Vendor_Questions_Atch_1.pdf

Amendment 0001 to R17PS00109 Attachment 1

1) Page 2 – General Information – Delivery Term Field Will it be correct to assume that since you specified FOB destination as the delivery term, you won’t need to see a shipping line item on the quote/offer spreadsheet?

Yes, we don’t need a separate line item for shipping.

2) Page 2 – General Information – Delivery Destination Field Can you suggest what shipping vendors usually deliver to this site (USPS, UPS, Fedex, Other?

We are asking since some power plants can only be reached by certain delivery methods and not others.

The destination address/location can accepts all kinds of shipping sources/methods.

3) Page 2 – Important Information Section & Page 3 – Quote/Offer spreadsheet Can you confirm you are ok with offerors adding page 3 with the quote/offer spreadsheet into their own RFQ response template?

If not, do you have an RFQ response template that you would like us to use?

Yes, we will accept additional documents provided with the quote.

4) Page 5 – Deliver to (FOB Destination) section and page 28 /Section WBR 1452.201-80.

Can you please confirm if the contact to send the shipment to will be the COR to be appointed at the time of award? If not, if the COR will be able to provide that information after the award?

The COR will be identified at the time of award, and he or she will accept the shipment.

5) Page 12 – Section 52.212-2 - Evaluation –Commercial Items - Subfactor 2: Demonstrated ability that the item proposed will be retrofitted by a licensed professional engineer Can you please elaborate what the section “that the item proposed will be retrofitted by a licensed professional engineer” mean?

This subfactor has been removed from the solicitation. To ensure consistency, pages 12-13 of the solicitation has been replaced by Attachment 2 of Amendment 0001.

6) Page 12 – Section 52.212-2 - Evaluation –Commercial Items - Subfactor 3 (iii) Past performance.

Do you have a predefined Past Performance template that you want offerors to fill out?

If not, can you confirm if these items will suffice or add any additional items you expect offerors to cover?

- Company Name

- Project/Name

- Contract #

- Project SOW (showing previous experience in selling these or comparable items) and

- POC contact information

We do not have a predefined past performance template. We do not have a list of items like you mentioned above. Therefore, you may submit the information in any format you wish, keeping in mind that past performance information is one indicator of an offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully.

Amendment 0001 to R17PS00109 Attachment 1

7) Page 11 – Solicitation Provisions Do the offerors need to add a provisions compliance section to the RFQ response that list every provision or will it suffice to add a general statement saying we are compliant and then add any items where we have clarifications to?

A general statement will suffice.

8) General questions

- Would you please confirm if offerors can send the technical information on the same document we list the pricing or you need separate documents?

Yes.

- What is the ETA for award date?

There is no estimated time/date of award. However, we ask that offers be valid for at least 60 days.

- What is the debrief timeframe?

This procurement is being acquired using simplified acquisition procedures. As such, there is no requirement for debriefing.

- Can you please share the name, phone number and email of the person that would be the contact for the debrief?

Dean Seggay