Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace Capacity Building Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- SFOP0009899
- Issued by
-
Department of State
About this file
Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace Capacity Building Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace Capacity Building Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Red text indicates content the Applicant must enter or update.
Blue text indicates drafting guidance and instructions.
Part 1: Project Context
| Applicant/Recipient Name |
| Name of Applicant/Recipient Organization |
| NOFO Title/Project Title |
| Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace Capacity Building |
| Federal Assistance Listing Number |
| 19.665 |
| Period of Performance |
| 18 months |
| CDP Strategic Goals & Objectives supported |
| Bureau Goal 1: Advance cyber and digital policies that align with U.S. national interests and foreign policy objectives. |
Objective 1.1: Deepen relationships with existing U.S. partners, forge new partnerships, and engage with a range of countries to advance a common vision for the Internet and digital technologies.
Objective 1.3: Identify, enhance, cultivate, and develop strategic engagements across the private sector and multistakeholder communities.
Objective 1.4: Increase secure and open digital connectivity and access to the Internet.
| DCCP Pillars supported |
| Pillar 4: Enhance Cybersecurity by increasing adoption and implementation of cybersecurity best practices. |
Part 2: Indicator Table In the table below, for each indicator, provide the full indicator title, the related project objectives the output/outcome being measured contribute to, the related project activity that will help achieve the output/outcome being measured, whether the indicator measures an output (what we get from the activity) or an outcome (what we achieve from completing the output), the data source (how data will be collected), baseline values (where we are starting) and target (the desired value for the output or outcome).
To complete the below table, consult the DCCP Indicator List and the Indicator Selection Guidance to select additional appropriate DCCP indicators. Project-specific indicators not identified in the DCCP Indicator List, and selected by the applicant, may be collected and should be identified in the table below.
Note: The award recipient will work with the State Department to finalize indicators, including some that will be required by the Department.
| Indicator Title |
| Project Objective(s) |
| Project Activit(y/ies) |
| Indicator Type (Output or Outcome) |
| Data Source/ |
Collection Method
| Baseline Value (if known) |
| Annual Targets |
(if known)
| 1.3 Number of countries that take steps to adopt or implement the Framework for Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace. |
| Project Objective 1 |
| 1.4 Number of countries whose attendance in key multilateral fora is enabled through project activities. |
| Project Objective 1 |
| 2.1 Number of countries that develop a plan for the adoption of, or begin implementing, one or more aspect of the Framework for Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace with USG support. |
| Project Objective 2 |
| 2.2 Number of instances of U.S. cyberspace policy positions presented in international or regional fora by the U.S. or DCCP partner countries. |
| Project Objective 2 |
| 2.3 Number of countries that develop and deliver independent public statements on how international law applies in cyberspace. |
| Project Objective 2 |
| DCCP 4.1 Number of people trained in international cyberspace security with USG support. |
| Project Objective 1 |
| DCCP 4.2 Number of people trained in international cyberspace security by the USG who demonstrate improved knowledge or skill. |
| Project Objective 1 |
Add more rows as needed
Part 3: Performance Monitoring & Evaluation Description This section summarizes how the project will be monitored, including roles and responsibilities for collecting and ensuring the quality of project performance management data the applicant will report.
Provide a narrative explanation describing how project performance will be accounted for, including:
· Roles and responsibilities for collecting data (including the use of sub-contractors, if applicable)
· Further explanation of any data collection methods described in the indicator table, if necessary (e.g., use of specific tools or surveys typically employed by organization)
· Procedures for ensuring data quality and security, including the use of software or other methods
· A description of any evaluations that would be conducted by an independent third-party
- 2 -
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .