Redacted SS Justification N6426721Q0186.pdf

1 | 7

BRAND NAME/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION (FBO)≤ SAT

LIMITED-SOURCES JUSTIFICATION (GSA)≤ SAT

JUSTIFICATION FOR AN EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY

(ID/IQ TAKS ORDER/DELIVERY ORDER)≤ SAT

1. Description of Supplies/Services.

Part # DESCRITION QTY ProV-AST/ N ProVision All Station SW Package. Package includes

Development GUI, Automatic Generators & Compilers for Test, PLD and FLASH Applications NODE LOCKED

LICENSE – USB Key

BSD/N Boundary Scan Diagnostics s/w for infra, interconnects & clusters (node locked license)

JTVS JTAG Visualizer for Schematics (PC only) plus 1 extractor 1 JTVB JTAG Visualizer for Boards (PC only) plus 1 extractor 1

BSP/HSSub Bscan sw for Teradyne HSSub 1 SWMT Software maintenance (10% of purchase price) mandatory first year

The requested supplies services represent the minimum requirements of the government, which have been verified by the certifying technical and requirements personnel.

2. Regulatory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition.

FBO

FAR 13.106-1(b)(i) Soliciting from a single source

FAR 13.106-1(b)(ii) Particular brand-name item

GSA

FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(A) An urgent and compelling need exists

FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(B) Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized

FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(C) In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures (the original order or BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures).

FAR 8.405-6 (b) Items peculiar to one manufacturer (brand-name item) ID/IQ Task Order/Delivery Order (e.g. NASA SEWP or ARMY CHESS)

2 | 7

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A) The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays.

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(B) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order. [When utilizing this exception, the rationale shall describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g., in terms of scope, period of performance, or value).]

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(D) It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.

3. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Regulatory Authority.

a.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 Must Be Compatible In All Aspects (Form, Fit And Function) With Existing Systems Presently Installed.

b.) A Patent, Copyright, or Proprietary Data Limits Competition.

c.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 are “Direct Replacements” Parts/Components for Existing Equipment.

d.) Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Supported By A Case Letter.

e.) Unusual and Compelling Urgency.

f.) Other: If required, discuss any other rationale that supports the use of a brand name/sole source for this effort.

JTAG Boundary Scan software is the only tool integrated with the target Test system (Teradyne Spectrum 9100). The intent is to leverage past research, development, manufacturing practices and production efforts into this procurement.

Market research has found that JTAG Technologies obtained proprietary rights that limit competition. JTAG Technologies designed and developed the Boundary Scan software.

NSWC Dahlgren currently uses the JTAG Boundary Scan software to develop tests for other circuit card assemblies tested on the target test station.

remy.s.oshiro Text Box remy.s.oshiro Text Box remy.s.oshiro Text Box remy.s.oshiro Text Box

3 | 7

4. Implication of Procuring another Brand/Manufacturer.

a.) Unacceptable Delays in Fulfilling the Agency’s Requirements.

b.) Substantial Duplication Of Cost To The Government That Is Not Expected To Be Recovered Through Competition.

c.) Other: If required, discuss any other implication of procuring another brand/manufacturer.

5. Actions to Remove Barriers to Competition.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance, which are included in this justification and its supporting data/documentation, are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

CUSTOMER:

Name, Title, Code Phone No. Date

APPROVALS

I certify that the Customer representations above have been verified, and are complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the processing of this brand name/sole-source justification precludes the use of full and open competition.

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR/SPECIALIST:

Awarding an alternative tool would result in an unanticipated and unbudgeted duplication of costs estimated to be in excess of $40,000.00 and require an additional twelve (12) months for research, development, testing, and evaluation that would not likely be recouped via full and open competition.

951-393-5689 5/20/21

OSHIRO.REMY.SA

SAKI.1500444513

Digitally signed by

OSHIRO.REMY.SASAKI.150044451

Date: 2021.06.22 11:07:23 -07'00'

GAMEZ.BLAZ.AN

DREW.115362474

Digitally signed by

GAMEZ.BLAZ.ANDREW.11536

24743 Date: 2021.06.22 11:46:29 -07'00' remy.s.oshiro Text Box remy.s.oshiro Text Box remy.s.oshiro Text Box

4 | 7

I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that completing this purchase as a brand name/sole source is in the best interest of the government.

CONTRACTING OFFICER:

RICHMOND.TASHELL.ANN.102

3253816

Digitally signed by

RICHMOND.TASHELL.ANN.1023253816

Date: 2021.06.22 14:37:46 -07'00'