RFP 24_023 Addendum 1.pdf

Addendum Number 1

RFP #24-023 S2122 GLENRIDGE DRIVE SIDEPATH (HAMMOND DRIVE TO WELLINGTON TRACE)

COMPLETE THIS ADDENDUM, SIGN and SUBMIT with the RFP

RESPONSE DUE DATE: November 3rd, 2023 at 4:30 P.M.

To All Prospective Offerors: In reference to the RFP listed above, the following answers to questions, additions, deletions, and changes are hereby incorporated into the RFP:

The close time for RFP 24-023 changed from November 3rd, 2023 at 2:00 P.M. to November 3rd, 2023 at

4:30 P.M.

Updates**

Question 1: Will the City of Sandy Spring require No Conflict letters and/or utility agreements for relocations if the new trail conflicts with existing utilities?

Answer: Yes

Question 2: Confirm that the city will need Utility Impact Analysis Reports (how utilities are impacted and cost resolution) for relocation is needed.

Answer: Yes

Question 3: Will the city provide records research for the utilities and easements, or should the prime assume all research to be self-provided.

Answer: Prime assumes all research.

Question 4: Please confirm if a Pole data table is required. Could we provide pole IDs and confirm services attached to the pole in leu of a PDT.

Answer: Follow GDOT Plan Development Process (PDP)

Question 5: The limits for Survey are currently described in a linear fashion. Could we get a further definition of the corridor width limits of the survey? i.e. RW to RW or 20’ beyond RW on West side of road for example.

Answer: Right-of-Way (RW) on the west side to 50’ beyond existing ROW on the east side of Glenridge

Drive.

Question 6: Is there an estimated number of affected parcels that will require new easement and/or RW takes that will be requiring individual easement or RW plats for?

Answer: No

Question 7: Should Survey RW staking be considered for just the estimated number of affected parcels or throughout the entire corridor?

Answer: Right-of-Way staking for the entire corridor.

Question 8: Will the project be exempt from Sandy Springs water quality requirements due to this being a linear project?

Answer: Yes

Question 9: Will the City require the design to include detention to offset the additional impervious cover of the pedestrian path.

Answer: It’s not anticipated that the design will need detention.

Question 10: Will the project team need to provide an environmental survey to identify any possible wetlands in the area.

Answer: Yes

Question 11: Will the City require a traffic control plan to be provided by the engineer, or will this be provided by the contractor.

Answer: The contractor will be required to provide the traffic control plan.

Question 12: Will the City require the design team to provide intersection designs at impacted intersections or will a signal plan showing the new pole locations be enough.

Answer: The City will require the design team to provide intersection designs at impacted intersections.

Question 13: Will designs need to include future connections across Hammond Drive and Glenridge

Drive

Answer: Yes, coordination will need to take place with the S2193 Hammond Drive Corridor Project.

Question 14: Will overhead connectivity need to be shown by the SUE provider.

Answer: Yes

I hereby acknowledge receipt of Addendum Number 1 for 24-023 S2122 Glenridge Drive Sidepath

(Hammond Drive to Wellington Trace) and have incorporated the changes into my response for the above mentioned RFP.

COMPANY NAME:

CONTACT PERSON:

ADDRESS:

CITY: _________________________________STATE: ___________ ZIP: ________________________

PHONE: ________________ FAX: _______________

EMAIL ADDRESS: ______________________________________

SIGNATURE: ____________________________________________

DATE: ______________________________________