RFP 24-3117 Q and A.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Endangered Species Act Assessments
- Solicitation number
- RFP 761 240000003117 2
- Issued by
- Michigan
About this file
This is a Question and Answer document for RFP 24-3117 issued by the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) regarding orphan wells remediation services. The project encompasses approximately 245 individual sites requiring environmental assessment and remediation work. Key clarifications include confirmation that all wells must be completed during the contract period, with EGLE's Program Manager responsible for establishing project schedules and prioritizing work. The RFP requires contractors to submit IPAC results and supporting documentation, though the specific table format is provided in Schedule D. A mandatory pre-proposal meeting was held with ten vendors in attendance, including AECOM, Egis, GEI Consultants, ASC Group, EnviroScience Inc., Merjent Inc., Civil & Environmental Consultants Inc., EA Engineering Science and Technology, Davey Resource Group Inc., and Mannik & Smith Group Inc. Additional well information and site details are available through the Michigan Orphan Wells Dashboard.
The RFP includes a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned (SDVO) business 10% preference that applies to prime contractors only. Pricing for Schedule B items 2-8 should be included for informational purposes only, as these items will be utilized if project scope alterations occur or if formal consultation with the Department of Interior and/or Fish and Wildlife Service becomes necessary. The RFP document has been updated to correct the number of sites from 345 to 245 and to clarify Section 106 consultation requirements, ESA service deliverables, and scope inclusions. Action areas for each project will be defined as box-shaped boundaries surrounding the wells and facilities included in each specific project.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule E - Example FWS Concurrence Letter.pdf | ||
| Schedule C - Example Species List.pdf | ||
| Schedule D - Example Crosswalk.pdf | ||
| RFP 240000003117 Endangered Species Act Assessments.docx | DOCX document | |
| Revised RFP 240000003117 Endangered Species Act Assessments.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question # | Document and Section | Page # | Bidder Question | EGLE Response |
| 1 | Vendor Questions Worksheet | 13 | Does the SDVO 10% bonus get awarded if the firm is on the team or do they need to be the prime? | The SDVO 10% preference is applied to the prime contractor. |
| 2 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 1 - Requirements | 42-45 | What other information other than location would typically be provided for each well or package? | Additional information can be found on the Michigan Orphan Wells Dashboard: https://egle.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/33245f79c74b4b0ca24768c947fd8fa6 |
| 3 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 1 - Requirements | 42-45 | Will you be defining/providing the action area around each well/facility? | Not specifically. The action area, in general will be a box shape that will surround the wells/facilities included in each specific project. |
| 4 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 1 - Requirements | 42-45 | Is the table you would like us to provide with the IPAC results and explanations for why a "not likely to effect" etc designation was assigned available for us to take a look at? | See Schedule D for this information. |
| 5 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 1 - Requirements | 42-45 | Will a project schedule be provided by EGLE? | Yes. The EGLE Program Manager will work with the awarded contractor to setup a schedule and prioritize the projects. |
| 6 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 1 - Requirements | 42-45 | Does EGLE expect that all the wells will be completed during this project/contract? | Yes. |
| 7 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 1 - Requirements | 42-45 | Is there a particular order or priority for the wells/projects? | Yes. The EGLE Program Manager will work with the awarded contractor to setup a schedule and prioritize the projects. |
| 8 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 1 - Requirements | 42-45 | The RFP notes approximately 245 individual sites. On page 54 it states 345 individual sites. Please clarify. | The correct answer is 245 sites. Page 54 of the RFP has been updated with the correct number. |
| 9 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 3 - Acceptance | 46 | The RFP notes the Contract must submit the complete Application for SHPO Section 106 Consultation for each location. Is this correct? | No this is not correct. RFP Section 3.1 Acceptance, Section 5.3 Reporting, Section 8.3 Procedure and Section 10 Service Level Agreement have been updated with the correct information. |
| 10 | Schedule A: Statement of Work; Section 10 Service Level Agreement | 54 | Does the scope also include A, B, and C? Or is it meant to say a contractor (others) has already submitted A, B, and C? Please clarify. | The RFP has been updated to reflect Section 7 ESA services and producibles. |
| 11 | Schedule B: Pricing | 57-58 | Should our pricing include items 2-8? | Pricing for items 2-8 are for informational purposes and will only be utilized in the event alterations are made to the project scope, or if Formal Consultation is necessary to obtain concurrence from DOI and/or FWS to start project activities. |
| Vendors who attended mandatory pre-proposal meeting: |
| AECOM |
| Egis |
| GEI Consultants |
| ASC Group |
| EnviroScience, Inc. |
| Merjent, Inc. |
| Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. |
| EA Engineering, Science and Technology |
| Davey Resource Group, Inc. |
| Mannik & Smith Group, Inc. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .