PWS_Attachment_II_BUMEDINST_6150.38A.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY

7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD

FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042 IN REPLY REFER TO

BUMEDINST 6150.38A

BUMED-M3B13

10 Jul 2013

BUMED INSTRUCTION 6150.38A

From: Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery

Subj: CODING PROGRAM STANDARD BUSINESS PRACTICES, PROCESSES, AND

REPORTING GUIDELINES

Ref: (a) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, (P.L. 104-191)

(b) BUMED memo 6000 M00 of 1 Oct 2012, Effective Documentation and Coding of Medical Services in Navy Medicine (NOTAL)

(c) DoD Directive 6040.41 of April 13, 2004

(d) MHS Professional Services and Specialty Coding Guidelines

(e) Joint Commission Information Management Standards

(f) The Office of Inspector General’s Compliance Program Guidance for Hospitals, Feb 1998

(g) DoD Instruction 6040.43 of June 10, 2004

(h) DoD Instruction 6040.40 of November 26, 2002

(i) NAVMED P-117, Manual of the Medical Department, Chapter 16

(j) SECNAV Manual 5214.1 of December 2005

(k) SECNAV Manual 5210.1 of January 2012

Encl: (1) Physician Query Guidelines

(2) Inpatient and Outpatient Coding Protocol Plan

(3) Navy Medicine Standard Coding Audit Requirements and Guidelines

(4) Acronyms

1. Purpose. The purpose of this instruction is to provide inpatient and outpatient coding program standard business practices, processes, and reporting guidelines. This instruction designates roles and responsibilities for inpatient and outpatient coding and provider query practices. References (a) through (i) and enclosures (1) through (3) are to be used by medical treatment facilities (MTFs) to establish management controls that support management of medical records, reporting responsibilities, and sustainment of accurate health information.

Enclosure (3) includes a list of acronyms used in this instruction.

2. Cancellation. BUMEDINST 6150.38 and NAVMED Policy Memo 10-001, NAVMED 6150/46 (01-2010), APV Coding Audit Worksheet; NAVMED 6150/50 (01-2010), Outpatient Coding Audit Summary; and NAVMED 6150/51 (01-2010), APV Coding Audit Summary.

3. Scope. This instruction applies to all MTFs. It is expected that each MTF will design processes that comply with standard business practices, processes, and reporting requirements set forth in this instruction and enclosures (1) through (3). These processes include implementation and oversight of a coding program that incorporates training, auditing, and accurate submission of data.

BUMEDINST 6150.38A

10 Jul 2013

4. Background. Coding for services rendered within the MTF is critical to providing a detailed and accurate clinical picture of patient population, overseeing population health, assessing quality outcomes and standards of care, managing business activities, and receiving reimburse-ment for services. Complete and accurate coding requires two critical inputs: that of the clinician who conducts and records the clinical episode, and that of the coder thoroughly versed in coding regulations and standards. The Military Health System (MHS) must meet the same high standards of integrity, compliance, and accuracy regarding health care data required of its civilian counterparts. Implementation of the collection from third party payors for health care services and changes mandated by reference (a) requires extensive inpatient and outpatient change management actions. Reference (a) is available at:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ191/pdf/PLAW-104publ191.pdf.

5. Discussion. Documentation is the key to accurate coding and is critical to Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Health Affairs (OASD(HA)) programs such as third party reimbursement, itemized billing, the Data Quality Management Control (DQMC) program and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). As indicated in reference (b), accurate capture of data that clearly documents the outpatient health care services provided by the MTF is essential. In addition, inpatient and outpatient coding is important for the MTF’s ability to manage issues related to population health and financial reimbursement from third party payors. The importance of full compliance with inpatient and outpatient coding standards cannot be overstated. Significant penalties for fraudulent coding and billing practices exist even if the error is unintentional. MTF focus on the auditing of inpatient and outpatient medical records is vital and leads to significant improvements in clinical documentation, health information, and cost recovery.

6. Policy. Clinical episodes throughout Navy Medicine (NAVMED) must be accurately and promptly documented and coded, adhering to legal and medical coding classification standards, as prescribed by references (c) through (e). Reference (c) is available at:

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/604041p.pdf. Reference (d) is available at:

http://www.tricare.mil/ocfo/bea/ubu/coding_guidelines.cfm. Reference (e) is available in print and electronic formats and can be purchased from The Joint Commission (TJC). MTF managerial controls must be put into place to ensure standard business practices and processes outlined in the applicable enclosures are implemented. The Coding Compliance Editor (CCE) is a tool developed to provide coding edits and references for professional coders. Inpatient records are directly coded into CCE. At this time, Ambulatory Procedural Visits (APV) and inpatient professional services must be directly coded into the Ambulatory Data Module (ADM) and then audited in CCE. All billable encounters must be completed in CCE prior to release for claims processing. While this instruction focuses on some specific components of a compliance plan, it does not meet the complete spectrum of compliance as defined under reference (f).

Reference (f) is included to assist MTFs in evaluating their inpatient and outpatient coding programs and is available at: https://www.oig.hhs.gov/compliance/compliance-guidance/index.asp.

7. Responsibilities. The roles and responsibilities of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED), NAVMED Regions, and the MTFs under their cognizance are outlined below.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ191/pdf/PLAW-104publ191.pdf� http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/604041p.pdf� http://www.tricare.mil/ocfo/bea/ubu/coding_guidelines.cfm� https://www.oig.hhs.gov/compliance/compliance-guidance/index.asp� https://www.oig.hhs.gov/compliance/compliance-guidance/index.asp�

a. BUMED

(1) Director, Records Management (BUMED-M3B13) develops and provides policy oversight of coding standard business practices, processes, table updates (Provider Specialty, International Classification of Diseases, Current Edition and Current Revision, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code table Department of Defense (DoD) Extender Code), system change packages, and reporting requirements through BUMED Health Care Operations (HCO) Directorate, BUMED- M3B13 and TRICARE Management Activity (TMA).

(2) Provides support to MHS through BUMED’s representatives to the Uniformed Biostatistical Utility (UBU) on matters related to Health Information Management (HIM) processes, including but not limited to MHS Coding Guidelines, file and table updates, and system changes.

(3) Develops and manages policy for custody, control, and retention of the medical records, reference (g). Reference (g) is available at:

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/604043p.pdf.

(4) Evaluates metrics outlined in reference (h) to assess overall data quality and the requirement to refine medical records documentation to facilitate accurate coding and is available at: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/604040p.pdf. BUMED-M3B13 provides ongoing analysis of external audit results, coding contract performance reports and other data outputs used to assess documentation and coding outputs.

(5) Provides oversight of all coding training conducted throughout NAVMED.

b. NAVMED Region Commands

(1) Assist BUMED with development of policies and procedures governing implementa-tion and management of coding standard business practices, development of metrics, and interpretation of data as indicated in references (g) through (i) and enclosure (3).

(2) Oversee and assist MTFs with implementation of the policies and procedures defined in this instruction.

(3) NAVMED Regions will summarize issues reported on the Data Quality (DQ) statement by the MTFs within their area of responsibility (AOR) on the DQMC, and develop a corrective plan of action. Copies of all plans of action and quarterly progress reports shall be provided to BUMED-M3B13.

(4) Forward deficiencies and findings to BUMED as directed in reference (f).

(5) Appoint a Coding Program Manager to ensure compliance with this instruction and provide functional oversight over the MTF’s inpatient and outpatient coding processes-including Multiple Award Task Order (MATO) contract coding, auditing, and training program guidance.

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/604043p.pdf� http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/604040p.pdf�

(a) Monitor coding practices and audit processes within the respective region.

(b) Provide functional and technical coding support to MTFs.

c. MTFs

(1) The MTF commander, commanding officer, or officer in charge will ensure that all clinical documentation, coding, and administrative procedures surrounding patient admissions and encounters are conducted per the requirements of this instruction, applicable State and Federal laws, and TJC standards.

(2) The Patient Administration Department (PAD) officer will ensure compliance with this instruction. The PAD officer is also responsible for maintenance of a closed medical record process within the MTFs AOR and functional oversight over the inpatient and outpatient coding processes, and implementation of the coding practices and audit processes outlined in enclosures

(1) and (2). Functional oversight of the coding processes includes program management of the MATO contract for coding, auditing, and training.

(3) The MTF Medical Record Administrator (MRA), preferably a Registered Health Information Administrator (RHIA), or a Registered Health Information Technician (RHIT), credentialed by the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) will manage the coding process and assist with the management of a closed medical records system.

The MRA or designee shall conduct random and focused audits per enclosure (3). Deficiencies must have corrective action taken when identified.

8. Action. The following programs and processes shall be implemented immediately if not already in place:

a. BUMED-M3B13

(1) Is responsible for development and oversight of policy and training concerning medical record documentation, coding processes, and audit processes.

(2) Will schedule quarterly NAVMED Region Command meetings to address compliance with the implementation of this instruction.

(3) Will have oversight of content for the clinical coding section of the NAVMED DQMC Web site, including, but not limited to, the coding hotline.

b. NAVMED Regions

(1) Provide BUMED with status reports on MTF compliance with coding and auditing plans per enclosure (3).

(2) Monitor MTF compliance with policy and procedures identified in this instruction and per references (d) through (i) and enclosures (1) and (2). Assist MTFs with the implementa-tion of requirements associated with this instruction.

(3) Ensure MTFs under their cognizance follow coding hotline business rules so that all coding issues are posted to the coding hotline. Ensure the NAVMED Region’s MRA provides a response to all coding questions within 5 working days of receipt.

(4) Provide MTFs with guidance and support in utilizing the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA) templates and documentation and coding tools, such as the CCE to support optimal performance and productivity outcomes for the MTFs.

(5) Coordinate with Navy Medicine Education and Training Command (NMETC) to ensure the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), CPT, and HCPCS code table updates have been synchronized and installed in the MTF’s information systems. Provide BUMED with a completion status report for MTFs under their AOR by 31 January and 31 October each year.

d. NMETC

(1) NMETC will support BUMED with the policies and procedures set forth in this instruction. NMETC will ensure the availability of technological support for a Web-based informational exchange platform including, but not limited to, the clinical coding section of the NAVMED DQMC Web site, serving providers, coders, data quality managers, and NAVMED Regions.

(2) NMETC will work with NAVMED Regions and the MTFs to ensure that notification of system updates is provided in a timely fashion to ensure that data completion can be accomplished prior to installation of updates and/or change packages.

(3) NMETC will work with BUMED-M3B13 to ensure applicable curricula are updated to reflect the policies and procedures in this instruction.

e. MTFs

(1) Enforcement of a closed medical record system, references (g) and (j), will ensure documentation availability when it is necessary for patient care and administrative purposes.

Patient care will be documented at all Navy MTFs accurately, completely, and timely.

Reference (i) is available at: http://www.med.navy.mil/directives/Pages/NAVMEDP- MANMED.aspx.

(2) Review all third party claims prior to being submitted to a third party payer. This 100 percent review to resolve discrepancies between clinical documentation and actual coding of the encounter will include Other Health Insurance (OHI) for the Third Party Outpatient Collections System (TPOCS)/Medical Services Account (MSA) and Medical Affirmative Claims Program (MACP) claims.

http://www.med.navy.mil/directives/Pages/NAVMEDP-MANMED.aspx� http://www.med.navy.mil/directives/Pages/NAVMEDP-MANMED.aspx�

PROVIDER QUERY GUIDELINES OVERVIEW

In today’s changing health care environment, Health Information Management (HIM) professionals face increased demands to produce accurate coded data. Therefore, establishing and managing an effective provider query process is an integral component of ensuring data integrity. A provider query is defined as a question posed to a provider to obtain additional, clarifying documentation to improve the specificity and completeness of the data used to assign diagnosis and procedure codes in the patient’s health record. Documentation can be greatly improved by a properly functioning provider query process.

Querying providers is a standard process in the private sector. Implementing a similar practice in NAVMED should not impact the timely completion of the patient record and is expected to generate more complete and accurate documentation. Accurate coding and the fullest workload capture is a direct result of complete, accurate, and timely clinical documentation. This guidance offers NAVMED HIM professionals important factors to consider in the development and management of an effective provider query process. It is intended to offer guiding principles and best practices in implementing a provider query process.

American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) Standards for Ethical Coding indicates

Query provider (physician or other qualified health care practitioner) for clarification and additional documentation prior to code assignment when there is conflicting, incomplete, or ambiguous information in the health record regarding a significant reportable condition or procedure or other reportable data element dependent on health record documentation (e.g., present on admission indicator).

Additionally, the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, the official rules for coding and reporting ICD-9-CM codes, includes commentary regarding the provider query process. (The ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting document is approved by the four organizations that make up the ICD-9-CM Cooperating Parties: The American Hospital Association, the American Health Information Management Association, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the National Center for Health Statistics.). The Guidelines may be used as a companion document to the official current version of the ICD-9-CM coding conventions and instructions. These Guidelines state:

A joint effort between the health care provider and the coding professional is essential to achieve complete and accurate documentation, code assignment, and reporting of diagnoses and procedures. These guidelines have been developed to assist both the health care provider and the coding professional in identifying those diagnoses and procedures that are to be reported. The importance of consistent, complete documentation in the medical record cannot be over-emphasized.

Without such documentation accurate coding cannot be achieved. The entire record shall be reviewed to determine the specific reason for the encounter and the conditions treated.

Enclosure (1)

Especially in light of official coding rules that have been implemented regarding identifying conditions that are present on admission (POA) and conditions that are acquired during the course of the admission, coders, now more than ever, need to clarify clinical information with providers. This means that coders and HIM staff tasked with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) responsibilities need to have a formal, standardized process of querying providers if important information needed to code a chart properly is illegible, incomplete, unclear, inconsistent, or imprecise.

Since reimbursement, workload capture, and clinical data mining all can be driven by how precise diagnostic information is, an opportunity exists to make sure medical treatment facilities (MTFs) are making good use of a provider querying process and are asking the necessary questions to optimize clinical data capture.

Querying a provider is generally limited to situations regarding:

• Legibility. This might include an illegible handwritten entry in the provider’s progress notes, and the reader cannot determine the provider’s assessment.

• Completeness. This might include a report indicating abnormal test results without notation of the clinical significance of these results (e.g., an x-ray shows a compression fracture of lumbar vertebrae in a patient with osteoporosis and no evidence of injury).

• Clarity. This might include patient diagnosis noted without statement of a cause or suspected cause (e.g., the patient is admitted with abdominal pain, fever, and chest pain and no underlying cause or suspected cause is documented).

• Consistency. This might include a disagreement between two or more treating providers with respect to a diagnosis (e.g., the patient presents with shortness of breath.

The pulmonologist documents pneumonia as the cause and the attending documents congestive heart failure as the cause).

• Precision. This might include an instance where clinical reports and clinical conditions suggest a more specific diagnosis than is documented (e.g., congestive heart failure is documented even though an echocardiogram is performed and the results of that procedure provides a more specific clinical diagnosis of chronic diastolic congestive heart failure).

Who to Query

An MTF’s provider query policy shall address the question of who to query. The provider query is directed to the provider who originated the progress note or other report in question. This could include the attending physician, consulting physician, or the surgeon. In most cases, a provider query for abnormal test results would be directed to the attending physician. Docu-mentation from providers involved in the care and treatment of the patient is appropriate for code

2 Enclosure (1) assignment; however, a provider query might be necessary if the documentation conflicts with that of another provider. If such a conflict exists, the attending physician is queried for clarification, as that provider is ultimately responsible for the final diagnosis.

When to Query

Providers shall be queried whenever there is conflicting, ambiguous, or incomplete information in the health record regarding any significant reportable condition or procedure.

Query the provider (physician or other qualified health care practitioner) for clarification and additional documentation prior to code assignment when there is conflicting, incomplete, or ambiguous information in the health record regarding a significant reportable condition or procedure or other reportable data element dependent on health record documentation (e.g., Present on Admission indicator).

When Not to Query

Codes assigned to clinical data shall be clearly and consistently supported by provider docu-mentation. Providers often make clinical diagnoses that might not appear to be consistent with test results. For example, the provider might make a clinical determination that the patient has pneumonia when the results of the chest x-ray might be negative. Provider queries shall not be used to question a provider’s clinical judgment, but rather to clarify documentation when it fails to meet any of the five criteria listed above—legibility, completeness, clarity, consistency, or precision.

A provider query might not be appropriate simply because the clinical information or clinical picture does not appear to support the documentation of a condition or procedure (e.g., docu-mentation of acute respiratory failure in a patient whose laboratory findings do not appear to support this diagnosis). In situations where the provider’s documented diagnosis does not appear to be supported by clinical findings, an MTF’s policies can provide guidance on a process for addressing the issue without querying the attending physician.

Example:

Dr. Harvey: According to the patient’s emergency room record from last week, the patient was placed on antibiotics for cellulitis of her leg. If the patient is still taking antibiotics, please document the cellulitis.

In this case, if this diagnosis was not documented in the current admission and is not affecting the patient’s care, it does not meet the definition of a secondary diagnosis. Querying the provider for this new information, which does not meet coding and reporting requirements, is inappropriate.

3 Enclosure (1)

MTF medical record departments use the following references to assign diagnoses and procedure codes:

• Facility Services Coding: Military Health System Inpatient Coding Guidelines

• Professional Services Coding: Military Health System Professional Services and

Specialty Coding Guidelines

• ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting

• Principles of CPT Coding, American Medical Association

• Coding Clinic for ICD-9-CM, American Hospital Association

• Coding Clinic for HCPCS, American Hospital Association

• CPT Assistant, American Medical Association

• CPT, Fourth Edition–Edition in effect for Dates of Service being audited

• Medical Dictionary

• Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS)

• CCE Coding Reference Library

• AHIMA Code of Ethics

• The Joint Commission Standards (IM 7.2, 7.6, and 7.10)

• Medicare Conditions of Participation

Expectations for Documentation

The primary purpose of health record documentation is continuity of patient care, serving as a means of communication among all health care providers. Documentation is also used to evaluate the adequacy and appropriateness of quality care, provide clinical data for research and education, and support reimbursement, medical necessity, quality of care measures, resource and workload utilization, reporting for services rendered by an MTF.

General Principles for Provider Queries

• Concurrent vs. Retrospective. Determine if providers shall be queried during the patient’s hospital stay (concurrently) or after discharge (retrospectively). A concurrent provider query has the advantage of allowing the information to be incorporated directly into the medical record before the patient is discharged. Concurrent provider queries are initiated “real time,” during the course of the patient encounter or hospitalization, at the time the documentation is naturally done. They thus encourage more timely, accurate, and reliable responses. Retrospective provider queries are effective in cases where additional information is available in the health record, in short stays where concurrent review was not completed, or whenever a concurrent provider query process is not feasible.

• Standardized Tool. If deemed appropriate, use a generic provider query tool approved by the local Medical Records Committee and Forms Committee, to request more information from the provider. (Facilities might determine that they need condition-specific provider query tools in addition to a generic provider query tool.) Do not use “sticky notes,” scrap paper, or other miscellaneous tools for a provider query.

4 Enclosure (1)

Concurrent Provider Queries

HIM coders shall query the patient’s providers if opportunities to improve documentation are noted during concurrent review of the patient’s record. The query shall be documented on the appropriate approved MTF’s query tools.

Providers shall be queried by coders or coding supervisors for:

1. Specificity in documentation.

2. Evaluation of lab data/radiology and other reports such as pathology as to the significance of any abnormalities or findings (and the name of the suspected/treated condition).

3. Agreement and documentation of diagnoses documented by other members of the health care team [i.e., Nutrition, Substance abuse team (if not completed by a physician member of team), Wound Care Team].

4. Co-signature of notes where a co-signature is necessary.

5. Differential diagnoses ruled in/out by discharge.

6. Conditions/procedure names which do not use approved hospital abbreviations.

7. Clarification if there are conflicts of diagnoses between consultant and the attending physician.

Providers shall review and respond to queries within 3 business days

1. If the provider agrees with the query, he or she is to document the applicable condition/ procedure on a late entry/addendum documentation.

2. If the provider does not agree with the query (i.e. there is no clinical significance for an abnormal lab test), they are to indicate that they “disagree with the query.”

Retrospective Provider Queries

HIM coders shall query the patient’s provider if opportunities to improve documentation are noted during retrospective review of the patient’s record. Queries of the attending physician after discharge shall be made only when there is sufficient supporting documentation within the body of the medical record to warrant a provider query. Questions about documentation in the record might arise during the coding process or as a result of a focused audit.

The provider shall be queried in the following situations:

1. Documentation is inconsistent and/or ambiguous, unclear, incomplete, or unspecified or general in nature [AHIMA Standards of Ethical Coding and Compliance Guidance for Third Party Billing Companies, 1999].

2. Principal diagnosis (reason for admission, after study) is not clearly identified.

3. Significant case manager queries not answered prior to discharge (e.g., those which would impact severity level).

5 Enclosure (1)

4. Abnormal diagnostic test results indicate the possible addition of a secondary diagnosis or increased specificity of an already documented condition.

5. Lack of clarity as to whether a condition has been ruled out.

6. Patient is receiving treatment for a condition that has not been documented.

7. The clinical significance of abnormal operative/procedural/pathologic findings is not documented.

8. Pre-determined and agreed upon (with medical staff) clinical criteria are met.

9. Agreement and documentation of diagnoses documented by other members of the health care team [i.e., Nutrition, Substance abuse team (if not completed by a physician member of team), Wound Care Team].

Providers will need to review and respond to retrospective queries within 3 business days.

Provider Query Tool Format

The formats for capturing the provider query include MTF-approved provider query tool, facsimile transmission, electronic communication on secure e-mail, or secure information technology messaging system. A provider query generally includes the following information:

• Patient name

• Admission date and/or Date of service

• Medical record number

• Registration number

• Date provider query initiated

• Name and contact information of the individual initiating the provider query

• Statement of the issue in the form of a question along with clinical indicators specified from the chart (e.g., history and physical states urosepsis, lab reports white blood count (WBC) of 14,400. Emergency department report fever of 102 degrees).

• Directions regarding how to provide the requested documentation clarification.

It is not advisable to record provider queries on handwritten sticky notes, scratch paper, or other notes that can be removed and discarded.

It is recommended that provider queries use precise language, identifying clinical indications from the health record and asking the provider to make a clinical interpretation of these facts based on his or her professional judgment of the case. Provider queries that appear to lead the provider to document a particular response could result in allegations of inappropriate “upcoding.” The provider query format shall not sound presumptive, directing, prodding, probing, or as though the provider is being led to make an assumption.

A single provider query tool can be used to address multiple questions. If there are multiple questions for one case, the provider is to be alerted that there is more than one provider query requiring a response. A distinct question shall be asked for each issue (e.g., if three questions exist based on clinical indications in the health record, there shall be three distinct questions clearly identified on the provider query tool).

6 Enclosure (1)

Example: Insulin-dependent diabetes with high blood sugars on admission is documented in a patient with renal failure. The three questions identified on the provider query might be related to type of diabetes (type I or II, or secondary);

relationship of diabetes to renal failure; and whether the diabetes is controlled or uncontrolled.

Guidelines in developing provider query language are as follows:

1. In completing the reason for the query on the provider query tool, the coder shall use open-ended questions and allow the provider to render and document his or her clinical interpretation of the diagnosis, condition, procedure, etc. based on the facts of the case. Closed-ended “yes/no” or “leading” questions shall be avoided (See below for Examples of “Leading” Provider Queries).

2. Exceptions to the open ended provider query, when it is appropriate to query for a specific diagnosis include the following:

a. Positive lab or radiology findings clinically supporting the diagnosis (Coding Clinic for ICD-9-CM, 2nd quarter 1998).

b. Medication is prescribed that supports the specific diagnosis (Coding Clinic for ICD-9-CM, 1st quarter 1993 and 2nd quarter 1998).

3. Provide query tools shall not be designed to ask questions about a diagnosis or procedure that can be responded to in a yes/no fashion. The exception is present on admission (POA) provider queries when the diagnosis has already been documented.

4. Finally, the provider query shall never indicate that a particular response would favorably or unfavorably affect reimbursement or quality reporting.

Examples of “Leading” Provider Queries:

In these examples the provider is not given any documentation option other than the specific diagnosis requested. The statements are directive in nature, indicating what the provider shall document, rather than querying the provider for his or her professional determination of the clinical facts.

Example 1:

Dr. Smith: Based on your documentation, this patient has anemia and was transfused 2 units of blood. Also, there was a 10-point drop in hematocrit following surgery. Please document “Acute Blood Loss Anemia,” as this patient clearly meets the clinical criteria for this diagnosis.

7 Enclosure (1)

This could be corrected as follows:

Dr. Smith: In your progress note on 6/20, you documented anemia and ordered transfusion of 2 units of blood. Also, according to the lab work done on xx/xx, the patient had a 10-point drop in hematocrit following surgery. Based on these indications, please document, in the discharge summary, the type of anemia you were treating.

Example 2:

Dr. Jones: This patient has Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and is on oxygen every night at home and has been on continuous oxygen since admission. Please document “Chronic Respiratory Failure.”

This could be corrected as follows:

Dr. Jones: This patient has COPD and is on oxygen every night at home and has been on continuous oxygen since admission. Based on these indications, please indicate if you were treating one of the following diagnoses:

• Chronic Respiratory Failure

• Acute Respiratory Failure

• Acute or Chronic Respiratory Failure

• Hypoxia

• Unable to determine

• Other:____________________

To achieve consistency in the coding of diagnoses, procedures, and/or POA indicators, coders must:

1. Follow procedures that result in complete, accurate, and consistent coding and accurately represent the patient’s diagnoses, procedures, and/or POA indicators for the relevant episode of care.

2. Adhere to all official coding guidelines as stated in this policy.

3. Assess physician documentation to ensure that it supports the diagnoses, procedures, and/or POA indicators selected.

4. Consult physician for clarification and additional documentation prior to final code assignment when there is conflicting, ambiguous, or incomplete data in the medical record.

a. Do not use the word “possible” in a query unless specified in the physician documentation.

8 Enclosure (1)

b. Assist and educate physicians and other clinicians by advocating proper documentation practices to accurately reflect the patient’s episode of care.

c. Follow the procedures as outlined in this policy to document an appropriate query.

d. Query the physician if the physician has substantially described a clinical condition but has not made a diagnosis.

Procedure for the Query Process

Any chart awaiting a response to a query should not be finalized until the provider’s response is documented on the query tool and/or in the body of the traditional medical record or the physician has responded that no addition to or clarification to the medical record is necessary.

Any chart awaiting a response to a query must be held according to the MTF’s delinquency timeframe or at a minimum The Joint Commission’s (TJC) delinquency timeframe of 30 days post discharge.

At a minimum, MTFs should ensure the Provider Query Process is implemented and maintained as it relates to high-volume clinical specialty areas. The Appendix of this document contains a series of tables that can be used to identify the highest volume clinical specialty areas for each MTF.

Initiating a Provider Query

1. The coder will initiate the query process. All queries will be screened by the coding super-visor, physician subject matter expert, or lead coder before being placed on the medical record.

2. If e-mail encryption capability is “lacking” due to certificates, then the Management Information Department (MID) must be notified and the provider will need to be contacted using another mechanism.

3. An entry will be made in the deficiency/delinquency tracking system by the HIM designee to track timeliness of completion.

Tracking and Resolving a Provider Query

1. Once the query has been initiated, HIM must notify the provider and perform routine follow-

up. The clerical staff, coding supervisor, medical records administrator, or appropriate designees must assist with contacting and following up with the provider. At a minimum, the designee will be responsible for follow-up (e.g., telephone, e-mail, office visit) and documentation to keep track of the follow-up.

2. Outstanding provider queries must be included in the incomplete and, as necessary, the delinquent record count. The Department Head, then Director must be engaged at the 7- and 14- day mark respectively, if the encounter is not closed out.

9 Enclosure (1)

Tracking and Resolving a Provider Query (Continued)

3. The provider will be notified regarding their delinquent queries per the MTF’s Medical Staff Bylaws. As applicable, it is encouraged that facilities also enlist such bodies as the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff, Medical Record Committee, Chairman of the Medical Staff and/or Department Chairpersons, or the respective Director to provide assistance in following up with physicians who are not responding to queries.

4. If a chart awaiting a provider response to a query has not been resolved based on the above required steps and within the MTF’s delinquency timeframe or at a minimum TJC’s delinquency timeframe of 30 days post-discharge, one of the following two options must be conducted in collaboration with the facility’s Leadership:

• The facility may choose to continue to wait for a provider response to the query (e.g., awaiting essential documents for accurate code assignment such as pathology reports, operative reports, etc.).

• The facility may choose to code to the appropriate Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) supported by provider documentation contained in the medical record.

Leadership and the MRA or Coding Supervisor must approve final abstracting (final billing) of all records without a physician response to the query.

a. The MRA or Coding Supervisor must report to Leadership the dates and number of attempts (including the methods used) made to contact the physician regarding the outstanding query.

b. The MRA or Coding Supervisor in collaboration with Leadership must evaluate relevant factors regarding why a provider might not be responding, and organizational impact, etc.

c. The query deficiency must be removed from the incomplete/delinquent process and the response not further pursued.

d. In the rare occurrence that a provider responds after a record has been coded and finalized, the record must be reviewed to determine next steps for any potential data integrity impact and implications.

5 If the physician has responded that no additional or clarifying information is necessary, the deficiency may be removed from the incomplete and, as necessary, the delinquent record count.

Trending Provider Queries

Patterns of queries identified (i.e., are there repeated queries on the same topic, such as anemia or pneumonia) will be monitored for education and training focus areas. The volume, average delinquency age, and total relative value units (RVUs)/relative weighted products (RWPs) associated with outstanding provider queries will be reported to the NAVMED Regions and

10 Enclosure (1)

BUMED on a monthly basis per the attached Physician Query Log. This information will be summarized at the MTF and forwarded to the NAVMED Regions to consolidate and submit by the third Monday of each month to BUMED-M3B13.

BUMED Responsibilities

1. BUMED-M3B13 is responsible for development and oversight of policies concerning inpatient and outpatient coding standard business practices, processes, and reporting require-ments. BUMED-M3B13 will answer questions and clarify requests escalated up from the NAVMED Regions and create policy clarification, as appropriate.

2. BUMED-M3B13 will use a standard Execution Process to assist with annual performance metrics and monitoring compliance with the Provider Query Process.

NAVMED Regions Responsibilities

1. The NAVMED Regions are responsible for assisting MTFs within their respective AOR in implementation of the policies and procedures defined in these Provider Query Guidelines.

NAVMED Regions will ensure queries generated are tracked and trended in order to facilitate improved documentation.

2. The NAVMED Regions will follow an Execution Process to ensure the Provider Query Guidance is implemented and executed correctly at all levels. The Execution Process will help the NAVMED Regions identify the key activities needed for successful implementation of the Provider Query Guidelines.

3. In addition to assisting MTFs with the implementation of the Provider Query Guidelines, the NAVMED Regions are responsible for addressing any questions or clarification requests that are escalated up from the MTFs.

MTF Responsibilities

1. The MTF commander, commanding officer, or officer in charge has the ultimate responsi-bility to ensure that all clinical documentation, clinical coding, and administrative procedures surrounding patient encounters are conducted following the requirements of these Provider Query Guidelines, applicable State and Federal laws, and TJC-formerly the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) standards. MTFs and MTF designee(s) will generate Performance Reports and will ensure training is in place to correct noted deficiencies, including (but not limited to) individual and group education, feedback, and ensuring bilateral communication between providers and coders.

2. The MTF commander, commanding officer, or officer in charge will communicate to the medical staff that coding staff will query providers when there are questions regarding documentation for code assignment.

11 Enclosure (1)

3. The PAD is responsible to the commander, commanding officer, or officer in charge for ensuring compliance with these guidelines and has functional oversight of the administrative coding process supporting both inpatient and outpatient encounters.

4. The MRA reports to the PAD or appropriate designee. The MRA is responsible for oversight of the inpatient and outpatient coding staff and coding processes and practices, including queries.

The MRA is further responsible for ensuring that clinical documentation in the patient record supports and justifies the coding assigned for the episode of care.

5. It is the responsibility of the MTF to identify, track, and ensure the resolution of any questions or clarification requests regarding the Provider Query Guidelines. Any questions or clarification requests that cannot be addressed at the MTF level should be escalated up to the NAVMED Region.

12 Enclosure (1)

APPENDIX A

Top Medical Expense Performance Reporting System (MEPRs) per MTF by Volume (Minimum 50 Encounters/Dispositions; FY2011)

NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH

Rank

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BHA Primary Care Clinics 246,146 2 BHZ Primary Medical Care Clinics Not Elsewhere Classified 184,663 3 BGZ Family Practice Not Elsewhere Classified 100,402 4 BCB Gynecology Clinic 91,277 5 BEA Orthopedic Clinic 73,454 6 BIA Emergency Medical Clinic 72,877 7 BFA Psychiatry Clinic 59,700 8 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 57,577 9 FBN Hearing Conservation 46,706

10 BFF Substance Abuse Clinic 46,665 11 ACB Obstetrics 3,537 12 ADB Newborn Nursery 3,011 13 AAA Internal Medicine 1,988 14 AFA Psychiatry 1,370 15 AEA Orthopedics 1,256 16 ABA General Surgery 1,232 17 ADA Pediatrics 1,042 18 AAB Cardiology 973 19 ACA Gynecology 854 20 ABD Neurosurgery 345

Total 995,074

Appendix A to

NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BHA Primary Care Clinics 328,546 2 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 90,461 3 BGZ Family Practice Not Elsewhere Classified 84,949 4 BCB Gynecology Clinic 83,644 5 BGA Family Practice Clinic 77,445 6 BDA Pediatric Clinic 71,965 7 BIA Emergency Medical Clinic 64,484 8 FBN Hearing Conservation 57,244 9 BFD Mental Health Clinic 56,002

10 BFF Substance Abuse Clinic 49,784 11 AAA Internal Medicine 3,733 12 ACB Obstetrics 3,665 13 ADB Newborn Nursery 3,017 14 ABA General Surgery 1,615 15 AFA Psychiatry 1,541 16 ADA Pediatrics 1,436 17 AAB Cardiology 1,236 18 AEA Orthopedics 699 19 ADE Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (Refer to the DJ accounts) 664 20 ACA Gynecology 465

Total 982,595

FEDERAL HEALTH CARE CENTER (FHCC)

(FORMERLY NAVAL HEALTH CLINIC GREAT LAKES)

Rank

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BHA Primary Care Clinics 237,991 2 BHZ Primary Medical Care Clinics Not Elsewhere Classified 123,828 3 BHC Optometry Clinic 43,765 4 BHD Audiology Clinic 37,056 5 BEA Orthopedic Clinic 30,754 6 BAA Internal Medicine Clinic 21,516 7 BGA Family Practice Clinic 21,457 8 BFD Mental Health Clinic 17,894 9 BCB Gynecology Clinic 17,287

10 BDA Pediatric Clinic 14,495

Total 566,043

2 Enclosure (1)

NAVAL HOSPITAL CAMP PENDLETON

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BHA Primary Care Clinics 155,104 2 BGZ Family Practice Not Elsewhere Classified 75,606 3 BFD Mental Health Clinic 75,236 4 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 56,341 5 BGA Family Practice Clinic 41,267 6 BIA Emergency Medical Clinic 38,139 7 BCB Gynecology Clinic 32,292 8 BFF Substance Abuse Clinic 30,017 9 FBN Hearing Conservation 29,374

10 BDA Pediatric Clinic 21,213 11 ACB Obstetrics 1,629 12 ADB Newborn Nursery 1,409 13 AAA Internal Medicine 718 14 ABA General Surgery 473 15 AGA Family Practice Medicine 398 16 ADA Pediatrics 203 17 AGH Family Practice Newborn Nursery 134 18 AAH Medical Intensive Care Unit (Refer to DJ accounts) 102 19 ACA Gynecology 89 20 AEA Orthopedics 56

Total 559,799

3 Enclosure (1)

NAVAL HOSPITAL CAMP LEJEUNE

Rank MEPRS3 Code MEPRS Name Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BHA Primary Care Clinics 117,269 2 BGA Family Practice Clinic 78,540 3 BAR Physical Medicine Clinic 49,978 4 BGZ Family Practice Not Elsewhere Classified 48,375 5 BCB Gynecology Clinic 47,418 6 BIA Emergency Medical Clinic 42,634 7 BFD Mental Health Clinic 36,989 8 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 27,996 9 FBN Hearing Conservation 27,353

10 BDA Pediatric Clinic 25,446 11 ADB Newborn Nursery 2,040 12 ACB Obstetrics 1,861 13 AGA Family Practice Medicine 1,156 14 AAH Medical Intensive Care Unit (Refer to DJ accounts) 453 15 AFA Psychiatry 374 16 ABA General Surgery 303 17 AEA Orthopedics 250 18 ADA Pediatrics 176 19 ACA Gynecology 130 20 ABF Oral Surgery 81

Total 508,824

4 Enclosure (1)

NAVAL HOSPITAL JACKSONVILLE

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BHA Primary Care Clinics 134,354 2 BGZ Family Practice Not Elsewhere Classified 128,957 3 BGA Family Practice Clinic 34,997 4 BIA Emergency Medical Clinic 31,897 5 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 30,949 6 BDZ Pediatric Care Not Elsewhere Classified 30,086 7 BAA Internal Medicine Clinic 24,193 8 FBN Hearing Conservation 21,051 9 BCB Gynecology Clinic 19,900

10 BHG Occupational Health Clinic 16,482 11 AGA Family Practice Medicine 824 12 ACB Obstetrics 788 13 ADB Newborn Nursery 656 14 AAA Internal Medicine 639 15 ABA General Surgery 330 16 AAH Medical Intensive Care Unit (Refer to DJ accounts) 248 17 AGH Family Practice Newborn Nursery 220 18 ADA Pediatrics 128 19 AEA Orthopedics 81 20 ACA Gynecology 61

Total 476,842

5 Enclosure (1)

WALTER REED NATIONAL MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BAA Internal Medicine Clinic 56,781 2 BHA Primary Care Clinics 47,909 3 BCB Gynecology Clinic 47,620 4 BAZ Medical Care Not Elsewhere Classified 44,737 5 BDA Pediatric Clinic 44,427 6 BFD Mental Health Clinic 37,462 7 BHZ Primary Medical Care Clinics Not Elsewhere Classified 35,879 8 BAC Cardiology Clinic 35,628 9 BAG Gastroenterology Clinic 34,078

10 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 32,885 11 ACB Obstetrics 2,251 12 AAA Internal Medicine 1,819 13 ADB Newborn Nursery 1,743 14 ABA General Surgery 752 15 AAB Cardiology 694 16 AAK Oncology 287 17 AFA Psychiatry 256 18 ABD Neurosurgery 246 19 ADC Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (Refer to the DJ accounts) 216 20 ABB Cardiovascular And Thoracic Surgery 156

Total 425,827

6 Enclosure (1)

NAVAL HOSPITAL PENSACOLA

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BGA Family Practice Clinic 125,866 2 BGZ Family Practice Not Elsewhere Classified 112,593 3 BAZ Medical Care Not Elsewhere Classified 39,164 4 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 31,278 5 BJA Flight Medicine Clinic 26,937 6 BIA Emergency Medical Clinic 21,175 7 BDZ Pediatric Care Not Elsewhere Classified 17,521 8 FBN Hearing Conservation 13,948 9 BHC Optometry Clinic 13,271

10 BHA Primary Care Clinics 12,334 11 ADB Newborn Nursery 535 12 AAA Internal Medicine 524 13 ACB Obstetrics 503 14 AGA Family Practice Medicine 426 15 ABA General Surgery 326 16 ACA Gynecology 138 17 AEA Orthopedics 124 18 ADA Pediatrics 53

Total 416,718

NAVAL HOSPITAL BREMERTON

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BGA Family Practice Clinic 74,214 2 BGZ Family Practice Not Elsewhere Classified 63,570 3 BHG Occupational Health Clinic 38,969 4 BIA Emergency Medical Clinic 21,608 5 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 17,884 6 BCB Gynecology Clinic 16,311 7 BAA Internal Medicine Clinic 13,880 8 BDA Pediatric Clinic 12,593 9 FBN Hearing Conservation 12,412

10 FCA Med Care In Non-Uniformed Facilities 12,129 11 AAA Internal Medicine 718 12 ADB Newborn Nursery 628 13 ACB Obstetrics 555 14 ABA General Surgery 292 15 AGA Family Practice Medicine 258 16 AGH Family Practice Newborn Nursery 169 17 AAH Medical Intensive Care Unit (Refer to DJ accounts) 113

Total 286,304

7 Enclosure (1)

NAVAL HOSPITAL BEAUFORT

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BHA Primary Care Clinics 121,915 2 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 25,758 3 BHC Optometry Clinic 23,791 4 BGA Family Practice Clinic 20,779 5 BHD Audiology Clinic 19,235 6 BIA Emergency Medical Clinic 10,944 7 BCB Gynecology Clinic 10,768 8 BGZ Family Practice Not Elsewhere Classified 10,379 9 BFD Mental Health Clinic 7,605

10 BAA Internal Medicine Clinic 7,585 11 AAA Internal Medicine 288 12 AGA Family Practice Medicine 88 13 ABA General Surgery 80 14 AEA Orthopedics 64

Total 259,278

NAVAL HEALTH CLINIC HAWAII – JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM

MEPRS3

Code MEPRS Name

Total Encounters/ Dispositions

1 BHA Primary Care Clinics 79,269 2 BDA Pediatric Clinic 44,667 3 BLA Physical Therapy Clinic 25,064 4 BGZ Family…