RFP for Remediation ADA Compliance.docx

Contra Costa County

Request For Proposal (RFP)

Remedial and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance

Solicitation #: RFP_F-Contr-0000000114

Release Date: August 07, 2025 Proposal Due Date: August 29, 2025 No later than 3:00 P.M. PDT

Contact: Des Gebre, Sr. Buyer

Contra Costa County Purchasing Division 40 Muir Road, 2nd Floor Martinez, CA 94553

General Information:

The Contra Costa County Department of Internet Technology (“County”) is seeking proposals from competent and experienced companies to provide web content and mobile applications comply with the ADA.

Proposal Submission:

Proposal Submission:

Proposals will not be accepted after the date and time stated above. Incomplete proposals or proposals that do not conform to the requirements specified herein will not be considered. Issuance of the RFP does not obligate the County to award a contract, nor is the County liable for any costs incurred by the proposer in the preparation and submittal of proposals for the subject work. The County retains the right to award all or parts of this contract to several bidders, to not select any bidders, and/or to re-solicit proposals. The act of submitting a proposal is a declaration that the proposer has read the RFP and understands all the requirements and conditions.

Questions:

All questions regarding the RFP will be accepted through the Bidnetdirect.com site only. The deadline for submitting questions for this RFP is on or before August 22, 2025, no later than 3:00 PM PDT. All questions will be answered and disseminated to those registered on the Bidnetdirect.com website. Contact customer service if you need technical assistance with any part of the bid process; call 800-835-4603, Option 2.

Pre-Proposal Conference:

This Project is not subject to pre-proposal conference.

Table of Contents

· Exhibit C – Customer References

· Exhibit D – Anti-Collusion Statement

· Exhibit E – CCC Business Opportunity Registration

Section I: Introduction

A. Purpose The County is seeking proposals from competent and experienced companies to provide web content accessibility guidelines as further described in detail under Section IV, Scope of Work (SOW).

B. Background A recent rule from the Department of Justice (DOJ) requires state and local governments to ensure their web content and mobile applications comply with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA), specifically the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA, Section 508, and ADA standards. The County has 10 websites with 17,000+ PDF documents that range in size from one page to hundreds of pages long that must be remediated in a structured and manageable way to meet WCAG compliance standards. The county acknowledges that many PDFs have certain pages which have significantly different requirements and may be significantly more difficult to remediate. Vendors are invited to propose how they would approach the following needs and challenges. The County is especially interested in responses that demonstrate an understanding of accessibility best practices, strong project management, and clear accountability structures.

C. Period of Agreement The initial term of any agreement awarded because of this RFP will be for three (3) years with two (2) one-year optional annual renewals upon the mutual agreement of the contractor and the County for a total term not to exceed five (5) years. Should the Contract expire, service shall continue a month-to-month basis until a new Agreement has been executed or either party terminates upon thirty (30) days written advance notice.

D. Calendar of Events

RFP Release date

August 07, 2025

Last date to submit written questions

Aug. 22, 2025, no later than 3:00 P.M. PDT

RFP due date

Aug. 29, 2025, no later than 3:00 P.M. PDT

E. Correspondence As of the issuance of this RFP, vendors are specifically directed not to contact County personnel for meetings, conferences or technical discussions related to this RFP. Questions to this RFP must be submitted via Bidnet Direct medium. Failure to adhere to this policy may result in disqualification of the vendor.

F. Addenda Knowledge All bidders shall acknowledge receipt of any amendments to this bid event by returning a signed hard copy with the bid. Failure to acknowledge receipt of any amendments may render the proposal to be non-responsive. Changes to this bid event shall be issued only by the County. See attachment D.

Section II: Requirements and Qualifications

The following are minimum qualifications that the vendor must meet for their proposal submittal to be eligible for evaluation.

The Evaluation Committee may choose to determine if a vendor meets minimum qualifications by reading that single document alone, so the submittal should be sufficiently detailed to clearly show how the minimum qualifications are met without looking at any other material. Minimum qualifications are scored on a pass/fail basis. Those that are not clearly responsive to these minimum qualifications may be rejected by the County without further consideration.

A. Proposer shall have at least five (5) years of experience in the business of providing remediation services of all PDF documents.

B. The Proposer shall describe tools, software, and methods that shall be used for analysis and remediation

C. The proposer shall adhere to all current applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes and ordinances.

D. The successful proposer must have a commercial general liability insurance policy that conforms to County requirements

E. Project understanding: Provide a statement articulating an understanding of the County’s project requirements

F. Project Approach: Describe project approach, standards for controlling work, challenges, and methods to overcome them

G. Project Schedule: Provide a schedule for implementing the project as specified in the RFP.

H. References: Provide references for at least three similar implementations in the past five years for large, federated organizations (preferably the public sector) with 24x7x365 availability and redundancy. Include:

· Client name and type of organization

· Project scope, technical environment, complexity, and Proposer’s role

· Project start and end dates

Section III: Instructions to Responders

All proposals shall include the following information, organized as separate section of the proposal. The proposal should be concise and to the point.

A. Format Respondents shall submit proposals which are concise and which specifically respond to the specifications posted in this RFP. Each proposal shall be submitted with a cover letter signed by an authorized person and the following documents:

a. Cover Letter – Signed by an authorized representative of the company

b. Proposal – within a maximum of 15 pages, no smaller than 12-point font, describe specific capabilities, experience, approaches and proposed methodologies that demonstrate a clear understanding of the nature of the work to be performed described in Section IV, Scope of work

c. Statement of Experience – See Exhibit A

d. Price Proposal – See Exhibit B

e. Customer References – See Exhibit C

f. Anti-Collusion Statement – See Exhibit D

g. Contra Costa County Business Opportunity Registration Form – See Exhibit E

h. Addenda Acknowledgement – See Attachment A

i. Federal, State, and local permits and licenses

j. Certificate of Insurance with Endorsement Letter

B. Proposal Submission

a. Response to this RFP MUST be submitted electronically through the Bidnet Direct web site – NO EXCEPTION

b. Late submittals WILL NOT be accepted – NO EXCEPTION

c. Fax submittals WILL NOT be accepted – NO EXCEPTION

C. Customer References Respondents shall provide a minimum of three (3) letters of references (Non-Contra Costa County government agents ONLY). Each letter must include the name of the firm, description of services provided, date(s) of services and contract amount for projects similar to the services requested in this RFP. See Exhibit C.

D. Licenses and Permits Respondents shall possess all licenses, registrations and permits required by the State of California and the County of Contra Costa. Such licenses and permits are to be submitted to the County with the proposal or prior to the contract signing date.

E. Proposal Expenses Respondents shall be fully responsible for all costs incurred in the development and submission of this RFP.

F. Proposer Responsibility The bidder assumes sole responsibility for the complete effort required in submitting a bid proposal in response to this RFP. No special consideration will be given after bid proposals are opened because of a proposer’s failure to be knowledgeable as to all of the requirements of this RFP.

G. Interpretation Should any discrepancies, omissions, or doubt as to their meaning be found in the RFP specifications or requirements, the Respondent shall notify the County in writing through the Bidnet Direct website. The County will send written instructions or addenda to all participants in the RFP process. The County shall not be responsible for oral interpretations.

H. Reservation The County reserves the right to do the following at any time and for its own convenience, at its sole discretion:

· To reject any and all proposals without indicating any reasons for such rejection

· Terminate this RFP and issue a new Request for Proposals anytime thereafter

· Extend any or all deadlines specified in the RFP, including deadlines for accepting proposals by issuing an Addendum at any time prior to the deadline for receipt of responses to the RFP

· Procure any services specified in the RFP by other means

· Disqualify any Respondent on the basis of any real or perceived conflict of interest or evidence of collusion that is disclosed by the proposal or other data available to the County. Such disqualification is at the sole discretion of the County

· Reject the proposal of any Respondent that is in breach of or in default under any other agreement with the County

· Reject any Respondent deemed by the County to be non-responsive, unreliable, unqualified or non-responsible

I. Truth and Accuracy of Representation False, misleading, incomplete, or deceptively unresponsive statements in connection with a proposal shall be sufficient cause for rejection of the proposal.

J. Sub-Contract and Assignment The Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. Prior written consent of the County, subject to any required state or federal approval, is required before the Contractor may enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under the Contract, or before the Contractor may assign the Contract or monies due or to become due, by operation of law or otherwise.

K. Addenda No one is authorized to amend any of these documents in any respect by an oral statement or to make any representation or interpretation in conflict with their provisions. Any changes to these documents will be issued in writing via Addenda to be posted on Bidnet Direct website.

L. Addenda Acknowledgement All addenda shall include an acknowledgement of receipt that must be returned. The addenda must be signed and attached to the final response. Failure to attach any addendum may result in the rejection of the response. See Attachment D.

M. Non-Collusion By submitting a signed proposal, Offeror certifies that there has been no collusion with any other Offeror. Reasonable grounds for believing Offeror has an interest in more than one proposal will result in rejection of all proposals in which the Offeror has an interest. Any party to collusion may not be considered in future proposals for the same or similar work. See Exhibit D attached.

Section IV: Scope of Work

The County is committed to ensuring accessibility and is required to demonstrate continuous progress, improvement, and remediation of its digital content. To meet these obligations, the County is seeking qualified vendors to support a phased approach that may extend over several years for the remediation of all PDF documents on the public facing websites.

This is a multi-year blanket award covering approximately 400,000 PDF pages. The contract is a general service agreement for each county department (the parties with authority and responsible to achieve ADA compliance of PDFs) to work with the vendor directly to determine the prioritization of documents and approve funding of remediation at the vendor proposed pricing. Although each department will determine its own path over time, we expect the selected vendor to begin with the easier tasks and gradually progress to more complex ones in a process of continuous improvement. Evaluation of the RFP responses will be based on the vendor’s experience, demonstrated success in PDF remediation, and overall cost effectiveness.

I. Public Facing Websites in Scope:

1. https://www.contracosta.ca.gov

2. https://24petconnect.com/

3. https://contra-costa.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

4. https://www.contracostavote.gov/

5. https://ehsd.org/

6. https://ccclib.org/

7. https://contracostaprobation.ca.gov/

8. https://www.cocopublicdefenders.org/

9. https://www.cocosheriff.org/

10. https://cwsalerts.com/

A. Document Remediation Pricing Tiers:

a. The county requires fully remediated documents not individual pages of a total PDF

b. For all PDFs remediated, a third-party certification listing to be provided of the PDF’s accessibility success

c. PDFs will be grouped by department of ownership as provided by the county and need to be returned as remediated in the same groupings

d. Vendors will be required to return the remediated PDFs in similar groupings and invoice based on the number of pages remediated within each group

e. Any PDF that is not remediated with a brief understanding of why for development of future phases

f. Remediation needs to be valid to support digital accessibly, not to trick external systems to think it's remediated when it is not

· e.g. Alt-text remediation to be reasonably accurate to the displayed image

B. Document Remediation Pricing Tiers:

To ensure that pricing accurately reflects the level of effort required, we are requesting that vendors provide tiered pricing based on the following complexity levels:

1. Basic

2. Intermediate

3. Advanced

4. Complex

The selected vendor will be responsible for assessing and determining the complexity level of each document to be remediated within the department of responsibility.

C. Vendor Approach:

1. Project Management and Coordination:

a) How would your firm assign and utilize a Project Manager to coordinate engagement involving up to 400,000 pages of document management and remediation services?

b) What tools, frameworks, or methodologies would you use to ensure effective project tracking, timely deliverables, and ongoing transparency with County stakeholders?

c) How would you structure governance and reporting to promote clear communication, issue resolution, and accountability throughout the project lifecycle?

2. PDF Document Management:

a) Given that the County will identify high-priority PDFs and provide download links, how would your team handle document intake, prioritization, and segmentation into tiers (e.g., P1 – low complexity, and P2 – remaining PDFs)?

b) What is your approach to conducting pre-remediation assessments using a PDF accessibility checker tool (e.g PDF Accessibility Checker (PAC) 2021 or any other tool)?

c) How would you report results of pre-remediation assessments to the County for up to 400,000 PDF pages?

d) How would you handle documents that may be considered too complex or non-remediable within a fixed-price structure?

3. Remediation:

a) How would you approach the remediation of PDFs to meet WCAG 2.1 AA standards?

b) What techniques, tools, and quality assurance methods would you employ to ensure high-quality and consistent results?

c) How would you manage large-scale remediation tasks while adapting to varying levels of document complexity?

4. Compliance Verification and Reporting:

a) What is your process for post-remediation compliance testing and validation?

b) How would you structure and deliver final reporting packages, including compliance documentation, summaries of results, and recommendations for future accessibility improvements?

c) What form of form of third-party certification or attestation for remediated documents will be provided?

D. Remediation Standards and Tier Definitions:

The four tiers—Basic, Intermediate, Advanced, and Complex—are defined by the structure, source, and technical challenges of the document. While effort and complexity vary, the expected outcome is the same across all tiers: a fully accessible document that complies with PDF/UA and WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards.

1. Expected Outcome for All Tiers:

All remediated PDFs must:

· Conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA and PDF/UA standards

· Include correct document title and language metadata

· Use appropriate heading structure and logical reading order

· Provide accurate alt text or summaries for all meaningful visual content (e.g., images, charts, tables)

· Non-informative or decorative images must be marked as decorative

· Use descriptive text for all hyperlinks and confirm link accessibility

· Use consistent font sizes and meet sufficient color contrast requirements

· Include properly tagged interactive elements (e.g., forms, bookmarks, media)

· Include the PDF/UA Compliance indicator

· Be accessible to screen readers and keyboard-only users

2. Tier Descriptions:

Note: Tasks and requirements are cumulative. Each higher tier includes all applicable remediation work from the tiers below it, in addition to the specific characteristics and tasks described here.

I. Tier 1: Basic Typical Use Case: Short, well-structured documents exported from accessible source files.

1) Estimated Remediation Effort: Minimal Key Characteristics:

a) Exported with tags from Word, InDesign, or another accessible authoring tool

b) Content is primarily body text with standard heading levels

c) No tables, forms, footnotes, or complex visual elements

d) Reading order is intact

e) No interactive elements present

f) Includes basic remediation tasks, such as:

1. Applying missing document title and language metadata

2. Verifying heading structure

3. Ensuring all images (if any) have appropriate alt text

4. Confirming links use clear, descriptive text

5. Verifying basic color contrast and standard font sizes are used

g) Minimal manual intervention required

II. Tier 2: Intermediate Typical Use Case: Mid-length documents or shorter documents with a few slightly complex visual elements.

1) Estimated Remediation Effort: Moderate

Key Characteristics:

a) Some tagging or structure present, but inconsistently applied

b) May include:

1. Simple tables

2. Static or moderately complex images, links, or tables missing alt text or summaries

3. Inconsistent use of heading levels

4. Basic interactive elements such as hyperlinks requiring accessible labeling

c) Requires review and cleanup of reading order

d) Remediation tasks may include:

1. Reviewing and updating link text to be descriptive and accessible

2. Adjusting font sizes and color contrast where inconsistent or insufficient

3. Basic tag role verification and correction (e.g., misused headings or paragraph tags)

4. Running Preflight tools to embed missing fonts, if applicable

5. Adding or correcting document metadata (title, language)

III. Tier 3: Advanced Typical Use Case: Long-form documents or those with complex structure and formatting.

1) Estimated Remediation Effort: Significant

Key Characteristics:

a) Little to no correct tagging present

b) Includes:

1. Tables with complex structure or inconsistent tagging, often requiring custom summaries or alt text for context

2. Charts, graphs, and infographics requiring detailed alt text

3. Bookmarks, footnotes, hyperlinks, or cross-references

4. Interactive elements requiring tagging and testing (e.g., navigation bookmarks, cross-document links)

c) Requires:

1. Full correction of tag roles and semantic structure

2. Manual tagging of complex content types

3. Extensive remediation of reading order and heading hierarchy

4. Embedding missing fonts as needed using Preflight or equivalent tools

d) May involve:

1. Rewriting link text and reviewing destination context for screen reader clarity

2. Evaluating and standardizing color contrast and font styles across document sections

3. Validation against PDF/UA structure rules

4. Multi-step verification to ensure content flow and usability

5. Coordination with content owners for context-specific alt text or structure verification

IV. Tier 4: Complex Typical Use Case: Forms, scanned content, interactive PDFs, or documents with legacy formatting.

1) Estimated Remediation Effort: Extensive

Key Characteristics:

a) Any length, but includes:

1. Fillable forms, buttons, or embedded scripts

2. Scanned or image-based content with no usable tags

3. Decorative, inconsistent, or multi-layered layouts

4. Interactive elements such as embedded media, scripted navigation, or complex link structures

b) Requires:

1. Optical Character Recognition (OCR) with verification and correction

2. Manual correction of tag roles and nested structure (e.g., deeply broken or absent semantic tagging)

3. Full rebuild of tagging and reading order from scratch

4. Embedding missing fonts if needed

c) May involve:

1. Complex form field tagging, labeling, tab order setup, and error handling

2. ARIA roles or scripting adjustments for interactive elements

3. Addressing inaccessible or redundant link structures, including testing in screen readers

4. Conducting full visual accessibility review for contrast issues, non-standard fonts, and layout consistency

5. Keyboard and screen reader testing

6. Stakeholder review for sensitive or compliance-related content

Section V: Evaluation and Selection Process

A. Selection Process All Proposals will be evaluated according to the following criteria and point value. Within the content of the information required by the RFP, Proposers are welcome to submit any and all supporting information which describes their ability to meet and exceed the criteria. An evaluation committee will conduct the evaluation of proposals. The Committee will discuss each proposal and establish consensus. Each member of the committee shall score the proposals independent of the other members, after which, scores will be combined/averaged.

The County reserves the right at any time during the evaluation process to conduct discussions with Proposers to clarify their Proposals. Once a contract award has been made, the County will notify all firms accordingly. Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

1. Company qualification and experience with similar projects

2. Project understanding, methodology, approach to technical requirements and implementation plan

3. Experience of personnel who are going to be assigned to the project

4. Description of tools, software, and methods used for analysis and remediation

5. Cost

6. Client References

B. Best and Final Offer (BAFO) The County, at its sole discretion, may request Best and Final Offer (BAFO) from the finalists.

C. Unit Price vs. Extended Price Bidders are advised that in the evaluation of cost, if applicable, it will be assumed that the unit price quoted is correct in the case of a discrepancy between the unit price and an extension.

D. Award Agreement Upon completion of the review period, the County shall notify those Proposers who will be considered for further evaluation and negotiation. All Proposers so notified may be contacted for an interview and negotiate in good faith in accordance with direction from the County. Any delay caused by Proposer's failure to respond to direction from the County may lead to a rejection of the Proposal.

If the County determines after further evaluation and negotiation, to award the Agreement, a Professional Services Contract shall be sent to the successful Proposer for the Proposer's signature. No proposal shall be binding upon the County until after the Agreement is signed by duly authorized representatives of both Proposer and the County.

E. Notice of Intent to Award It is the intent of the County to award a contract as the result of this RFP to the highest-ranked proposer(s). The County will notify the successful Proposer in writing and post the results on bidnetdirect.com website. Unsuccessful Proposers will be notified via bidnetdirect.com notification system. It is the responsibility of proposers to check their email notification and have an updated email address on bidnetdirect.com.

F. Proposals are Public Records California Government Code Section 6250, the Public Records Act, defines a public record as any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics. The Public Records Act provides that public records shall be disclosed upon request and that any resident has a right to inspect any public record unless the document is exempted from disclosure.

Unless otherwise compelled by a court order, the County will not disclose any proposal while the County conducts its deliberative process in accordance with the procedures identified in this RFP. However, after the County either awards an agreement to a successful Proposer, or rejects all proposals, the County shall consider each proposal subject to the public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. Each Proposer is hereby informed that, upon submittal of its proposal to the County in accordance with this RFP, the proposal becomes the property of Contra Costa County.

G. Protest

1. Protest Policy Any bidder or proposer who is aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or award of a contract may protest to the Purchasing Agent or designee. The protest shall be submitted in writing to the Purchasing Agent or designee, within five (5) business days after such aggrieved person or company knows or should have known of the facts giving rise thereto. Failure to submit a timely protest shall bar consideration of a protest.

2. Grounds for Protest The protest shall state all grounds claimed for the protest and include supporting documentation. Failure to clearly state the grounds for the protest and provide supporting documentation shall be deemed a waiver of all protest rights.

3. Protest Procedures In the event a dispute arises concerning the proposal process prior to the award of the contract, the party wishing resolution of the dispute shall submit a request in writing to the attention of:

Cindy Shehorn, Purchasing Manager Contra Costa County Public Works Department 40 Muir Road, 2ND Floor Martinez CA, 94553

Section VI: Invoicing and Billing

A. Payment Terms Contractor shall submit a correct and complete invoice(s) to the County after the County accepted the deliverables. Payment terms are Net 30 days or best offer, after receipt of correct invoice. Bidders are requested to provide a detailed price quote for (3) years, summarizing annual costs for years 1 – 3, and confirm the capability to invoice the County annually.

All bidders MUST accept the payment terms of Contra Costa County.

B. Rates Proposer shall submit costs for total project. Please see Exhibit B.

C. Pricing Price shall be firm fixed for the duration of the contract.

Exhibit A: Statement of Experience

SECTION A____________________________________________________________________________ Business Name: __________________________________________ Phone #: _____________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ City: __________________________________________________ State: ________ ZIP: _____________ Federal Tax ID #: ____________________________ Business License #: ___________________________ Business Status:

_____Non Profit Corporation _____Corporation State of Incorporation:_____________________ _____General Partnership _____Limited Partnership _____Sole Proprietorship Other: __________________________ Name and title of an Officer or owner authorized to sign this proposal and any contract with the County that may result.

Name: __________________________________________________ Title: ________________________

SECTION B____________________________________________________________________________ Number of years in business under present business name: ____________________________________ Other Business Name(s): ________________________________________________________________ Number of years under prior name if any: ___________________________________________________

SECTION C____________________________________________________________________________ Number of years of experience in providing required, equivalent, or related projects: _______________ SECTION D____________________________________________________________________________ Similar services/projects completed during the last five years?

Period Services $ Amount Paid Location Agency Name 1 - __________________________________________________________________________________ 2 - __________________________________________________________________________________ 3 - __________________________________________________________________________________ 4 - __________________________________________________________________________________ 5 - __________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION E____________________________________________________________________________ Have you, or your agency failed or refused to complete a contract? _____ YES ______ No If yes, explain: _________________________________________________________________________

SECTION F____________________________________________________________________________ Is your firm authorized to do business in the State of California? _____Yes ________No

SECTION G____________________________________________________________________________ Is your firm a State of California registered small business? ______Yes ______No

SECTION H____________________________________________________________________________ Is your firm local Business? ______Yes ______No

SECTION I_____________________________________________________________________________ Explain any litigation similar to the services requested by this proposal involving you, or your agency, or any principal officer(s) thereof:

SECTION J___________________________________________________________________________ Has your company filed any written declaration for bankruptcy protection, a potential merger or acquisition, office closure, pending lawsuits, financial loss that might affect your ability to perform under the contract? _________ Yes _________ No (if yes, please explain): _____________________

SECTION K____________________________________________________________________________ License Provisions Has your company changed names or license numbers in the past 10 years? If so, please state reason for change. Yes_____ No_____

Reason ________________________________

SECTION L____________________________________________________________________________ List the names and titles of the key personnel who would be assigned to the Project.

SECTION M____________________________________________________________________________ List all required business and professional licenses that pertain to this Project:

License Number Type Expiration Date

SECTION N____________________________________________________________________________ Do you and your agency agree to provide additional information as required by the County to make an informed determination of qualifications? ______ Yes _____ No By signing this Statement of Experience, you are certifying that all information provided on this form and contained within your proposal are true, and you acknowledge that if the proposal contains any false statements, the County may declare any contract or agreement made as a result of the proposal to be void.

Signature: ________________________________________________ Date: ______________________ Authorized Name: ____________________________________Title: _____________________________

Exhibit B: Proposal Price

Cost per page $: _____________________________________________________________

I have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions of all contents of this RFP. The undersigned agrees to furnish the service stipulated in the RFP as stated.

Exhibit C: Customer References

*Non-Contra Costa County government agents ONLY.

*Government Agency:

Contact Person:

Address:

Tel. Number:

City, State, Zip:

Email Address:

Services Provided / Date(s) of Service:

Government Agency:

Contact Person:

Address:

Tel. Number:

City, State, Zip:

Email Address:

Services Provided / Date(s) of Service:

Government Agency:

Contact Person:

Address:

Tel. Number:

City, State, Zip:

Email Address:

Services Provided / Date(s) of Service:

Firm Name: _____________________________________________________________

Authorized Name: _______________________________ Title: ___________________

Authorized Signature: ____________________________ Date: __________________

Exhibit D: Anti-Collusion Statement

By signing this form, the Bidder agrees that this quote is made without any other understanding, agreement, or connection with any person, corporation, or firm submitting a quote for the same purpose and that the quote is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud, IT IS AGREED BY THE UNDERSIGNED BIDDER, THAT THE SIGNING AND DELIVERY OF THE QUOTE REPRESENTS THE BIDDER'S ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE FORGOING SPECIFICATIONS AND PROVISIONS, AND IF AWARDED, THIS CONTRACT WILL REPRESENT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BIDDER AND THE COUNTY.

NAME OF FIRM: ______________________________________________________________

[Sign in ink in the space provided below]

SIGNED BY: _________________________________________________________________

TITLE: ______________________________________________________________________

ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________________

CITY & STATE: _______________________________________________________________

TELEPHONE: _________________________________________________________________

Exhibit E: CCC Business Opportunities Registration

Place Holder

See Attached

Attachment A: Addenda Acknowledgement

TO BE RETURNED WITH REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

RFP No.: _______________ Title: ________________________________________________

ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (Please initial for addendums received)

Company Name: _____________________________________________________________

Contact Name: _______________________________________________________________

Email Address: ____________________________________________ Phone No.: _________

Address:____________________________________________________________________

Authorized Signature: _________________________________________________________

Date: _______________________________________________________________________

Attachment B: CCC General Conditions

Place Holder

See Attached

Remedial and ADA Compliance RFP No.: RFP_F-Contr-0000000114 pg. 1 image1.png