeline duration.
2. Qualifications and Experience. Responder should provide an outline of background and experience with examples of similar work done by the Responder and a list of personnel who will conduct the project, detailing their training, and work experience. This component should clearly demonstrate the mandatory minimum qualifications as an Lean Six
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 8 of 38
Sigma trainer; two (2) years leading and guiding Lean Six Sigma training in a healthcare, non-profit, or government agency; two (2) years of facilitating continuous improvement training in a healthcare, non-profit, or government agency.
Resumes or other information about project personnel should not, if possible, contain personal telephone numbers, home addresses, or home email addresses. If it is necessary to include personal contact information, please clearly indicate in the response that personal contact information is being provided.
3. References. Responder should complete and submit “Attachment E: Reference Form” with their response.
Responder should submit two (2) completed reference forms with each reference’s company name and contact information with their response. Once Responder’s response is received, the Solicitation Administrator will send the same form to Responder’s reference(s) for each reference to fill out and return to the Solicitation Administrator.
Responder must complete and submit “Attachment E: Reference Form” with their response. Responder should answer every question and provide all information requested on the reference form. Failure to meet this requirement may result in the rejection of the entire solicitation response as non-responsive.
The State reserves the right to verify the information submitted on Attachment E before an award is made. The State reserves the right to contact the references listed in Attachment E. The solicitation response will be rejected if the State, in its sole discretion, receives information that indicates the responder is non-responsible or non-responsive.
4. Cost Detail. Complete and submit Attachment C, “Cost Detail,” attached to this solicitation.
Submit all requested documentation, including, but not limited to, the following documents:
1. Attachment A: Responder Declarations
2. Attachment B: Exceptions to State's Standard Terms and Conditions
3. Attachment C: Cost Proposal
4. Attachment D: Responder Forms
a. Workforce and Equal Pay Declaration Page
b. Equal Pay Certificate Form
5. Attachment E: Reference Form
DO NOT INCLUDE Non-Public/Trade Secret data (as defined by Minn. Stat. § 13.37).
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 9 of 38
SECTION 5 – EVALUATION PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA
The State will conduct an evaluation of responses to this Solicitation. The evaluations will be conducted in three phases:
Phase 1 - Review responses for responsiveness and pass/fail requirements Phase 2 - Evaluate responses Phase 3 - Select finalist(s)
Phase 1 – Responsiveness and Pass/Fail Requirements The purpose of this phase is to determine if each response complies with mandatory requirements. The State will first review each proposal for responsiveness to determine if the Responder satisfies all mandatory requirements. The State will evaluate these requirements on a pass/fail basis.
Mandatory Requirements. The following will be considered on a pass/fail basis:
• Responses must be received by the due date and time specified in this RFP.
• Lean Six Sigma trainer.
• 2 years leading and guiding Lean Six Sigma training in a healthcare, non-profit, or government agency.
• 2 years of facilitating Continuous Improvement training in a healthcare, non-profit, or government agency.
Phase 2 - Evaluate Responses Only those responses found to have met Phase 1 criteria will be considered in Phase 2.
The factors and weighting on which responses will be evaluated are:
1. Work Plan for Deliverables 350 points
2. Qualifications and Experience 250 points
3. References 100 points
4. Cost Detail 300 points
Total 1000 points
5. Preference Points (if applicable) 120 points (in addition to 1,000 available)
Preference points are described under Solicitation Terms and will be applied to the total score after points have been awarded.
Phase 3 - Select Finalist(s) Only those responses that have been evaluated under Phase 2 shall be eligible for Phase 3.
The State will make its selection based on best value, as determined by this evaluation process. The State reserves the right to pursue negotiations on any exception taken to the State’s standard terms and conditions. In the event that negotiated terms cannot be reached, the State reserves the right to terminate negotiations and begin negotiating with the next highest scoring responder or take other actions as the State deems appropriate. If the State anticipates multiple awards, the State reserves the right to negotiate with more than one Responder.
It is anticipated that the evaluation and selection will be completed by December 1, 2026
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 10 of 38
SECTION 6 – UNENFORCEABLE TERMS AND SOLICITATION TERMS
Unenforceable Terms
As of July 1, 2025, certain terms are unenforceable in state contracts. See Session Laws, 2025 Regular Session, Chapter 39, Article 2, Section 45.
Unenforceable terms
(a) A contract entered into by the state shall not contain a term that:
(1) requires the state to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless another person or entity, unless specifically authorized by statute;
(2) binds a party by terms and conditions that may be unilaterally changed by the other party;
(3) requires mandatory arbitration;
(4) attempts to extend arbitration obligations to disputes unrelated to the original contract;
(5) construes the contract in accordance with the laws of a state other than Minnesota;
(6) obligates state funds in subsequent fiscal years in the form of automatic renewal as defined in section
325G.56; or
(7) is inconsistent with chapter 13, the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.
(b) If a contract is entered into that contains a term prohibited in paragraph (a), that term shall be void and the contract is enforceable as if it did not contain that term.
Solicitation Terms
Competition in Responding The State desires open and fair competition. Questions from responders regarding any of the requirements of the Solicitation must be submitted in writing to the Solicitation Administrator listed in the Solicitation before the due date and time. If changes are made the State will issue an addendum.
Any evidence of collusion among responders in any form designed to defeat competitive responses will be reported to the Minnesota Attorney General for investigation and appropriate action.
Addenda to the Solicitation Changes to the Solicitation will be made by addendum with notification and posted in the same manner as the original Solicitation. Any addenda issued will become part of the Solicitation.
Data Security - Foreign Outsourcing of Work is Prohibited All storage and processing of information shall be performed within the borders of the United States. This provision also applies to work performed by subcontractors at all levels.
Joint Ventures The State allows joint ventures among groups of responders when responding to the solicitation. However, one responder must submit a response on behalf of all the others in the group. The responder that submits the response will be considered legally responsible for the response (and the contract, if awarded).
Withdrawing Response A responder may withdraw its response prior to the due date and time of the Solicitation. For solicitations in the SWIFT Supplier Portal, a responder may withdraw its response from the SWIFT Supplier Portal. For solicitations done any other way, a responder may withdraw its response by notifying the Solicitation Administrator in writing of the desire to withdraw.
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 11 of 38
After the due date and time of this Solicitation, a responder may withdraw a response only upon showing that an obvious error exists in the response. The showing and request for withdrawal must be made in writing to Solicitation Administrator within a reasonable time and prior to the State’s detrimental reliance on the response.
Rights Reserved The State reserves the right to:
• Reject any and all responses received;
• Waive or modify any informalities, irregularities, or inconsistencies in the responses received;
• Negotiate with the highest scoring Responder[s];
• Terminate negotiations and select the next response providing the best value for the State;
• Consider documented past performance resulting from a State contract may be considered in the evaluation process;
• Short list the highest scoring Responders;
• Require Responders to conduct presentations, demonstrations, or submit samples;
• Interview key personnel or references;
• Request a best and final offer from one or more Responders;
• The State reserves the right to request additional information ; and
• The State reserves the right to use estimated usage or scenarios for the purpose of conducting pricing evaluations. The State reserves the right to modify scenarios, and to request or add additional scenarios for the evaluation.
Samples and Demonstrations Upon request, Responders are to provide samples to the State at no charge. Except for those destroyed or mutilated in testing, the State will return samples if requested and at the Responder’s expense. All costs to conduct and associated with a demonstration will be the sole responsibility of the Responder.
Responses are Nonpublic during Evaluation Process All materials submitted in response to this Solicitation will become property of the State. During the evaluation process, all information concerning the responses submitted will remain private or nonpublic and will not be disclosed to anyone whose official duties do not require such knowledge. Responses are private or nonpublic data until the completion of the evaluation process as defined by Minn. Stat. § 13.591. The completion of the evaluation process is defined as the State having completed negotiating a contract with the selected responder. The State will notify all responders in writing of the evaluation results.
Trade Secret Information
9.1 Responders must not submit as part of their response trade secret material, as defined by Minn. Stat. § 13.37.
9.2 In the event trade secret data are submitted, Responder must defend any action seeking release of data it believes to be trade secret, and indemnify and hold harmless the State, its agents and employees, from any judgments awarded against the State in favor of the party requesting the data, and any and all costs connected with that defense.
9.3 The State does not consider cost or prices to be trade secret material, as defined by Minn. Stat. § 13.37.
9.4 A responder may present and discuss trade secret information during an interview or demonstration with the State, if applicable.
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 12 of 38
Conditions of Offer Unless otherwise approved in writing by the State, Responder’s cost proposal and all terms offered in its response that pertain to the completion of professional and technical services and general services will remain firm for 180 days, until they are accepted or rejected by the State, or they are changed by further negotiations with the State prior to contract execution.
Award Any award that may result from this solicitation will be based upon the total accumulated points as established in the solicitation. The State reserves the right to award this solicitation to a single Responder, or to multiple Responders, whichever is in the best interest of the State, providing each Responder is in compliance with all terms and conditions of the solicitation. The State reserves the right to accept all or part of an offer, to reject all offers, to cancel the solicitation, or to re-issue the solicitation, whichever is in the best interest of the State.
Requirements Prior to Contract Execution Prior to contract execution, a responder receiving a contract award must comply with any submittal requests. A submittal request may include, but is not limited to, a Certificate of Insurance.
Targeted Group, Economically Disadvantaged Business, Veteran-Owned and Individual Preference Unless a greater preference is applicable and allowed by law, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 16C.16, businesses that are eligible and certified by the State as targeted group (TG) businesses, economically disadvantaged (ED) businesses, and veteran-owned businesses will receive points equal to 12% percent of the total points available as preference.
For TG/ED/VO certification and eligibility information visit the Office of Equity in Procurement website at https://mn.gov/admin/business/vendor-info/oep/ or call the Division’s Helpline at 651.201.2402.
Reciprocity State shall comply with Minn. Stat. § 16C.06, subd. 7, as that applies to a non-resident vendor. This paragraph does not apply for any project in which federal funds are expended.
https://mn.gov/admin/business/vendor-info/oep/
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 13 of 38
ATTACHMENT A: RESPONDER DECLARATIONS
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
A. Response Contents. The information provided is true, correct, and reliable for purposes of evaluation for potential contract award. The submission of inaccurate or misleading information may be grounds for disqualification from the award as well as subject the Responder to suspension or debarment proceedings as well as other remedies available by law
B. Authorized Signature. This Declaration is signed by the appropriate person(s), with the authority to contractually bind the Responder, as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, minutes, and ordinances.
C. Non-Collusion Certification.
2. The Proposal has been arrived at by the Responder independently and has been submitted without collusion and without any agreement, understanding or planned common course of action with any other vendor designed to limit fair or open competition; and
3. The contents of the Response have not been communicated by the Responder or its employees or agents to any person not an employee or agent of the Responder and will not be communicated to any other individual prior to the due date and time of this Solicitation. Any evidence of collusion among Responders in any form designed to defeat competitive responses will be reported to the Minnesota Attorney General for investigation and appropriate action.
D. Organizational Conflicts of Interest. To the best of Responder’s knowledge and belief, and except as otherwise disclosed, there are no relevant facts or circumstances which could give rise to an organizational conflict of interest.
An organizational conflict of interest exists when, because of existing or planned activities or because of relationships with other persons,
1. a vendor is unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the State;
2. the vendor’s objectivity in performing the contract work is or might be otherwise impaired; or
3. the vendor has an unfair competitive advantage.
If after award, an organizational conflict of interest is discovered, an immediate and full disclosure in writing must be made to the State’s Chief Procurement Officer which must include a description of the action which the contractor has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflicts. If an organizational conflict of interest is determined to exist, the State may, at its discretion, cancel the contract. In the event the Contractor was aware of an organizational conflict of interest prior to the award of the contract and did not disclose the conflict to OSP, the State may terminate the contract for default. Organizational conflicts of interest terms apply to any subcontractors for this work.
E. Certification Regarding Lobbying. For State of Minnesota Contracts and Grants over $100,000, the undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 14 of 38 cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying in accordance with its instructions.
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub-grants, and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into and is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31 U.S.C. 1352.
Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
F. Copyrighted Material Waiver. By signing its Response, the Responder certifies that it has obtained all necessary approvals for the reproduction and distribution of the contents of its response.
G. Diverse Spend Reporting. The Sample Contract contains a clause for Diverse Spend Reporting. When this clause applies, Contractor will be required to register in a free portal to report diverse spend.
Please see Diverse Spend Reporting Frequently Asked Questions for additional information.
By signing this form, Responder acknowledges and certifies compliance with all applicable requirements indicated above.
Company Name:
Signature:
Printed Name:
Title:
Date:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
https://osp.admin.mn.gov/sites/osp/files/2022-11/viva_diverse_spend_reporting_faq.pdf
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 15 of 38
ATTACHMENT B: EXCEPTIONS TO STATE’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The State presumes a responder agrees to the terms and conditions of this solicitation unless a responder takes specific exception to one or more of the conditions on this form.
The State reserves the right to reject, negotiate, or accept any exception listed to the State’s terms and conditions (including those found in the attached Sample Contract).
INSTRUCTIONS: A responder must explicitly list all exceptions to State’s terms and conditions, if any (including those found in the attached Sample Contract). Reference the clause number and page number of the State's term and condition for each of a responder’s exceptions. If no exceptions exist, state "NONE" specifically on the form below.
Whether or not exceptions are taken, the Responder must sign and date this form and submit it as part of their response. (Add additional pages if necessary.)
Clause and Page Number Suggested Change to Clause Explanation or Justification
By signing this form, I acknowledge that the above-named responder accepts, without qualification, all terms and conditions stated in this solicitation (including the sample contract) except those clearly outlined as exceptions above.
Signature:
Printed Name:
Title:
Date:
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 16 of 38
ATTACHMENT C: COST DETAIL
Responders must submit Attachment C “Cost Detail” form as their Cost Proposal. The rate(s) identified in the Cost Proposal must include all costs, including but not limited to: travel expenses, mass mailings, fees, commissions, compensation, indirect costs, equipment, supplies, and other charges. The contractor shall provide firm, fixed pricing, for Six Sigma training on a per-participant basis. Unit prices shall include all costs necessary to provide the training, including instructor services, course materials, manuals, examinations, certification fees, and other incidental costs, unless specifically identified as a separate line item in the pricing schedule. Responders should assume the number of participants in each class will be as indicated in Section 2.3 of this RFP.
Identify the level of the State’s participation in the contract and details of cost allowances for this participation. The State does not make regular payments based solely upon the passage of time; it only pays for services performed or work delivered after it is accomplished.
Submit the Attachment C: Cost Detail as a separate document(s) from your technical response for all copies of the Proposal. Do not include any cost information in the Technical Proposal part of the response. The Proposal must be open for acceptance until a contract is executed, the Solicitation is cancelled, or 180 days after the due date and time of the Solicitation, whichever comes first.
Responder must complete the chart below for each identified deliverable requested in the RFP for the contract. Total cost should include all staffing and other costs to complete the services and deliverables requested in the RFP for the contract period identified in Section 3 of this RFP.
Task # Deliverable Description
* Number of Classes per program Total Cost per
Participant
1 Yellow Belt Certification Program $
2 Green Belt Certification Program per Participant $
3 Black Belt Certification Program per Participant $
4 Master Black Belt Certification Program per Participant $
* For informational purposes only, and not a scored element.
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 17 of 38
ATTACHMENT D: RESPONDER FORM
Workforce and Equal Pay Declaration Page This form is required for all businesses executing government contracts under the following:
Select one:
☐ Businesses executing a contract with State or Metropolitan agencies in excess of $100,000 (Workforce
Certificate) and if applicable $500,000 (Equal Pay Certificate)
☐ Businesses executing a contract with University of Minnesota for general obligation bond funded capital projects in excess of $100,000 (Workforce Certificate) and if applicable $500,000 (Equal Pay Certificate)
☐ Businesses executing a contract with Political Subdivisions for general obligation bond funded capital projects in excess of $250,000 (Workforce Certificate) and if applicable $1,000,000 (Equal Pay Certificate)
Select all that apply:
We are a Certificate holder:
☐ Workforce Certificate under the name: _________________________________________________________ ☐ Equal Pay Certificate under the name: __________________________________________________________
We are applying/have applied for the following certificate(s):
☐ Workforce Certificate Application date (MM/DD/YYYY): ____________________ ☐ Equal Pay Certificate Application date (MM/DD/YYYY): ____________________
We have not applied for one or both certificates:
☐ Our Company does not yet have a Workforce Certificate or Equal Pay Certificate. We acknowledge that a
Workforce and, if applicable, Equal Pay Certificate, or approved exemption by MDHR is required before a contract can be executed.
We are Exempt:
☐ We attest to MDHR that we have not employed 40 or more employees on a single day during the prior 12 months in Minnesota or the state in where we have our primary place of business. MDHR may request the names of our employees during the previous 12 months, the date of separation, if applicable, and the current employment status and count.
Business Information
Vendor/Supplier ID Business Name Name of Contracting Agency
Authorized Signatory Name Title Date
Signature Email Phone
For assistance with this form, email the Minnesota Department of Human Rights Compliance.MDHR@state.mn.us https://mn.gov/mdhr/certificates/workforce-certificate/ https://mn.gov/mdhr/certificates/workforce-certificate/ https://mn.gov/mdhr/certificates/equalpay/ https://mn.gov/mdhr/certificates/workforce-certificate/ https://mn.gov/mdhr/certificates/equalpay/ https://mn.gov/mdhr/certificates/workforce-certificate/ https://mn.gov/mdhr/certificates/equalpay/ mailto:Compliance.MDHR@state.mn.us
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 18 of 38
ATTACHMENT E: REFERENCE FORM
Responder:
REFERENCE
Company Name:
Contact Name:
Address:
Email:
Phone Number:
1. How would you rate the overall quality of the vendor's Lean Six Sigma training (Yellow Belt, Green Belt, Black Belt, and/or Master Black Belt)? Did the training meet your organization's expectations?
2. How effectively did participants apply the knowledge and tools learned during training to real organizational improvement projects? Can you share any measurable results or examples?
3. How knowledgeable and engaging were the instructors? Were they able to adapt the training to your organization's industry, culture, and operational needs?
4. Did the vendor provide adequate coaching, mentoring, and feedback throughout participants' certification projects?
Were certification requirements clear and consistently managed?
5. How responsive and collaborative was the vendor before, during, and after the training? Were timelines, deliverables, and expectations consistently met?
6. Based on your experience, would you choose this vendor again for Continuous Improvement certification training?
Why or why not? Are there any strengths or areas for improvement you believe we should consider?
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 19 of 38
APPENDIX A: SAMPLE STATE PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL CONTRACT
State of Minnesota
Professional and Technical Services Contract
SWIFT Contract Number:
This Contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Example: “Commissioner of [insert name of agency or board]” or “Director of [insert name]” (“State”) and [Contractor] whose designated business address is [Contractor’s business address] (“Contractor”). State and Contractor may be referred to jointly as “Parties.”
Recitals
1. State issued a solicitation identified as [Solicitation identification] [SWIFT Event No.] on [Solicitation date] for [brief narrative describing purpose of solicitation] (“Solicitation”);
2. Contractor provided a response to the Solicitation indicating its interest in and ability to provide the goods or services requested in the Solicitation; and
3. Subsequent to an evaluation in accordance with the terms of the Solicitation and negotiation, the Parties desire to enter into a contract.
Accordingly, the Parties agree as follows:
Contract
Term of Contract
1.1 Effective date. [Spell out full date (e.g., April 1, 2022)], or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 2, whichever is later. The Contractor must not begin work under this Contract until this Contract is fully executed and the Contractor has been notified by the State’s Authorized Representative to begin the work.
1.2 Expiration date. [Spell out full date (e.g., March 31, 2024)], or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. The contract may be extended for up to an additional [## months/years], in increments as determined by the State, through a duly executed amendment.
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 20 of 38
Contractor’s Duties The Contractor shall perform all duties described in this Contract to the satisfaction of the State.
The Contractor, who is not a State employee, shall:
Representations and Warranties
3.1 Under Minn. Stat. §§ 15.061 and 16C.03, subd. 3, and other applicable law [Insert additional statutory authorization if necessary] the State is empowered to engage such assistance as deemed necessary.
3.2 Contractor warrants that it is duly qualified and shall perform its obligations under this Contract in accordance with the commercially reasonable standards of care, skill, and diligence in Contractor’s industry, trade, or profession, and in accordance with the specifications set forth in this Contract, to the satisfaction of the State.
3.3 Contractor warrants that it possesses the legal authority to enter into this Contract and that it has taken all actions required by its procedures, by-laws, and applicable laws to exercise that authority, and to lawfully authorize its undersigned signatory to execute this Contract, or any part thereof, and to bind Contractor to its terms.
Time The Contractor must comply with all the time requirements described in this Contract. In the performance of this Contract, time is of the essence.
Consideration and Payment
Consideration. The State will pay for performance by the Contractor under this Contract as follows:
Compensation. The Contractor will be paid [Explain how the Contractor will be paid].
Total obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the Contractor under this Contract will not exceed $ [##].
5.2 Payment.
Invoices. The State will promptly pay the Contractor after the Contractor presents an itemized invoice for the goods received or services actually performed, and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced goods or services. Invoices must be submitted timely and according to the following schedule: [insert invoicing schedule]
Retainage. [Do not remove or waive retainage unless the Department of Administration has reviewed and approved your retainage waiver request.] Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd. 2 (10), no more than 90 percent of the amount due under this Contract may be paid until the final product of this Contract has been reviewed by the State. The
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 21 of 38 balance due will be paid when the State determines that the Contractor has satisfactorily fulfilled all the terms of this Contract.
Conditions of payment. All services delivered by the Contractor under this Contract must be performed to the State’s satisfaction and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations including business registration requirements of the Office of the Secretary of State. The Contractor will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law.
Authorized Representative
6.1 The State's Authorized Representative is [name, title, address, telephone number], or his/her successor or delegate, and has the responsibility to monitor the Contractor’s performance.
6.2 Contractor’s Authorized Representative. The Contractor's Authorized Representative is [name, title] at the following business address and telephone number: [insert business address and telephone number], or his/her successor. If the Contractor’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Contract, the Contractor must immediately notify the State.
Exhibits The following Exhibits are attached and incorporated into this Contract. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Contract and its Exhibits, or between Exhibits, the order of precedence is first the Contract, and then in the following order:
Exhibit A: Contract Terms Exhibit B: Insurance Terms Exhibit C: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work Exhibit D: Price and Payment Schedule
1. State Encumbrance Verification
Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A.15 and 16C.05
Print Name: ___________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________
Title: Date: ______________
SWIFT Contract No. _____________________________
2. Contractor The Contractor certifies that the appropriate person has executed the Contract on behalf of the Contractor as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances.
Print Name: ___________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________
Title: Date:
State Agency
With delegated authority
Print Name: ___________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________
Title: Date: ______________
3. Commissioner of Administration As delegated to The Office of State Procurement
Rev. 07.01.2024 Page 22 of 38
Print Name: ___________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________
Title: Date: ______________
Admin ID: _____________________________________
Exhibit A: Contract Terms
Prompt Payment and Invoicing.
1.1 Prompt Payment. The State will pay the Contractor pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16A.124, which requires payment within 30 days following receipt of an undisputed invoice, or merchandise or service, whichever is later.
Terms requesting payment in less than 30 days will be changed to read “Net 30 days.” Notwithstanding the foregoing, the State may pay the Contractor in advance for purchases as allowed pursuant to Minn. Stat. §16A.065.
The payment for each order will only be made for goods received or services actually performed that have been accepted by the ordering entity, and meet all terms, conditions, and specifications of the Contract and the ordering document.
1.2 Invoicing. The invoice must be in the same format as the sample invoice form approved as Exhibit D, Supplement 1 with the Contract, unless an alternative format is approved in writing by the State Authorized Representative, or delegate. See Exhibit D, Supplement 1 for a list of minimum invoice requirements.
Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete.
2.1 Assignment. The Contractor may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Contract without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed assignment agreement, executed and approved by the authorized parties or their successors.
2.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this Contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the authorized parties or their successors.
2.3 Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this Contract, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it.
2.4 Contract Complete. This Contract contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Contractor. No other understanding regarding this Contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party.
Termination.
3.1 Termination for Convenience. The State or Commissioner of Administration may cancel this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the Contractor. Upon termination for convenience, the Contractor will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services or goods satisfactorily performed or delivered.
3.2 Termination for Breach. The State may terminate this Contract, with cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to Contractor of the alleged breach and opportunity to cure. If after 30 days, the alleged breach has not been remedied, the State may immediately terminate the Contract.
3.3 Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this Contract if it does not obtain funding from…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .