ratings sheet.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 246-21-Q-0058
About this file
This document contains a solicitation for cardiology clinic services at Claremore Indian Hospital. The Indian Health Service is seeking a single-source award for outpatient cardiology services under a firm fixed-price contract with an initial one-year period of performance and four one-year options. Interested offerors must provide pricing for all five potential years, as well as credentials for the cardiologist who will provide services, proof of medical malpractice insurance, and at least two past performance references pertaining to similar clinical services. Offers are due by June 23, 2021 and should be submitted to the Oklahoma Area Indian Health Service office. The purpose of the attached ratings sheet is to evaluate offerors based on their understanding of requirements, technical approach, past performance, and risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SOW - Claremore Cardiology Clinics.doc | DOC document | |
| Pricing Worksheet for Claremore Cardiology.docx | DOCX document | |
| FBO - Claremore Cardiology Clinics.docx | DOCX document | |
| Pt 12 solicitation clauses.doc.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT A – RATINGS SHEET
Ratings Methods Ratings Descriptors
Excellent Proposal demonstrates superior understanding of requirements and approach that exceeds performance or capability standards and contains at least one exceptional enhancing feature that benefits the Government. Any weakness is minor. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
Good Proposal demonstrates an exhaustive understanding of the requirements and a thorough approach that meets performance or capability standards. There may be strengths and weaknesses, though they offset one another. Has one or more enhancing features that will benefit the Government. Weakness do not significantly detract from the Quoter’s response. Any weaknesses appear to be correctable and will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk is low.
Satisfactory Proposal demonstrates acceptable understanding of requirements and approach that meets performance or capability standards. Acceptable solutions are identified. No major enhancing features will benefit the Government are identified. There is some risk.
Unsatisfactory Proposal fails to meet performance or capability standards and requirements of the Solicitation. Proposal is not awardable. Requirements can only be met with major changes to the proposal. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Past Performance Ratings
| Rating Method |
| Rating Descriptors |
| Excellent |
| The contractor has performed successfully and greatly exceeded expectations under the contract. |
| Good |
| The contractor has performed successfully under the contract. |
| Neutral |
| No record of performance or performance is inconclusive. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The contractor has performed unsuccessfully under the contract. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .