RFA-NS-28-010-Full-Announcement.html
HTML file 139 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- RFA-NS-28-010
About this file
This is a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) and Request for Application (RFA) issued by the National Institutes of Health for the BRAIN Initiative: Research Opportunities Using Invasive Neural Recording and Stimulating Technologies in the Human Brain (RFA-NS-28-010). The funding opportunity is administered by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) in partnership with ten other NIH institutes and centers including the National Eye Institute, National Institute on Aging, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. The R01 activity code grant opportunity does not allow clinical trials and supports transformative, mechanistic research into human brain function using invasive neural recording and stimulation technologies during surgical procedures. Applications must investigate fundamental neuroscience questions revealing how neural activity generates internal experiences and observable behaviors; studies must maximize opportunities from direct brain access during invasive procedures and employ rigorous, mechanistic, and innovative approaches guided by theoretical constructs or quantitative models. Eligible applicants include higher education institutions, nonprofits, for-profit organizations, local and state governments, Indian tribal governments, federal agencies, and faith-based organizations, with project periods not exceeding five years and anticipated direct costs generally not exceeding $1 million per award.
The funding opportunity opens January 8, 2027, with multiple application due dates throughout 2027, 2028, and 2029, with an expiration date of February 9, 2029. The NIH intends to commit an estimated $8 million total to fund approximately 5 awards per receipt date. All PDs/PIs must commit at least 2.4 person-months throughout the award period and possess eRA Commons accounts linked to valid ORCID IDs. Applications require a mandatory one-page Team Management Plan describing organizational structure, governance, decision-making processes, and a designated consortium liaison; a Data Management and Sharing Plan compliant with BRAIN Initiative requirements; and detailed neuroethical considerations addressing informed consent, FDA risk assessment, device maintenance and removal, and long-term patient care plans. Review criteria emphasize significance and innovation of high-impact human neuroscience questions, rigor and feasibility of the mechanistic approach including appropriate sample sizes and justification for the human patient cohort and invasive procedures, and expertise of interdisciplinary teams comprising clinicians, scientists, device engineers, data scientists, regulatory specialists, and ethics experts. Funded investigators must participate in a consortium working group coordinated by NIH to establish consensus standards, standardize data collection and sharing, and address neuroethical considerations; travel costs for up to two key personnel to attend the BRAIN Initiative Biennial Conference are allowable budget items.
RFA-NS-28-010-Full-Announcement.html
Text of this file
Department of Health and Human Services
Part 1. Overview Information
Participating Organization(s)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Components of Participating Organizations
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
National Eye Institute (NEI)
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Funding Opportunity Title
BRAIN Initiative: Research Opportunities Using Invasive Neural Recording and Stimulating Technologies in the Human Brain (R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)
Activity Code
R01 Research Project Grant
Announcement Type
Reissue of
RFA-NS-22-041
Related Notices
Check for any recent Notices of NIH Policy Changes that may impact application requirements.
Funding Opportunity Number (FON)
RFA-NS-28-010
Companion Funding Opportunity
None
Number of Applications
See Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
Assistance Listing Number(s)
93.372, 93.853, 93.213, 93.173, 93.867, 93.242, 93.279, 93.866, 93.273, 93.286, 93.865
Funding Opportunity Purpose
This funding opportunity supports transformative, mechanistic research aimed at understanding how the human brain functions. Applications should seek to reveal how the dynamic activity of individual neurons and ensembles of neurons within spatially organized brain networks gives rise to internal experiences, such as sensations, perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and memories, as well as to observable motor and social behaviors.
To achieve fundamental mechanistic insights into human brain function, proposed studies are expected to leverage opportunities made possible by invasive surgical procedures in humans, such as intracranial recording or stimulation. These investigations may be enhanced by incorporating complementary experimental models or systems that provide access to knowledge, techniques, or resources not otherwise available in human neuroscience research. Such integration is encouraged to strengthen the mechanistic understanding of human brain function and to connect discoveries across species and biological scales. This program builds on cutting-edge advances enabled by the BRAIN Initiative and the broader neuroscience community.
Projects supported through this opportunity are expected to produce transformative outcomes by the end of the funding period. Approaches should be rigorous, mechanistic, and innovative by (1) maximizing opportunities to conduct innovative in vivo human neuroscience research made available by direct access to the human brain from invasive surgical procedures, (2) employing approaches guided by specified theoretical constructs and/or quantitative, mechanistic models.
Funded investigators will join a consortium working group, coordinated by the NIH, to identify consensus standards of practice, including neuroethical considerations, to collect and provide data for ancillary studies, and to aggregate and standardize data for dissemination among the wider scientific community.
Funding Opportunity Goal(s)
To provide extramural research support for the Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies® (BRAIN) Initiative's aim of revolutionizing our understanding of the brain and its function in unprecedented detail. The NIH BRAIN Initiative's focus is foundational development of new technologies and tools to map, monitor, and modulate brain circuits in model systems and humans – toward the ultimate goal of treating and curing human brain disorders.
Key Dates
Posted Date
September 30, 2026
Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)
January 08, 2027
| Application Due Dates |
| Review and Award Cycles |
| New |
| Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) |
| AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed |
| Scientific Merit Review |
| Advisory Council Review |
| Earliest Start Date |
February 08, 2027
February 08, 2027
Not Applicable
| July 2027 | |
| October 2027 |
December 2027
February 08, 2028
February 08, 2028
Not Applicable
| July 2028 | |
| October 2028 |
December 2028
February 08, 2029
February 08, 2029
Not Applicable
| July 2029 | |
| October 2029 |
December 2029
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Due Dates for E.O. 12372
Not Applicable
Expiration Date
February 09, 2029
Required Application Instructions
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
| There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity. | |
| Use the NIH ASSIST system to prepare, submit and track your application online. | |
| Use an institutional system-to-system (S2S) solution to prepare and submit your application to Grants.gov and eRA Commons to track your application. Check with your institutional officials regarding availability. | |
| Use Grants.gov Workspace to prepare and submit your application and eRA Commons to track your application. |
Table of Contents
Part 1. Overview Information Key Dates Part 2. Full Text of Announcement Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description Section II. Award Information Section III. Eligibility Information Section IV. Application and Submission Information Section V. Application Review Information Section VI. Award Administration Information Section VII. Agency Contacts Section VIII. Other Information
Part 2. Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description
Background Since 2014, the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies® (BRAIN) Initiative has aimed to accelerate the development and application of innovative neurotechnologies, enabling researchers to produce a new dynamic picture of the brain that reveals how individual cells and complex neural circuits interact in both time and space. It is expected that these advances will ultimately lead to new ways to treat and prevent brain disorders.
As one of several federal agencies involved in the BRAIN Initiative, NIH's contributions to the BRAIN Initiative were initially guided by "BRAIN 2025: A Scientific Vision," a strategic plan that detailed seven high-priority research areas. This plan was updated and enhanced in 2019 by: "The BRAIN Initiative 2.0: From Cells to Circuits, Toward Cures" and "The BRAIN Initiative and Neuroethics: Enabling and Enhancing Neuroscience Advances for Society." This and other BRAIN Initiative Notices of Funding Opportunities (NOFOs) are based on this vision and issued with input from Advisory Councils of the 10 NIH Institutes and Centers supporting the BRAIN Initiative, as assisted by the NIH BRAIN Multi-Council Working Group and Neuroethics Working Group.
The BRAIN Initiative requires a high level of coordination and sharing between investigators. BRAIN Initiative recipients are encouraged to cooperate and coordinate their activities after awards are made by participating in Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) meetings and in other activities such as the BRAIN Initiative Conference. The data sharing expectations for BRAIN Initiative awards can be found at BRAIN Data Knowledge Resources.
The BRAIN Initiative Research Opportunities in Human Neurosciences This Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) will support transformative, mechanistic investigations that leverage invasive surgical procedures in humans, such as recording and stimulating neuronal activity intracranially within precisely localized brain structures, to understand how the human brain functions. Applications should be high-impact investigations of how single cells and neuronal ensembles in spatially organized networks give rise to internal states, such as sensations, perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and memories, and to observable motor and social behaviors.
Projects will to produce transformative outcomes by the end of the funding period (e.g. rigorously challenge established neuroscience paradigms, overcome barriers to knowledge or practice, and generate innovative principles or models about human brain function). Approaches are should be rigorous, mechanistic, and innovative by (1) maximizing opportunities to conduct innovative in vivo human neuroscience research made available by direct access to the human brain from invasive surgical procedures, and (2) employing approaches guided by specified theoretical constructs and/or the development and testing of quantitative, mechanistic models. Bridging fundamental discoveries and approaches across species and biological scales is encouraged to strengthen the mechanistic understanding of human brain function. While fundamental basic research often provides insights relevant to disorders of the nervous system, this program is not intended to support research targeting disease mechanisms or therapeutics.
Interdisciplinary teams, comprising clinicians, scientists, device engineers, computational/data scientists, and regulatory and neuroethics experts, are essential. Mentorship that fosters expertise in human intracranial studies is encouraged. While teams may be based at a single institution, collaboration across sites, including new partnerships with centers not yet part of the Research Opportunities in Humans Consortium, is strongly recommended due to limited patient availability at any one center. Recipients are expected to actively participate in a consortium working group, coordinated by the NIH, to identify consensus standards of practice.
We anticipate that implantable devices for most of these applications will rely on existing technology sufficiently advanced for an IRB non-significant risk designation and/or FDA IDE without needing significant additional pre-clinical testing on the device, though newly IDE-approved devices may become available over the course of these awards. Investigators proposing to use non-FDA approved devices are strongly encouraged to complete any needed FDA risk assessment and/or the IDE process prior to submission. NIH BRAIN supports new device development and regulatory approval through other initiatives, including template Memoranda of Agreements (MOUs), Confidential Disclosure Agreements (CDAs) and Collaborative Research Agreements (CRAs) with device providers that may facilitate adoption of novel technologies.
Topics and Activities Supported Representative, but not exhaustive, examples of topics and activities that could be considered responsive to this NOFO:
Direct brain access and multimodal integration:
| Utilize intracranial recordings with or without stimulation. |
| Combine intracranial methods with non-invasive technologies, external wearables, or other modalities to measure brain function across spatial and temporal scales in real time. |
| Incorporate additional invasive or non-invasive measures (e.g., neurochemical recordings) in conjunction with intracranial approaches. |
| Leverage approved chronic implants (e.g., DBS systems, FDA-approved electrodes) to investigate brain function, plasticity, and network dynamics. |
| Pair quantitative psychophysics and behavioral assays with neural recordings/stimulation to test innovative mechanistic hypotheses, with behavioral timing aligned to neural resolution. |
Systems and circuit-level investigations:
| Develop new approaches to understand neural coding of sensory information, complex motor control, or social behaviors. |
| Investigate circuit functions underlying memory consolidation, retrieval, learning, spatial/relational processing, attention, and planning. |
| Examine distributed representations and information processing supporting higher-order cognition, including language, decision making, reasoning, numerical cognition, consciousness, and metacognition. |
| Study distributed circuits coordinating motivational states, emotion, and reward processing. |
| Apply empirical and analytical approaches to understand how behavioral states emerge from interactions among neurons, circuits, and networks. |
Integrative approaches:
| Incorporate complementary experimental systems or non-human animal studies to test mechanistic hypotheses not feasible in humans alone, with clear justification for species choice and relevance to fundamental principles of human brain function. |
| Pursue unique opportunities by applying emerging tools, computational methods, or conceptual frameworks (especially those developed through the BRAIN Initiative) to enable rigorous and mechanistic approaches. |
Prior Consultation with Scientific/Research Staff Consultation with relevant Scientific/Research staff is strongly recommended. to discuss responsiveness and fit with the goals of this NOFO and the mission of the BRAIN Initiative. Staff will not evaluate the technical and scientific merit of the proposed project.
| Applications that are not responsive to this NOFO and will not be reviewed include the following: | |
| Activities that do not include intracranial interventions in humans (recording with or without stimulation) | |
| Studies designed primarily to develop or improve disease/disorder therapeutics or devices. | |
| Studies for which the primary goal is to achieve regulatory approval of neurotechnology (see other BRAIN NOFOs which support this activity, and the NIH bioengineering grant program) or the peripheral nervous system (see NIH SPARC). | |
| Imaging approaches not coupled with intra-cranial interventions, recording or stimulation. | |
| Implementing rehabilitation therapies. | |
| Projects focused on enhancing mental and cognitive functions beyond what is necessary to maintain health. |
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Section II. Award Information
Funding Instrument
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.
Application Types Allowed
New
Renewal
Resubmission
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Clinical Trial?
Not Allowed: This NOFO only accepts applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.
Need help determining whether you are doing a clinical trial?
Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards
Issuing IC and partner components intend to commit an estimated total of up to $8M to fund 5 awards per receipt date.
Award Budget
Application budgets need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project. It is anticipated that most awards will not exceed $1M direct costs.
Award Project Period
The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period. The maximum project period is 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Organizations
| Higher Education Institutions - Includes all types | |
| Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education | |
| Private Institutions of Higher Education |
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
| Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education) |
| Nonprofits without 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education) |
For-Profit Organizations
| Small Businesses |
| For-Profit Organizations (Other than Small Businesses) |
Local Governments
| State Governments |
| County Governments |
| City or Township Governments |
| Special District Governments |
| Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Federally Recognized) |
| Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized). |
| Federal Governments | |
| Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government, including the NIH Intramural Program | |
| U.S. Territory or Possession |
Other
Independent School Districts
Public Housing Authorities/Indian Housing Authorities
Native American Tribal Organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)
Faith-based or Community-based Organizations
Regional Organizations
Applications Involving the NIH Intramural Research Program The requests by NIH intramural scientists will be limited to the incremental costs required for participation. As such, these requests will not include any salary and related fringe benefits for career, career conditional or other Federal employees (civilian or uniformed service) with permanent appointments under existing position ceilings or any costs related to administrative or facilities support (equivalent to Facilities and Administrative or F&A costs). These costs may include salary for staff to be specifically hired under a temporary appointment for the project, consultant costs, equipment, supplies, travel, and other items typically listed under Other Expenses. Applicants should indicate the number of person-months devoted to the project, even if no funds are requested for salary and fringe benefits. If selected, appropriate funding will be provided by the NIH Intramural Program. NIH intramural scientists will participate in this program as PDs/PIs in accord with the Terms and Conditions provided in this NOFO. However, Intramural Scientists cannot participate as MPI's on Extramural awards. Intellectual property will be managed in accord with established policy of the NIH in compliance with Executive Order 10096, as amended, 45 CFR Part 7; patent rights for inventions developed in NIH facilities are NIH property unless NIH waives its rights. Should an extramural application include the collaboration with an intramural scientist, no funds for the support of the intramural scientist may be requested in the application. The intramural scientist may submit a separate request for intramural funding as described above.
Foreign Organizations/International Collaborations
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
NIH will no longer issue awards (i.e., new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. See NIH Grants Policy Statement 16.8 Collaborative International Research Awards.
Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.
Required Registrations
Applicant Organizations Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply- Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information.
System for Award Management (SAM) – Applicants must complete and maintain an active registration, which requires renewal at least annually. The renewal process may require as much time as the initial registration. SAM registration includes the assignment of a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code for domestic organizations which have not already been assigned a CAGE Code. Foreign organizations must obtain a NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (in lieu of a CAGE code) in order to register in SAM. Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)- A UEI is issued as part of the SAM.gov registration process. The same UEI must be used for all registrations, as well as on the grant application.
| eRA Commons - Once the unique organization identifier is established, organizations can register with eRA Commons in tandem with completing their Grants.gov registrations; all registrations must be in place by time of submission. eRA Commons requires organizations to identify at least one Signing Official (SO) and at least one Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) account in order to submit an application. |
| Grants.gov – Applicants must have an active SAM registration in order to complete the Grants.gov registration. |
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s)) All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must be registered with ORCID. The personal profile associated with the PD(s)/PI(s) eRA Commons account must be linked to a valid ORCID ID. For more information on linking an ORCID ID to an eRA Commons personal profile see the ORCID topic in our eRA Commons online help.
Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Investigator)
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply-Application Guide.
2. Cost Sharing This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
3. Additional Information on Eligibility Number of Applications
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission (A1) application.
A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application.
An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.9.4 Similar, Essentially Identical, or Identical Applications).
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Requesting an Application Package The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise (in this NOFO, in a policy notice, or other notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Page Limitations All page limitations described in the How to Apply- Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
Instructions for Application Submission
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply- Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
SF424(R&R) Cover All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Other Project Information
Other Attachments:
Team management plan An "Other Attachment" of up to 1-page entitled "Team management plan" must be included as a separate attachment in pdf format. NIH strongly encourages applicants to form interdisciplinary teams that consist of clinicians, scientists, device engineers, mathematicians, statisticians, data scientists, regulatory experts and neuroethics specialists, as appropriate. This interdisciplinary team should be able to address the details of the plans and experiments, and to execute the research strategy. An organizational structure that clearly defines the team structure and relationships among the various components should be described in the team management plan and illustrated in an organizational chart. This plan should also describe the governance and organizational structure of the leadership team, including communication plans, processes for making decisions on scientific direction, and procedures for resolving conflicts. For publications, policies to address the ordering and recognition of authors, and decisions about what material to publish, consistent with the interests of commercial partners (where applicable), should be presented. The team management plan should establish a Scientific Steering Group that consists of representatives from each of the partnering organizations and meets regularly to discuss project status, problems, and directions. Those individuals identified in the team management plan, who together would have the intellectual and leadership responsibilities, would likely be members of the Scientific Steering Group. Plans for enhancing the abilities and opportunities for investigators to work across disciplinary boundaries should also be included. Although all team members are expected to actively participate in the Research Opportunities in Humans (ROH) consortium working group, the team should designate a team member who can undertake a larger leadership role towards consortium activities, including data coordination (e.g., standardization, harmonization, analyses, and data sharing pipelines, best practices for multimodal data acquisition and device integration) and neuroethics.
SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile
Applications to this NOFO should assemble integrated, multi-disciplinary teams of clinicians, scientists, device engineers, mathematicians, statisticians, data scientists, regulatory specialists and/or ethics specialists, as appropriate, to propose innovative research plans within the context of the unique research opportunities offered by these clinical procedures. These teams may be assembled within a single university or medical center, or may comprise integrated teams across multiple institutions to aggregate these limited opportunities to address high-impact neuroscience questions.
R&R or Modular Budget
The budget should include funds necessary for travel for up to two key personnel to participate in the BRAIN Initiative Biennial Conference.
Data sharing costs: Applicants may include costs associated with preparing and submitting data to a data archive (as outlined in the BRAIN data sharing policy: BRAIN Data Knowledge Resources.).
Research Budget: To be successful, programs of this level of complexity are expected to require significant effort from all PDs/PIs involved. All PDs/PIs must commit at least 2.4 person months (i.e., the equivalent of 20% effort on a full-year appointment, 26.67% on a 9-month appointment, or 40% on a 6-month appointment) throughout the duration of the award.
Certain supporting functions such as equipment, animal research costs, and clinical research costs may be requested if well justified and unique to the institution(s) involved. Within the research budget, equipment, including data sharing and management systems, can be included if well justified. Equipment that duplicates existing institutional or regional shared facilities that are available to investigators must be identified and the proposed duplication should be well justified. Do not request inflationary increases in the overall budget or any of the budget categories. Changes in budget should reflect changes in activities required by the science.
R&R Subaward Budget
PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement
PHS 398 Research Plan All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Research Strategy:
The goal of this Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is to support transformative and mechanistic human neuroscience investigations. Applications to this NOFO must propose to investigate fundamental questions in human neuroscience. Harmonization of research participant recruitment and methods (including collection, curation, and analysis) across multiple sites should be well planned and described as appropriate and consistent with achieving the goals of the program. While fundamental basic research often generates insights relevant to disorders of the nervous system, this NOFO is not intended to generate research that is explicitly disease-related. The project must appropriately engage interdisciplinary teams consisting of clinicians, scientists, device engineers, data/computational scientists, regulatory experts, and ethics specialists.
All applications are required to include the following points, which must be incorporated within the page limits of the Research Strategy:
| Statement of the fundamental questions in neuroscience to be addressed, including justification of the theoretical and conceptual framework and computational model(s) that drive the research design and questions, and discussion of the analytical methods for interpreting the results. Where relevant, include any connections to mechanistic animal research that informed the conceptual framework or research design. |
| Describe the expected transformative outcome(s). |
| Describe how this study is designed to be rigorous, mechanistic, and innovative. |
| Justification of why the specified cohort of human patients, and the relevant invasive surgical procedures (e.g., intracranial recording or stimulation) are the most appropriate for addressing the questions posed. |
| Description of how studies in these brain regions, which are potentially affected by the disease or disorder of the patient cohort(s) under investigation, can adequately address the research questions. |
| Experimental model systems and a cross-species/comparative approach are welcome to enable mechanistic insights. Investigators must justify their choice of species based on their ability to address the specific human neuroscience question at hand and to reveal generalizable and fundamental principles of human brain function. |
| Justification of recording/manipulation methods and parameters that will be employed or developed, and how the invasive intervention and/or the implantation of foreign (device) materials may confound the interpretation of results. Where adoption of newly developed technology is anticipated, including technology pending FDA approval or approved under an IDE, reasonable description as an alternative methodology (to the extent that details are available), along with potential advantages and pitfalls, is required. |
| Description of a timeline for completion of tractable research goals, strategic goals, and key stages of progress for the project, especially in terms of participant accrual. |
| Applicants must address the technical, procedural, and ethical aspects specific to invasive studies involving human patients, and the strategic plans for addressing functional studies of a specified neural system in the context of patients with neural dysfunctions and invasive device interventions. |
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
| A Data Management and Sharing Plan (DMS Plan) is required for any NIH-funded or conducted research that will generate scientific data. Applicants must submit the DMS Plan at the time of application using the NIH DMS Plan Format Page. The DMS Plan must address the elements in the structured format. Where the DMS Plan Format Page requires a "Yes or No" response, no additional narrative is allowed. | |
| Consistent with authorities under the 21st Century Cures Act, all applications to BRAIN Initiative NOFOs must include a Data Management and Sharing Plan. | |
| All BRAIN-funded studies must comply with the BRAIN data sharing requirements. Please refer to the BRAIN Initiative requirements for additional information. |
| Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. | |
| No publications or other material, with the exception of blank questionnaires or blank surveys, may be included in the Appendix. |
PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply- Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered "Yes" to the question "Are Human Subjects Involved?" on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
Section 3- Protection and Monitoring Plans
3.1 Protection of Human subjects
Neuroethical considerations Applicants must describe and discuss the following in detail:
| The process of informed consenting of research subjects who can expect no direct benefit from engaging in the investigative research proposed, |
| Considerations of FDA-defined conditions of non-significant risk/significant risk beyond established standards of clinical care, |
| Ethical and practical considerations of invasive device maintenance and ultimate removal, and other ethical issues specific to invasive human neuroscience research (e.g., compensation, informed consent, undue influence, therapeutic misconception and capacity, dual roles of clinician and investigator, etc.), |
| The consent methodology should address how the possibility of coercion or undue influence, and therapeutic misconception, will be minimized. |
Please note that the Federal mandate for cooperative research at 45 CFR 46.114 requires a single IRB and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Policy on the Use of a Single Institutional Review Board of Record for Multi-Site Research establishes the expectation that all sites participating in multi-site studies involving non-exempt human subjects research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) will use a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) to conduct the ethical review required by the Department of Health and Human Services regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects at 45 CFR Part 46 (NOT-OD-16-094).
Long-Term Plan for Patients: Applicants must describe a plan for the care of patients at the end of the study and after the study period, if appropriate. These plans may vary from project to project, but examples might include 1) explant of indwelling devices once the approved study period is complete, 2) surgical removal of batteries and capping the exposed metals from leads/IS-1 connectors, 3) manufacturer-supported device maintenance for participants, as appropriate, 4) manufacturer support for filing of compassionate use exemptions for device maintenance, etc.
Delayed Onset Study Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.
PHS Assignment Request Form
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM) See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
4. Submission Dates and Times Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH's electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply-Application Guide.
5. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372) This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
6. Funding Restrictions All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
7. Other Submission Requirements and Information
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply – Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organization's profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Use of Common Data Elements in NIH-funded Research Many NIH ICs encourage the use of common data elements (CDEs) in basic, clinical, and applied research, patient registries, and other human participants research to facilitate broader and more effective use of data and advance research across studies. CDEs are data elements that have been identified and defined for use in multiple data sets across different studies. Investigators are encouraged to consult the NIH CDE Repository and describe in their applications any use they will make of NIH-supported CDEs in their projects, when applicable. Use of CDEs can facilitate data sharing and standardization to improve data quality and enable data integration from multiple studies and sources, including electronic health records. NIH ICs have identified CDEs for many clinical domains (e.g., neurological diseases), types of studies (e.g. genome-wide association studies (GWAS)), types of outcomes (e.g., patient-reported outcomes), and patient registries (e.g., the Global Rare Diseases Patient Registry and Data Repository). NIH has established a Common Data Element (CDE) Repository Resource Portal" (http://cde.nih.gov/) to assist investigators in identifying NIH-supported CDEs when developing protocols, case report forms, and other instruments for data collection. The Portal provides guidance about and access to NIH-supported CDE initiatives and other tools and resources for the appropriate use of CDEs and data standards in NIH-funded research.
Mandatory Disclosure
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at grantdisclosures@oig.hhs.gov.
Post Submission Materials Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
| For this particular announcement, note the following: | |
| The application must address why these studies require human intracranial patients and why the specified cohort of human patients is best for the questions posed. | |
| If non-human experimental components are proposed, these must be adequately described and justified. For example, choice of species must be justified based on its ability to address the specific human neuroscience question at hand and to reveal generalizable and fundamental principles of human brain function. | |
| The application must address the capability and ability to conduct the project at each of the proposed site(s) or centers, including plans to add or drop enrollment centers, as needed. |
The BRAIN Initiative invites applications with high levels of innovation, which assumes some degree of risk. Reviewers should evaluate whether a sound rationale has been provided as to why the proposed approach is the most appropriate and likely to have an exceptionally high impact, if successful.
In addition to the standard review criteria below, reviewers will assess the technical, procedural, and ethical aspects specific to invasive studies involving human patients, and the strategic plans for addressing functional studies of a specified neural system in the context of patients with neural dysfunctions and invasive device interventions.
In the interest of adopting improved technologies during the award, when applicants propose either newly developed devices with IDE approval, or devices pending FDA approval, reviewers should assess feasibility, risk and opportunity, along with strategic contingencies.
Overall Impact
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following scored review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact.
Scored Review Criteria
Reviewers will consider Factors 1, 2 and 3 in the determination of scientific merit, and in providing an overall impact score. In addition, Factors 1 and 2 will each receive a separate factor score.
Factor 1. Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation)
| Significance | |
| Evaluate the importance of the proposed research in the context of current scientific challenges and opportunities, either for advancing knowledge within the field, or more broadly. Assess whether the application addresses an important gap in knowledge in the field, would solve a critical problem, or create a valuable conceptual or technical advance. | |
| Evaluate the rationale for undertaking the study, the rigor of the scientific background for the work (e.g., prior literature and/or preliminary data) and whether the scientific background justifies the proposed study. |
Innovation
| Evaluate the extent to which innovation influences the importance of undertaking the proposed research. Note that while technical or conceptual innovation can influence the importance of the proposed research, a project that is not applying novel concepts or approaches may be of critical importance for the field. |
| Evaluate whether the proposed work applies novel concepts, methods or technologies or uses existing concepts, methods, technologies in novel ways, to enhance the overall impact of the project. |
Specific to this NOFO:
Significance
| Evaluate the extent the project investigates high-impact questions in human neuroscience as appropriate for the expected transformative goals of this NOFO and the BRAIN Initiative. |
| Evaluate the extent to which this human subjects study improves our understanding of the biological mechanisms of brain function and their role in mental and neurological conditions. |
Innovation Evaluate the extent to which the project maximizes opportunities for innovative in vivo neuroscience research enabled by direct access to the brain during invasive surgical procedures.
Factor 2. Rigor and Feasibility (Approach)
| Approach | |
| Evaluate the scientific quality of the proposed work. Evaluate the likelihood that compelling, reproducible findings will result (rigor) and assess whether the proposed studies can be done well and within the timeframes proposed (feasibility). |
Rigor:
| Evaluate the potential to produce unbiased, reproducible, robust data. | |
| Evaluate the rigor of experimental design and whether appropriate controls are in place. | |
| Evaluate whether the sample size is sufficient and well-justified. | |
| Assess the quality of the plans for analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results. | |
| Evaluate whether the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex or age, in the design, analysis, and reporting. | |
| For applications involving human subjects or vertebrate animals, also evaluate: | the rigor of the intervention or study manipulation (if applicable to the study design). |
| whether outcome variables are justified. | |
| whether the results will be generalizable or, in the case of a rare disease/special group, relevant to the particular subgroup. | |
| whether the study population appropriately models the target population. |
For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, assess the adequacy of inclusion plans as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Considerations of appropriateness may include disease/condition/behavior incidence, prevalence, or population burden, population representation, and/or current state of the science.
Feasibility:
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PKG00294275.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .