RFP Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire_7.27.21.docx

DOCX document 36 KB Posted

Attached to
DARPA Program Security Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HR001121R0003
Issued by
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Security & Intelligence Directorate (SID) Program Security Services solicitation numbered HR001121R0003. The questionnaire requests ratings and comments on an incumbent contractor's performance in areas such as technical performance, management, personnel security, and overall expectations. Respondents are asked to provide details on their knowledge of the contractor from dates of involvement on a specific contract or task order. Completed questionnaires must be returned directly to DARPA by September 1, 2021 to inform their evaluation of offerors' past performance.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DARPA Program Security Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFP Attachment 7 - Cost Spreadsheet_8.24.21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HR001121R0003 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 1 - PWS_8.19.21_tracked changes.docx DOCX document
RFP Attachment 7 - Cost Spreadsheet_8.19.21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Attachment 9 - Questions and Answers_8.19.21.pdf PDF
HR001121R0003 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 2 - Sections L and M_8.19.21.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 1 - PWS_8.19.21.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 2 - Sections L and M_8.19.21_tracked changes.docx DOCX document
RFP Attachment 2 - Sections L and M_Revised 7.30.21.pdf PDF
HR001121R0003 Program Security Services RFP (Released).pdf PDF
HR001121R0003 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 2 - Sections L and M_Revised 7.30.21_tracked changes.docx DOCX document
RFP Attachment 5 - Accounting System Checklist_7.27.21.docx DOCX document
RFP Attachment 1 - PWS_7.27.21.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 8 - Questions Matrix_7.27.21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Attachment 7 - Cost Spreadsheet_7.27.21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Attachment 2 - Sections L and M_7.27.21.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 4 - Non-Disclosure Agreement_7.27.21.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 1A - Additional Requirements_7.27.21.pdf PDF
HR001121R0003 Program Security Services RFP.pdf PDF
RFP Attachment 3 - Current Staffing Mix_7.27.21.pdf PDF
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HR0001121R0003 Past Performance Questionnaire DARPA SID Program Security Services

Transmittal Letter to Accompany Past Performance Questionnaire

MEMORANDUM FOR: [Government Customer]

FROM: [Offeror]

SUBJECT: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire for [Past Performance Information Submission Selection]

1. We are currently responding to the DARPA Security & Intelligence Directorate Program Security Services Request for Proposals (RFP) HR001121R0003 as a [prime contractor or subcontractor to _______]. This RFP specifically requires that we, as an Offeror, send a Past Performance Questionnaire to our identified points of contact (POCs) and track its completion and return.

2. We identified the subject contract / task order as relevant to this acquisition and you as our POC. As such, please take a few moments of your time to fill out the attached questionnaire and return it directly to the POC indicated below. The information contained in the completed questionnaire is considered source selection sensitive and cannot be released to us, the Offeror. If you have any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire, your questions must be directed back to the below POC.

3. Please email the completed questionnaire directly to the Government no later than 10:00 AM Eastern on Wednesday, September 1, 2021, at:

DARPA Contracts Management Office Attention: Mary Beth Colavito, Contracting Officer ProgramSecurityRequirement@darpa.mil

4. No classified information shall be submitted with this unclassified questionnaire. Please reach out to the Contracting Officer prior to email submission if classified communication is required.

Thank you for your timely assistance.

Sincerely, [Offeror POC]

Attachment:

Past Performance Questionnaire

Contact Information for the Individual Completing Survey

Name:
Functional Responsibility:

Customer Contracting Agency/Company:

Email Address:
Phone:

Mailing Address:

Dates of Involvement:

From:

To:

Contract Information

Company/Division Being Rated:
Program Title:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type(s):

Date of Award and Period of Performance:

Did/Does this contract involve any classified work?

|_| No |_| Secret |_| Top Secret |_| SCI

|_|Other (i.e. SAP)

Original Contract Value and Current Contract Value (provide explanation for differences):

Original Completion Date and Current Completion Date (provide explanation for differences):

Brief Description of Work Including Complexity of Work:

|_| Complete |_| Ongoing

Fee Structure and Award Fee History (Provide amount awarded vs. amount available for award, with explanation for differences and award fee policy):

Summary of Major Achievements, Successes, Innovations, and Awards Accomplished During Contract Performance:

Signature:

Date:

Based on your knowledge of the contract identified above, please provide your assessment of how well the contractor performed on each of the following topics. Your answers to these questions will help the Government evaluate how well the contractor performed under your contract. Please check the appropriate rating, and we strongly encourage you to provide thorough and concise comments for all responses other than those rated Satisfactory or N/A. A separate sheet may be used, if necessary. Thank you in advance for your participation.

Please use the following scale to respond to each question below:

Unacceptable
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Exceptional
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Indicates the contractor is deficient and demonstrates very little understanding and ability to perform the goals/objectives of the contract. Such deficiencies are expected to be very difficult or impossible to correct.
Indicates contractor’s performance does meet contractual requirements, however, the area of evaluation experienced serious problems that were difficult to correct. Corrective action was either not identified, appeared only marginally effective, or was not fully implemented.
Indicates the contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and the goals/objectives of the SOW/PWS. The area of evaluation experienced some minor problems for which: either, 1) corrective action was taken and appears to be satisfactory, or 2) corrective action was identified that will probably correct the problems.
Indicates the contractor’s performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeded some. The contractor is fulfilling the goals/objectives of the SOW/PWS. Area of evaluation may have experienced a few minor problems, which timely corrective action was taken and was effective.
Indicates the contractor’s performance exceeds all contractual requirements and the goals/objectives of the SOW/PWS. The area of evaluation may have experienced a few minor problems for which timely corrective action was taken and was effective.

Quality of Technical Performance:

(1) How well did the Contractor do in meeting technical performance requirements and providing complete, accurate, and timely products or services?

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

Comments:

(2) Did the Contractor staff regularly display critical thinking and problem solving skills, and provide the Government with proposed solutions to complex problems?

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

(3) Did the Contractor work in a diverse environment to include subcontractors, other Government support contractors, FFRDCs, customers, and Government personnel to create a “one team” environment?

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

(4) Did the Contractor accomplish its incoming and outgoing contract transitions well? Did the Contractor ensure that changeovers were seamless, transparent, and timely with minimal impact to the Government?

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

(5) Did the Contractor meet all the personnel security requirements on the contract (specifically, please address pre-screening, clearance processing, training, and any contract unique security requirements)?

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

Quality of Management Performance:

(6) How would you assess the Contractor’s ability to manage contract staffing, cost, schedule, performance, and risk and their ability to communicate this information effectively to the Government? Please provide details and rate how well they did.

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

(7) Were cost or schedule problems encountered with the Contractor’s performance and how effective was the Contractor at solving the problems and taking corrective action to reduce the risk of recurrence? Please provide details and rate how well they did.

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

(8) Was the Contractor’s corporate reachback able to provide effective support for on-site personnel and willing to assist on contract management if there were performance issues? Did the Government have to step in to assist in contract management to ensure successful performance? Please provide details and rate how well they did.

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

Overall:

(9) How well did the Contractor meet your overall expectations with regard to their performance in meeting the objectives and requirements of the contract?

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N/A

Thank you for completing this questionnaire.

Your time and candor are greatly appreciated.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .