RFP__00000111-SA_Presidential_and_Executive_Compensation_Study_RFP.pdf

University of Maryland

College Park

Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 00000111-SA For USM Presidential and Executive Compensation

Study

Issue Date: April 17, 2025 Pre-Proposal Conference: N/A Deadline for Questions: May 1, 2025 at 3:00 PM Proposal Due Date: May 8, 2025 at 3:00 PM

Contractors who have received this document from a source other than the Issuing Office should immediately contact the Issuing Office and provide their name and mailing address in order that amendments to the RFP or other communications can be sent to them. Contractors who fail to notify the Issuing Office with this information assume complete responsibility in the event that they do not receive communications from the Issuing Office prior to the closing date.

Contractors are cautioned not to make changes to any of the terms and conditions in this solicitation. Doing so may render a Contractor’s proposal unacceptable and subject to rejection. Questions and comments may be addressed to the point of contact identified in Section A-1, Item 9 of this document.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1

Introduction Background Information

SECTION 2

Instructions and Notices to Contractors

2.1 Issuing Office

2.2 Pre-Proposal Conference

2.3 Questions

2.4 Submission of Proposals Amendments to the RFP

2.5 Due Date

2.6 Late Proposals

2.7 Durations of Proposal Offer

2.8 Amendments to the RFP

2.9 Alternate Proposals

2.10 Economy of Preparation

2.11 Unable to Propose

2.12 Public Information Act Notice

2.13 Cancellation of the RFP

2.14 Two Volume Proposal

2.15 Volume 1 - Technical Specifications and Business Requirements

2.16 Volume 2 - Financial Volume

SECTION 3

Evaluation, Award, Contract Formation, Debriefing of Unsuccessful Proposers, Protests and Claims, Contract Implementation Meeting

3.1 Evaluation Method

3.2 Evidence of Responsibility

3.3 Solicitation, Proposal, Acceptance, Award and Discussion

3.4 Negotiation

3.5 Basis of Award

3.6 Formation of Agreement/Contract with Successful Contractor

3.7 Debriefing of Unsuccessful Proposers

3.8 Protests and Claims

3.9 Contract Implementation Meeting

SECTION 4

Mandatory Requirements

4.1 Contractor Data

4.2 Contractor Qualifications

4.3 Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) Participation

4.4 Technical Requirements

SECTION 5

Proposal and Contract Terms and Conditions Affidavits Corporate Diversity Addendum IT Accessibility Addendum Sensitive and Secure Data Addendum Insurance Addendum Certification Regarding Investment Activities In Iran Exhibit 1 - Solicitation/Contract Form

SECTION 1

Introduction

The University System of Maryland (USM), Maryland's premier public higher education system, seeks consulting services to conduct a comprehensive Presidential and Executive Compensation Study. This study will include analysis of compensation for USM’s Chancellor, presidents of USM institutions, Executive Directors at the three USM Regional Centers, and employees at the USM System’s office who serve as staff to the Board of Regents, totaling approximately 110 positions.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The Chancellor’s Office of the USM is dedicated to maintaining a compensation process for its executive roles that reflect best practices, aligns with market standards, and supports recruitment and retention objectives. Consultants are expected to have in-depth expertise in executive compensation within public higher education.

The selected consultants will assess the validity of USM’s current process for determining executive compensation, recommend improvements or alternatives based on industry’s best practices, and provide a written report with findings and recommendations to the Committee on Governance & Compensation of the USM Board of Regents (the Committee).

Additional information about USM and its institutions is available at:

https://www.usmd.edu/about_usm/

Objectives

The objectives of the consulting services include:

1. Validation of Current Process:

The review of USM’s compensation process will involve:

• Evaluating the Board’s executive compensation philosophy.

• Reviewing the selection of peer groups for USM presidential and executive compensation comparisons.

• Analyzing factors in USM’s salary-setting methodology, such as peer salaries, geographic and market influences, equity considerations, individual performance metrics, cost-of-living adjustments, and the use of bonuses.

• Assessing methods for non-salary compensation elements, including housing, transportation, and deferred compensation.

• Evaluating the current practices related to initial employment compensation packages and periodic adjustments.

This assessment will include salary setting and overall total compensation, addressing both individual and comparative appropriateness of compensation levels for the Chancellor, USM institution presidents, regional center Executive Directors, and Board of Regents staff.

https://www.usmd.edu/about_usm/

2. Best Practices Recommendations:

Based on the findings, consultants will recommend the best practice improvements for the USM’s executive compensation process, focusing on:

• Enhancements to the USM’s current practices to align with industry standards in higher education executive compensation.

• Alternatives for the current compensation-setting methodology or individual elements thereof if they could improve the effectiveness and transparency of USM’s decision-making.

Scope of Work

The compensation study will encompass the following roles totaling approximately 110 positions:

1. USM Chancellor

2. Presidents of USM Institutions

3. Executive Directors at the Three USM Regional Centers

4. Employees at the USM System's Office

Scope Details

1. Market Analysis: Conduct benchmarking across these roles, considering higher education and relevant public/private sectors.

2. Data Collection: Gather detailed data on all elements of compensation, including base salary, benefits, deferred compensation, bonuses, and other remunerative elements.

3. Peer Comparisons: Establish relevant peer groups for each position to assess competitive positioning and internal equity.

4. Recommendations: Provide actionable, data-driven recommendations specific to each role.

5. Compliance and Equity Review: Ensure that all recommendations align with applicable Maryland and federal regulations and address internal equity.

Deliverables

1. Comprehensive Report: A written report with findings, analyses, and recommendations.

2. Presentation: An executive summary for the Committee on Organization and

Compensation.

3. Data Tables: Data tables for internal USM use in future analyses.

4. Project Timeline: Timeline for each project phase and deliverable.

Project Timeline

Proposals should provide a timeline for each phase, from project initiation to final submission.

Evaluation Criteria

Proposals will be evaluated based on:

• Experience with similar studies

• Understanding of the higher education sector

• Quality and clarity of deliverables

• Timeline and project milestone adherence

Appendices

Include additional documents as necessary, such as institution lists and organizational charts.

SECTION 2

Instructions and Notices to Contractors

2.1 Issuing Office

The sole point of contact at the University of Maryland, College Park (UMCP), for purposes of this Request for Proposal (RFP), is the Issuing Office. The Issuing Office as identified on the Solicitation/Contract Form provided as Exhibit 1 is:

The University of Maryland Department of Procurement & Business Services 2113-R Chesapeake Building College Park, MD 20742

All contact throughout the process is to be made in writing, via email, throughout the RFP process with the exception of information received as a result of a Pre-Bid Conference. Responses to inquiries will be made in writing and issued to all known participants.

The Point of Contact is

Name Salem Alsai

Title Procurement Category Manager

Email Address salsai@umd.edu

2.2 Pre-Proposal Conference

There is no Pre-proposal conference for this procurement.

2.3 Questions

The Contractor is responsible for carefully reading and fully understanding the requirements, terms, and conditions of this RFP. All contact between Contractors and the University will be made formally at scheduled meetings or in writing through the Issuing Office with the identified Point of Contact.

Requests for clarification or additional information must be submitted in writing, via email, to the Point of Contact and received by the Issuing Office no later than May 1, 2025 at 3:00 PM. These requests are to contain the following subject line:

“QUESTIONS: RFP # 00000111-SA”. Outside of the Pre-bid meeting, only written communications relative to the procurement will be responded to. It is incumbent upon the Contractor to verify University receipt of their questions.

All questions will be answered in writing. Questions and answers will be distributed, without identification of the inquirer(s), to all Contractors who are on record with the Procurement Officer as having received this RFP. Oral communications are not to be relied upon for proposal purposes. Any communication received from parties other than the identified Point of Contact are to be considered non-authoritative in nature.

To the extent that a question causes a change to any part of this RFP, an amendment shall be issued addressing such.

mailto:salsai@umd.edu

2.4 Submission of Proposals

Proposals must be:

(1) submitted in the designated format

(2) made in the official name of the firm or individual under which Contractor's business is conducted (including the official business address),

(3) signed by a person duly authorized to commit Contractor to the proposal, electronic signatures are acceptable

(4) submitted electronically clearly marked with the assigned RFP number and

Contractor name as described below

(5) separated into Technical and Financial volumes, and

(6) addressed to the Procurement Officer identified as the Point of Contact in the

Issuing Office

The Contractor must submit one electronic version of the Technical volume plus one electronic version of the Financial volume separately to the following Box folder:

https://umd.app.box.com/f/319c2229c0aa4e37a14aeb75eba3102c

Commingling of technical and financial information or failure to submit the two volumes separately, or as instructed, may result in the proposal being deemed non-acceptable. Submittals deemed non-acceptable will be rejected. The volumes, which contain the offer to be considered, must be clearly identified as the RFP# 00000111-SA

- Contractor Name, Technical Volume and RFP# 00000111-SA - Contractor Name, Financial Volume.

NOTE: PROPOSALS SUBMITTED THROUGH MEANS OTHER THAN IDENTIFIED WILL

NOT BE ACCEPTED.

2.5 Due Date

Proposals must arrive at the location identified in Section 2.4 of this document on or before May 8, 2025 at 3:00 PM.

Depending upon the subject matter of the RFP, Contractors may be required to submit hard copy proposals. In these instances, Contractors are to allow sufficient time for delivery to ensure timely receipt by the Issuing Office.

Proposals, amendments to proposals, or requests for withdrawal of proposals arriving after the closing time and date shall not be considered.

There shall be no public opening of the proposals. The names of Contractors will not be released until after award.

2.6 Late Proposals

Any proposal, request for withdrawal, or modification of a proposal including a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) that is not received at the designated location at the designated due date and time will be considered late and will be rejected as non-acceptable.

Delivery of the proposal to the specified location by the prescribed date and time is the sole responsibility of the Contractor. Exceptions may be authorized, at the sole https://umd.app.box.com/f/319c2229c0aa4e37a14aeb75eba3102c discretion of the Procurement Officer, when the reason for the late proposal, late request for withdrawal, late modification of a proposal or BAFO is due to the action or inaction of the University. A record of the late proposal, request for withdrawal, modification of a proposal or BAFO will be retained in the appropriate procurement file.

2.7 Duration of Proposal Offer

Proposals will be valid for a minimum of 120 days following the closing date of this RFP. If an award is not made during that period, the proposal will automatically extend for another 120 days, unless the Contractor gives specific written notice to the Procurement Officer at least 15 days before the expiration of the then current 120 day period. Proposals will automatically renew for an additional 120 days until such time as an award is made or proper written notice is given to the University of Contractor's intent to withdraw its proposal. By submission of a proposal, Contractor guarantees that its offer shall be firm for the period specified in this clause.

2.8 Amendments to the RFP

If it becomes necessary to revise any part of this RFP, notice of the revision will be issued in the form of an Amendment to Contractors on record with the Procurement Officer as having received this RFP. All Amendments shall become a part of this RFP. Each Contractor is required to acknowledge receipt of Amendments. Failure of a Contractor to acknowledge any Amendment will not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for complying with the content of the Amendment.

2.9 Alternate Proposals

Alternate proposals shall not be allowed or accepted, nor will they be considered, for this solicitation.

2.10 Economy of Preparation

Each proposal is to be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of the Contractor's offer and capabilities to satisfy the requirements of this RFP.

Emphasis is to be placed on clarity of content and providing a complete response.

2.11 Unable to Propose

If Contractor is unable or unwilling to submit a proposal in response to the requirements, Contractor must indicate this in writing to the Procurement Officer on or before the proposal due date. Electronic mail is an acceptable delivery method for submittal of the Contractor’s inability to submit a proposal. UMD requests that Contractors who are unable to respond include a brief explanation of the rationale for non-submission of a proposal.

2.12 Public Information Act Notice

Contractors are required to specifically identify those portions of their proposals that they deem to contain confidential, proprietary information, or trade secrets. The Contractor is further required to provide specific justification, with respect to each separate portion identified, as to why the materials, upon request, should not be disclosed by the State under the Access to Public Records Act, State Government Article, Title 10, Subtitle 6, Annotated Code of Maryland.

For claims of confidentiality to be considered, Contractors must clearly identify and provide individual justification for each and every section that is claimed to contain confidential, proprietary information or trade secrets. It is not sufficient to preface your proposal with a proprietary statement, or to use a page header or footer that arbitrarily marks some or all pages as confidential. General claims of confidentiality or similar blanket designations will not be accepted and may result in a proposal being deemed non-acceptable, at the discretion of the Procurement Officer.

2.13 Cancellation of the RFP

The University may cancel this RFP, in whole or in part, or reject any or all proposals submitted in response to the RFP when such action is determined to be fiscally advantageous to the

University and/or the State or otherwise in the best interest of the University and/or the State.

2.14 Two Volume Proposal

The selection procedure for this procurement requires an independent evaluation of the technical and financial proposals. This separation allows for evaluation of technical proposals, on a “go/no-go” or “pass/fail” decisional rule based on meeting the technical specifications and business requirements. Consequently, Contractor is required to submit its proposal in two separately volumes as indicated in Section 2.4.

2.15 Volume 1 - Technical Specifications and Business Requirements

2.15.1 Executive Management Summary

The Contractor’s response is to contain an Executive/Management Summary. This section of the Contractor’s offer is to contain a brief synopsis of how the Contractor's proposal meets the needs of the University. Briefly outline the proposed approach and understanding of USM’s goals.

2.15.2 Technical Volume

Contractors are expected to read the specifications, requirements, and qualifications very carefully and to submit questions, in writing, by the due date for questions.

Misinterpretation of specifications, requirements, or qualifications by the Contractor do not relieve the Contractor of responsibility to accurately address these components of this RFP or to perform the contract, if awarded.

The information/items specified as Specifications, Requirements, and/or Qualifications must be addressed in the technical proposal. The proposal must expressly indicate that it satisfies each point of the RFP Requirements, Specifications and/or Qualifications referenced in Section 4. Simple YES or NO responses to stated requirements are insufficient. The Contractor must describe in detail how the proposed products and/or services meet or exceed the stated requirements. The Contractor must explain any exception or deviation from the requirements. In cases where the Contractor cannot or does not meet a requirement, this must be clearly stated along with the reason for not meeting the Requirement, Specification, or Qualification.

The Technical Volume must contain:

Exhibit 1 - Solicitation/Contract Form Contractors must complete Exhibit 1 - Solicitation/Contract Form (Section 5) as part of the Technical Volume. Failure to submit this document, signed by a person duly authorized to commit Contractor to the proposal may cause the Contractor’s proposal to be rejected, at the sole discretion of the University.

Completed Section 4 & 5 Mandatory Requirements and affidavits

1- All required information listed as Contractor Data (Section 4.1) 2- Contractor Qualifications (Section 4.2) 3- Technical Requirements (Section 4.4) 4- All affidavits, addenda, and disclosures included as Exhibits (Section 5)

The University may make a final determination regarding a proposal’s acceptability solely on the basis of the proposal as submitted. The University is under no obligation to seek clarification for missing information or to repair responses that are deemed to be incomplete

2.16 Volume 2 - Financial Volume

This volume consists of and must contain the offered pricing information in the format required by the University. Contractors are not to include any technical information or specifications in the financial volume. Inclusion of technical requirements in the Financial Volume, unless technical details are necessary to provide pricing clarity, may result in in disqualification of the Contractor’s response particularly if said technical details are not included in the Technical Volume.

2.16.1 Pricing Section

The Contractor is required to use the provided Pricing Proposal Form (Section 4.5).

The Contractor is required to submit their proposal for pricing on the Price Proposal Form provided when an electronic Pricing Matrix is not used. Using Price Proposal Form will help ensure consistency in the financial evaluation. The price proposal form is to be completed in full when used for submittal of pricing.

2.16.2 Financial Viability

The University reserves the right to require, during proposal evaluation, that the Contractor provide a copy of its most current Annual Report or audited Statement of Financial Condition to include a Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Cash Flow Statement or other acceptable financial information. These documents may be relied on in any determination regarding Contractor financial responsibility and suitability for contract award.

2.16.3 Best and Final Offers

The University reserves the right to request best and final offers (BAFO) following evaluation of technical and pricing proposals. Contractors must submit BAFO pricing information in the format required, on or before the date and time indicated on the BAFO request, and using the means of submission indicated by the Procurement Officer.

SECTION 3

Evaluation, Award, Contract Formation, Debriefing of Unsuccessful Proposers, Protests and Claims, Contract Implementation Meeting

3.1 Evaluation Method

3.1.1 The University intends to make an award to best value acceptable offeror. In order to be considered technically acceptable, Contractors must meet all technical specifications and business requirements as delineated in this solicitation. Only those Contractors meeting the technical specifications and business requirements (supplier qualifications, including financial viability) will be considered in the Financial evaluation stage.

3.1.2 Technical Evaluation

3.1.2.1 Evaluation Committees

The Procurement Officer shall establish separate technical and financial evaluation committees to review and rate the proposals. The financial evaluation committee may be composed of the Procurement Officer and any other individuals appointed by the Procurement Officer. The technical evaluation committee shall be composed of other individuals appointed by the Procurement Officer.

3.1.2.2 Acceptability of Proposals

The Procurement Officer shall determine which contractors have met the basic requirements of the RFP

Failure to comply with any mandatory requirement will normally disqualify a contractor's proposal

The Procurement Officer shall have the sole authority to determine whether any deviation from the requirements of this RFP is substantial in nature

The Procurement Officer may waive or permit to be cured minor irregularities or minor informalities in proposals that are immaterial or inconsequential in nature, whenever it is determined to be in the University’s best interest

The Procurement Officer may reject in whole or in part any and all proposals if such is in the University’s interest, and may conduct discussions with contractors in any manner deemed necessary to best serve the interests of the University

The University reserves the right to make an award to more than one contractor or to split an award among contractors

3.1.2.3 Technical Evaluation

Evaluation of technical proposals will be based on “go/no-go” or “pass/fail” decisional rule, applied to each technical specification and business requirement delineated below.

A no-go or fail rating will eliminate a Contractor from further consideration. The Contractor either meets or does not meet each of the technical specifications and business requirements.

There is no merit or extra credit awarded for exceeding the requirements.

Only those Contractors meeting the technical specifications and business requirements will be considered for financial evaluation.

The Technical Evaluation Committee may request site visits for the purpose of evaluating proposals and/or Contractor's responsibility. The

Committee may request additional technical assistance from any source. Industry standard references may be used during the evaluation process.

3.1.2.4 Evaluation Criteria

The following minimum technical requirements must be met for the Contractor proposal to be considered technically acceptable

• Experience with similar studies

• Understanding of the higher education sector.

• Quality and clarity of deliverables.

• Timeline and project milestone adherence.

The terms "must" or "shall” and “required” are used throughout this document to indicate mandatory requirements. Contractors must meet all the requirements and specifications; that is, that the Contractor is fully capable of delivering the items and providing the services as specified in this RFP.

3.1.3 Oral Presentations

3.1.3.1 At the sole discretion of the Procurement Officer, short-listed Proposers may be invited to provide an oral presentation and product demonstration.

Information provided during this phase will be used to supplement the prior evaluation of the written technical proposal and the final evaluation of technical capabilities will take into account both the written technical proposal and the oral presentation/product demonstrations.

3.1.3.2 The University reserves the right to waive the Oral Presentation/Product Demonstration, in which case the technical evaluation will be based on the written technical proposal submittal alone. Proposers are therefore encouraged to submit the best possible proposal at each opportunity for submittal

3.1.3.3 The due date and time of the oral presentation/product demonstration will be determined by the University upon evaluation completion of Technical Proposals. The actual date will be verified with the applicable Proposers at the time the presentation is requested. Refer to the Solicitation Schedule for tentative dates. Proposers are advised to set these dates aside so as to avoid a conflict

3.1.3.4 The oral presentation will be informal, as the University is not interested in a marketing presentation, rather, it will be a casual and informal format in which to view the Proposers presentations, etc.

3.1.3.5 The purpose and parameters of the Oral Presentation/Product demonstration will be defined by the Procurement Officer at the time of scheduling. This information may be included in Technical requirements in those instances when it is a requirement for short-listed Contractors.

3.1.3.6 The criteria and format of the demonstration will be provided with the written request to conduct an oral presentation.

3.1.4 Financial Evaluation

Only those Contractors meeting the technical specifications and business requirements will be considered in the Financial Volume evaluation. The Financial Volume evaluation will consist of ranking on the basis of overall best value to the University and State when considering technical submittal. Information from the pricing proposal sheet contained in the Pricing Matrix or on the Price Proposal Form will be used to compute the total price.

3.2 Evidence of Responsibility

Prior to the award of a contract pursuant to this RFP, the Procurement Officer may require

Contractor to submit such additional information bearing upon Contractor's ability to perform the contract as the Procurement Officer deems appropriate. The Procurement Officer may also consider any information otherwise available concerning the financial, technical, and other qualifications or abilities of the Contractor.

3.3 Solicitation, Proposal, Acceptance, Award and Discussion

This RFP creates no obligation on the part of the University to award a contract or to compensate Contractors for proposal preparation expenses. The University reserves the unilateral right to cancel this solicitation at any time and to accept or reject any and all proposals, in whole or in part, received in response to this RFP; the unilateral right to award a contract in whole or in part; to award a contract to one Contractor; and to waive or permit cure of minor irregularities; and to conduct discussions with Contractors in any manner necessary to serve the best interest of the University.

Discussions may be conducted with those Contractors who submit proposals initially judged by the Procurement Officer to be reasonably susceptible of being selected for award. However, the University reserves the right to award a contract based upon the proposals received without further discussions.

3.4 Negotiation

The University has the right to accept the best proposal as submitted, without discussion or negotiation. Contractors should therefore not rely on having a chance to discuss, negotiate and adjust their proposals.

Contractors who submit proposals initially judged by the Procurement Officer to be reasonably susceptible of being selected for award may be asked to discuss their proposals with the University to facilitate arrival at a contract most advantageous to the University. If the Procurement Officer determines that discussion is in the best interest of the University, the Procurement Officer will advise contractors to submit a best and final offer for consideration after discussions are held.

However, discussions may not be conducted if the Procurement Officer determines either that discussions are not in the best interests of the University or that discussions need not be conducted: (a) with respect to prices that are fixed by law or regulation, although consideration shall be given to competitive terms and conditions; (b) because the time of delivery or performance does not permit discussions; or (c) because it can be demonstrated clearly from the existence of adequate competition or accurate prior price experience with the particular item that acceptance of an initial offer without negotiation would result in a fair and reasonable price.

3.5 Basis of Award

The University will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is determined to offers the best value to the University.

Recommended contract awards, if any, resulting from this RFP, may be subject to State and University approvals.

3.6 Formation of Agreement/Contract with Successful Contractor This RFP and any resulting contract shall be governed by the University System of Maryland

Procurement Policies and Procedures. These policies and procedures may be viewed at the following web site: https://www.usmd.edu/usm/procurement/procedures.html.

3.7 Debriefing of Unsuccessful Proposers

A debriefing of an unsuccessful proposer shall be conducted upon written request submitted to the Procurement Officer within ten (10) days of the date on which the proposer knew, or should have known, its proposal was unsuccessful. The debriefing shall be limited to a discussion of the proposer’s unsuccessful proposal. The debriefing will be oral and shall provide information on areas in which the proposal was deemed weak or insufficient. The debriefing will NOT include discussion of a competing offeror’s proposal or discussion, thoughts, notes or ranking from individual evaluation committee members. A summary of the Procurement Officer’s rationale for the selection may be given. Debriefings shall be conducted at the earliest feasible time.

3.8 Protests and Claims

Any protest regarding the award of this contract or claim arising out of this contract shall be administered in accordance with the University System of Maryland Procurement Policies and Procedures, Section XI - Protests and Claims. Detail is available by accessing the following web site https://www.usmd.edu/usm/procurement/procedures.html.

3.9 Contract Implementation Meeting

Contractor receiving an award under this solicitation may be required to attend a Contract

Implementation Meeting to be held after contract award, as scheduled by the Procurement Officer. The location and agenda for this meeting will be communicated to the Contractor by the Procurement Officer.

about:blank

SECTION 4

Mandatory Requirements

Contractor is required to provide the information listed below. Failure to comply with this instruction may result in disqualification of Contractors proposal.

4.1 Contractor Data

The Contractor’s proposal must include the following information

4.1.1 Contractor/Company Details

4.1.1.1 Contractor (Company/Corporate) Name (as it appears on current W-9)

4.1.1.2 Contractor Primary Business Location/Address

4.1.1.3 Contractor to provide company organization chart and staffing profile including tenure for staff

4.1.1.4 Contractor Main Point of Contact (POC)

4.1.1.4 Contractor POC Contact Information, location, telephone number, cell phone number, email address

4.1.1.5 Contractor Office that will service the University

4.1.1.6 Contractor Tax Identification Number and current W-9

4.1.1.7 Contractor Parent Company (if applicable)

4.1.1.8 Parent Company business location

4.1.1.9 Contractor Authorized Signer for contractual purposes

4.1.1.10 Name and Address for delivery of notices

4.1.1.11 Contractor Small Business status and Maryland Small Business Certification

Number with certificate provided as attachment – if applicable

4.1.1.12 Contractor MBE status. If Contractor is an MBE company provide State of

Maryland MDOT MBE certification number and date of certification

4.1.1.13 If proposing company is not publicly traded, identify principal owners of company

4.1.2 Company Size

4.1.2.1 Identify the number of people employed by Contractor

4.1.2.2 Identify the current number of customers serviced by Contractor

4.1.2.3 Identify the number of customers serviced by the location that will service the University

4.1.3 Customer Service

4.1.3.1 Overview of customer service program

4.1.3.2 Customer Service key contact information

4.1.3.3 Location Customer Service is conducted from (if off-shore provide

Country/State/Province/City customer service is delivered from)

4.1.3.4 Hours of operation for Customer Service location servicing the University

4.2 Contractor Qualifications

The Contractor’s proposal must include the following information

4.2.1 References

Offerors must have in-depth expertise and experience in the analysis of executive compensation, particularly in the field of public higher education. Offerors must provide a minimum of three (3) and no more than six (6) references and ancillary information on the reference form provided below. This must include a summary of prior executive compensation study projects the company has completed over the past three (3) years that are comparable in size and scope to the project detailed herein.

The University will consider all listed Projects to be valid references. Reference sheet is attached.

Reference Sheet

1 - REFERENCE

Name of Client:

Client Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

Contact E-Mail Address:

City/State:

Project Description:

Project Term (Start and End Date):

Project Description sufficient to explain the scope and nature of the

Project:

Justification of Similar Size and Scope to

USM:

2 - REFERENCE

Client Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

Contact E-Mail Address:

City/State:

Project Description:

Project Term (Start and End Date):

Project Description sufficient to explain

3 - REFERENCE

Client Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

Contact E-Mail Address:

City/State:

Project Description:

Project Term (Start and End Date):

Project Description sufficient to explain

4 - REFERENCE

Client Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

Contact E-Mail Address:

City/State:

Project Description:

Project Term (Start and End Date):

Project Description sufficient to explain

5 - REFERENCE

Client Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

Contact E-Mail Address:

City/State:

Project Description:

Project Term (Start and End Date):

Project Description sufficient to explain

6 - REFERENCE

Client Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

Contact E-Mail Address:

City/State:

Project Description:

Project Term (Start and End Date):

Project Description sufficient to explain

4.2.2 Contractor problem resolution and escalation process

4.2.2.1 Contractor is required to outline the Contractor’s escalation process for problem resolution

4.2.2.2 Contractor is to identify and provide key contacts including title and contact information for the individuals involved in the escalation process

4.3 Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) Participation

MBE goal is not applicable for this procurement.

4.4 Technical Requirements

The Contractor is required to complete the Technical Requirements Matrix provided in this section. Failure to complete the Requirements Matrix will result in disqualification of the Contractor’s proposal.

The Contractor shall fill out the column “Respondent Comments”, explaining how the

Contractor’s solution meets the requirement.

Requirements/Specifications will be identified by a code designating its level of importance.

Priority Codes are as follows:

Priority Codes:

M = Mandatory

I = Information

HD = Highly Desirable

D – Desirable Requirement

/C = Contractor must Confirm agreement to this requirement (ie: M/C)

/E = Contractor must explain how their solution meets this requirement. (ie: M/E)

Item

Description Priority Respondent Comments

4.4 – PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.4.1 Firm Background Information

Provide background information for your Firm to include, at a minimum, a description of the firm including size, locations, number of years in business, and primary services provided.

M/E Explain:

4.4.2 Experience

Describe experience in completing similar consulting efforts within the last three (3) years. Provide a minimum of three (3) successful projects similar in scope, at least one (1) of these projects must be

M/E Explain:

related to a public higher education institution, preferable a University System similar in size to USM.

4.4.3 Samples of Past Compensation

Studies

Provide a minimum of three (3) samples of past studies. These may be redacted for confidentially reasons if necessary but should include sufficient detail to evaluate the scope of the sample of the studies.

M/C Confirm and attach requested documentation.

The requested samples of past compensation studies are attached

Yes/ No

4.4.4 Proposed Methodology to

Accomplish the Project

Discuss your Firms approach to the project. This shall include, at a minimum, a description of process and methodology, an anticipated project timeline or schedule from project start to final report. Include any anticipated project milestones, status reports and presentations.

M/E Explain:

4.4.5 Proposed Project Organization

and Management

Discuss your Firms proposed organization and management of the project. This shall include, at a minimum, a description of;

- The key personnel and anticipated Level of Effort (LOE). Identify key personnel (staff) and the responsibilities, provide resumes of all proposed staff, and provide personnel availability and accessibility during the proposed project timeline.

M/E Explain:

LOE shall include the not to exceed total number of consulting hours proposed broken out by project phase and staff.

- Details regarding what work can be accomplished on-site versus off-site.

- The process for follow-up or assistance once the study is completed.

- Details for the estimated USM resources required to complete the project.

This should include the estimated USM staff needed to provide support for the project, estimated LOE for USM staff, and any on-site resources needed such as meeting space, projectors, access to printers, etc.

- Describe the final project deliverables and documentation.

4.4.6 Compliance Confirmation

Affirm adherence to Maryland and federal regulations relevant to executive compensation.

M/C Confirm:

4.5 Pricing Section

Offerors are required to submit pricing using the Price Proposal Form furnished by the University. The

Offeror shall propose a firm not-to-exceed fee amount and a firm not-to-exceed number of man-hours anticipated for the completion of the executive compensation study in accordance with the scope of work listed in Section 1.

The firm not-to-exceed fee on the Proposal Price Form submitted must be inclusive of all associated costs including, but not limited to: fringe, mark-up, overhead, G&A, and profit.

This should not include reimbursable expenses for travel related costs. Reimbursements for travel related expenses are allowed. Reimbursements the University makes to the Contractor for incidental, out-of-pocket expenses the Contractor incurs pursuant to the Contract must comply with the Board of

Regents Policy on University System Travel (VIII - 11.00- February 28, 1992), and the Schedule of

Reimbursement Rates (FY 2015)(VIII - 11.10 - Approved by the Chancellor, December 18, 2014)

(http://www.usmd.edu/Leadership/BoardofRegents/Bylaws/SectionVIII).

Blanks on the price proposal form will be interpreted as zero (0) and no price will be allowed for that item. The Statement of Work is described in Section 1 of this document.

Price Proposal Form

RFP# 00000111-SA

COMPENSATION STUDY FEE

Firm not-to-exceed fee amount and a firm not-to-exceed number of man-hours for completion of the compensation study:

Item # Description Cost

1 Project Fee (Firm-fixed Fee) $ ________

Not-to-exceed man-hours _______

REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES

Provide estimates for the costs of travel and reimbursable expenses to USM for completion of the compensation study:

Item # Description Cost_____________

2 Estimated Reimbursable Expenses $ ________ __

Vendor Name Authorized Signature Date

Street Address City/State/Zip Code Federal Tax Id No.

Email address Phone Fax http://www.usmd.edu/Leadership/BoardofRegents/Bylaws/SectionVIII

Affidavits over 200K; V.1 Revised 11-29-16 24

SECTION 5

Proposal and Contract Terms and Conditions

The University of Maryland Standard Terms and Conditions apply to University of Maryland College Park (UMD) procurements.

AFFIDAVITS, ADDENDA, AND FEDERAL FLOW DOWNS- The following affidavits, addenda, and Federal flow downs may apply to this Contract and will automatically attach based upon the nature of the procurement and/or funding source. All Affidavits and Addenda requiring signature must be completed by the Contractor and returned to the UMD Procurement and Business Services and must reference the associated Purchase Order Number or transaction number (if ordered by credit card).

UMD ACCESSIBILITY ADDENDUM (for any and all web-based deliverables (including, but not limited to, off the shelf software, custom developed software, and related goods or services used to create, maintain or update the University’s Web pages, Web content, Web-based applications, online instructional content, services and resources.)

UMD CONTRACT AND BID/PROPOSAL AFFIDAVITS (for all Contracts exceeding $200,000, Contractor shall execute the Bid/Proposal and Contract Affidavit required by the University, which shall be in substantially the same form as the Maryland forms at the time the Contract is executed by the University. Additional University certifications may be required for Contracts of any dollar amount. Any additional required documents and certifications, not included herein, will be identified and provided by the Procurement Officer as part of the procurement process.)

UMD FEDERAL FLOW-DOWN CLAUSES (for any Contract funded by a federal contact, grant, or cooperative agreement.) https://purchase.umd.edu/umd-federal-uniform-guidance-flowdown-provisions or https://purchase.umd.edu/umd-federal-government-flowdown-provisions

UMD SECURE/SENSITIVE DATA ADDENDUM (for contracts involving sensitive data, including but not limited to Personal Data and identifiers, FERPA Data, Cardholder or other PCI Data, or Health Information.)

UMD PROCUREMENT INSURANCE ADDENDUM (for contracts over $200,000, or for work performed on University premises, or using equipment or facilities owned, occupied or used by the University, or as otherwise required by the University.)

SECTION 889 AFFIDAVIT (for procurements for equipment/devices or services that include video surveillance, cameras, telecommunications. This federally required affidavit must be completed by the Contractor and returned to the buyer.

ANTI-BRIBERY

Contractor warrants that neither it nor any of its officers, directors, or partners nor any of its employees who are directly involved in obtaining or performing contracts with any public body has been convicted of bribery, attempted bribery, or conspiracy to bribe under the laws of any state or of the federal government or has engaged in conduct since July 1, 1977, which would constitute bribery, attempted bribery, or conspiracy to bribe under the laws of any state or the federal government.

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND RFP# 00000111-SA

Affidavits over 200K; V.2 Revised 2022 25

COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

Contractor hereby represents and warrants that:

It is qualified to do business in the State of Maryland (whether a domestic business or a foreign corporation subject to registration under the Corporations and Associates Article of the Maryland Annotated Code) and that it will take such action as, from time to time hereafter, may be necessary to remain so qualified;

It is not in arrears with respect to the payment of any moneys due and owing the State of Maryland, or any department or unit thereof, including but not limited to the payment of taxes and employee benefits, and that it shall not become so in arrears during the term of this Contract;

It shall comply with all federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances applicable to its activities and obligations under this Contract, including but not necessarily limited to: Maryland Building Codes, Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Maryland Occupational Safety and Health Act and related regulations; and

It shall obtain, at its expense, all licenses, permits, insurance and governmental approvals, if any, necessary to the performance of its obligations under this Contract.

CONFIDENTIALITY; DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

Contractor shall not release any information related to services or performance of the services under this Contract, nor publish any final reports or documents without the prior written approval of the University.

Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and the University, its officers, agents and employees from all harm which may be incurred by reason of dissemination, publication, distribution or circulation, in any manner whatsoever, of any information, data, documents, or materials pertaining in any way to this Contract by Contractor, its agents or employees.

CONFLICTING TERMS AND ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

Any proposal for terms in addition to or different from those set forth in the Solicitation or Contract or any attempt by the Contractor to vary any of the terms of this offer by Contractor's acceptance shall not operate as a rejection of this offer, unless such variance is in the terms of the description, quantity, price or delivery schedule, but shall be deemed a material alteration thereof, and this offer shall be deemed acceptable by the Contractor without the additional or different terms. If this Solicitation or Contract is an acceptance of a prior offer by the Contractor, the acceptance is expressly conditioned upon Contractor's assent to any additional or different terms contained herein. The Contractor understands and agrees that the terms and conditions of this Solicitation or Contract may not be waived.

In the event of a conflict, the University of Maryland's Terms and Conditions shall take precedence over any terms specifically identified in Contractor's proposal or any other forms or documents provided by Contractor. The University is not, and shall not be, bound by any other terms in or referenced by Contractor's proposal, invoices, form(s), or online terms and conditions unless such terms are specifically incorporated herein.

CONTRACTOR'S INVOICES

Contractor shall include the Purchase Order Number and its Taxpayer Identification Number on the face of each invoice billed to the University. Failure to provide this information on invoicing may result in delayed payment.

Affidavits over 200K; V.2 Revised 2022 26

DELAYS AND EXTENSION OF TIME

The Contractor agrees to perform the work continuously and diligently and no charges or claims for damages shall be made by it for any delays or hindrances from any cause whatsoever during the progress of any portion of the work specified in this Contract.

Time extensions will be granted only for excusable delays that arise from unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including but not restricted to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of the State in either its sovereign or contractual capacity, acts of another Contractor in the performance of a contract with the State, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, or delays of subcontractors or suppliers arising from unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of either the Contractor or the subcontractors or suppliers.

DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE

Delivery shall be made in accordance with the specifications in the Solicitation and Contract. The University, in its sole discretion, may extend the time of performance for excusable delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the Contractor's control. The University unilaterally may order in writing the suspension, delay, or interruption of performance hereunder. The University reserves the right to test any materials, equipment, supplies, or services delivered to determine if the specifications have been met.

Materials shall be delivered FOB to the point or points specified in the bid or proposal, on the date either agreed to in advance or specified in the bid or proposal. Any material that is defective or fails to meet the terms of the specifications may be rejected. Rejected materials shall be promptly replaced. If Contractor fails to promptly replace rejected materials, the University reserves the right to purchase replacement materials in the open market. Contractor shall be liable for costs to replace materials incurred by the University which exceed the bid proposal or Contract price, including expenses such as, but not necessarily limited to, shipping and delivery, if any.

DISPUTES

Pending resolution of a claim, the Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of the Contract in accordance with the Procurement Officer's decision.

DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE

The Contractor warrants that the Contractor shall comply with COMAR 21.11.08 (Drug and Alcohol Free Workplace), and that the Contractor shall remain in compliance throughout the term of this Contract.

EXPORT CONTROL

This Contract is subject to US export control regulations including, when applicable, the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and the Office of Foreign Asset Control sanctions programs. Each party is responsible for compliance with applicable export and import regulations, and associated embargo and sanction regulations. If any of the materials or information to be furnished under this Contract is a controlled technology on the US Munitions List of the ITAR, Contractor must contact and receive written approval from the UMD Export Compliance Office (export@umd.edu) prior to acceptance of this Contract.

FERPA (FAMILY EDUCATION RIGHTS AND…