QASP - CVI - 2026.pdf
PDF 411 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127Q26QA009
About this file
This is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for RCTA Commercial Vehicle Interdiction Courses, a training delivery contract.
The QASP establishes performance monitoring procedures and acceptance criteria for instructor-led training courses. The Contracting Officer Representative (COR), MSgt Zachary A. Clay (601-616-3465, zachary.a.clay.mil@army.mil), monitors contractor performance monthly through DOD CORT and completes status reports. Quality evaluation relies on student course evaluations administered by Government Facilitators at the end of each course iteration, combined with COR observations. Six deliverables are defined with an Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) of 75% average or above on each class's evaluation: instructor presentation of information, instructor knowledge of subject matter, hands-on training of materials, textbook and handout materials, instruction's strong points of course, and overall course rating. Performance is rated using a three-tier system—Green (acceptable quality level met), Yellow (minimum AQL met but requiring contractor attention), and Red (below minimum AQL requiring immediate resolution). The COR must identify specific components requiring attention or improvement for Yellow or Red ratings. The deliverable rating sheet includes fields for vendor name, contract number, course title, month/year, course iterations and locations/dates, and mandatory comments for substandard ratings. A Combating Trafficking in Persons compliance question is included in the certification process, which references FAR Part 52.246-4 (inspection of services) or FAR Part 52.212-4(a) (commercial contract inspections).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions- Answers.pdf | ||
| CVI WAGE DETERMINATION.pdf | ||
| CLAUSES W9127Q26QA009.pdf | ||
| PWS - CVI.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
The Contracting Officer Representative (COR) will monitor contractor performance and complete the status report in DOD CORT monthly. The COR for this acquisition is MSgt Zachary Clay 601-616-3465, zachary.a.clay.mil@army.mil.
The Government Facilitator for each course iteration will provide students with an end of course evaluation. The completed evaluations, along with the COR observations, will be used to evaluate the quality of the course presentation/deliverable.
Deliverable Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Method Used/Frequency
1. Instructor presentation of information
75% average or above on each class’s evaluation
Course Evaluation / Each Course
2. Instructor knowledge of subject matter
75% average or above on each class’s evaluation
Course Evaluation / Each Course
3. Hands on training of materials
75% average or above on each class’s evaluation
Course Evaluation / Each Course
4. Textbook & handout materials presented to the students
75% average or above on each class’s evaluation
Course Evaluation / Each Course
5. Instruction’s strong points of course
75% average or above on each class’s evaluation
Course Evaluation / Each Course
6. Overall course rating 75% average or above on each class’s evaluation
Course Evaluation / Each Course
*Student Course Evaluations will be completed by each student attending the course, and will ask students to rate the following:
1. Instructor presentation of information
2. Instructor knowledge of subject matter
3. Hands on training of materials
4. Textbook & handout materials presented to the students
5. Instruction’s strong points of course
6. Overall course rating
RCTA Commercial Vehicle Interdiction Courses
Rating Description Green Performance and technical specifications are being met at an acceptable quality level (AQL).
Yellow Performance and technical specifications are currently being met at the minimum
AQL, but the following service/ deliverable needs contractor attention (see comments).
The COR must identify what component of the deliverable and/or service requires attention.
Red Performance and technical specifications are not being met at AQL and the following service/ deliverable needs immediate contractor resolutions (see comments).
The COR must identify what component of the deliverable and/or service is below the minimum AQL.
Vendor Name:
Contract number:
Course title:
Month: Year:
DELIVERABLE GREEN YELLOW RED
1. Instructor presentation of information
2. Instructor knowledge of subject matter
3. Hands on training of materials
4. Textbook & handout materials presented to the students
5. Instruction’s strong points of course
6. Overall course rating
Iterations This Period (Location/Dates):
Comments (Required for Yellow or Red ratings):
Combating Trafficking in Persons: Was there evidence of any Combating Trafficking in Persons violations? Yes____ No____ (if “Yes,” provide an explanation in the space provided below. (use a separate page if more space is required)
I certify that this report is in accordance with the Inspection of Services Clause FAR Part 52.246-4 or the inspections for commercial contracts FAR Part 52.212-4(a), the monthly surveillance schedule, and the QASP. I hereby certify that services have been received and accepted.
COR Name/Phone/Email: MSgt Zachary A. Clay, 601-616-3465, zachary.a.clay.mil@army.mil
COR Signature:
Quality Assurance Rating Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .