PWS.docx

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

(PWS)

For Repair of ATCALS Angle Drive Unit

NSN: 3010-00-871-8122 P/N: 462275-1

DATE: 18 Feb 2021

FD2030-20-02280

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

PREPARING ORGANIZATION: AFSC/448 SCMW/848 SCMG/424 SCMS/GUMF TINKER AFB OK 73145

Table of Contents

i

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES/GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 Purpose Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Fix numbering..not sure why it starts with 1.11 Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Done.

1.1.1 The purpose of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) is to define the repair requirements for the Air Traffic Control and Landing Systems (ATCALS) Angle Drive Unit (NSN: 3010-00-871-8122 P/N: 462275-1) specified in Attachment A of the PWS. The work encompasses the disassembly, cleaning, inspection, maintenance, reassembly, testing and finishing actions required to return the items to a serviceable condition. The contractor is responsible for having the repair capabilities to include appropriate technical data, repair documents, and license agreements, required to accomplish this repair. The Contractor is responsible for the scheduled delivery of a quality product.

1.2 General Information

1.2.1 Contractor employees shall identify themselves as Contractor personnel by introducing themselves or being introduced as Contractor personnel and displaying distinguishing badges or other visible identification for meetings with Government personnel. In addition, Contractor personnel shall appropriately identify themselves as Contractor employees in telephone conversations and in formal and informal written correspondence.

1.3 Work Requirements

General Requirements:

1.3.1 Teardown, Test, and Evaluate (TT&E)

Visual, mechanical, and electrical testing shall be accomplished by the contractor to determine the condition of the asset. Test procedures will be completed in accordance with manufacturer’s original specifications. Upon completion of the task, assets will be separated into one of the following categories: Repairable, No Fault Found (NFF) or Beyond Economic Repair (BER). NFF assets will fall under the TT&E category.

1.3.2 Repair

The contractor shall return unit to a serviceable condition via contractor acceptance testing procedures and contractor documents.

1.3.3 No Fault Found (NFF)

If unit passes contractor acceptance test procedure, then the contractor will document and report.

1.3.4 Beyond Economic Repair

Items that are deemed beyond economic repair due to obsolescent or limited parts available to complete a repair. This includes evaluation, testing, cannibalization, and disposal of units.

The Contractor shall submit a Beyond Ecomonic Repair request to the local Defense Contract Mangement Agency (DCMA) Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) for concurrence. The request will then be submitted to DCMA contracting who in turn will present to the Air Force Supply Chain (AFSC). This request shall contain the contractor’s findings, documentation and/or pictures which detail the extent of the damage.

The Government will then review the request and provide a response to the Contractor within 10 calendar days.

1.3.5 Over and Above Work

Upon discovery of the need for over and above work, the Contractor shall prepare and furnish to the Government a work request in accordance with the agreed-to procedure.

The Contractor and Administrative Contracting Officer shall mutually agree to procedures for Government administration and Contractor performance of over and above work requests. If the parties cannot agree upon the procedures, the Administrative Contracting Officer has the unilateral right to direct the over and above work procedures to be followed. These procedures shall, as a minimum, cover—

The format, content, and submission of work requests by the Contractor. Work requests shall contain data on the type of discrepancy disclosed, the specific location of the discrepancy, and the estimated labor hours and material required to correct the discrepancy. Data shall be sufficient to satisfy contract requirements and obtain the authorization of the Contracting Officer to perform the proposed work; Government review, verification, and authorization of the work and Proposal pricing, submission, negotiation, and definitization.

The Government will review the work request and provide a response to the contractor within 15 calendar days if the over and above work request is approved by the Government. Approved work requests will result in contract modifications to definitize all over and above work.

Failure to agree on the price of over and above work shall be a dispute within the meaning of the Disputes clause of this contract.

1.3.6 Data (CDRLs)

The contractor shall provide data in accordance with the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRLs). See paragraph 1.4.1 for data listings.

1.3.7 Repair and Calibration of Special Test Equipment (STE)

The contractor shall provide all routine and preventative maintenance, repair, and necessary calibration of all STE as a part of the funded effort included in this PWS. The contractor must provide quote and receive approval from PCO before moving forward with unscheduled/uncommon/non-routine maintenance, repairs, and calibration. -DID: DI-QCIC-80798C

Specific Work Requirements:

1.3.8 The Contractor shall perform repair of the items specified in Attachment A of this PWS. The work shall include the disassembly, cleaning, inspection, maintenance, reassembly, troubleshooting and testing and finishing actions required to return the items to a serviceable condition. The work shall be accomplished in accordance with(IAW) the Contractor’s latest repair instructions. In the event that a situation develops where the instructions conflict with the pertinent manual, this PWS shall take precedence. Return unit to a serviceable condition.

Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Define acronym Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: corrected

1.3.8.1 The Contractor shall replace any component parts that do not meet specified inspection requirements, or if there is any doubt as to its serviceability or longevity at the Contractor’s expense. This includes any part requiring replacement due to catastrophic failure, fatigue failure, or normal deterioration. The Contractor is advised to include the cost of replacing a percentage of each recoverable part in their repair cost proposal.

1.3.8.2 If the Contractor is not a Government Engineer approved source of repair for a recoverable part, this part shall be replaced with a new part per paragraph 1.10 or repaired by a Government Engineer approved source. The Contractor may propose their repair procedure in writing with substantiating documentation for Government evaluation and possible approval. The Contractor shall submit the request for evaluation to the cognizant engineering office through the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) for approval. The Government will not be responsible for any costs associated with development of any repair procedures unless it has been negotiated and approved by the PCO. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Define acronym Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Done

1.3.8.3 Identification of missing and/or externally damaged components must be revealed within five (5) business days after the asset is removed from the shipping container and reported to the PCO through the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) in the form of a Discrepancy Report. Failure of the Contractor to identify missing and/or externally damaged components within five (5) business days may result in failure of the missing/damaged components to be covered under over and above. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Define acronym Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Done

1.3.8.4 End Item Identification and Marking:

1.3.8.4.1 Permanently and legibly mark each repaired end item with the Contractor's identification. This identification shall include the Contractor's CAGE and the date of repair. The identification shall be permanently affixed to the end item by stamp, stencil, or similar means.

1.3.8.4.2 Item Unique Identification (IUID) shall be added to the end item in accordance with the following:

a. Specification requirements for IUID marking will be contained in technical order 00-25-260, approved engineering drawing, or a Government provided Engineering Order (EO) (AF Forms 3925, 3926 and 3927) as applicable.

b. IUID markings are required for the end-item only. IUID for subcomponents is only required if specifically identified in the technical order 00-25-260, approved engineering drawing, or a Government provided EO.

c. For items that do not have IUID marking specifications as stated in paragraph b., the Contractor shall develop the marking specifications in accordance with the current revision of MIL-STD-130. Location and marking method shall be determined by the contractor.

d. IUID markings currently in place on items undergoing repair shall be protected from damage or removal during repair. Verify 2-D matrix IUID markings are readable per TO 00-25-260. Should IUID marking be rendered unreadable during repair, the Contractor shall replace the IUID mark.

e. The Contractor shall submit the required and applicable contingent data for Legacy items to the IUID Registry per the data submission procedures at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/data_submission_informatio n.html.

f. The Contractor shall submit IUID data for new manufactured items that require IUID based on the DFARS clause 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, as prescribed in DFARS Subpart 211.274

1.3.8.5 Quality Acceptance and Processing:

1.3.8.5.1 The Contractor shall comply with quality acceptance inspections of each end item IAW DCMA’s latest approved procedure. Quality acceptance will be performed by DCMA at the repair site. Quality acceptance documentation for each end-item shall be maintained by the Contractor as part of the item document package.

1.3.8.5.2 Each end item identified as serviceable shall be delivered to the Government defect free.

1.3.8.6 Shipping Documentation: Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 1.13.5?

1.3.8.7 The Contractor shall insure that the appropriate tag is attached to each serviceable end-item generated.

a. Tested OK (Serviceable) tag is DD Form 1574/1574-1 (or contractor equivalent) (Yellow).

b. Unserviceable (repairable) tag is DD Form 1577-2/1577-3 (or contractor equivalent) (Green).

c. Unserviceable (condemned) tag is DD Form 1577/1577-1 (or contractor equivalent) (Red).

1.3.8.7.1 Shipments under this contract shall be by Commercial Bill of Lading (CBL) by routine shipping. The Contractor has the discretion to use carriers such as UPS, FedEx, or equivalent.

1.4 Reporting Requirements

1.4.1 Data requirements are specified below and in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL DD Form 1423) found in Part 1, Section B, The Schedule of the Basic contract.

1.4.2 In addition, the Contractor shall maintain a document package, in the Contractor’s format, containing the following documentation for each item repaired for the contract period:

1.5 Quality Program and Inspection System Requirements

1.5.1 The Contractor shall establish, document and maintain a quality system as a means of ensuring that the end item conforms to specified requirements. The quality system shall be in accordance with the contract requirements.

1.5.2 When a Deficiency Report (DR) is received for an end item repaired under the terms of this contract, the Contractor shall comply with the ACO directions. Guidance is provided in Technical Order (TO) 00-35D-54, USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution.

1.5.3 The Contractor shall comply with quality audits as required by the ACO. These audits may require that one or more end items be removed from the production line and subjected to any combination of inspection, testing, disassembly, or assembly, to determine that the standards of performance and technical conformance meet the requirements of this PWS. The Contractor shall be required to correct a deficient process to eliminate the cause(s) of any defects as directed by the ACO before production of the next end item.

1.5.4 The Contractor shall allow quality assurance reviews to be conducted at the site of repair at the request of the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) throughout the contract period.

1.5.5 The Contractor shall allow a quality acceptance review by the DCMA representative at the site of repair for each end item generated under the terms of this contract.

1.5.6 The Contractor shall submit requests for deviation / waiver to the PCO through the ACO. Work shall not be initiated on assemblies / components affected by deviation / waiver pending approval / disapproval. Requests shall include the contract number, NSN and P/N of end item and lowest part / assembly affected, effect on cost / price and delivery schedule, description of deviation / waiver, justification for deviation / waiver, and proposed corrective action taken.

1.6 Condemnation Candidates/End Items Beyond Economical or Physical Repair

1.6.1 Beyond Economical Repair (BER) items are end items in which the repair cost will exceed 75% of the contracted repair cost for the particular end item in question. Upon determination of BER, the Contractor shall report BER candidates to the PCO within 30 calendar days of discovery.

1.6.2 The Contractor shall not condemn reparable or recoverable items without prior approval of the PCO or ACO. The Contractor shall ensure non-repairable items are demilitarized and disposed of according to the Contractor-developed, Government-approved property procedures.

1.6.3 As specified in the Contractor-developed, Government-approved property procedures, the disposition of condemned items will be determined on a case- by-case basis by the ACO.

1.6.4 On units approved to be condemned by the Government, the Contractor is authorized to retain serviceable parts salvaged from the condemned unit. The salvaged parts shall be retained by the Contractor for further use in repair of all NSNs listed on this PWS. These parts will not be replenished when used up. The non-useable, scrapped parts shall be condemned IAW the Contractor-developed, Government-approved property procedures.

1.7 Special Tools (ST) and Support Equipment (SE)

1.7.1 1.7.1. The SE required to accomplish the scope of work to be completed on end-items under this contract is contained in the contractors latest repair instructions. If the equipment specified in the repair procedures is not designated as Government furnished in this contract, the Contractor shall furnish identical or substitute SE from commercial sources. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Should be 1.17.1

1.7.2 If the Contractor intends to substitute SE the Contractor shall demonstrate that substitute SE can be acquired and meets the standards stipulated in the technical data by the following actions:

1.7.2.1 Displaying drawings, schematics, or specifications which illustrate that the Contractor understands the exact nature of the work to be performed and the SE required to perform the tasks.

1.7.2.2 Explaining the capabilities of substitute SE to ensure that it is adequate to perform the specified testing requirements.

1.7.2.1 Defining how substitute SE will be designed, built, and calibrated without assistance from the Government, by an internal engineering capability, or the services of a recognized outside engineering agency.

1.7.3 Support Equipment Calibration Requirements. The Contractor shall ensure documentation certifying the accuracy of all calibrated SE is made available to the ACO prior to work performed. The Contractor shall ensure SE calibration is maintained throughout performance of this contract. Upon request, the Contractor shall provide certification documents (DI-QCIC-80798C) to the ACO for each SE item as follows:

a. SE part number and serial number

b. Date calibrated

c. Calibration due date

d. Calibration source

e. Calibration procedure used

f. Calibration data

g. Facsimile of the current stamped calibration sticker affixed to SE item

h. Verification of full performance compliance IAW this PWS for SE items not requiring calibration.

i. Traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology

1.8 Precious Metals Recovery Program

1.8.1 The handling and control of precious metals shall be IAW AFI 23-101, Air Force Materiel Management.

1.9 Parts Control Program Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Should this be 1.19?

1.9.1 The Contractor shall establish, document, and maintain a parts control program for the work associated with this PWS. Parts or material used shall be equal to or exceed the original requirements technical data.

The current item configuration, as described in the applicable Approved Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) parts list, shall serve as the baseline and Program Parts Selection List (PPSL) for required parts. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Define Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Done

1.9.2 The Contractor shall maintain configuration of items worked under the scope of this contract as specified in the applicable end-item or system parts list. The Contractor shall notify the PCO via fax or e-mail of any configuration discrepancies noted between the parts list, engineering drawings, and the current configuration of the end-item. The Contractor shall obtain written authorization from cognizant engineering activity via the PCO for deviations from the parts list prior to implementation for parts that are not Class II changes. The contractors engineering department shall have the authority to prepare and approve Class II engineering change orders and minor deviations as defined by MIL-HDBK-61 concerning workload. The contractor shall submit all Class I and Class II ECOs to DCMA for concurrence with classifications. Copies of all Class II ECOs or minor deviations, shall be forwarded to the PCO through the ACO using contractor’s internal form in accordance with the contractor’s internal procedures (DI-SESS-80639D).

1.9.3 The Contractor shall keep records of the sourcing of replacement parts for each end item repaired per their approved Parts Management Plan (PMP) and shall furnish these records for inspection upon Government request.

1.9.4 Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP). The contractor shall submit all appropriate data requirements to the Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) as it is generated. The contractor shall screen each Alert or Safe received from GIDEP to determine if the device or process for which the Alert is issued, is used in the manufacture of the unit and take appropriate action. If appropriate action requires a stock purge that negatively impacts production, the contractor shall perform a risk analysis and provide recommendations to the cognizant engineering office. Contractor shall adhere to the policies and directives of GIDEP. DI-MGMT-80368

1.10 Counterfeit Prevention Plan Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Should this be 1.20?

1.10.1 Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP). Contractors that supply electronic parts or systems that contain electronic parts shall establish policies and procedures to avoid, detect, mitigate and disposition counterfeit electronic parts to prevent such parts from entering the USAF/DoD supply chain. These policies and procedures shall be documented in a CPP for submission and approval in accordance with Data Item Description (DID) DI-MISC-81832 and accomplished for all specified contract items. DI-MISC-81832 is applicable to Parts, Material and Processes Selection (PMPS) associated with delivery of systems and assemblies to the USAF and DoD. The requirements established by DI-MISC-81832 also apply to electronics components procured in sustainment of such systems and assemblies. The requirements of the recently DoD-adopted SAE 5553, Aerospace Standard, Counterfeit Electronics Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition shall also apply.

1.10.2 At a minimum, the CPP shall address PWS paragraph: 1.11.3 and/or address:

1.10.2.1 Applicability. The Contractor shall identify all Business locations and programs to which the CPP applies. The CPP shall address (as applicable) materials, hardware, electronic parts, and procured assemblies.

1.10.2.2 Definitions. The Contractor shall utilize definitions per AS 5553 to ensure consistency. Any contractor-derived definitions must be included in an appropriate CPP appendix or annex. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, appendix H)

1.10.2.3 Parts Availability and Use of Parts Brokers. The Contractor shall not procure materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts from parts Brokers when available from Original Manufacturers (OM) or their Authorized Distributors. In cases where materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts are no longer available from the OM or their Authorized Distributors, procurement from Brokers may be authorized as defined by the Contractor’s policy and their CPP. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.1, 4.1.2.e., appendix A)

1.10.2.4 Procurement Policies. The Contractor shall provide and implement policy directing development and implementation of business practices and procedures, and processes to prevent procurement of Counterfeit materials and parts. The Contractor shall identify the appropriate office(s), business units, functional organizations, and programs, who shall have responsibility for development, maintenance and implementation of the CPP. The CPP shall identify the specific roles and responsibility for each. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, appendix B, C, D)

1.10.2.5 Risk Assessment. Assessment. The contract shall address the risk of using unknown sources and or unauthorized suppliers in the CPP. Application or technical risk assessments shall establish the effect that counterfeit parts may have on performance. Vendor or source of supply risk assessments shall establish the potential for obtaining counterfeit parts. Using any risk analysis tool acceptable to the Government, the Contractor shall conduct a risk assessment based upon item characteristics and how likely it is that a counterfeit part will be received. The contractor shall identify and describe in the CPP how parts are selected for assessment and what risk is acceptable based upon the parts design, construction, material and functional requirements. As a minimum, analysis shall be completed for flagging high risk items, such as items that are obsolete, discontinued, rare, etc. The contractor shall require completion of a trade study, documented within the CPP that shall facilitate determining whether 100% testing of parts procured from after-market sources is more cost effective than qualification or requalification of a manufacturer. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, appendix B, C, D)

1.10.2.6 Detection and Avoidance Responsibilities. The Contractor shall establish processes for the review and approval of contractor and applicable subcontractor systems for the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts, which processes shall be comparable to the processes established for contractor business systems under section 893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4311; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). The Contractor shall flow down such requirements and processes to their subcontractors per ODASD Memo titled “Overarching DoD Counterfeit Prevention Guidance”, dated 16 March 2012. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.4, 4.1.5, appendix E)

1.10.2.7 Testing and Verification. The Contractor shall establish and accomplish testing and verification processes for items not received from an original equipment manufacturer, original component manufacturer, or authorized distributor that are identified as having high risk for counterfeit potential. These processes apply to prime contracts, and to subcontracts or suppliers below the prime contracts. The Contractor shall provide a list of acceptable test facilities if the subcontractor or supplier does not have the capability to perform required testing. Submittal of Certificates of Compliance indicating the parts are not counterfeit shall be acceptable for verification of testing. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.4, appendix E)

1.10.2.8 Configuration Identification and Traceability. The Contractor shall identify and control the configurations of all systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts, and enable mechanisms to provide traceability of parts. The Contractor shall report to the Government when control of the configurations of all systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts, and mechanisms to provide traceability of parts are not possible. The Contractor shall identify the specific systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts beyond the Contractors’ control. The Contractor shall be responsible for detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of counterfeit materials and parts, to include procured assemblies and subassemblies, in such products and shall be responsible for the rework or corrective action that may be required to resolve the use or inclusion of counterfeit materials and parts. The cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such parts are not allowable costs under Department contracts , unless: a) the contractor has established a counterfeit avoidance/detection system approved by the DoD, b) the counterfeit parts were procured from a DoD-accredited trusted supplier or provided as government property, and c) the contractor has provide timely notification to the government. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.6, appendix F)

1.10.2.9 Counterfeit Notification and Reporting. The Contractor shall report in writing to the Procuring Activity within 30 calendar days of determining any end item, component, part, or material contained in supplies purchased by the Department of Defense, or purchased by a contractor or subcontractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, the Department, contains counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts for the purpose of investigation and notification of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) shall coordinate reporting to the appropriate Program Management/Item Management, System Engineering Management, the AFMC Discrepant Materiel Reporting Program (DMRP) Office in 406 SCMS/GULAB, and the AFOSI. Additionally, the Contractor shall within the same 30 calendar day period ensure all suspected or confirmed counterfeit items are entered into the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) system, which will serve as the DoD central reporting repository. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.7, appendix G)

1.10.2.10 Counterfeit Prevention Training. The Contractor shall provide appropriate training and shall require all personnel working procurement within their company, to include at a minimum their supply chain management specialists, receiving inspectors, and engineers, to complete said training. The Contractor shall determine the appropriate training required. Training may be developed in-house or may be other Industry accepted training. The CPP shall describe and list the training provided by the contractor to their personnel.

1.10.2.11 The Contractor’s Counterfeit Parts Program shall be in accordance SAE AS5553 and AS6174 and/or DFARS 252.246-7007.

1.11 Cannibalization of Parts (Module Swap) Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 1.11 already exists at the beginning of the PWS

1.11.1 The Contractor is authorized to cannibalize subassemblies or parts between inducted unserviceable assets in order to expedite repair when a particular repair is constrained for lack of materials that are not, and will not be immediately available. Cannibalization requests shall be subject to the review and subsequent approval or disapproval of the Government Equipment Specialist, 424 SCMS/GUME. Such cannibalization actions should only be considered upon exhaustion of all other sources of materials. The Contractor shall not initiate any cannibalization action unless such action shall satisfy all material requirements for the item in question. The Contractor shall ensure the contract delivery schedule is not negatively affected by the removal of any subassemblies or parts from any inducted end item.

1.12 Lead (Pb) Free Electronics Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 1.12 already exists

1.12.1 The use of lead (Pb) solder and/or components/assemblies in the repair of the subject items is considered a potential safety risk as described by the Reduction of Hazardous Substance (ROHS) requirements. Therefore, if lead (Pb) solder and/or components/assemblies are used in the repair of the subject items, the contractor shall ensure the affected items are marked in accordance with IPC J-STD-609, "Marking, Symbols and Labels of Leaded and Lead-Free Terminal Finish Materials Used in Electronic Assembly.”

1.12.2 Mixing of incompatible metals can reduce the reliability and can possibly lead to the formation of Tin-Whiskers in electronic assemblies. Therefore, all touch-up, rework, or repair of printed circuit assemblies shall be performed with the solder and component finish composition used to manufacture the original assembly. The Contractor shall refer to the fabrication drawings to determine the material alloy and rosin type to be used in the repair process. Any deviation requests must be approved by the PCO. The use of Lead Free in lieu of Tin Lead solder is prohibited in the repair process. Use T.O. 00-25-259 as a guide.

1.13 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 1.13 already exists

1.13.1 This requirement does not require the use of a Class 1 ozone depleting substance (ODS) in the performance of the contract. The Contractor is authorized to use a suitable substitute for any Class 1 ODS which may be required by the specifications or Technical Data of this PWS. The Contractor shall immediately identify the substitute by written notification to the PCO.

1.14 Delivery Schedule Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 1.14 already exists

1.14.1 The Contractor shall meet the contractual delivery schedule. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Where is the delivery schedule? Will it be defined in each order? Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: The final delivery schedule is part PCO negotiations and won’t be completely defined until the contract awards.

1.15 Customer Service Requirements Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 1.15 already exists

1.15.1 Information Requests: The Contractor shall ensure responses to requests for information and data are only provided to customers authorized by the PCO in the performance of official duties. All requests between the Government and the Contractor shall go through the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).

1.15.1.1 Information requests shall contain a subject line, nature of the request and an expected/requested response date and time. The request must be identified as “EMERGENCY”, “URGENT” or “ROUTINE” IAW paragraph 1.16.1 of this PWS so that a response is provided within the specified timeframes. A log will be maintained by the PCO or an appointed Government Representative. The log will be used to track all requests and evaluate response times. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Paragraph does not exist Comment by CAMERON MAXFIELD: Corrected

1.15.1.2 Contractor requests for engineering and/or technical related problems or issues shall be submitted on an AFMC Form 202, Nonconforming Technical Assistance Request and Reply or through the PCO by E- mail/phone call. All AFMC Form 202s submitted shall be sent directly to 424 SCMS Cognizant Engineer with an information copy to the ACO and PCO.

1.15.1.3 Response Times for Information Requests: All requests for information initiated by the Government or Contractor shall be in writing and submitted electronically via e-mail or fax. Requests for information shall be answered within the following timeframes:

a. Emergency Respond within two (2) business days.

b. Urgent- Respond within five (5) business days.

c. Routine- Respond within ten (10) business days.

1.16 Safety and Health Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 1.16 already exists

1.16.1 While performing work under this contract the Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulations regarding occupational safety and health. By safety and health standards, the Contractor shall notify the PCO, within two (2) business days of any damage to government property where the dollar value exceeds $500,000.00 and within five (5) business days, for any damage to government property less than $500,000.00 during the execution of the contract. Mishap notifications shall contain, as a minimum, the following information: Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 8 or 2? Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Corrected Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 2 or 5? Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Corrected

a. Contract, Contract Number, Name and Title of Person(s) Reporting

b. Date, Time and exact location of accident/incident

c. Brief Narrative of accident/incident (Events leading to accident/incident)

d. Cause of accident/incident, if known

e. Estimated cost of accident/incident (material and labor to repair/replace)

f. Nomenclature of equipment and personnel involved in accident/incident

g. Corrective actions (taken or proposed)

h. Other pertinent information

If requested by the designated PCO, the Contractor shall immediately secure the mishap scene/damaged property and impound pertinent maintenance and training records, until released by the Procuring Safety Office. Contractors will not dispose of contract data related to a mishap until notified to do so by the CO.

1.17 Manpower Reporting Language for Contract Performance Work Statements Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: 1.17 already exists

1.17.1 The Contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for the United States Air Force via a secure data collection site. The Contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields at Service Contract Report (SCR) at www.SAM.gov . Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance for each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs 1 October through 30 September. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than 31 October* of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to SAM.gov service desk (https://www.fsd.gov/fsd-gov/home.do).

*Reporting Period: Contractors are required to input data by 31 October of each year.

Uses and Safeguarding of Information: Information from the secure web site is considered to be proprietary in nature when the contract number and contractor identity are associated with the direct labor hours and direct labor dollars. At no time will any data be released to the public with the Contractor name and contract number associated with the data.

User Manuals: Data for Air Force service requirements must be input at www.sam.gov. A quick start user guide is available at on the SAM.gov website at https://sam.gov/SAM/transcript/SCR_QSG.pdf. In addition, a full user guides for contractors and government personnel are available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/pages/public/help/samUserGuides.jsf.

1.18 Surge/Mission Essential Services Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Section header is 1.18 however paragraphs below are 1.19

1.18.1 In the event that the Department of Defense (DoD) experiences an unplanned spike or sudden increase in demand, due to major theater warfare or a national emergency (also known as surge), and invokes surge, the Contractor shall work to meet and sustain this demand for quantity levels above and beyond normal peacetime requirements. After being notified by the PCO of the surge demand in writing, the Contractor may see additional orders and/or will see the priority status elevated on current orders. The Contractor shall implement their procedures to support the surge demand.

1.18.2 The Contractor shall notify the PCO advance and be given the opportunity to negotiate any expedite charges that might apply at the time of surge. Contractual requirements for production of this contract are addressed in Part I of basic contract. The schedule and surge requirements shall be on a best-effort basis. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Requirements should be defined in the PWS, not the contract document. Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: These production requirements are also part of the final negotions and can’t be specified before contract awards.

1.18.3 The Contractor shall prepare for the continuation of essential DoD services during crisis IAW Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.237-7023. The contractor shall establish and provide a written plan to ensure continued support during a crisis. The plan shall be submitted with the contractor's proposal. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Should be 252.237-7023 Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Corrected

SERVICE SUMMARY

0. Service Summary

0. Contractor performance shall be measured and assessed, using the Performance Requirements listed in Table 2-1. The Contractor service requirements are summarized into performance requirements that relate directly to the mission essential items. The performance threshold requirements describe the minimum acceptable levels of service for each requirement. In the event the performance requirement is not met, the Contractor shall be given time after notification to correct the unacceptable performance, if such correction is possible. The Contractor shall immediately take corrective action in accordance with the performance threshold(s). In cases where the Contractor fails to implement corrective action, the PCO will take appropriate measures.

0. Service Summary (SS) Requirements: The Contractor shall ensure the performance and threshold requirements are achieved as identified in Table 2-1.

0. Surveillance Methods: The Production Management Specialist (PMS), DCMA QAR and PCO will exercise surveillance over the performance requirements. The absence of any contract requirement from the SS shall not detract from this enforceability nor limit the rights or remedies of the Government under any other provision of the contract. The Contractor shall support the PMS, DCMA QAR, and PCO surveillance methods as identified below: Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: define Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Done.

a. Periodic Inspection of Process or Output

b. Random Sampling of Recurring Service Output

c. 100 Percent Inspection of Output

d. Customer Observation or Complaint

2.1.1.1 The PMS, DCMA QAR, and/or PCO will monitor Contractor performance to determine if it meets the contract thresholds as set forth in the performance measures and this PWS.

2.1 SERVICE SUMMARY TABLE

Requirements

Urgent Requests – respond within 5 business days Routine Requests – respond within 10 business days

100% of all end-item identified as serviceable shall be delivered to the Government defect free.

0. Contractor Performance Evaluation: The Contractor shall understand that the evaluation of performance will occur when the PMS evaluates the service of the Contractor to determine whether or not it meets the performance measures of the contract.

a. SS-1through SS-5: The Contractor’s failure to meet the requirement for this item may result in an unsatisfactory or marginal rating under the Contractor Performance Assessment Review (CPAR).

GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

3.1 Government Property

3.1.1 The Contractor shall furnish all material, support equipment, tools, test equipment, and services except as listed below. No Government Furnished Property will be provided other than the units to be repaired. Government Furnished Material will not be provided.

3.2 Disposition of Government Property

3.2.1 These instructions apply to all Government owned property. Within 90 calendar days prior to contract expiration, the Contractor shall submit a letter to the PCO requesting disposition instructions in the transfer of Government furnished property (GFP). A listing identifying GFP shall include the NSN, part number/CAGE, noun, quantity, condition code, and dollar value, and the list shall be submitted through the PCO to the PMS for disposition instructions.

3.2.2 If a follow-on contract is being awarded or, is in the negotiation or solicitation stage, the existing GFP may be retained to the extent required to phase support on the current contract and/or the follow-on contract.

3.2.3 The Contractor shall comply with preservation, packaging, and packing instruction as specified in the basic contract and/or on the AFMC Form 158 (Packaging Requirements).

3.2.4 The Contractor shall comply with the Transportation Data on the DD Form 1653 and Transportation Appropriations Form when returning government property.

3.3 Discrepancies Incident to Shipment:

3.3.1 The Contractor shall perform 100% inspection of GFP and shall report 100% of discrepancies incident to shipment. Discrepancies incident to shipment include misidentified items, variations in quantity, non-requisitioned items, lost or damaged parcel post, and items in dubious condition. These discrepancies shall be reported and resolved using the DoD web-based application WebSDR link is https://www2.transactionservices.dla.mil/websdr/home.asp This system of reporting a Supply Discrepancy Report (SDR), formerly called Report of Discrepancy (ROD), has been developed in compliance with DoD regulations 4140.1-R and 4000.25-M Volume 2, which requires automated SDR processing. In those situations where the SDR initiator is unable to gain access to the AF WebSDR, continued use of manual forms is permitted. A copy of the form will be forwarded through the ACO and Quality Assurance (QA) activity for corrective action.

3.3.2 Transportation discrepancies and item transaction discrepancies shall be coordinated with the DCMA Property Administrator and ACO within 2 business days upon discovery for corrective action utilizing the AF WebSDR submittal.

3.3.3 The Contractor shall process a SDR (SF Form 364) for contract line items received with missing components (Missing On Induction, (MOI)) within 2 business days upon discovery in accordance with AFI 23-101. An electronic copy of MOI SDR form shall be submitted to the ACO and PCO within 2 business days of discovery.

3.3.4 All misdirected shipments of GFP shall be reported to the Production Management Specialist (PMS) via email notification within three business days. The PMS will consult with issue appropriate disposition instructions for the misdirected items. Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Recommend changing to business to remain consistent with the rest of the PWS Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Corrected

3.3.5 Overages, shortages, and misidentified items which are part of this contract and received by the contractor shall be reported into CAVAF with the actual received quantity and with the correct NSN. An SDR shall be processed in accordance with standard procedures identified above for these overages, shortages, and misidentified items.

3.4 Other

3.4.1 The Contractor shall not obtain Government Furnished Property (GFP) through the utilization of requisition codes assigned exclusively to this contract for any other contracts.

3.4.2 The Contractor shall not transfer or use GFP charged to this contract to any other contract, Contractor, or activity without the advance approval of the PMS through the PCO.

3.4.3 The Contractor shall replace GFP that has been removed by the USAF to fulfill other more urgent requirements. If any item so removed by the government is still required to complete the contract, the Contractor shall take appropriate action to replace the removed item.

ATTACHMENT A – END ITEMS

END ITEM

RECEIVED AS

END ITEM

TO BE DELIVERED AS

END ITEM NO

NATIONAL STOCK NO(S)

PART NO(S)

NATIONAL STOCK NO(S)

PARTS NO(S)

ATTACHMENT B – DEFINITIONS Comment by ROXANNE YORGASON: Definitions should be in alphabetical order or the order in which they appear wihin the PWS. If choosing order of appearance, then list the PWS paragraph as well. Comment by MAXFIELD, CAMERON P GS-09 USAF AFMC 424 SCMS/GUME: Done.

The following definitions are applicable to this PWS:

a) Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO): A contracting officer assigned the responsibility for the post award functions related to the administration of a government contract in the field. The ACO is normally located in the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) office. The ACO is responsible for ensuring the Contractor performs in accordance with the terms of the contract.

b) Beyond Economic Repair: Items that are deemed beyond economic repair due to obsolescent or limited parts available to complete a repair.

c) Cannibalization: Authorized removals of a specific assembly, subassembly, or part from one weapon system, system, support system, or equipment end-item for installation on another end-item to meet priority mission requirements with an obligation to replace the removed item.

d) Consumable Part: Detail item that in itself is not repairable.

e) Defect: Any nonconformance of a characteristic with specified requirements.

f) End Item: An end item is a complete piece of Government equipment as listed in Government supply catalogs and suitable for government storage and issue.

g) Initial Production Evaluation (IPE): An IPE is a planned Government review of early production items and processes to evaluate a Contractor’s capability to complete the work stipulated in the contract and in accordance with (IAW) the technical order (TO), and other guidance stipulated in this PWS.

h) Item Unique Identification (IUID): A system of establishing unique item identifiers (UII) within the DoD by assigning a machine-readable character string or number to a discrete item, which serves to distinguish it from other like and unlike items. UIIs are stored in the IUID registry, along with pedigree data associated with item. The registry is maintained by the Defense Logistics Agency Logistics Information Service (DLIS) (see http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/)

i) Mishap: An unplanned event, or series of events, which results in damage to Air Force property; injury to Air Force personnel; injury to on-duty civilian personnel; occupational illness to Air Force military or civilian personnel; or damage to property, injury, or illness to non-Department of Defense personnel caused by Air…