About this file

This is a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the BRAIN Initiative's Exploratory Research Opportunities Using Invasive Neural Recording and Stimulating Technologies in the Human Brain. The funding opportunity, designated RFA-DC-27-004, is a reissuance of the previous RFA-DC-24-001 and seeks exploratory research projects using invasive neural recording and stimulation technologies to investigate fundamental questions about how neural activity gives rise to sensations, perceptions, emotions, thoughts, memories, and observable behaviors. The R61 activity code supports Phase 1 exploratory and developmental research from newly formed or established multidisciplinary teams. Applications must propose exploratory research and planning activities to establish feasibility and early-stage development that would lay groundwork for subsequent research project grant applications. The NOFO explicitly prohibits clinical trials. Participating NIH components include the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Eye Institute (NEI), National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), and National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH).

The earliest application submission date is May 9, 2026, with application due dates on June 9, 2026, November 2026, and February 11, 2027, with the final expiration date of February 12, 2027. The estimated funding commitment is $6 million in total costs to support approximately five awards per receipt date. Maximum project budgets are $700,000 per year in direct costs (exclusive of facilities and administrative costs for consortia), with a maximum project period of three years. The earliest start date is June 9, 2026, with subsequent review and award cycles extending through October 2027. Eligible applicants include higher education institutions, nonprofits with 501(c)(3) status, for-profit organizations, local and state governments, Indian tribal governments, and faith-based organizations. However, the NOFO explicitly prohibits foreign subawards and subcontracts, though unfunded collaborations and foreign components are permitted. All applicants must complete registrations in the System for Award Management (SAM), obtain a Unique Entity Identifier, register with eRA Commons, and register with Grants.gov prior to application submission. Applications require submission through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace, or institutional system-to-system solutions. Required attachments include a one-page team management plan, and a Data Management and Sharing Plan using the NIH DMS Plan Format Page not exceeding two pages. Applications must address neuroethical considerations including informed consent methodology, FDA-defined non-significant risk/significant risk designations, maintenance and removal of invasive devices, and long-term care plans for participants following study completion. Applications that lack the required team management plan or fail to address neuroethical considerations will be deemed incomplete and not reviewed.

RFA-DC-27-004-Full-Announcement.html

Text of this file

Department of Health and Human Services

Part 1. Overview Information

Participating Organization(s)

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Components of Participating Organizations

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

National Eye Institute (NEI)

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Funding Opportunity Title

BRAIN Initiative: Exploratory Research Opportunities Using Invasive Neural Recording and Stimulating Technologies in the Human Brain (R61 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)

Activity Code

R61 Phase 1 Exploratory/Developmental Grant

Announcement Type

Reissue of

RFA-DC-24-001

Related Notices

Check for any recent Notices of NIH Policy Changes that may impact application requirements.

Funding Opportunity Number (FON)

RFA-DC-27-004

Companion Funding Opportunity

None

Number of Applications

See Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.

Assistance Listing Number(s)

93.173, 93.866, 93.213, 93.242, 93.865, 93.867, 93.273, 93.286, 93.279, 93.853

Funding Opportunity Purpose

Invasive surgical procedures in humans offer the unique opportunity to intracranially record and stimulate neuronal activity within precisely localized brain structures, enabling high-impact human neuroscience investigations. This NOFO seeks exploratory research projects, from newly formed or established multi-disciplinary teams, to understand how dynamic activity of single cells and ensembles of neurons in spatially organized networks gives rise to the internal states we experience as sensations, perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and memories, and to observable motor and social behaviors. The project should be proposed as exploratory research and planning activities to establish feasibility and early-stage development that, if successful, would support, enable, and/or lay the groundwork for a potential, subsequent research project grant application using invasive neural recording and stimulation technologies in the human brain. Projects should maximize opportunities to conduct innovative in vivo human neuroscience research made available by direct access to the brain from invasive surgical procedures. Projects should employ approaches guided by specified theoretical constructs and by quantitative, mechanistic models where appropriate.

Recipients will join a consortium working group, coordinated by the NIH, to identify consensus standards of practice, including neuroethical considerations, to collect and provide data for ancillary studies, and to aggregate and standardize data for dissemination among the wider scientific community.

Funding Opportunity Goal(s)

To provide extramural research support for the Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies® (BRAIN) Initiative’s aim of revolutionizing our understanding of the brain and its function in unprecedented detail. The NIH BRAIN Initiative’s focus is foundational development of new technologies and tools to map, monitor, and modulate brain circuits in model systems and humans – toward the ultimate goal of treating and curing human brain disorders.

Key Dates

Posted Date

May 04, 2026

Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)

May 09, 2026

Application Due Dates
Review and Award Cycles
New
Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed)
AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed
Scientific Merit Review
Advisory Council Review
Earliest Start Date

June 09, 2026

June 09, 2026

Not Applicable

November 2026
January 2027

April 2027

February 11, 2027

February 11, 2027

Not Applicable

July 2027
October 2027

December 2027

All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.

Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.

Due Dates for E.O. 12372

Not Applicable

Expiration Date

February 12, 2027

Required Application Instructions

It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).

Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.

Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
Use the NIH ASSIST system to prepare, submit and track your application online.
Use an institutional system-to-system (S2S) solution to prepare and submit your application to Grants.gov and eRA Commons to track your application. Check with your institutional officials regarding availability.
Use Grants.gov Workspace to prepare and submit your application and eRA Commons to track your application.

Table of Contents

Part 1. Overview Information Key Dates Part 2. Full Text of Announcement Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description Section II. Award Information Section III. Eligibility Information Section IV. Application and Submission Information Section V. Application Review Information Section VI. Award Administration Information Section VII. Agency Contacts Section VIII. Other Information

Part 2. Full Text of Announcement

Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description

Background Since 2014, the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative has aimed to accelerate the development and application of innovative neurotechnologies, enabling researchers to produce a new dynamic picture of the brain that reveals how individual cells and complex neural circuits interact in both time and space. It is expected that these advances will ultimately lead to new ways to treat and prevent brain disorders.

As one of several federal agencies involved in the BRAIN Initiative, NIH's contributions to the BRAIN initiative were initially guided by "BRAIN 2025: A Scientific Vision," a strategic plan that detailed seven high-priority research areas. This plan was updated and enhanced in 2019 by: "The BRAIN Initiative 2.0: From Cells to Circuits, Toward Cures" and "The BRAIN Initiative and Neuroethics: Enabling and Enhancing Neuroscience Advances for Society". This and other BRAIN Initiative NOFOs are based on this vision and issued with input from Advisory Councils of the 10 NIH Institutes and Centers supporting the BRAIN Initiative, as assisted by the NIH BRAIN Multi-Council Working Group.

The BRAIN Initiative requires a high level of coordination and sharing between investigators. It is expected that BRAIN Initiative recipients will cooperate and coordinate their activities after awards are made by participating in Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) meetings and in other activities such as the BRAIN Biennial Initiative Conference. The data sharing expectations for BRAIN Initiative awards can be found at NOT-MH-19-010.

The BRAIN Initiative Research Opportunities in Humans Program This program provides support for research projects focused on investigative neuroscience with intracranial access to recording and manipulating the brain directly. Investigations within the human brain offer revolutionary, but challenging, opportunities for experimental investigation in how the human brain senses, perceives, remembers, plans, makes decisions, registers emotions, engages language, and activates movements. By leveraging surgical procedures with direct access to the brain, there is the opportunity to design experiments specifically about human neuroscience in ways that are otherwise impossible. While fundamental basic research often provides insights relevant to disorders of the nervous system, this program is not intended to support research targeting disease mechanisms or therapeutics.

Research opportunities involving invasive, higher resolution stimulation/recording devices in human neuroscience research often have limited time windows. These opportunities are mostly restricted to patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures or implantation for less than 30 days with devices such as ECoG/EEG grids and indwelling penetrating arrays. There are few stimulating/recording devices that are FDA market-approved for implantation for greater than 30 days. These inherent challenges associated with research using invasive devices in the human nervous system therefore require a high degree of planning and interdisciplinary collaboration.

NOFO Research Objectives Invasive surgical procedures in humans offer the unique opportunity to intracranially record and stimulate neuronal activity within precisely localized brain structures, enabling high-impact human neuroscience investigations. This NOFO seeks exploratory research projects, from newly formed or established multi-disciplinary teams, to understand how dynamic activity of single cells and ensembles of neurons in spatially organized networks gives rise to the internal states we experience as sensations, perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and memories, and to observable motor and social behaviors.

Applications should include exploratory research and planning activities to establish feasibility and early-stage development that, if successful, would support, enable, and/or lay the groundwork for a potential, subsequent research project grant application using invasive neural recording and stimulation technologies in the human brain. Projects should maximize opportunities to conduct innovative in vivo human neuroscience research made available by direct access to the brain from invasive surgical procedures. Applicants should propose prospective testing and validation of explicit or model-driven hypotheses. Projects should engage multidisciplinary teams consisting of clinicians, scientists, device engineers, data/computational scientists, regulatory experts and ethics specialists. Mentorship relationships that would facilitate acquisition or expansion of special research expertise for investigators in intracranial studies in humans are encouraged. Teams may be assembled within a single institution, but because of the likelihood of a limited number of patients at any single research center, integration of research teams in the form of new collaborations between sites is strongly encouraged. Collaboration with sites/centers that are not yet part of the Research Opportunities in Humans Consortium is also highly encouraged.

Recipients are expected to actively participate in a consortium working group, coordinated by the NIH, to identify consensus standards of practice, including neuroethical considerations, to collect and provide data for ancillary studies, and to aggregate and standardize data for dissemination among the wider scientific community.

We anticipate that implantable devices for most of these applications will rely on existing technology sufficiently advanced for an IRB non-significant risk designation, and/or an FDA IDE without needing significant additional pre-clinical testing on the device. We also anticipate that newly IDE-approved devices may become available over the course of these awards. NIH BRAIN is supporting new device development and regulatory approval through other NIH BRAIN initiatives, including the availability of template Memoranda of Agreements (MOUs), Confidential Disclosure Agreements (CDAs) and Collaborative Research Agreements (CRAs) with various private and commercial device providers that may facilitate recipients to adopt novel technologies (see http://braininitiative.nih.gov/ for up-to-date information and NIH Scientific/Research contacts). Where appropriate, applicants are encouraged to anticipate potential and alternative plans for adopting newly available technologies.

Activities Supported The list below includes representative, but not exhaustive, examples of activities that could be considered responsive to this NOFO.

Utilize direct intracranial recording with or without stimulation.
Combine multi-modal techniques whereby intracranial recordings with or without stimulation technologies are synchronized in real time with non-invasive technologies, external wearables, and/or other modalities to measure brain function across spatial and temporal scales.
Utilize other relevant invasive or non-invasive measurement, such as neurochemical recordings, in conjunction with intracranial recording and stimulation approaches.
Propose a combination of quantitative psychophysics and behavioral assays in combination with intracranial brain recording and stimulation that test innovative mechanistic hypotheses. Behavioral assays with time resolution comparable to neural recording assays are strongly encouraged.
Utilize approved, chronic implants, (e.g., DBS implants; FDA-approved indwelling electrodes) to address mechanistic hypotheses about brain function, plasticity, etc.

Topics Supported The list below includes representative, but not exhaustive, examples of topics that could be considered responsive to this NOFO.

Investigative studies for understanding the neurobiology of complex cognitive functions in humans.
New approaches to understanding neural coding of sensory information.
Paradigms to assess neural circuitry during complex motor behavior.
New approaches to understand neural circuitry associated with social behaviors.
Circuit functions underlying the brain's ability to store information and to learn new behaviors.
New approaches designed to capture and assess information processing across brain regions during memory consolidation, memory retrieval, learning, spatial/relational processing, attention, or planning.
Assessment of distributed representations and information processing associated with complex mental processes such as language, decision making, numerical cognition, reasoning, consciousness, and metacognition.
Investigation of distributed circuits that contribute to the coordination of motivational states and reward behavior.
Empirical and analytical approaches to understand how behavioral states are emergent properties of the interaction of neurons, circuits, and networks.

Prior Consultation with Scientific/Research Staff Consultation with relevant Scientific/Research staff is strongly recommended. If requested by the applicants, staff can advise whether the proposed project meets the goals of this NOFO and the mission of the BRAIN Initiative, and discuss responsiveness questions. Staff will not evaluate the technical and scientific merit of the proposed project; technical and scientific merit will be determined during peer review using the review criteria indicated in this NOFO. During the consultation phase, if the proposed project does not meet the programmatic needs of this NOFO, applicants will be strongly encouraged to consider other Funding Opportunities.

Applications Not Responsive to this NOFO The following types of applications are not responsive to this NOFO and will not be reviewed:

Human research studies that include clinical trials designed to answer specific questions about safety, tolerability, efficacy, and/or effectiveness of pharmacologic, behavioral, biologic, surgical, or device (invasive or non-invasive) interventions (e.g., phase 1, phase II, phase II, or pivotal clinical trials).
Studies designed primarily to develop or improve disease/disorder therapeutics or devices.
Studies for which the primary goal is to achieve regulatory approval of neurotechnology (see http://braininitiative.nih.gov/ )for other BRAIN NOFOs supporting this activity, and the NIH bioengineering grant program https://www.nibib.nih.gov/research-funding/bioengineering-research-partnerships or the peripheral nervous system (see NIH SPARC http://commonfund.nih.gov/sparc/index).
Imaging approaches not coupled with intracranial interventions, recording or stimulation.
Implementing rehabilitation therapies.
Definitive clinical trials of therapeutic devices, such as a traditional feasibility study and/or pivotal trial (see http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulati%20onandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM279103.pdf2 for the definition of an early feasibility study, feasibility study, and pivotal trial).
Projects focused on enhancing mental and cognitive functions beyond what is necessary to maintain health.
Applications that do not address neuroethical considerations.
Applications that lack the required one-page team management plan.

See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.

Section II. Award Information

Funding Instrument

Grant: A financial assistance mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.

Application Types Allowed

New

Resubmission

Revision

The OER Glossary and the How to Apply Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.

Clinical Trial?

Not Allowed: This NOFO only accepts applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.

Need help determining whether you are doing a clinical trial?

Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards

Issuing IC and partner components intend to commit an estimated total of $6M total costs to fund approximately 5 awards per receipt date.

Award Budget

Application budgets may not exceed $700,000 (Direct Costs, exclusive of facilities and administrative costs for consortia) in any single year.

Award Project Period

The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period. The maximum project period is 3 years.

NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.

Section III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

Eligible Organizations

Higher Education Institutions - Includes all types
Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education
Private Institutions of Higher Education

Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education

Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education)
Nonprofits without 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education)

For-Profit Organizations

Small Businesses
For-Profit Organizations (Other than Small Businesses)

Local Governments

State Governments
County Governments
City or Township Governments
Special District Governments
Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Federally Recognized)
Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized).

Federal Governments

Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government

U.S. Territory or Possession

Other

Independent School Districts

Public Housing Authorities/Indian Housing Authorities

Native American Tribal Organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)

Faith-based or Community-based Organizations

Regional Organizations

Foreign Organizations/ International Collaborations NIH will no longer issue awards (new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. This new requirement was effective, May 1, 2025.

Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.

Foreign Organizations/International Collaborations

Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.

Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.

Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.

NIH will no longer issue awards (i.e., new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. See NIH Grants Policy Statement 16.8 Collaborative International Research Awards.

Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.

Required Registrations

Applicant Organizations Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply- Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information.

System for Award Management (SAM) – Applicants must complete and maintain an active registration, which requires renewal at least annually. The renewal process may require as much time as the initial registration. SAM registration includes the assignment of a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code for domestic organizations which have not already been assigned a CAGE Code. Foreign organizations must obtain a NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (in lieu of a CAGE code) in order to register in SAM. Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)- A UEI is issued as part of the SAM.gov registration process. The same UEI must be used for all registrations, as well as on the grant application.

eRA Commons - Once the unique organization identifier is established, organizations can register with eRA Commons in tandem with completing their Grants.gov registrations; all registrations must be in place by time of submission. eRA Commons requires organizations to identify at least one Signing Official (SO) and at least one Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) account in order to submit an application.
Grants.gov – Applicants must have an active SAM registration in order to complete the Grants.gov registration.

Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s)) All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.

All PD(s)/PI(s) must be registered with ORCID. The personal profile associated with the PD(s)/PI(s) eRA Commons account must be linked to a valid ORCID ID. For more information on linking an ORCID ID to an eRA Commons personal profile see the ORCID topic in our eRA Commons online help.

Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Investigator)

Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.

For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply-Application Guide.

2. Cost Sharing This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.

3. Additional Information on Eligibility Number of Applications

Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.

The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:

A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission (A1) application.

A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application.

An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.9.4 Similar, Essentially Identical, or Identical Applications).

Section IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Requesting an Application Package The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.

2. Content and Form of Application Submission It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise (in this NOFO, in a policy notice, or other notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

Page Limitations All page limitations described in the How to Apply- Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.

Instructions for Application Submission

The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply- Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.

SF424(R&R) Cover All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.

SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

SF424(R&R) Other Project Information

Other Attachments:

Team management plan An "Other Attachment" of up to 1-page entitled “Team management plan” must be included as a separate attachment in pdf format. NIH strongly encourages applicants to form multidisciplinary teams that consist of clinicians, scientists, device engineers, mathematicians, statisticians, data scientists, regulatory experts and ethics specialists, as appropriate. This multidisciplinary team should be able to address the details of the plans and experiments, and to execute the research strategy. An organizational structure that clearly defines the team structure and relationships among the various components should be described in the team management plan and illustrated in an organizational chart. This plan should also describe the governance and organizational structure of the leadership team, including communication plans, processes for making decisions on scientific direction, and procedures for resolving conflicts. For publications, policies to address the ordering and recognition of authors, and decisions about what material to publish, consistent with the interests of commercial partners (where applicable), should be presented.

The team management plan should establish a Scientific Steering Group that consists of representatives from each of the partnering organizations and meets regularly to discuss project status, problems, and directions. Those individuals identified in the team management plan, who together would have the intellectual and leadership responsibilities, would likely be members of the Scientific Steering Group. Plans for enhancing the abilities and opportunities for investigators to work across disciplinary boundaries should also be included.

Applications lacking this required item will be deemed incomplete and will not be reviewed.

SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile

Applications to this NOFO should assemble integrated, multi-disciplinary teams of clinicians, scientists, device engineers, mathematicians, statisticians, data scientists, regulatory experts and ethics specialists, as appropriate, to propose innovative research plans within the context of the unique research opportunities offered by these clinical procedures. These teams may be assembled within a single university or medical center, or may comprise integrated teams across multiple institutions to aggregate these limited opportunities to address high-impact human neuroscience questions.

R&R Budget

R&R Subaward Budget

PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement

PHS 398 Research Plan All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

Research Strategy:

Applications to this NOFO must propose to investigate fundamental questions in human neuroscience using direct intracranial recording with or without stimulation technologies. Harmonization of research subject recruitment and methods (including collection, curation, and analysis) across multiple sites should be well planned and described as appropriate and consistent with achieving the goals of the program. While fundamental basic research often generates insights relevant to disorders of the nervous system, this NOFO is not intended to generate research that is explicitly disease-related.

All applications are required to include the following points, which must be incorporated within the page limits of the Research Strategy:

Statement of the fundamental questions in neuroscience to be addressed, including justification of the theoretical and conceptual framework and computational model(s) that drive the research design and questions, and discussion of the analytical methods for interpreting the results.
Description of how the proposed R61 application will enable the research goals of future research project grant application. Specifically, the application must describe how the aims and approach of the proposed R61 will establish feasibility, validity or other technically qualifying results that, if successful, would support, enable, and/or lay the groundwork for the future grant application.
Justification of why these studies are best engaged in humans (vs. nonhuman species).
Description of how studies in brain tissue, potentially affected by the disease or disorder, can adequately address the research questions, including comparison to complementary studies in animals if appropriate and feasible.
Justification of recording/manipulation methods and parameters that will be employed or developed, and how the invasive intervention and/or the implantation of foreign (device) materials may confound the interpretation of results.
If complementary animal studies are proposed, non-human, experimental components must be adequately described and justified.
Description of a timeline for completion of tractable research goals, strategic goals, and key stages of progress for the project, especially in terms of participant accrual.

Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.

Other Plan(s):

All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

A Data Management and Sharing Plan (DMS Plan) is required for any NIH-funded or conducted research that will generate scientific data. Applicants must submit the DMS Plan at the time of application using the NIH DMS Plan Format Page. The DMS Plan must address the elements in the structured format should not exceed two (2) pages. Where the DMS Plan Format Page requires a “Yes or No” response, no additional narrative is allowed.

Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
No publications or other material, with the exception of blank questionnaires or blank surveys, may be included in the Appendix.

PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply- Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:

If you answered “Yes” to the question “Are Human Subjects Involved?” on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.

Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information

Section 3- Protection and Monitoring Plans

3.1 Protection of Human subjects

Neuroethical considerations Applicants must describe and discuss the following in detail:

The process of informed consenting of research subjects who can expect no direct benefit from engaging in the investigative research proposed,
Considerations of FDA-defined conditions of non-significant risk/significant risk beyond established standards of clinical care,
Ethical and practical considerations of invasive device maintenance and ultimate removal, and other ethical issues specific to invasive human neuroscience research (e.g., compensation, informed consent, undue influence, therapeutic misconception and capacity, dual roles of clinician and investigator, etc.),
The consent methodology should address how the possibility of coercion or undue influence, and therapeutic misconception, will be minimized.

Please note that the Federal mandate for cooperative research at 45 CFR 46.114 requires a single IRB and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Policy on the Use of a Single Institutional Review Board of Record for Multi-Site Research establishes the expectation that all sites participating in multi-site studies involving non-exempt human subjects research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) will use a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) to conduct the ethical review required by the Department of Health and Human Services regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects at 45 CFR Part 46 (NOT-OD-16-094).

Long-Term Plan for Patients: Applicants must describe a plan for the care of patients at the end of the study and after the study period, if appropriate. These plans may vary from project to project, but examples might include 1) explant of indwelling devices once the approved study period is complete, 2) surgical removal of batteries and capping the exposed metals from leads/IS-1 connectors, 3) manufacturer-supported device maintenance for particpants , as appropriate, 4) manufacturer support for filing of compassionate use exemptions for device maintenance, etc.

Applications that do not address neuroethical considerations will be withdrawn as incomplete.

Delayed Onset Study Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

PHS Assignment Request Form

3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM) See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov

4. Submission Dates and Times Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.

Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.

Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.

Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply-Application Guide.

5. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372) This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.

6. Funding Restrictions All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.

7. Other Submission Requirements and Information

Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply – Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.

Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.

For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.

Important reminders:

All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.

The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply – Application Guide.

See more tips for avoiding common errors.

Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.

Mandatory Disclosure

Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.

Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at grantdisclosures@oig.hhs.gov.

Post Submission Materials Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy

Section V. Application Review Information

1. Criteria Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.

For this particular announcement, note the following:

This R61 will support exploratory human neuroscience research and planning activities to establish feasibility and early-stage development that, if successful, would lay the groundwork for a potential, subsequent research project grant application using invasive neural recording and stimulating technologies in the human brain. Preliminary data on feasibility are not required but can be included if available.

Overall Impact

Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following scored review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact.

Scored Review Criteria

Reviewers will consider Factors 1, 2 and 3 in the determination of scientific merit, and in providing an overall impact score. In addition, Factors 1 and 2 will each receive a separate factor score.

Factor 1. Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation)

Significance
Evaluate the importance of the proposed research in the context of current scientific challenges and opportunities, either for advancing knowledge within the field, or more broadly. Assess whether the application addresses an important gap in knowledge in the field, would solve a critical problem, or create a valuable conceptual or technical advance.
Evaluate the rationale for undertaking the study, the rigor of the scientific background for the work (e.g., prior literature and/or preliminary data) and whether the scientific background justifies the proposed study.

Innovation

Evaluate the extent to which innovation influences the importance of undertaking the proposed research. Note that while technical or conceptual innovation can influence the importance of the proposed research, a project that is not applying novel concepts or approaches may be of critical importance for the field.
Evaluate whether the proposed work applies novel concepts, methods or technologies or uses existing concepts, methods, technologies in novel ways, to enhance the overall impact of the project.
Specific to this NOFO
Evaluate the extent the project investigates high-impact questions in human neuroscience as appropriate for the goals of this NOFO and the BRAIN Initiative.
Evaluate how the project will lay the groundwork for subsequent research project grant applications.
Evaluate whether the project maximizes opportunities to conduct innovative in vivo neuroscience research made available by direct access to brain from invasive surgical procedures.

Factor 2. Rigor and Feasibility (Approach)

Approach
Evaluate the scientific quality of the proposed work. Evaluate the likelihood that compelling, reproducible findings will result (rigor) and assess whether the proposed studies can be done well and within the timeframes proposed (feasibility).

Rigor:

Evaluate the potential to produce unbiased, reproducible, robust data.
Evaluate the rigor of experimental design and whether appropriate controls are in place.
Evaluate whether the sample size is sufficient and well-justified.
Assess the quality of the plans for analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results.
Evaluate whether the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex or age, in the design, analysis, and reporting.
For applications involving human subjects or vertebrate animals, also evaluate:the rigor of the intervention or study manipulation (if applicable to the study design).
whether outcome variables are justified.
whether the results will be generalizable or, in the case of a rare disease/special group, relevant to the particular subgroup.
whether the study population appropriately models the target population.

For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, assess the adequacy of inclusion plans as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Considerations of appropriateness may include disease/condition/behavior incidence, prevalence, or population burden, population representation, and/or current state of the science.

Feasibility:

Evaluate whether the proposed approach is sound and achievable, including plans to address problems or new challenges that emerge in the work. For proposed studies in which feasibility may be less certain, evaluate whether the uncertainty is balanced by the potential for major advances.
For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, evaluate the adequacy and feasibility of the plan to recruit and retain a study population that appropriately models the target population. Additionally, evaluate the likelihood of successfully achieving the proposed enrollment based on age, race, ethnicity, and sex.
For clinical trial applications, evaluate whether the study timeline and milestones are feasible.
Specific to this NOFO
Evaluate the extent the application addresses why the studies are best engaged in humans (vs. nonhuman species).
If complementary animal studies are proposed, evaluate the description and justification of the experimental components.
Evaluate the extent the application offers a description of recording/manipulation methods that will be employed or developed, and whether and how the invasive intervention and/or the implantation of foreign (device) materials may confound the interpretation of results.
Evaluate whether the planned studies in human brain tissue, potentially affected by the disease or disorder, can adequately address the research questions, including comparison to complementary studies in animals if appropriate and feasible.
Evaluate whether the application adequately addresses the neuroethical considerations of the proposed work.

Factor 3. Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment)

Investigator(s) Evaluate whether the investigator(s) have demonstrated background, training, and expertise, as appropriate for their career stage, to conduct the proposed work. For Multiple Principal Investigator (MPI) applications, assess the quality of the leadership plan to facilitate coordination and collaboration.

Environment Evaluate whether the institutional resources are appropriate to ensure the successful execution of the proposed work.

Specific to this NOFO
Evaluate whether the project engages multidisciplinary teams consisting of clinicians, scientists, device engineers, data/computational scientists, regulatory experts, and ethics specialists, as appropriate.

Additional Review Criteria

As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, but will not give criterion scores for these items, and should consider them in providing an overall impact score.

Protections for Human Subjects

For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects; 2) adequacy of protection against risks; 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others; 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained; and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.

For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption; 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics; and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.

This NOFO only accepts applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.

Vertebrate Animals

When the proposed research includes Vertebrate Animals, evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals according to the following criteria: (1) description of proposed procedures involving animals, including species, strains, ages, sex, and total number to be used; (2) justifications for the use of animals versus alternative models and for…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

Other files

File Type Posted
PKG00292615.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .