Request for Information (RFI)_C2ISR Supply Support.docx

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT CENTER

ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE GEORGIA

ENTERPRISE CONTRACTED LOGISTICS SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT (ECLSS)

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

DESCRIPTION:

The Government is conducting market research to identify potential sources that possess the expertise and capabilities to meet the qualification requirements to provide the services needed to support the Enterprise Contracted Logistics Sustainment Support (ECLSS) services at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia. The preponderance of work will be perfomed at this location with occasional travel requirements to support field sites in both CONUS and OCONUS locations.

The Government is establishing an enterprise approach for accomplishing effective Supply Chain Management (SCM) to provide global logistics support to the war fighter. The ECLSS performance tasks include functioning as the Service Provider (SP) at the enterprise level for Materiel Management, Warehousing, and related SCM activities as identified by the weapon systems. Additionally, technical support of sustainment activities associated with product support of weapon system inventory of the kind provided by a sustainment equipment specialist will be required.

An essential component of the ECLSS effort is to use the web-based Automated Logistics Management Support System (ALMSS) and/or other DoD approved supply support systems (e.g., D200 [Requirements Management System], D035 [Stock Control and Distribution System], D043 [Master Item Identification Control System]). These logistics support systems will be used to track materiel usage, provide historical data, determine stock leveling, and provide stock control and distribution functionality for both national stock number and part number peculiar items for wholesale and retail distribution. No trainee (apprentice) level personnel will be accepted for performance under this effort. All positions require a minimum of a Secret clearance, with some positions requiring access at the Top Secret clearance level. Foreign companies, as a prime, partner or subcontractor, are excluded from participating in this effort.

All tasks will be specifically directed by individual Task Descriptions (TD) issued under an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. The anticipated period of performance for this effort is five (5) years, consisting of a one-year basic period and four annual option periods in addition to a six-month extension period in accordance with FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services.

This RFI is issued solely for informational and planning purposes; it does not constitute a RFP or a promise to issue a RFP in the future. The Government is not at this time seeking proposals and will not accept unsolicited proposals. Respondees are advised that the Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in response to this RFI; all costs associated with responding to this RFI will be solely at the interested party’s expense.

RESPONSES:

Responses to the Capability Survey Part I and Part II must be received no later than 4:00 PM EST, 22 June 2026. Please ensure data is in a readable electronic format that can be received through a firewall. Attachments shall not exceed 10MB per email. Multiple emails are acceptable. Responses must be sent via email to the following:

· Philip Holt, Procuring Contracting Officer (philip.holt@us.af.mil)

· Jennifer Keller, Contract Specialist (jennifer.keller.3@us.af.mil) Part I. Business Information

Please provide the following business information for your company/institution and for any teaming or joint venture partners:

· Company/Institute Name:

· Address:

· Point of Contact:

· CAGE Code:

· Phone Number:

· E-mail Address:

· Web Page URL:

· Government Proposed North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code: 561210 Based on the Government proposed NAICS Code, state whether your company is:

· A statement as to whether your company is domestically or foreign owned (if foreign, please indicate the country of ownership).

Part II. Capability Survey Questions

Please review the draft PWS and provide responses to the following questions:

1. Provide company literature or other such documentation that verifies your capability to perform a contract/task order for the services listed in the draft PWS.

2. Provide a brief summary of any relevant previous experience your company has in performing similar requirements as identified in the draft PWS.

3. Does your company have the capability to perform all required services in the draft Performance Work Statement (PWS)?

4. Does your company have similar or previous experience with the type of work outlined in the draft PWS?

5. Does the draft PWS contain sufficient information that would enable you to adequately respond to an Request for Proposal (RFP)?

6. Does your company currently employ individuals with Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information clearance level? If so, how many?

7. Has your company or does your company hold a Top Secret facility clearance?

8. Please demonstrate your company’s understanding and experience with managing contracts requiring Department of Defense and Air Force Transporation/Supply related regulations as would be required for this effort.

9. Please demonstrate your company’s understanding and experience with managing contracts requiring Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) regulations as would be required for this effort.

10. When awarded a contract to perform as Contracted-Inventory Control Point (C-ICP) for various stakeholders, do you have a preferred Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR)-compliant Inventory Management System (IMS) you are accustomed to working with? Can you provide the system name?

11. If obligated to use an approved Accountable Property System of Record (APSR) (e.g. GOLDesp, eQuip, DPAS, ALMSS) other than your preferred, what are the principal challenges you would anticipate in transition or have experienced previously?

12. Which is your preferred APSR? Provide an explanation as to why it is your preferred, if willing/able.

13. The PWS requires transportation and distribution to 30+ global sites. Describe your proposed transportation and distribution strategy, including your approach to selecting carriers, managing customs and import/export regulations, and tracking shipments to ensure on-time delivery. How would you mitigate the risks associated with global shipping, such as delays, damage, and loss?"

14. If given the opportunity, would your company be interested in submitting a proposal in response to an RFP issued for this requirement?

15. If the Government were to conduct an in-person or virtual Industry Day, would your company be interested in attending?

16. Provide any additional information that you think may be relevant for consideration.

Part III. Cost-Sharing Questions Please review the draft PWS and provide responses to the following:

17. In an IDIQ contract with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) structure, the Government requires a stable and equitable cost-sharing model for on/off ramping stakeholders throughout the contracts performance period. This involves multiple stakeholders with similar but varying needs (e.g., differing quantities/volumes). Given the FFP constraint, what internal cost-sharing practices or agreements have you found effective, or can envision working, to ensure fairness and predictability amongst the stakeholders? Please share any relevant experiences or examples, particularly those addressing fluctuating demand, uneven stakeholder participation, and mechanisms for adjusting cost allocations within the fixed price.

18. What methodologies does your company recommend for establishing a fair and equitable cost-sharing model among multiple stakeholders with varying needs?

19. How do you establish a baseline for cost allocation in a multi-stakeholder environment?

20. How do you ensure that the cost-sharing model remains stable and predictable over the entire contract performance period?

21. How would you structure a cost model for on-boarding/off-boarding of stakeholders to ensure a smooth transition and fair reallocation of costs?

22. What are the financial implications of on-boarding/off-boarding, and how would you propose to manage them?

23. How would you structure a cost model to account for the differing quantities and volume of services required by each stakeholder?

24. What is your approach to allocating fixed versus variable costs among stakeholders?

25. How would you handle situation(s) where a stakeholder may need to make a significant change during the contracts performance period?

26. What are the best practices for administering and managing a complex cost-sharing model?

27. Please provide examples of successful cost-sharing models you have implemented for similar government or commercial contracts.

28. What are key lessons learned from your past experiences with multi-stakeholder cost-sharing models?

29. What are the most common challenges in implementing and managing cost-sharing models, and how would you mitigate them?

30. Provide any additional information that you think may be relevant for consideration.

image1.png