Redacted Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition.pdf

PDF 252 KB Posted

Attached to
Purchase of Profile; Angle; Plate
Solicitation number
70Z03826QL0000187
Issued by

About this file

This is a U.S. Coast Guard Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition for commercial products and services at or below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), issued under FAR 12.102(a) and FAR Class Deviation 25-21 Rev. 1 for FAR Part 12, last updated March 3, 2026.

The Coast Guard (MRS) intends to procure three replacement parts for HC-144 aircraft on a sole source basis due to corrosion and damage discovered during inspection. The required parts are: PROFILE (P/N 35-23118-0502, NSN 1680-01-HS3-8181, Quantity 4 each), ANGLE (P/N 35-23133-0902, NSN 1560-01-HS3-8182, Quantity 4 each), and PLATE (P/N 95-22140-0101, NSN 1680-01-HS3-8183, Quantity 16 each). The justification type selected is "Only One Source Is Available" based on market research indicating that Airbus Defence and Space SAU is the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and only known source capable of fulfilling the requirement. The sole authorized U.S. distributor is Airbus DS Military Aircraft, Inc., located at 8100 Airbus Military Drive, Mobile, AL 36608 (Cage Code 0DAF1). Market research confirmed that all potential sources were contacted and evaluated against three critical criteria: legal possession of necessary service data, true capability, and ability to meet required turn-around-time. No fair and reasonable price determination method has been selected or documented on this justification form.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Terms and Conditions.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Last Updated 03/03/2026

U.S. COAST GUARD JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES AT OR BELOW THE SAT

FAR 12.102(a), FAR Class Deviation 25-21 Rev. 1 for FAR Part 12

AUTHORITY JUSTIFICATION TYPE

Restricting Competition FAR

12.102(a), FAR Class Deviation 25-21 Rev. 1 for FAR Part 12

☒ Only One Source Is Available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing agreements, or industrial mobilization).

☐ Brand Name - Items peculiar to one manufacturer: The particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government’s requirements, and market research indicates other companies’ similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet, the agency’s needs

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED AND THE INTENDED USE: MRS intends to procure the following part(s) on a sole source basis: PROFILE, P/N: 35-23118-0502, NSN: 1680-01-HS3-8181, QTY: 4 ea. ANGLE, P/N:

35-23133-0902, NSN: 1560-01-HS3-8182, QTY: 4 ea. PLATE, P/N: 95-22140-0101, NSN: 1680-01-HS3-8183, QTY: 16 ea.

with an additional quantity of 0 ea. These parts are used on the HC-144 aircraft and are replaced during inspection due to corrosion/damage.

SUGGESTED SOURCE NAME, ADDRESS, & UNIQUE ENTITY IDENTIFIER (UEI):

AIRBUS DS MILITARY AIRCRAFT, INC., 8100 AIRBUS MILITARY DRIVE, MOBILE, AL 36608 US Cage Code (0DAF1)

RATIONALE FOR JUSTIFICATION TYPE SELECTED ABOVE TO INCLUDE RELEVANT INFORMATION GAINED

THROUGH YOUR MARKET RESEARCH TO SUPPORT THE JUSTIFICATION TYPE:

USCG uses past procurement history and the international aviation subscription service (Inventory Locator Service or ILS®).

to seek available sources of supply. All potential sources were contacted via market research to determine if they possessed all the following criteria: (1) if not the OEM, are in legal possession of the necessary service data, (2) have true capability, and

(3) can meet the required Tum-Around-Time. Airbus Defence and Space SAU is the product OEM and is the only known source capable of fulfilling this requirement. The only authorized distributor is their U.S. based company, Airbus DS Military Aircraft, Inc. (Cage Code 0DAF1).

CONTRACTING OFFICER - FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE DETERMINATION METHODS:

☐ MARKET RESEARCH

☐ COMPARISON OF PROPOSED PRICE WITH PRICES FOUND REASONABLE ON PREVIOUS PURCHASES

☐ CURRENT PRICE LIST

☐ COMPARISON WITH SIMILAR ITEMS IN A RELATED INDUSTRY

☐ COMPARISON TO IGCE

☐ CONTRACTING OFFICER’S PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE (EXPLAIN)

☐ OTHER (EXPLAIN)

https://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul/far-part-deviation-guide/far-overhaul-part-12#FAR_12_102 https://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul/far-part-deviation-guide/far-overhaul-part-12#FAR_12_102

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .