Answered Questions and Answers RFI-ARMY-DTSPO-2026-0420 (04-27-2026).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFI-ARMY-DTSPO-2026-0420
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document addressing clarifications to RFI-ARMY-DTSPO-2026-0420, a market research solicitation issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), Huachuca Division. The RFI seeks a comprehensive enterprise-scale Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) solution for governance, data tagging, and records management within the U.S. Army's Microsoft 365 environment. Key clarifications from the Q&A document indicate that work will be primarily remote, CONUS-based, with possible travel to Fort Huachuca, Arizona required depending on the proposed solution. The Government will evaluate both single COTS platform providers and integrated solutions combining multiple best-of-breed tools. Solutions must integrate with Microsoft Purview and SharePoint, with responses including implementation, configuration, and sustainment details as necessary. The Government is open to solutions that extend native Microsoft 365 capabilities through orchestration and policy automation, as well as enterprise data governance platforms integrated with M365-native enforcement mechanisms.
Additional details from the Q&A clarify that the Government has not yet determined an acquisition strategy for follow-on actions and will use RFI results to assess industry capabilities and inform future decisions regarding small business set-asides or teaming structures. Due to the potentially sensitive nature of data being accessed (including PII/PHI), vendors are encouraged to detail methods reducing risk of unintended data exposure, with particular emphasis on Zero Vendor Access models where applicable. Responses to the RFI were due April 28, 2026, at 4:00 PM Arizona Time. The solicitation falls under NAICS Code 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services) and PSC Code DA01 (IT and Telecom - Business Application/Application Development Support Services).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Request for Information (RFI) RFI-ARMY-DTSPO-2026-0420.docx | DOCX document | |
| Data Tag and SPO - PWS - DRAFT.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q&A's
| Questions and Answers RFI-ARMY-DTSPO-2026-0420 | ||
| Question # | Question | Government Response |
| 1 | Regarding solicitation # RFI-ARMY-DTSPO-2026-0420, can you confirm the Place of Performance? I do not see it listed on the PWS or on SAM. | Intent is that work would primarily be remote, CONUS based. Some work/travel to Ft Huachuca, Arizona, may be required, depending on proposed solution. |
| 2 | COTS vs. Integrator Model – Is the Government primarily seeking a single COTS platform provider, or is there openness to integrators who combine multiple best-of-breed tools into a unified solution? | We will evaluate both single COTS platforms and integrated solutions. |
| 3 | Existing Tooling – Are there incumbent or currently deployed M365 governance or data protection tools that the Army expects to retain or integrate with? | Solution will need to integrate with MS Purview & SharePoint. |
| 4 | Small Business Participation – Is the Government considering small business participation strategies (e.g., set-aside, partial set-aside, or teaming structures) for any potential follow-on acquisition? | The Government has not yet determined an acquisition strategy for this requirement. The results of this RFI market research will be used to assess industry capabilities and inform any future decisions regarding small business set-asides or teaming strategies. |
| 5 | Implementation vs. Licensing Scope – Should responses focus strictly on the software solution, or also include implementation, configuration, and ongoing sustainment services? | Please include details for implementation, configuration and (if necessary) sustainment. |
| 6 | Does the Government envision a single, unified COTS platform meeting all functional requirements outlined in the RFI, or is a composable architecture acceptable—one that integrates multiple capabilities (e.g., governance modeling, policy enforcement, records management) under a unified governance and control framework? | We will evaluate both COTS platforms and composite solutions. |
| 7 | Additionally, we would appreciate any insight on the following: | |
| Whether solutions that extend and operationalize native Microsoft 365 capabilities (e.g., Microsoft Purview, SharePoint Online) through orchestration and policy automation are within scope | These are in scope, yes. | |
| The Government’s perspective on integrating enterprise data governance platforms (e.g., metadata-driven policy engines) with M365-native enforcement mechanisms | Intent is to expand on and enhance native capability. | |
| Any preference regarding vendor access models, specifically solutions designed to operate with zero vendor access post-deployment | Due to potentially sensitive data being accessed by the solution (e.g. PII/PHI), please include details of any methods to reduce risk of unintended data exposure, such as Zero Vendor Access models, where applicable. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .