QASP-PRI Laser tech Revised10-29-2020.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q523-- Laser and Technician Service Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C26121Q0530
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_A Document 9-30-2021.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26121Q0530 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26121Q0530 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26121Q0530_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD 2015-5623 Contra Costa County Revision 15 DOLR 7-21-21.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5631 Sacramento County Revision 13 DOLR 8-3-21.pdf | ||
| SCHEDULE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
For: Laser Technician Services The Contractor will be evaluated in accordance with the following:
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored?
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring?
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the Contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the Contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the Contractor through contract modification. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the Contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the Contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: ____________________________________ Organization or Agency: VISN 21 Consolidated Contracting Authority
b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: Carol Ross Organization or Agency: VANCHCS, Surgical Service
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employee(s) of the Contractor serve as the Contractor’s program manager(s) for this contract.
Primary:
Alternate:
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The Contractor is responsible for performance of ALL terms and conditions of the contract. CORs will provide contract progress reports quarterly to the CO reflecting performance on this plan and all other aspects of the resultant contract. The performance standards outlined in this QASP shall be used to determine the level of Contractor performance in the elements defined. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine the level of Contractor performance to these standards.
The Performance Requirements are listed below in Section 6. The Government shall use these standards to determine Contractor performance and shall compare Contractor performance to the standard and assign a rating. At the end of the performance period, these ratings will be used, in part, to establish the past performance of the Contractor on the contract.
5. INCENTIVES/DEDUCTS
The Government shall use past performance as incentives. Incentives shall be based on ratings received on the performance standards (Inclusion of any monetary incentives requires approval through the Department’s Senior Procurement Executive (SPE)).
6. METHODS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
a. DIRECT OBSERVATION: Will be performed periodically by the OR Nurse Manager or designee.
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
Page 2 of 6 Version 0001 Dated 3/17/2014
| Performance Measure |
| PWS Reference |
| Performance Requirement |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Surveillance Method |
| Frequency |
| Incentive |
| Disincentive |
| 1. Licensing, Accreditation & Certification |
| 4.4 |
| Contractor shall submit with the offerors quote the Technician Qualification Sheets that lists training and equipment certificates on file with the contractor for each technician who will perform duties under this contract. |
| Proper certification |
| 100% meets Standards |
| Presented by the Contractor with Qualifications and as updated/renewed |
| Annual |
| Favorable Contractor performance evaluation |
| Termination of the contract |
| 2. Security |
| 6.7 |
| Contractor Information Security requirements establishes the VA comprehensive information security program and practices that protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information created, processed, stored, aggregated, and transmitted by VA’s information systems and business processes. |
| Compliance with all laws, regulations, policies and procedures relating to Privacy, Confidentiality and HIPAA |
| 100% compliance |
| Periodic Sampling; Contractor shall provide evidence of annual training required by VAMC, reports violations per VA Directive 6500.6.. |
| Annual |
| Favorable Contractor performance evaluation |
| Termination of the contract |
| 3. Technical Proficiency |
| 2.1.2. |
| Contract laser technician(s) shall be technically proficient in the skills necessary to fulfill the government’s requirements, including the ability to speak, understand, read, and write English fluently. |
| No more than one set-up or operation errors per quarter |
| 95% Compliance |
| Direct observation |
| Per case |
| Favorable Contractor performance evaluation |
| Termination of the contract |
| 4. Invoicing |
| 4.1.1. |
| Contractor is responsible for submitting a case sheet at the completion of services provided. The contractors case sheet must be signed by the operating room nurse manager or designee and will be used by the COR to confirm case/days and services provided against the Contractor’s invoices. |
| Accuracy and timeliness of invoice submissions |
| 95% meets Standards |
| Monthly observance by the COR |
| Quarterly |
| Favorable Contractor performance evaluation |
| Unfavorable contractor performance evaluation |
| Timeliness |
| 4.4.2.1 |
| Contractor shall transfer requested records to Records Manager Contractor technician(s) shall provide clinical laser technician services. Contractor technician(s) shall be present on time for any scheduled clinics/surgeries as documented by physical presence in the clinic or operating room at the scheduled start time. |
| No more than one late attendance |
| 90% compliance |
| Shipment of records. |
| Per case |
| Favorable Contractor performance evaluation |
| Unfavorable Contractor performance evaluation; registration with CPARS; termination of the contract. |
| Safety |
| 4.4.2.3 |
| Contractor shall provide all material to safely operate the laser equipment and consumable medical supplies. At the conclusion of the case, the contract laser technician will safely remove the laser device from the Operating Room and coordinate with Operating Room Staff for any decontamination requirements |
| Compliance with all laws, regulations, policies and procedures |
| 90% Compliance |
| Direct Observation |
| Per case |
| Favorable Contractor performance evaluation |
| Termination of the contract |
Metrics and methods are designed to determine rating for a given standard and acceptable quality level. The following ratings shall be used:
| EXCEPTIONAL: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular event could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| VERY GOOD: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| SATISFACTORY: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the Contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| MARGINAL: |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. Note: To justify Marginal performance, you should identify a significant event in each category that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the Contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Report or letter). |
| UNSATISFACTORY: |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the Contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters). |
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. The Government shall document positive and/or negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action and preparing annual past performance using CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (CPAR).
b. If contractor performance does not meet the Acceptable Quality level, the CO shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the CO shall document the discussion and place it in the contract file. When the COR and the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to CO. The CO will in turn review and will present to the Contractor's program manager for corrective action.
The Contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the Contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the Contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the Contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the CO. The Government shall review the Contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The CO shall also assure that the Contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance and the acceptability of the Contractor’s corrective action plan.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO. See Sample CDR below.
CONTRACT DISCREPANCY REPORT
| 1. CONTRACT NUMBER |
| 2. REPORT NUMBER FOR THIS DISCREPANCY |
| 3. TO: (Contracting Officer) |
| 4. FROM: (Name of COR) |
5. DATES
a. CDR PREPARED
| b. RETURNED BY CONTRACTOR: |
| c. ACTION COMPLETE |
6. DISCREPANCY OR PROBLEM (Describe in detail. Include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)
| 7. SIGNATURE OF COR |
| Date: |
| 8. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER |
| Date: |
| 9a. TO (Contracting Officer) |
| 9a. FROM (Contractor) |
10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE, CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. (Cite applicable quality control program procedures or new procedures. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
| 11. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE |
| Date: |
12. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION. (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
13. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
14. CLOSE OUT
| NAME |
| TITLE |
| SIGNATURE |
| DATE |
CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED
COR
CONTRACTING OFFICER
9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
a. Frequency of Measurement. The frequency of measurement is defined in the contract or otherwise in this document. The Government (COR or CO) will periodically analyze whether the frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
b. Frequency of Performance Reporting. The COR shall communicate with the Contractor and will provide written reports to the Contracting Officer quarterly (or as outlined in the contract or COR delegation) to review Contractor performance.
10. COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP
SIGNED:
COR NAME/TITLE DATE
SIGNED:
CONTRACTOR NAME/TITLE DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .