View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sources Sought Response Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ID07200018

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) Greater Southwest Region

PROJECT NUMBER:

#47QFWA20R0006

ITSS Order # ID07200018

C/KC-135, KC-10, KC-46, OC-X Weapon Systems Support, Information Assurance/Mission Assurance, and Life Cycle Management Program- Integrated Data Environment

GSA ALLIANT 2

Performance Work Statement (PWS)

March 17, 2020

CHANGE CONTROL LOG

Version
Date
Change

Initial Release

N/A

CONTENTS

Performance Work Statement (PWS)

Change Control Log1
1.0 BACKGROUND5
2.0 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES/DESSCRIPTION OF WORK5
3.0 SCOPE6
4.0 REQUIREMENTS/SPECIFIC TASKS6 4.1 Task Order Program Management Services6
4.2 Requirements Support9
4.3 Acquisition Program Support9
4.4 Test and Evaluation Planning and Execution Support9
4.5 Technical Order Development and Production Support9
4.6 Modification Training Development and Execution Support9
4.7 Qualification and Continuation Training Development10
4.8 Mission Assurance10
4.9 LCMP – IDE LCMP – IDE Applications Systems Analysis12
4.10 Lifecycle Management Process – IDE SUSTAINMENT13
4.11 Lifecycle Management Process – IDE Enhancements & Support13
4.12 Mission Execution through Strategic Planning and IA/MA/AE Analysis15
4.13 Capability Gaps and Requirements15
4.14 Airborne and Ground Systems16
4.15 Detailed and Viable Alternatives for Mission Requirements17
4.16 Development and Assessment of IA/MA/AE Requirements17
4.17 Assessment of Impacts on IA/MA/AE Technology18
4.18 Vulnerability, Authenticity, and Continuity Assessments19
4.19 Assessment of Capabilities in Real-World Environments19
4.20 IA/MA Conference Planning and Meeting Initiatives19
4.21 IA/MA Mission Requirements Program Analysis20
5. GENERAL INFORMATION20
5.1 Deliverables20
5.2 Contractor Staffing32
5.3 Desired Skills and Knowledge33
6. PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS37
6.1 Contractor Employee Guidelines37
6.2 Personnel Qualifications and Experience39
7. TRAVEL39
7.1 Travel Sites39
7.2 Trip Reports40
7.3 Passports40
7.4 Travel Time40
7.5 Approval for Travel40
8. OTHER DIRECT COSTS41
8.1 Materials/Equipment/Supplies41
8.2 Total Estimated Other Direct Costs41
8.3 Methods of Material/ODC Procurement42
9. ADDITIONAL REQUIEMENTS INFORMATION43
9.1 Data Rights43
9.2 Applicable Publications and References43
9.3 DD25444
9.4 Organizational Conflict of Interest44
9.5 Green/Sustainable Procurement Practices/Requirements46
9.6 Warranty Service49
10. ORDER REQUIREMENTS INFORMATION49
10.1 Type of Task49
10.2 Line Item Numbering Structure49
10.3 North American Industry Classification System Code50
10.4 Period of Performance and FAR Clauses in Full Text or by Reference50
10.5 Place and Hours of Performance51
10.6 Productive Labor Hours52
10.7 Government Property52
10.8 Contractor Acquired Government Furnished Property52
10.9 Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12)53
10.10 Security53
10.11 Special Terms and Conditions/Requirements54
10.11.1 508 Compliance54
10.12 Post Award Conference54
10.13 Transition Plan55
10.14 Personal Service55
10.15 Privacy Act56
10.16 Limitation of Funds56
10.17 Unilateral Modifications for Funds Management56
10.18 Records/Data56
10.19 Contractor Manpower Reporting56
10.20 Government Furnished Items57
10.21 Government Furnished Property57
11. INVOICING/PROCEDURES FOR PAYMENT57
11.1 Task Order Pricing58
11.2 Electronic Posting of Invoices58
11.3 Invoicing Instruction Based on Order Type58
11.4 Invoice Content58
11.5 Receiving/Client Agency’s Acceptance59
11.6 Final Invoice60
11.7 Orders-Close Out Procedures60
11.8 Unilateral Close Out Modifications60
11.9 Contract Performance Evaluation60
11.10 Other Considerations61
11.11 Third Party Delays61
11.12 Solicitation Provisions and Task Order Clauses61
12. FAR CLAUSES INCORPATED BY REFERENCE62

1.0 BACKGROUND

The Air Force Tanker Support Division have mission requirements to provide Information Assurance (IA), Mission Assurance (MA), Aerospace Systems (AS), Aerospace Engineering (AE), and information/mission systems security improvements to Airborne and Ground systems/platforms involving secure systems, mechanical, structural, electrical, aerospace engineering, and technical research/analysis in support of the C/KC-135, KC-10, KC-46, & OC-X Weapon System.

Under this effort, the contractor will provide personnel to support weapon system sustainment, modifications, and mission assurance activities for the Tanker Support Division System Program Office (SPO) portfolio of systems. Weapon system sustainment activities span the Defense Acquisition Life Cycle phases and examples include: Materiel Solution Analysis, Technology Development, Engineering and Manufacturing design, Production and Deployment, and Operations and Support. Contractor personnel will support weapon systems through the provision of subject matter expertise to support the SPO program managers, Air Force system engineers, and Higher Headquarters (HHQ) agencies. Provide operational/systems expertise during Technical Interchange Meetings (TIM) in order to refine road maps for future modifications and to guide requirements definitions, systems design, modification readiness, and test planning. Contractor personnel will review and provide input on technical documents, provide technical expertise to Requirements Working Groups (RWG), Requirements Review Boards (RRB), and Stakeholder Working Groups (SWG). Additionally, contractor personnel will provide operational expertise in reviewing the original equipment manufacturer provided technical and training materials, developing modification training materials, planning, managing and conducting contractor/government developed test and evaluations, and executing training sessions for other operational crew members, both on the ground and airborne.

2.0. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES/DESCRIPTION OF WORK

The SPO requires subject matter and functional area expertise in the following objective areas. The contractor must support the Tanker Support Division platform by providing subject matter expertise to fulfill mission requirements:

· Task Order Program Management Services

· Requirements Support

· Acquisition Program Support

· Test and Evaluation Planning and Execution Support

· Technical Order Development and Production Support

· Modification Training Development and Execution Support

· Qualification and Continuation Training Development

· Mission Assurance

· LCMP – IDE LCMP – IDE Applications Systems Analysis

· Lifecycle Management Process – IDE Sustainment

· Lifecycle Management Process – IDE Enhancements & Support

· Mission Execution through Strategic planning and IA/MA/AE analysis

· Capability gaps and requirements

· Airborne and Ground systems

· Detailed and Viable Alternatives for Mission requirements

· DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF IA/MA/AE requirements

· Assessment of Impacts on IA/MA/AE technology

· Vulnerability, authenticity, and continuity assessments

· Assessment of capabilities in real-world environments

· IA/MA Conference planning and meeting initiatives

· IA/MA Mission Requirements Program Analysis

· Conference planning and meeting initiatives

· Aerospace Systems Engineering

· Program Analysis

· Program Support

In the following section, the Tanker Support Division SPO describes the tasks for supporting the overall objective of enhancing IA/MA/AS/AE systems and supporting air and ground platforms. These tasks require operational, functional, and subject matter experts with experience in a wide range of areas. To meet these requirements, the contractor will provide platform experienced/qualified staff to the SPO, which will enable the division to excel. The contractor needs to be available beyond a normal work week/day. Flexible schedules are required to support across several projects or tasks, from unclassified through Top Secret levels without extensive ramp-up time or retraining.

3.0. SCOPE

Tanker Support Division SPO requires professional services to support the aircraft platform. The primary contractor domiciles for day-to-day support will be within the Tanker Support Division SPO based at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma; however, travel to support mission needs at other locations may be required. All labor performed by the contractor pursuant to this PWS must cover all requirements listed within Section 2, including the task deliverables, known and unknown, stated in Section 3. The services provided by the contractor are required to meet the SPO mission needs, objectives, and tasks.

Contractor personnel must integrate with existing government workforce and utilize their previous operational experience while interfacing with existing military partners to assist them in identifying system shortfalls; and, aid in requirements definition, organization and prioritization for funding analysis, decision and development of a fielding strategy for potential solutions. The Contractor must assist the Government to refine, enhance and improve the process in the area of system modernization when required. Contractor personnel may be required to travel to various locations to support these tasks.

4.0. REQUIREMENTS/SPECIFIC TASKS

4.1. TASK 1 PROVIDE TASK ORDER PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES

The contractor must provide program management services under this TO. This includes the management and oversight of all activities performed by contractor personnel, including subcontractors, to satisfy the requirements identified in this Performance Work Statement (PWS).

4.1.1 SUBTASK 1 – COORDINATE A PROJECT KICK-OFF MEETING

The contractor must schedule, coordinate, and host a Project Kick-Off Meeting (Table 5.1, Deliverable 01)) at the location approved by the Government. The meeting will provide an introduction between the contractor personnel and Government personnel who will be involved with the TO. The meeting will provide the opportunity to discuss technical management, and security issues, and travel authorization and reporting procedures. At a minimum, the attendees must include the contractor’s Key Personnel, Tanker Support Division SPO, Technical Points of Contact (TPOCS), other relevant Government personnel, and the GSA Contracting Officer (CO) and Program Manager (PM).

At least three days prior to the Project Kick-Off Meeting, the contractor must provide Kick-Off Meeting Agenda (Table 5.1, Deliverable 01) for review and approval by the GSA CO and PM and the Tanker Support Division SPO. The agenda must include, at a minimum, the following topics/deliverables:

· Points of contact (POCs) for all parties

· Personnel discussion (i.e., roles and responsibilities and lines of communication between contractor and Government).

· Staffing Plan and status

· Transition-In Plan (Table 5.1, Deliverable 03) and discussion.

· Security discussion and requirements (i.e., building access, badges, Common Access Cards (CACs)).

· Invoicing requirements.

The Government will provide the contractor with the number of Government participants for the Kick-Off meeting, and the contractor must provide sufficient copies of the presentation for all present.

The contractor must draft and provide a Kick-Off Meeting Minutes Report (Table 5.1, Deliverable 05). The MSR must include the following:

· Activities during reporting period, by task (include ongoing activities, new activities completed, and progress to date on all above mentioned activities). Each section must start with a brief description of the task.

· Problems and corrective actions taken. Also include issues or concerns and proposed resolutions to address them.

· Personnel gains, losses, and status (security clearances. Etc.).

· Government actions required.

· Schedule (show major tasks, milestones, and deliverables; planned and actual start and completion dates for each).

· Summary of trips taken, conferences attended etc. (Attach Trip Reports to the MSR for reporting period).

· Cost incurred by CLIN.

· Accumulated invoiced cost for each CLIN up to the previous month.

· Projected cost of each CLIN for the current month.

4.1.2 SUBTASK 2 – CONVENE TECHNICAL STATUS MEETINGS

The contractor TO Program Manager (TOPM) must convene a monthly Technical Status Meeting with Tanker Support Division SPO, GSA PM and other Government stakeholders (Section F, Deliverable #). The purpose of this meeting is to ensure all stakeholders are informed of the monthly activities and MSR, provide opportunities to identify other activities and establish priorities and coordinate resolution of identified problems or opportunities. The contractor PM must provide minutes of these meetings, including attendance, issues discussed, decisions made, and action items assigned, via a Technical Status Meeting Minutes Report to the GSA PM (Table 5.1, Deliverable #02).

4.1.3 SUBTASK 3 – PREPARE AND UPDATE a PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) The contractor must document all support requirements in a PMP and provide it to the Government (Table 5.1, Deliverable 08). The PMP must:

· Describe the proposed management approach and contractor organizational structure including the contractor’s approach for quality management to ensure TO deliverables are of the highest quality in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) (Attachment 1) Provide for an overall Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) with a minimum of three levels and associated responsibilities and partnerships between or among Government organizations.

· Contain detailed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for all tasks and processes that require Government involvement and/or approval.

· Include milestones, tasks, and subtasks required in this TO.

· Describe in detail the contractor’s approach to risk management under this TO.

· Describe in detail the contractor’s approach to communications, including processes, procedures, communication approach, and other rules of engagement between the contractor and the Government.

The PMP is an evolutionary document that must be updated as changes in the program occur. The contractor must work from the latest Government-approved version of the PMP.

4.1.4 SUBTASK 4 – PREPARE TRIP REPORTS The Government will identify the need for a Trip Report (Table 5.1, Deliverable 09) when a Consent to Purchase is submitted (Attachment 5) The contractor must keep a summary of all Long-Distance Travel including, but not limited to, the name of the employee, location of travel, duration of trip, and Point of Contact (POC) at travel location. Trip Reports must also contain Government approval authority, total cost of the trip, a detailed description of the purpose of the trip, and any knowledge gained.

4.1.5 SUBTAK 5 – CONDUCT TRANSITION-IN The contractor must conduct transition-in activities as proposed in it transition-in approach provided with its proposal and the Transition-In Plan. The contractor must ensure that there will be minimum service disruption to vital Government business and no service degradation during and after transition. The contractor must implement its transition-in approach immediately after TO award (TOA) and all transition-in activities must be completed no later than 45 calendar days after TOA.

4.1.6 SUBTASK 6 – CONDUCT TRANSITION-OUT The contractor must provide transition-out support when required by the Government. The Transition-Out Plan (Table 5.1, Deliverable 10) must facilitate the accomplishment of a seamless transition from the incumbent to incoming contractor/Government personnel at the expiration of the TO. The contractor must provide the Transition-Out Plan within three months of Project Start (PS). The contractor must review and update the Transition-Out Plan in accordance with the specifications in Sections E and F.

In the Transition-Out Plan, the contractor must identify how it will coordinate with the incoming contractor and/or Government personnel to transfer knowledge regarding the following:

· Project management processes.

· Points of contact.

· Location of technical and project management documentation.

· Status of ongoing technical initiatives.

· Appropriate contractor–to-contractor coordination to ensure a seamless transition.

· Transition of Key Personnel.

· Schedules and milestones.

· Actions required of the Government.

The contractor must also establish and maintain effective communication with the incoming contractor/Government personnel for the period of the transition via weekly status meetings or as often as necessary to ensure a seamless transition-out.

Note: The contractor must implement its Transition-Out Plan NLT six months prior to expiration of the TO.

4.2 TASK 2 – REQUIREMENTS SUPPORT Contractor personnel must integrate with existing government workforce and utilize their previous operational experience while interfacing with existing military partners to assist them in identifying system shortfalls; aid in requirements definition, organization and prioritization for funding analysis, decision and development of a fielding strategy for potential solutions. The Contractor must assist the Government to refine, enhance and improve the process in the area of system modernization when required. Contractor personnel may be required to travel to various locations to support these tasks.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #03)

4.3 TASK 3 ACQUISITION PROGRAM SUPPORT Contractor personnel will integrate into the existing government workforce in respective C/KC-135, KC-10, KC-46 & OC-X Weapon Systems SPO units, assisting and augmenting their current processes for the system modernization. Contractor personnel will utilize their previous operational experience in the aiding of government personnel in: the design and development of schedules within the program office; accomplish analysis and input to system design, development, and install; aid and assist in documentation creation, review and acceptance. The Contractor must assist the Government to refine, enhance and improve the process in the area of system modernization when required. Contract personnel may be required to travel to various locations to support these tasks.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable # 04)

4.4. TASK 4 TEST AND EVALUATION PLANNING AND EXECUTION SUPPORT Contractor personnel will integrate into the existing government workforce, assisting and augmenting their current processes for developmental and operational test planning and execution, test training development and implementation, event scheduling and tracking. The Contractor must assist the Government to refine, enhance and improve the process in the area of system modernization when required. Contract personnel may be required to travel to various locations to support these tasks.

Contract personnel will use existing unit processes, tools and mechanisms, and/or work to integrate test Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) processes, tools, and mechanisms for test discrepancy documentation, reporting, and tracking to ensure discrepancies are documented, tracked and resolved by the appropriate agency.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #05)

4.5. TTASK 5 TECHNICAL ORDER DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION SUPPORT

Contract personnel will integrate into the existing government workforce, assisting and augmenting their current processes for technical order development. Contract personnel will utilize previous operational experience to conduct and aid in the analysis of system designs and coordinate end-user inputs into the technical order authoring process. The Contractor must assist the Government to refine, enhance and improve the process in the area of technical order development when required. Contract personnel may be required to travel to various locations to support these tasks.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #06)

4.6 TASK 6 MODIFICATION TRAINING DEVELOPMENT AND EXECUTION SUPPORT

Contract personnel will integrate into the existing government workforce, assisting and augmenting their current processes for identifying and developing training strategies for each new system modification. Contract personnel will utilize previous operational experience to: conduct analysis of various modification design documentation; identify changes in operational techniques and procedures; and subsequently develop training concepts or strategies related to modifications for eventual assimilation into long-term weapon system training curriculums. The Contractor must assist the Government to refine, enhance and improve the process in the area of training requirements analysis when required. Contract personnel may be required to travel to various locations to support these tasks.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #07)

4.6.1 .SUB TASK 1 QUALIFICATION AND CONTINUATION TRAINING & CONTINUATION TRAINING DEVELOPMENT Contract personnel will integrate into the existing government workforce, assisting and augmenting their current processes for assimilating numerous modifications into long-term qualification and continuation training programs. Contract personnel will utilize previous operational experience to advise in the development and management of long-term training framework strategies altered by system modifications. The Contractor must assist the Government to refine, enhance and improve the process in the area of continuation training when required. Contract personnel may be required to travel to various locations to support these tasks.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #08)

4.7. TASK 7 MISSION ASSURANCE

Contract personnel will integrate into the existing government workforce, assisting and augmenting their current processes for ensuring mission success. Contract personnel will utilize their operational experience to augment government personnel in the planning and execution of modifications and sustainment activities, to include coordination with numerous high-level Department of Defense, Secretary of the Air Force and Major Command organizations.

The contractor must conduct research and analysis to assist the SPO in its assessment of priorities and strategies for achieving strategic planning, interoperability, airworthiness, its fielding of sustainment and modification capabilities that satisfy specified mission requirements.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #09)

4.8. TASK 8 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT PROCESS (LCMP) – IDE SUSTAINMENT

Contractor must provide technical reports and software code releases to the Air Force Tanker Support Division. Contractor support must include IA/MA research, analysis, and recommendations to the Program Office. A Secure Data Management System, known as the Lifecycle Management Program-Integrated Data Environment (LCMP-IDE), is in place to provide Lifecycle Sustainment Analysis for Air Force Tanker Support Division. The contractor must provide LCMP-IDE updates to compliance status and documentation, infrastructure support, software maintenance and support, user support, incident response, and hosting environment support. Additionally, contractor provides program management, module enhancements, and system administration for LCMP-IDE, including a detailed chronology of known/forecasted aircraft lifecycle events, along with comprehensive fleet management. The contractor must provide IA/MA technical research, analysis, and recommendations to the Air Force Tanker Support Division to aid in developing a secure, capabilities-based planning process for identifying, interpreting, and leveraging near-, mid-, and long-term opportunities, as well as metrics for capturing existing, new, and emerging IA/MA requirements. The contractor must prepare data management system security requirements reports on selected advance technologies and their impact on the Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #10 Secure Data Management System Security Requirements) The contractor must prepare secure data management system security plan on selected advance technologies and their impact on the Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #11 Secure Data Management System Security Plan) The contractor must provide IA/MA research and analysis of the interoperability and compatibility of these new components with existing and planned systems. The contractor must identify IA/MA and Network Operations (NetOps) requirements and capabilities for information systems and operations, as well as identify IA/MA technology insertion opportunities and potential IA/MA capability shortfalls of MCDA and other ground/airborne systems and Air Force Tanker Support Division systems platforms.

The contractor must provide a Secure Data Management System Security Site document for Air Force Tanker Support Division. The contractor must document system usage statistics, compile system user and access privileges reports, and conduct survivability and vulnerability analysis reports. The contractor must prepare IA/MA Emerging Technologies reports for Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #12 Secure Data Management System Security Site) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #13 IA/MA Emerging Technology reports) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #14 Secure Data Management System Security Site - Vulnerability of Threat Assessment Updates) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #15 Secure Data Management System Security Site - Financial Status Reports)

4.8.1 SUBTASK 1 COMPLIANCE The contractor must provide updates to compliance status and documentation, infrastructure support, software maintenance and support, user support, incident response, and hosting environment support. The contractor must maintain compliance with Department of Defense (DoD) Risk Management Framework (RMF) to retain the system’s Authority to Operate (ATO): efforts include recurring system vulnerability and maintenance patching, maintenance of Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) / Security Requirements Guide (SRG) compliance, and continuous monitoring of the system for security threats and newly discovered vulnerabilities. Contractor must support security roles to include: compliance with applicable policies, procedures, and directives; assist in meeting security requirements for the system and its components; assist in the day-to-day operations of the system and its operational availability to support the mission. Information about the system and its operational status must be maintained and reported to DoD/Air Force authoritative sources, to include National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) compliance and maintenance of system records in Information Technology Investment Portfolio Suite (ITIPS) and Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service (eMASS) systems.

4.8.2 SUBTASK 2 INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT The contractor must provide ongoing infrastructure support to ensure the system is stable, reliable, and up to date. The contractor must perform tasks such as patching, backups, technical refreshes and regular monitoring to ensure uptime and usability. (Note: large scale reengineering of the infrastructure would be reserved for separate modernization activities to be separately priced and approved if deemed necessary.) The contractor must support the testing and staging of production-ready LCMP-IDE updates prior to Configuration Control Board (CCB) approval and subsequent deployment to the Tanker Support Division LCMP-IDE production Automated Information System.

4.8.3 SUBTASK 3 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT – The contractor must support a CCB for reviewing and approving changes, regular code reviews/scans, and software testing. The contractor must maintain separate testing, staging, and production environments to facilitate updates and software configuration management for the LCMP-IDE. The contractor must support production deployments of major/minor releases required to provide updates, enhancements and issue resolution.

4.8.4 SUBTASK 4 USER SUPPORT– The contractor must provide a DoD-trusted, smart card enabled account for any user of the LCMP-IDE system. The contractor must provide a helpdesk ticketing service to support activities such as initial account request, account provisioning, account decommissioning, change permission requests, and smart card issues/renewals. Accounts will be reviewed and audited for DoD policy compliance. On-Call helpdesk support provides Tier 1, 2, and 3 assistance for issue resolution by system administrators. In addition, the contractor must support the ongoing operations of the system by strategic communications to coordinate planned maintenance efforts and/or incident status to the user community. The contractor must provide user account management procedures to be regularly reviewed and documented and user usage data reporting as required. The contractor must provide evaluations including system performance 18analysis, auditing log records, reporting, and monitoring for anomalous user activity.

4.8.5 SUBTASK 5 INCIDENT RESPONSE – The contractor must provide ongoing preventative maintenance efforts, and address incident scenarios ranging from minor system issues to major infrastructure failure by providing responses from various supporting staff to restore system functionality or otherwise address the incident condition as quickly as possible.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #19)

4.8.9 TASK 9 LCMP – IDE LCMP – IDE APPLICATIONS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS – The contractor must provide improved efficiency, effectiveness, and productivity of the program office while using LCMP-IDE. The contractor must provide analysis and recommendations for using the LCMP-IDE system to manage information associated with B52 weapon system lifecycle management. The contractor must conduct research and analysis to assist the Tanker Support Division in improving the LCMP-IDE system’s alignment with lifecycle management processes.

The contractor must conduct research and analysis to assess LCMP-IDE system usage levels in managing fleet lifecycle information in the Tanker Support Division, and across the bomber enterprise. The contractor must implement usage metrics depicting monthly statistics and time-based trends. The contractor must prepare two LCMP Usage Summary Reports showing the number of LCMP-IDE users, their organizations and locations, and the usage metrics.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #20 LCMP Analysis Report) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #21 LCMP Usage Summary Report) 4.10.TASK 10 LCMP – IDE ENHANCEMENTS AND SUPPORT – The contractor must provide enhancement to its LCMP-IDE site and support associated with existing capabilities. The contractor must provide update to the specific modules listed below to enhance user experience and provide new functionality where requested. Targeted efforts will include but not be limited to: (specific enhancements will be identified during Option Years).

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #22 Initial LCMP-IDE CDRLs SQL 2012 database file (.bak) compressed attachments file (.zip/.7z)) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #23 Final LCMP-IDE CDRLs SQL 2012 database file (.bak) and compressed attachments file) (.zip/.7z),) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #24 Secure Data Management System Security Site - Deploy enhancement prototypes to staging servers) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #25 Secure Data Management System Security Site - Deploy enhancement prototypes to staging servers) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #26 Secure Data Management System Security Site - Deploy final enhancement features to production servers)

4.11 TASK 11 MISSION EXECUTION THROUGH STRATEGY PLANNING AND IA/MA ANALYSIS

The contractor must conduct research and analysis to assist the Air Force Tanker Support Division in its assessment of priorities and strategies for achieving strategic planning, interoperability, and secure architectures and in its fielding of IA/MA capabilities that satisfy specified mission requirements.

The contractor must provide IA/MA technical research, analysis, and recommendations in developing short-and long-term strategic plans to enhance the ability of the Air Force Tanker Support Division to proactively execute its mission and roles (Table 5.1, Deliverable #27 Strategic Plan Recommendations) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #28 Network Modeling of Fleet) To assess system compliance with IA/MA policies and interoperability, the contractor must provide IA/MA technical research, analysis, and recommendations for the application of IA/MA leading-edge technology. The contractor must also provide IA/MA technical analysis to optimize the use of leading-edge and existing networks, reduce vulnerabilities, and increase the efficiency of the Air Force Tanker Support Division. The contractor must provide recommendations for the development of a Department of Defense (DoD) IA/MA-compliant architecture framework that incorporates Network Centric Enterprise Services and complies with the IA/MA component of the Global Information Grid (GIG) architecture (Table 5.1, Deliverable #29 Technical Reports) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #30 Technology Assessment Reports) The contractor must provide IA/MA technical analyses for capability-based planning processes and other strategic planning efforts through architecture development, requirements analysis, capability analysis, technical and resource evaluation of alternatives, and examination of key enabling technologies consistent with other agencies and commands (Table 5.1, Deliverable #31 Capabilities/Requirements Documents) The contractor must provide analytic techniques and models for the Air Force Tanker Support Division’s planning processes that analyze the Tanker Support objectives.

The contractor must conduct assessments related to the technical, operational, and scheduling aspects of strategic planning efforts. The contractor must conduct technical analyses of tools, techniques, and procedures to capture the military IA/MA technology, aerospace operations, and infrastructure. Based on this technical analysis, the contractor must develop recommendations for IA/MA Transformation Plans and Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&M) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #32 Recommendations for IA/MA Transformation Plans and plans of Action and Milestones) The contractor must develop recommendations for Concepts of Operations (CONOPSs), and for Headquarters (HQ) DoD planning and requirements structure (Table 5.1, Deliverable #33 CONOPS and Requirements Structure Recommendations) The contractor must perform IA/MA technical assessments, IA/MA threat assessments, and critical IA/MA infrastructure protection analyses across the Air Force Tanker Support Division. The contractor must develop a system or infrastructure risk assessment methodology that provides a qualitative assessment of IA/MA related actions, results, and related metrics (Table 5.1, Deliverable #34 Risk Assessment Methodology Report)Compliance of Airborne Systems to Meet IA/MA Mission Requirements) The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical research and analysis and must identify IA/MA requirements for airborne systems and modifications to KC-10, KC-46, and KC-135 aircraft to assist the Air Force Tanker Support Division in complying with stakeholder IA/MA requirements

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #35 Recommendations for Airborne IA/MA Prioritization) The contractor must analyze existing and evolving DoD IA/MA policies to identify IA/MA technical shortfalls that emerge during the development of secure airborne systems. The contractor must analyze information gathered from the Airborne IA/MA Security Plan and report the impacts identified on specific systems to Air Force Tanker Support Division and provide recommendations on findings (Table 5.1, Deliverable # 36 Airborne IA/MA Security Plan and Program Protection Plan) The contractor must analyze airborne system specifications, program success criteria, program exit criteria, system safety requirements, and Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) requirements against IA/MA objectives.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #37) Based on the analysis, the contractor must develop recommendations for aligning new IA/MA technologies and IA/MA policies and procedures (Table 5.1, Deliverable #38) The contractor must conduct technical research and analysis to identify and test emerging IA/MA technologies to identify the impact of IA/MA technologies on programs for aircraft, training, and system modification (Table 5.1, Deliverable #39) Based on the prioritized IA/MA requirements, the contractor must provide technical research, analysis, and recommendations in the development of Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) documents (Table 5.1, Deliverable #40 IA/MA Input JCIDS Documentation)

4.12 TASK 12 ANALYZE AND IDENTIFY IA/MA CAPABILITY GAPS AND REQUIREMENTS

To support the Air Force Tanker Support Division’s response to IA/MA capability gaps with KC-10, KC-46, and KC-135 aircraft, contractor will identify IA/MA deficiencies and requirements shortfalls and recommend updates to requirements documents (Table 5.1, Deliverable #41 IA/MA input of JCIDS Documentation) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #42 IA/MA Capability Gap Analysis Documents) The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical analyses, including the development of requirements, test, and modification of KC-10, KC-46, and KC-135 and other ground/airborne systems/platforms systems, subsystems, and components (Table 5.1, Deliverable #43 Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Feasibility Report) The contractor must provide support in addressing identified capability gaps through research and assessment of IA/MA emerging technologies. The contractor must demonstrate prototype solutions of the forefront technologies (Table 5.1, Deliverable #44 Prototype Solution of Capability Gap Documentation and Briefing) The contractor must develop recommendations for the way ahead for IA/MA modifications and development planning (including the development of databases) to identify and report impacts on the status of aircraft modifications (Table 5.1, Deliverable #45 IA/MA Modification and Development Planning Recommendations Document) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #46 IA/MA Databases).

The contractor must provide engineering and operational analyses to evaluate system designs and analyze KC-10, KC-46, and KC-135 aircraft functionalities (e.g., communication systems, system-level requirements, emerging IA/MA technologies, and KC-10, KC-46, and KC-135 aircraft modernization programs) and airborne systems IA/MA risks (Table 5.1, Deliverable # 47 System Design, Functionality, and Risk Assessment Document) The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical analyses of requirements definition, development, production, test, modification, and sustainment of KC-10, KC-46, and KC-135 modernization programs (Table 5.1, Deliverable #48 IA/MA Technical Analysis of Modernization Programs Report) The contractor must provide IA/MA technical analysis, assessments, identification, and recommendations for potential Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, and Facilities (DOTMLPF) approaches to or mitigating capability gaps as part of the JCIDS process to assist the Air Force Tanker Support Division in meeting new requirements.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #48 DOTMLPF Analysis) The contractor must develop recommendations for the Air Force Tanker Support Division’s IA/MA experimentation efforts, including concept formulation, technology identification, technology insertion, technology transition, and experiment assessment.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #49 IA/MA Experimentation Analysis and Recommendations)

4.13 TASK 13 COMPLIANCE OF GROUND SYSTEMS TO MEET IA/MA MISSION REQUIREMENTS The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical research and analysis and develop recommendations to identify the IA/MA requirements specific to individual Airborne and Ground systems to ensure the Air Force Tanker Support Division’s compliance with both newly developed Airborne and Ground systems and modifications to existing Airborne and Ground systems with KC-10, KC-46, and KC-135 aircraft and stakeholder IA/MA requirements.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #50 IA/MA Requirements Recommendations for Ground Systems) The contractor must analyze existing and evolving DoD IA/MA policies to identify IA/MA shortfalls related to technical IA/MA issues that will emerge during the development of secure Airborne and Ground systems.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #51 Airborne and Ground Systems IA/MA Policy Gap Analysis Documents) The contractor must analyze Airborne and Ground system specifications, program success criteria, program exit criteria, system safety requirements, and OT&E requirements to ensure that IA/MA objectives are met Based on the results of the analysis, the contractor must develop recommendations for aligning new IA/MA technologies and IA/MA policies and procedures The contractor must perform technical research and analysis to identify and test emerging IA/MA technologies. The results of the analysis will aid the Air Force Tanker Support Division in its assessment of the impact of IA/MA technologies on programs for training and Airborne and Ground system modification Based on the recommended IA/MA requirements priorities, the contractor must provide technical research, analysis, and recommendations to aid in the development of JCIDS documents.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #53 Objective Analysis for Airborne and Ground Systems) Table 5.1, Deliverable #54 Airborne and Ground Policy and Procedure Assessment and Recommendations) Table 5.1, Deliverable #55 IA/MA Airborne and Ground System Technology Impact Analysis) Table 5.1, Deliverable #56 IA/MA Input to JCIDS Documentation)

4.14 TASK 14 DETAILED AND VIABLE ALTERNATIVES FOR MISSION REQUIREMENTS The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical analysis, technology studies, analyses of alternatives (AoA), and feasibility studies to ensure that the Air Force Tanker Support Division can evaluate operational effectiveness of platform systems to meet mission capabilities. The contractor must draft a study plan that must specify assessment actions, timetables, and deliverables for an AoA and must then orchestrate the analysis (Table 5.1, Deliverable #57 Analysis of Alternatives Report) The contractor must deliver a report analyzing the Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) or experimentation and its applicability to Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems (Table 5.1, Deliverable #58 Experimentation Report) The contractor must deliver Technology Plans that should include Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems technology and capabilities (Deliverable 33: Technology Plan). The contractor must deliver Technology Roadmaps that include a description of Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems technology, capabilities, desired outcome, and schedule for deployment (Table 5.1, Deliverable #59 Technology Roadmap) The contractor must develop or arrange for briefings on selected advance technologies and their impact on the Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems (. The contractor must deliver reports on selected advance technologies and their impact on the Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems, including an IA/MA risk analysis of potential systems and subsystems.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #60 Advance Technology Presentation) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #62 Advance Technology Report)

4.15 TASK 17 DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF IA/MA REQUIREMENTS The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical research, analysis, and recommendations for the development of mission needs, capability acquisition procedures, and IA/MA requirements documents. The contractor must develop recommended documentation for capability-based analysis, to include recommendations to Joint Capabilities Documents (JCD) Initial Capabilities Documents (ICD), Capability Development Documents (CDD), and Capability Production Documents (CPD) and associated briefings (e.g., Requirements Strategy Review [RSR]).

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #63 IA/MA Input to JCIDS Documentation) The contractor must analyze IA/MA requirements, constraints, and guidelines described in requirements documents and must apply the results of the analysis to develop recommendations for the optimal method of incorporating IA/MA into systems that merge voice, data, and video traffic over networks (Table 5.1, Deliverable #64 IA/MA Recommendations for Systems that Merge Voice, Data, and Video Traffic) The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical research, analysis, and recommendations for existing and emerging Certification & Accreditation (C&A) activities for the Air Force Tanker Support Division to certify and accredit secure airborne/ground communications systems, information systems, and special-purpose airborne/ground systems

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #65 Communication System C&A Documentation)

The contractor must conduct technical analysis of certification and security test and evaluation activities, Verification and Validation (V&V) analysis, and assessment of IA/MA issues connected with the development of systems and architectures to ensure that this development complies with existing and evolving C&A activities and policy for new IA/MA systems and modifications to existing systems (Table 5.1, Deliverable #66 Security Test and Evaluation Report) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #67 Independent V&V Review of IA/MA systems) As new technologies and capabilities are developed, the contractor must draft reports analyzing survivability and threats to Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems information networks and databases that will enable the Air Force Tanker Support Division to develop assessments, evaluations, and residual risk documents for inclusion in the associated DoD C&A packages (Table 5.1, Deliverable #68 Technical Analysis for Integrating IA/MA into Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and reconnaissance)

4.16 TASK 18 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ON IA/MA TECHNOLOGY The contractor must provide IA/MA research and analysis pertaining to the development of applications and system interfaces that the division will need to securely integrate evolving technologies into the Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #69 Interface Control Document) The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical research and analysis and develop recommendations for the development, execution, and documentation of large-scale Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations (ACTDs), simulations, experiments, and exercises (Table 5.1, Deliverable #70 IA/MA Components of ACTD Standards/Policies Compliance Report) The contractor must conduct IA/MA technical research and analysis and must develop recommendations pertaining to Air Force Tanker Support Division and Airborne and Ground secure voice communications to those designated ground and airborne and Air Force Tanker Support Division platforms that require common access to joint, global, and network-centric applications and tools. Additionally, the contractor must analyze new technologies, procedures, and policies identified in the ACTD experiments (Table 5.1, Deliverable #71 IA/MA Component ACTD Analysis Reports)

4.19 TASK 19 VULNERABILTIY, AUTHENTICITY AND CONTINUITY ASSESSMENTS OF IA/MA SYSTEMS The contractor must assess the vulnerability, authenticity, and continuity of the Air Force Tanker Support Division’s information systems and networks to ensure that those systems and networks comply with DoD IA/MA policies (Deliverable 50: Assessment of Architectural Compliance).

The contractor must prepare an IA/MA dissemination report for Air Force Tanker Support Division platform systems. As part of this objective, the contractor must develop recommendations regarding prioritized vulnerability reductions to enhance the IA/MA components of DOD communications/information systems and networks.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #72 IA/MA Dissemination Report) (Table 5.1, Deliverable #73 Vulnerability Reduction Technical Report) The contractor must verify that MCDA and other ground and airborne and Air Force Tanker Support Division systems/platform communications systems architectures, interfaces, and configurations conform to existing and emerging DoD IA/MA guidance.

(Table 5.1, Deliverable #74 Critical Program Technical Report)

4.20 TASK 20 ASSESSMENT OF CAPABILITIS IN REAL WORLD ENVIRONMENTS The contractor must provide modeling or simulation design, development, and execution for the development and analysis of strategic plans, the identification and assessment of capability requirements, and the evaluation of technology and system opportunities. The contractor must conduct scientific and technical analysis and offer recommendations in the design, development, implementation, and execution of flight planning and command and control (C2) models to optimize MCDA and other ground and airborne and Air Force Tanker Support Division systems/platforms

(Table 5.1, Deliverable # 75 Modeling and Simulation Assessment)

The contractor must assess and recommend modeling approaches to satisfy requirements and analyze the outcome of modeling and simulation scenarios based on real-world scenarios and parameters of MCDA and other ground and airborne and Air Force Tanker Support Division systems/platforms. In addition, the contractor must develop operational CONOPS based on the outcome of those scenarios and parameters

(Table 5.1, Deliverable # 76 Model and Simulations CONOPS)

The contractor must develop guides and instruct ions for modeling/simulation use and assessments, which can be reused in future evaluations (Table 5.1, Deliverable #77 Modeling and Simulations Guides)

4.21 TASK 21 IA/MA CONFERENCE PLANNING AND IA/MA MEETING INITIATIVES

The contractor must…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .