QASP Visalia CA.pdf

PDF 132 KB Posted

Attached to
Community Nursing Home Visalia, CA Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C26122Q0031
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 21

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Community Nursing Home Visalia, CA, newest first.
File Type Posted
WD 1973-0130 Rev 62 dtd 10.20.21.pdf PDF
36C26122Q0031_1 122721.pdf PDF
RUG IV Descriptions.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLAND PLAN (QASP)

1. For: Westgate Gardens Care Center

a. This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

What will be monitored

How monitoring will take place

Who will conduct the monitoring

How monitoring efforts and results will be documented

b. This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

c. This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis.

However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO: TBD

b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR: Amy Butler amy.butler@va.gov 559-225-6100 extension 4826

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.

a. Program Manager –

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

a. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.

b. The Performance Requirements Summary Matrix below includes performance standards. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) on a quarterly basis.

c. Contractor will be held to the same standard as VA personnel through quality assurance and performance monitoring to ensure compliance under this Contract. The Quality Assurance and Performance Monitoring will be governed by the appointed COR who will be responsible for verifying compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract. After the contract is awarded, any incidents as evidenced by the monitoring procedures will be forwarded immediately to the Contracting Officer. In addition, the COR will forward the summary evaluation of the contractor performance to the Contracting Officer once performance ends.

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

Nursing Home Care

No. Paragraph in PWS

Indicator/Performance Standard

Standard for

Quality Level

Acceptable Quality Level

Method of Surveillance1

Incentive

1 (C)(11) Nursing Home shall provide VA with copies of all State / Federal licensures, certifications, and investigations reports when requested.

100% 100% Periodic Reviews and spot checks

Positive past performance rating

2 (C)(12) The Contractor shall cooperate in developing plans of corrective action according to outlined criteria in the Performance Work Statement.

100% 100% Periodic Reviews and spot checks

Positive past performance rating

3 (C)(15) Notice of veteran being hospitalized within 72 hours and notice of any veteran death within 24 hours or immediately the first business day after a weekend or holiday.

100% 95% - 100%

Periodic Reviews and spot checks

Positive past performance rating

4 (C)(17) Notice of all reportable events on VA contract veterans and all facility sentinel events within 24 hours or immediately the first business day after a weekend or holiday.

100% 100% Periodic reviews

Positive past performance rating

1 See “Methods of Surveillance,” paragraph 6 of this QASP, for additional methods of monitoring performance.

5 (C)(19) All medical records concerning the veteran's care in the nursing home a) will be readily accessible to VA, and b) within acceptable standards and practice.

100% 100% Periodic Reviews and spot checks

Positive past performance rating

6 (C)(23) Invoices shall be timely and accurate for all items billed.

100% 95% - 100%

Periodic Reviews and spot checks

Positive past performance rating

5. INCENTIVES/RATING STANDARD

Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.

6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. There will be quarterly meetings held with the Contractor to discuss any issues. In addition, the COR shall use the following surveillance methods in the administration of this QASP:

a. Direct Observation. Observation will be taken during any and all site visits by an VA staff.

b. Periodic Inspection. Formal evaluations shall be done annual or as needed. Inspections may be announced or unannounced.

c. Validated User/Customer Complaints. VA staff relies on the Veteran to identify deficiencies.

Veterans will be queried as to the services being provided to them. Any identified concerns or complaints are then investigated and validated.

d. Random Sampling. Random sampling of patient names listed on the monthly detailed invoice shall be verified in CPRS.

e. Progress or status meetings. There will be quarterly meetings held with Contractor to discuss any issues.

7. RATINGS

Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:

The rating method may depend on the monitoring techniques you select. One rating method may be used for all standards or multiple methods may be used.

Exceptional

Performance significantly exceeds contract requirements to the Government's benefit

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet contractual requirements

8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

a. The Government shall document positive OR NEGATIVE performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.

b. When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.

c. When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a

Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's program manager.

d. The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The CO shall review the contractor's corrective action plan with the COR to determine acceptability.

e. Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.

7. FREQUENCY OF SURVEILLANCE.

a. Frequency of Surveillance. During contract performance, the CO will periodically analyze whether the frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed with the COR.

b. Performance Assessment Meetings. The COR shall meet with the contractor Quarterly to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.

Printed Name/Signature – Contractor Representative

Amy Butler– Contracting Officer’s Representative

Alternate COR – Contracting Officer’s Representative

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .