RedactedJandAAttachmentA.pdf

CLASS JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION FOR

AIR FORCE SUSTAINMENT CENTER ENTERPRISE-WIDE

WOODWARD ACQUISITIONS

I. CONTRACTING ACTIVITY

United States Air Force

AFSC/PZA

3001 Staff Drive Tinker AFB, OK 73145

AFSC/PZABB

Robins, AFB, GA 31098

AFSC/PZA

Hill AFB, UT 84056

Purchase Request (PR) Number: To be cited on each individual contract action utilizing this Class Justification and Approval (J&A)

II. NATURE AND/OR DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION BEING PROCESSED

This Class Justification & Approval (J&A) authorizes the use of other than full and open competition procedures as prescribed by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 6.302-1, only one Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services will satisfy Agency Requirements. This is an Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC) Enterprise-Wide Class J&A, issued in support of requirements generated by the 448th Supply Chain Management Wing (SCMW), where Woodward Inc. (Woodward) has been identified as the sole source provider for procurement of performance based repair and overhaul or remanufacture of items identified in Attachment A. The Attachment A provides detailed information applicable to all currently known National Stock Numbers (NSNs) and Part Numbers (P/Ns) applicable to this Class J&A. This Class J&A will not be used for any Bridge acquisitions. Individually issued Firm-Fixed- Price (FFP) contract actions including Requirements, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) or Definitive Quantity, may be established utilizing this Class J&A. The maximum ceiling value of this Class J&A is .

The contemplated contract actions utilizing this Class J&A which are identified as follow-on acquisitions on Attachment A, were previously performed by Woodward INC., Woodward HRT, Woodward Governor Company, or MPC Products Corp. (dba) Woodward and all entities, to include but not limited to the following Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) codes: 31361, 0TFM1, 60029, 65065, 81873, 19710, 0JAU7, 66503. Woodward has previously provided the required supplies/services on sole-source contracts (see Attachment A).

this Class J&A authority will be limited to the award value of the individual contract action. Any overages will require coordination through the 429 SCMS/GUMAB prior to awarding an action. At time of contract award, the PCO will annotate the Class J&A Usage Form with the final award value, and forward the Class J&A Usage Form to the 429 SCMS/GUMAB for overall tracking purposes.

Attachment A Includes the current NSN’s applicable to this Class J&A and other pertinent information including but not limited to Repair Method Codes (RMC)/Repair Method Suffix Codes (RMSC) , previous contract number and award information, type of award, award date, expiration date.

III. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLIES/SERVICES REQUIRED TO MEET THE

AGENCY’S NEEDS

This Class J&A will be used to support acquisitions using other than full and open competition to acquire repair, overhaul, or remanufacture of any NSNs in Attachment A where the supplier, Woodward, is the only responsible source. These items will be utilized on various U.S. Air Force air and ground weapon systems and platforms. Each contemplated contract utilizing this J&A may also include line items for Over and Above, Beyond Economical Repair, Item Unique Identification Description, Data and when applicable, will be identified on the individual contract action.

Each contract utilizing this Class J&A will identify the specific NSN, Period of Performance, Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs), and type of appropriation for each CLIN on the resultant contract.

The dollar ceiling for this Class J&A is . This dollar amount is reflective of the projected eight-year requirement for the assets listed in Attachment A, the projected unit cost (with inflation) and a 10% variance factor to address such elements as unexpected variation in demand and/or price or ‘potential adds’ to this J&A.

Due to the circumstances described below in Sections V, IX and XI there are no immediate actions that could be taken to develop competition. Therefore, it is considered appropriate to seek approval for more than one fiscal year’s requirements. If other qualified or approved sources are identified full and open competition will be considered and utilized to the maximum extent practicable after identification.

Type of appropriation: To be cited on individual contract action

IV. STATUTORY AUTHORITY PERMITTING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN

COMPETITION

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1), as implemented by FAR 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii and/or iii)(B)

V. DEMONSTRATION THAT THE WOODWARD’S UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS

OR NATURE OF THE ACQUISITION REQUIRES THE USE OF THE

AUTHORITY CITED ABOVE (APPLICABILITY OF AUTHORITY)

This Class J&A addresses 448 SCMW requirements and the circumstances surrounding and substantiating sole-source acquisition of the items identified in Attachment A. For these items, the only source that can satisfy the requirement is Woodward.

Some items contained within Attachment A are a mixture of Critical Application Items and Critical Safety Items, as defined by the Aviation Critical Safety Item Management Handbook. These items are highly specialized components of their respective military weapon systems.

Market Research and analysis revealed there exists four major factors that categorically limit the ability of the Government to obtain competition for the items identified in Attachment A in all instances, and any potential ‘adds’ which may in the future be incorporated into Attachment A. These factors are described herein and cover the following Repair Method Suffix Codes (RMSCs): B, C, D, K, M, N, P, Q, R,V, and Z.

All other RMSCs are not applicable to this Class J&A. Definitions of the Repair Method Code (RMC)/Repair Method Suffix (RMSC) Codes are found with the other supporting documents for the Class J&As in the SharePoint site.

Factor 1 – Items for which the Government does not have adequate technical data (RMSCs B, D, Q, R, V and Z) The current repair source, Woodward, is the only known source that possesses the requisite technical data to repair/overhaul/remanufacture the items specified in Attachment A. Additionally, Woodward is the only known source to possess unique sub-assemblies or piece parts, expertise, special tooling, special test equipment, and design engineering resources required to meet the Government’s requirement. Items subject to this Factor may or may not require special tooling and special test equipment. This tooling/test equipment should not be mistaken for the specialized and unique equipment described in Factor 4. Qualification requirements (QRs), quality standards, and acceptance criteria for these items cannot be developed due to the unavailability of technical data. It is not possible to draft adequate specifications for these items without design engineering effort (see Section IX) or access to the current repair source’s technical data. Although the Government has unlimited use-rights to form, fit, and function (FFF) and Operation, Maintenance, Installation, and Training (OMIT) data, this information lacks sufficient detail to fully define the repair/overhaul/remanufacture requirement. The Government has queried all available sources of data to include, but not be limited to, the Joint Engineering Data Management Information and Control System (JEDMICS), the Military Engineering Data Asset Locator System (MEDALS), and the Enhanced Technical Information Management System (ETIMS); no data was found.

Factor 2 – Items for which the Government does not have adequate use-rights to available technical data (RMSC P) The Government does not have Government-purpose or unlimited rights to the necessary technical data to acquire these supplies/services from an alternate source. The current repair source is the only known source that possesses the requisite use-rights to the required technical data. Woodward has previously provided the required supplies/services on sole-source contracts (see Attachment A). QRs, quality standards, and acceptance criteria for these items cannot be developed without Government-purpose rights to the technical data. Although the Government has unlimited use-rights to FFF and OMIT data, this information lacks sufficient detail to fully define the repair/overhaul/remanufacture requirement. The Government has queried all available sources of data to include, but not be limited to, JEDMICS, MEDALS, and ETIMS searching for appropriate use-rights information. Items subject to this Factor may or may not require special tooling and special test equipment. This tooling/test equipment should not be mistaken for the specialized and unique equipment described in Factor 4.

Factor 3 – Items for which the Government has sufficient technical data but no additional sources have qualified (RMSC C) The Government possesses sufficient technical data to establish QRs which a prospective source must satisfy to become an approved source. The establishment of QRs has been justified in writing as required by FAR 9.202(a) on a Justification for Qualification Requirements (JQR). The JQR is coordinated through Small Business and the Competition Advocate; it is approved by the Chief of Contracting Office. Items subject to this factor require engineering source approval by the design control authority in order to maintain the quality of the item. Prospective sources must be approved by the cognizant engineering authority through the Source Approval Request (SAR) process. Items subject to this factor are currently sole-source but have the greatest potential to become competitive assuming a prospective source can meet the defined requirements.

Factor 4 – Items requiring specialized and unique equipment (RMSCs K, M, and N) Items subject to this factor require either Class 1 castings or similar forging equipment, master or coordinated tooling, or ultra-precision test or inspection equipment. This unique equipment is only available to the current repair source. Suitable substitute equipment or facilities cannot be made available to or re-produced by alternate sources.

The equipment described within this Factor are not to be mistaken for more common, albeit special, tooling and test equipment that may be required for repair/overhaul/remanufacture of the items subject to the previous three Factors 1, 2 or 3.

The 448th SCMW believes that award of any items identified on Attachment A, to any other source than Woodward, would result in unacceptable delays in fulfilling the Air Force’s requirements thereby leaving the Air Force unable to meet critical mission requirements and hampering the Air Force’s ability to execute its global mission.

Accordingly, Woodward is the only firm capable of providing the repair/overhaul/remanufacture described in Section III above without the Air Force experiencing unacceptable delays due to parts shortages thus fulfilling mission requirements.

Additional information can be found in Section IX.

VI. DESCRIPTION OF EFFORTS MADE TO ENSURE THAT OFFERS ARE

SOLICITED FROM AS MANY POTENTIAL SOURCES AS DEEMED

PRACTICABLE

Pursuant to FAR 10, in support of market research to identify potential sources for the repair, overhaul, and remanufacture of the NSN listed in Attachment A, a Sources Sought Synopsis (SSS) was posted on 19 January 2018 to the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website, www.FBO.gov. The SSS included Sources Sought Number:

Multi_NSN 1-7 ,and Spray_Ring_Assembly_5996_2915 and was issued with a close and response date of 20 February 2018. This SSS included all items on Attachment A including the NSN, P/N and Best Estimated Quantity (BEQ) for each item. In addition, the SSS separated the NSNs by the following categories: NSNs where the government has data, NSNs where the government has no data, NSNs where the data is proprietary, and NSNs that require specialized or unique equipment. The SSS was posted in FedBizOpps to provide the widest dissemination of information to the marketplace.

Three vendors expressed interest - M1 Composites, Turbine Controls, Inc., expressed interest on all NSNs that begin with 2915 (All Spray Rings). Turbine Controls, Inc., expressed interest on NSNs that were found in Multi_NSN 1; and also in the SSS labeled Aircraft Manifold Overhaul, Repair, & Remanufacture (NSN: 2995-). The only interested vendor approved for work under NAICS 336412 or 336413 are Turbine Controls, Inc.

However, at this time, none of the interested vendors have submitted (SAR) packages as stipulated in the established QRs for those items that require QRs.

IAW FAR 5.201, requirements utilizing this Class J&A must be synopsized. In addition, the Request for Proposals (RFP) for each individual acquisition utilizing this Class J & A must be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website.

VII. DETERMINATION BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER THAT THE

ANTICIPATED COST TO THE GOVERNMENT WILL BE FAIR AND

REASONABLE

The Contracting Officer will ensure that all individual acquisitions utilizing this Class J&A will be negotiated at a fair and reasonable price to the Government. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and supplements, the contractor may be required to provide certified cost or pricing data, and/or data other than certified cost or pricing data, to be used in supporting the Government’s evaluation of the proposed costs.

A detailed cost analysis and/or price analysis will be performed on any acquisition using this Class J&A. The Contracting Officer may request a technical evaluation from the Defense Contract Management Agency to aid in the evaluation of the contractor’s proposal if necessary or required. The Contracting Officer may seek audit assistance from the Defense Contract Audit Agency if necessary or required. The Contracting Officer will determine that the overall cost is determined fair and reasonable to the Government on every acquisition using this J&A.

VIII. DESCRIPTION OF THE MARKET RESEARCH CONDUCTED AND THE

RESULTS, OR A STATEMENT OF THE REASONS MARKET RESEARCH

WAS NOT CONDUCTED

Market Research, IAW FAR Part 10, was conducted by a multi-functional team consisting of the J&A Specialists, a Market Research subject matter expert, Small Business representative, cognizant engineer, and Contracting Officer for each item on Attachment A. This research included inquiries into internet sites including Google, the Thomas Register, Haystack, Dynamic Small Business, Ability One, Aviation Parts, NSN Now and similar item manufacture’s websites beginning 2 Feb 2018. This research was performed to identify alternate sources or alternate equipment that might fill the Government needs with only minor modifications, within either the commercial or noncommercial market. The screening process was used extensively to determine the competitive environment for each NSN covered by the scope of this J&A. Current screening results are documented from all AFMC 762 Forms (Contract Repair Screening Analysis Worksheets (CRSAWs) for all NSNs listed on Attachment A. These screening results were used to determine the capability of supporting the repair by verifying RMSC codes and verifying overhaul, repair or remanufacture capabilities of the relevant parts.

Also, the Automated Budget Compilation System (ABCS) computation from Sept 2016 and Mar 2017 cycles were used based on a eight year out requirement for estimated unit cost and required repair quantity. These screening results were relied on significantly to identify initial NSNs associated with this Class J&A. Market research determined there are no other current vendors capable of conducting the repairs, overhaul or remanufacturing, within engineering established QRs.

The Government has attempted to purchase the necessary data from Woodward many times individually in the past on the items listed on Attachment A. Woodward has failed to respond to past inquiries, or has responded with a negative statement. On 22 Jan 2018, a Rough Order of Magnitude Price request was submitted to Woodward to estimate the cost for the Government to purchase Technical Orders and /or drawings containing more detail than FFF or OMIT data currently in the Government’s possession. To date, Woodward has not responded to this request.

IX. ANY OTHER FACTS SUPPORTING THE USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND

OPEN COMPETITION

Regarding Factors 1, 2, and 4 from section V, it is not possible to develop repair, overhaul, or remanufacture procedures, or the specialized and unique equipment described in Factor 4, without detailed production level technical data. This data is described in part in section V. Reverse engineering is an opportunity to develop some of the requisite detailed production level technical data, however completion of a reverse engineering program of this scope (e.g. highly specialized end-items found on major weapon systems) will take a minimum average of five years through the Consolidated Sustainment Activity Group (CSAG) Sustaining Engineering program. This timeframe includes the budget request period, purchase request processing, contract negotiation and award, period of performance qualification testing, and source qualification. A cost estimate to conduct reverse engineering for these NSNs has not been generated due to lack of historical project cost information for similar equipment and scope of qualification testing, which is required to ensure no change to the item’s approved technical baseline and airworthiness certification. Finally, reverse engineering is considered a high-risk endeavor for highly-specialized end-items requiring unique contractor skill sets and considerable government resources to provide items for inspection and destructive analysis.

Regarding Factor 3 from section V, the government has sufficient data to qualify additional sources, however there have been no Source Approval Request (SAR) packages submitted against the items with Qualification Requirement (QRs) listed in Appendix A. SAR processing time can vary from organization to organization, however on average the expected processing time is 6-12 months from receipt of the package. The variance in this process is due to different requirements including package contents, source demonstration (site-visit), and production evaluation/qualification. The organization responsible for establishing the QRs for a given item, will periodically synopsize the QRs as required by FAR 9.204(a)(1).

X. LIST OF SOURCES, IF ANY, THAT EXPRESSED INTEREST IN THE

ACQUISITION

Woodward FST Inc. CAGE 65065 700 N. Centennial St.

Zeeland MI 49464

(616) 748-7714

Woodward HRT, Inc. CAGE 81873 25200 W. Rye Canyon Rd.

Santa Clarita CA 91355

(661) 702-5576

MPC Products Corporation CAGE 19710 Woodward MPC, Inc.

6300 W. Howard St.

Niles IL 60714

(224) 592-2544

Woodward, Inc. CAGE 66503 Woodward Turbine System 5001 N. 2nd St.

Loves Park IL 61111

(815) 639-6963

Turbine Controls, Inc. CAGE: 8T088 5 Old Windsor Rd Bloomfield CT 06002-1311 Phone: 860-242-0448

M1 Composites Technology Inc. CAGE: L05P1 2460 Rue Michelin Laval Quebec Canada, H7L 5C3 450-686-8864

Woodward Inc. CAGE: 31361 1000 E Drake Rd Ft Collins CO. 80525-1800 970-498-3618

Woodward Inc. CAGE: 0TFM1 3800 N Wilson Ave Loveland CO. 80538-2075 970-498-3618

Woodward Inc. CAGE: 60029 1700 Business Center Dr.

Duarte CA 91010-2859 661-702-5747

Woodward Governor Co. CAGE: 0JAU7

1 Woodward Way Rockton IL. 61072-1673 815-639-6963

XI. A STATEMENT OF THE ACTIONS, IF ANY, THE AGENCY MAY TAKE TO

REMOVE OR OVERCOME ANY BARRIERS TO COMPETITION BEFORE

MAKING SUBSEQUENT ACQUISITIONS FOR THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES

REQUIRED

Any AFSC Enterprise requirement which contemplates using this Class J&A, will be responsible for accomplishing the synopsis IAW 5.201 and performing the screening process prior to using this Class J&A. In the event an item is rescreened and determined competitive, the NSN will be removed and this J&A will not be used as an authority to procure repair, overhaul, and/or remanufacture of this item. If other qualified or approved sources become known during the life of this contract, full and open competition will be considered and utilized to the maximum extent practicable.

Per DFARS PGI 206.304(a)(S-70), as indicated by the signature on the Coordination and Approval Document, all previous J&As that were able to be located and available for items listed on Attachment A have been reviewed and all identified actions to overcome barriers to competition have been accomplished.

XII. CONTRACTING OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION

The contracting officer’s signature on the Coordination and Approval Document evidences that he/she has determined this document to be both accurate and complete to the best of his/her knowledge and belief.

XIII. TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS PERSONNEL’S CERTIFICATION

By their signatures on the Coordination and Approval Document, the technical and/or requirements personnel have certified as accurate and complete all supporting data, which is their responsibility, contained herein IAW FAR 6.303-2(c).

Attachment A for Woodward Class JWoodward Current NSNs

RMC/RMSC NSN Previous or Current Contract Number Basis Of Award (Competitive or Sole Source

Date Of Award Part Number Noun Qualification Requirements Item Description and Function

Application (Weapon System ) CAI/CSI Best Est. Qty

Reason for J&A Duplication of Cost or Unacceptable Delay

Data, No Data, Or

Proprietary

Follow On Acqisition Yes/No

Notes

R3/C 2915014711311NZ FA812118D0012 Sole Source 17‐Aug‐18 4085197 SPRAY RING ASSEMBLY Yes L 42" X W 42" X H 10" Weighs 20 LBS. Item is made of Nickel Alloy. Item Distributes the fuel required for augmentor operation F15/F16 CSI 516 Unacceptable Delay Data w/QRs Yes

R3/C 2915013339600NZ FA812118D0013 Sole Source 17‐Aug‐18 4071274 SPRAY RING ASSEMBLY Yes L 42" X W 42" X H 7" Weighs 21 LBS. Item is made of Waspaly nickel cobalt alloy. Item Provides atomized fuel for augmentation.

F15/F16 CSI 505 Unacceptable Delay Data w/QRs Yes

R3/B 4810014209644PR FA812213M0009 Sole Source 27‐Jun‐13 1886‐279 VALVE,LINEAR,DIRECT Yes L 2.5" X W 2.5" X H 2.5" Weighs 1 LB. Item is made of Aluminum Alloy. Item controls VSV position in primary mode F16 No 14 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/R 3010014564269SO FA853813D0009 Sole Source 21‐Dec‐12 SW7‐200L ACTUATOR,ELECTRO‐ME No

L 8" X W 2.47" X H 3.472". Weighs 3 LBS. Item is made of Steel, Copper, Aluminium, Plastic. Item Actuates Electro‐Mechanical Rotary Joints on the

Ku‐band antenna

AN/APQ 170 RADAR

SYSTEM No 9 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/R 5996013062074SO FA853813D0009 Sole Source 21‐Dec‐12 E48‐200B AMPLIFIER,ELECTRONIC No

L 10.77" W 7.52" H 1.75" Weighs 3 LBS. Item is made of Aluminum, Copper, Composite

Components, Electrical Wiring Circuit Boards.

Item Regulates magnetron frequency to produce an RF signal accurately matching the frequency commanded by the SPC.

AN/APQ RADAR

SYSTEM No 1 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3R 3010015009244SO FA853813D0009 Sole Source 21‐Dec‐12 2W6‐200H ACTUATOR,ELECTRO‐ME No

L 6.631" X W 3.125" H 4.62" Weighs 2.5 LBS. Item is made of Steel, Copper, Aluminium, Plastic.

Item Actuates Electro‐Mechanical Drive motors on the ku‐Band antenna

AN/APQ RADAR

SYSTEM

No 3 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/R 3010013055346SO FA853813D0009 Sole Source 21‐Dec‐12 2W6‐207A ACTUATOR,ELECTRO‐ME No

L 16.03" X W 1.28" X H 2.82" Weighs 3 LBS. Item is made of Steel, Copper, Aluminium, Plastic.

Item Actuates Electro‐Mechanical rotary Joints on the Ku‐Band Antenna

AN/APQ‐170 RADAR

SYSTEM

No 1 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/R 3010013053340SO FA853813D0009 Sole Source 21‐Dec‐12 2W6‐216A ACTUATOR,ELECTRO‐ME No

L 11" X W 4" X H 3" Weighs 3 LBS. Item is made of Steel,Copper,Aluminium,Plastic Sleeving,Wires,Wire Braid,& Paint. Item functions as The Electro‐Mechanical Actuator uses the signals received from Roll Amplifier to position the Antenna in the roll axis.

AN/APQ 170 RADAR

SYSTEM MC‐130H

No 1 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/R 3010014809008SO FA853813D0009 Sole Source 21‐Dec‐12 2W6‐201J ACTUATOR,ELECTRO‐ME No

L 12" X W 3.126" X H 4.62" Weighs 3 LBS. Item is made of Steel, Copper, Plastic, Aluminuim. Item Actuates Electro‐Mechanical rotary joints on the

Ku‐Band Antenna

AN/APQ 170 RADAR

SYSTEM

No 3 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/R 3010013091204SO FA853813D0009 Sole Source 21‐Dec‐12 2W6‐202D ACTUATOR,ELECTRO‐ME No

L 16" X W 1.29" X H 2.82" Weighs 2.5 LBS. Item is made of Steel, Copper, Aluminium, Plastic. Item actuates Electro‐Mechanical Drives in the Ku‐ band Antenna

AN/APQ 170 RADAR

SYSTEM

No 3 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/Z 2915011964310PN FA812213D0015 Sole Source 17‐Mar‐16 1886‐306 MOTOR,VALVE No

L 6" X W 6" X H 6" Weighs 1 LB. Item is made of Aluminum body hosed with electrical components. Item functions as an electrical signal to the motor moves an arm to increase or decrease pressure on the left side of the servo

KC‐135 No 1 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/C 2915011396618PN FA812215D0015 Sole Source 26‐Apr‐16 9178M37P02 SENSOR,COMPRESSION Yes

L 7" X W 3" X H 7" Weighs 1 LB. Item is made of Various Alloys. Item is The Compressor Inlet Temperature (CIT) Sensor is a temperature sensor and transducer unit for the Main Engine Control (MEC) It responds to changes in

KC‐135 CSI 205 Unacceptable Delay Data w/QRs Yes

R3/D 2915014857506PR FA812215D0014 Sole Source 26‐Sep‐14 1269M86P02 TEMPERATURE SENSOR Yes

L 5" X W 2.5" X H 2.5" Weighs 5 LBS. Item is made of steel, helium. Item functions as the Fan Discharge Temperature is sensed by a helium filled bellows.

F‐16 CSI 136 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

Attachment A for Woodward Class JWoodward Current NSNs

R3/D 2915013432931PR FA812216D0010 Sole Source 4‐Nov‐14 8901‐337 REGULATOR,FUEL FLOW Yes

L 3" X W 4.4" X H 2.4" Weighs 3 LBS. Item is mad of STAINLESS STEELSTRUT, CAST ALUMINUM

BODY, MACHINED ALUMINUM AND INCONEL

PARTS AND ZIRCALLOY SENSING COILS. Functions

AS A TEMP SENSOR AND TRANSDUCER UNIT FOR

F‐16 CSI 43 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/D 2915013102888PR FA812216D0010 Sole Source 12‐Sep‐11 8901‐336 REGULATOR,FUEL FLOW Yes

L 26" X W 15" X H 14" Weighs 20 LBS. Item is made of Stainless Steel. Item provides a hydraulic signal (fuel pressure) to main engine control (MEC) and an electrical signal to the DEC.

F‐16 CSI 76 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

R3/C 5996013061479SO FA853813D0009 Sole Source 21‐Dec‐12 881755‐1 AMPLIFIER,ELECTRONIC No

L 2.25" X W 1.2" X H 1.515" Weighs 1.5 LBS. Item is made of Steel, Copper, Plastic, Aluminium

Electrical Components. Item Amplifies Electronic Signals in the Ku‐Band Antenna

AN/APQ RADAR

SYSTEM No 1 Unacceptable delay No Data Yes

R4/B 2915011152700OP N/A 1‐Aug‐16 4071T72P01 SENSOR,FUEL TEMP No L 4.75" X W 1.8" X H 4.39" Weighs 1.4 LBS. Item is made of Aluminum. Item Aid's in sensing compressor inlet temperature A‐10 CSI 33 Unacceptable delay No Data No

R3/C 2915016595074 FA812119D0002 Sole Source 11‐Jan‐19 4089329 Manifold Assy No. 4 Yes

L 42.00" X W 42.00" X H 10.00" Weighs 22.0 LBS.

Item is made of Nickel Alloy. Item is to atomize fuel for augmentor afterburtner for F100 220 engine.

F100 CSI 187 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

Approved and Added on 15 Nov 2019 by Dylan Brady in the 421st. 2915016595074NZ is the master and supersedes

2915013347068NZ

R3/C 2915013347068 FA8121119D0002 Sole Source 11‐Jan‐19 4073225 SPRAY RING ASSEMBLY Yes L 42.00" X W 42.00" X H 10.00" Weighs 50.0 LBS.

Item is made of Nickel Alloy. Item is designed to provide atomized fuel for augmentation.

F100 CSI 187 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

Approved and Added on 15 Nov 2019 by Dylan Brady in the 421st

R3/C 2915014713480 FA810406D00190054 Sole Source 1‐Apr‐10 4085199 SPRAY RING ASSEMBLY Yes L 42.00" X W 42.00" X H 10.00" Weighs 30.0 LBS.

Item is made of Nickel Alloy. Item is designed to provide atomized fuel for augmentation.

F100 CSI 186 Unacceptable Delay No Data Yes

Approved and Added on 15 Nov 2019 by Dylan Brady in the 421st

20 Total NSNs

LEGEND

QR (Qualification Requirement) Qualifying criteria that must be met before a contract is awarded

RMSC Z ‐ This part is a commercial/non‐developmental/off‐the‐shelf‐item. Valid RMCs: 1,2,3,4,&5.

RMC/RMSC Code/Definitions

CAI (Critial Application Item) ‐ any factor of the item whose failure will result in loss of operation

CSI (Critial Safety Item) ‐ is part, assembly or support equipment whose failure could cause loss of life, major injurty, loss of a system or significant equipment damage. Potentially catastrophic failure

RMC (Repair Method Code) / RMSC (Repair Method Suffix Code) ‐ Two single digit numeric codes, assigned by a contract repair screening activity, used in conjunction to provide PCOs approved repair sources, determined and justified based on the availability and adequacy of resources required to effect timely repair and high quality workmanship. The RMC identifies engineering, manufacturing and technical data used in the repair process and the RMSC represents the results of a technical review and denotes the method used in repairing the item. Refer to AFMCI 21‐149 for more detail.

RMC 4 ‐ Repair for the first time, directly from the actual manufacturer rather than the prime contractor who is not the actual manufacturer

RMSC B ‐ Acquisition of this part is restricted to source(s) specified on "source control," "altered item," or "selected item" drawings/documents. Valid RMCs 1,2,3,4, & 5.

RMSC C ‐ This part requires engineering source approval by the design control activity in order to maintain the quality of the part. An alternate source must qualify in accordance with the design control acitivity's procedures, as approved by the cognizant Government engineering activity. Valid RMCs: 1,2,3,4,&5.

RMSC D ‐ The data needed to produce this item from additional sources is not physically available. Valid RMCs: 1,2,3,4,&5

RMSC P ‐ The rights to use the data needed to purchase this part from additional sources are not owned by the Government and cannot be purchased. Valid RMCs: 1,2,3,4,&5.

RMSC Q ‐ The Government does not have adequate data, lacks rights to data, or both, needed to purchase this part from additional sources. Valid RMCs: 1,2,3,4,&5.

RMSC R ‐ The data or rights to use the data needed to purchase this part from additional sources are not owned by the Government and it has been determined that it is uneconomical to purchase. Valid RMC's: 1,2,3,4,&5

RMC 3 ‐ Repair, for the second or subsequent time, directly from the manfacturer