Response to Offeror Questions document.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Tower Inspections & Cathodic Protection Installation Services
Solicitation number
23RFP9293
Issued by
Brown County, South Dakota

About this file

This document is a Response to Offeror Questions related to a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the State of South Dakota, Bureau of Information and Telecommunications (BIT) for Tower Inspection and Cathodic Protection Installation Services. The RFP seeks a qualified contractor to perform inspections on guyed, self-support, and/or monopole towers across South Dakota, with some towers requiring excavation, inspection, and re-burial of anchor points, as well as installation of Anchor Guard cathodic protection systems. The contractor will be required to provide written reports and photographs of the performed inspections with recommended courses of action. The RFP provides details on the number of anchor points for each tower site, as well as information on the availability of climbing equipment and safety features at each location. Contractors are required to bid on all items requested as a complete offering for the tower inspections.

The RFP does not require a bid bond or performance/payment bonds. Contractors are allowed to submit inquiries to the State for clarification, with all inquiries and responses posted on the state's e-procurement system. The State will not accept any inquiries after the date and time indicated in the Schedule of Activities. Contractors are not allowed to rely on any other statements, either written or oral, that alter the specifications or terms of the RFP.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP Document.pdf PDF
Addendum 1- RFP Document.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Tower Inspection and Cathodic Protection RFP Question Responses

1) Does the State of SD require a bid bond and/or performance or payment bonds if awarded? If so, what % of contract amount does the bid bond need to be?

No.

2) Are you able to provide the number of anchors for each guyed tower? We will assume most are three anchor towers.

Tower Site
Number of Anchor Points
Aberdeen
3
Billsburg
3
Bowdle
3
Brookings
3
Castle Rock
3
Crandall
3
Herreid
6
Iona
3
McPherson
3
Miller
6
Mitchell
3
Mt. Coolidge
3
Ridgeview
6
Shadehill
3
Slim Buttes
0 - Self supporting
Sly Hill
0 - Self supporting
Summit
3
Terry Peak
3
Toronto
6
Turkey Ridge
9
Webster
6
Willow Creek
6
Edgemont
3
Huron
6
Pierre
0 - Monopole
Ipswich
6

3) Will you confirm if all towers will have step bolts and/or climbing ladder, and safety climbs available for tower crews accessing the towers?

Tower Site
Climbing Notes
Aberdeen
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Billsburg
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Bowdle
YES, safety climb cable on ladder inside tower
Brookings
YES, safety climb cable outside on North face of tower
Castle Rock
YES, safety climb cable on ladder inside tower
Crandall
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Edgemont
NO safety climb cable, outside climb
Huron
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Herreid
YES, safety climb cable on outside of tower
Iona
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Ipswich
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
McPherson
YES, safety climb on tower steps, outside climb
Miller
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder. Tower has Bridge Strand guy cable - Upper 2 guy levels
Mitchell
NO safety climb cable, outside climb 3 ft face tower
Mt. Coolidge
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Pierre
YES, safety climb cable between step bolts
Ridgeview
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Shadehill
NO safety climb cable, outside climb 18" face tower
Slim Buttes
NO safety climb cable, step bolts on one leg
Sly Hill
YES, safety climb cable, step bolts on one leg
Summit
NO safety climb cable, outside climb 3 ft face tower
Terry Peak
NO safety climb cable, tower face horizontals outside climb
Toronto
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Turkey Ridge
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Webster
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder
Willow Creek
NO safety climb cable, inside climbing ladder

4) Will the owner allow the use of UAV technology in place of a climbing assessment which is proven to be safer and more cost effective?

a. If yes, to the previous question, is there a required process to pre-qualify contractors to fly UAVs?

b. If no, can contractors bid on the Anchor Inspection and Anchor Guard scopes while not bidding the Tower Inspection scope?

Climbing assessments are requested under this RFP. Bidders are asked to bid on all items requested as a complete offering for a tower.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .