PWS and QASP_Camp Shelby Firebreak Construction.pdf
PDF 291 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127Q26QA008
About this file
This is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for Firebreak Construction Services at Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center in Mississippi, issued July 29, 2026.
The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and quality control to construct firebreaks on approximately 2 acres of forestry mulching and 1 mile of blading of Department of Defense property. The work involves preparing fire breaks down to mineral soil for prescribed fire purposes. The Period of Performance is 3 months after contract award. Services must be performed between 0700-1630 hours, Monday through Friday, excluding recognized U.S. federal holidays and facility closures due to emergencies or administrative reasons, at DOD Units 28, 29, 32, and 15. The contractor must maintain workforce stability and continuity, comply with all installation access and security requirements including Awareness Training Level 1 and iWATCH training within 30 days of contract start, and complete an Unexploded Ordnance Safety Brief prior to commencing work.
Key operational requirements include constructing firebreaks minimum 15 feet wide with minimal damage to adjacent trees over 10 inches diameter, constructing water bar-berms one foot in height with specified down cuts and angles, and maintaining water bars according to percent grade and spacing parameters ranging from 212 feet minimum spacing at 0-4% grades to 35 feet at 30-40% grades. Resource protection requirements mandate maintaining 25-foot buffers around gopher tortoise burrows, 10-foot buffers around cogon grass areas, keeping water bodies free of debris, prohibiting equipment access in wetlands, and restricting machinery operation during excessive soil moisture conditions pending clearance from Camp Shelby Environmental or Installation Forester. The contractor is solely responsible for cleanup and restoration from any accidents or spills at no additional cost. The Government furnishes only utilities; the contractor provides all other property, materials, and equipment. The QASP establishes performance standards monitored through periodic monthly inspections by the Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, with acceptable quality levels requiring firebreaks and water bar-berms to fall within PWS parameters and resource protection buffers to be maintained.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Firebreak Construction Area Maps.pdf | ||
| CLSExport_W9127Q26QA008.pdf | ||
| SAM.gov WD# 2015-5151.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(Ver May 2018)
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)
FOR
Firebreak Construction Services for Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center, MS
29 July 2026
1.0 General:
1.1 Scope: The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and quality control necessary, except as specified in Paragraph 3.0 as Government Furnished, to perform Firebreak Construction Services at Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center, MS as defined in this PWS.
1.2 Background: The Mississippi Army National Guard (MSARNG) has a requirement to prepare fire breaks on approximately 2 acres of forestry mulching and 1 mile blading of Department of Defense property at Camp Shelby, Mississippi. The intent of this project is to prepare fire breaks down to mineral soil for the purpose of prescribed fire.
1.3 Period of Performance (PoP): The Period of Performance shall be 3 months after receipt of award.
1.4 General Information:
1.4.1 Place and Performance of Services: The contractor shall provide services between the hours of 0700-1630 on Monday through Friday, except on recognized US holidays or when the Government facility/installation is closed due to local or national emergencies, administrative closings, or similar Government-directed facility/installation closings. Performance shall be at DOD Unit 28,29,32 and 15 (see Exhibit 3,4,5,6). The contractor shall at all times maintain an adequate work force for the uninterrupted performance of all tasks defined within this PWS when the Government facility/installation is not closed for the above reasons. When hiring personnel, the contractor shall keep in mind that the stability and continuity of the work force are essential.
1.4.1.1 Telework:
The Government does not permit the contractor to telework in support of this requirement. In furtherance of Continuity of Operations Planning (COOP), a telework program may be enacted to ensure that the Government's mission-critical operations stay operational during times of national emergency or incidents of national significance.
Telework shall be at no additional cost to the Government.
1.4.1.2 Unscheduled gate closures by the Security Police may occur at any time causing all personnel entering or exiting a closed installation to experience a delay. This cannot be predicted or prevented. Contractors are not compensated for unexpected ii closures or delays. Vehicles operated by contractor personnel are subject to search pursuant to applicable regulations. Any moving violation of any applicable motor vehicle regulation may result in the termination of the contractor employee’s installation driving privileges.
1.4.1.3 The contractor’s employees shall become familiar with and obey the regulations of the installation; including fire, traffic, safety, and security regulations while on the installation. Contractor employees should only enter restricted areas when required to do so and only upon prior approval. All contractor employees shall carry proper identification with them at all times and shall be subject to such checks as may be deemed necessary. The contractor shall ensure compliance with all regulations and orders of the installation, which may affect performance. The Government reserves the right to direct the removal of an employee from Government property or revoke access to Government systems for misconduct, security reasons, or any overt evidence of communicable disease. Removal of contractor employees for reasons stated above does not relieve the Contractor from responsibility for total performance of this contract.
1.4.2 Recognized Holidays: The following are recognized United States (US) holidays.
The contractor shall not perform services on these days:
1.4.2.1 New Year’s Day: January 1st
1.4.2.2 Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Birthday
1.4.2.3 President’s Day
1.4.2.4 Memorial Day
1.4.2.5 Juneteenth National Independence Day: June 19th
1.4.2.6 Independence Day: July 4th
1.4.2.7 Labor Day
1.4.2.8 Columbus Day
1.4.2.9 Veteran’s Day: November 11th
1.4.2.10 Thanksgiving Day
1.4.2.11 Christmas Day: December 25th
1.4.3 Quality Control (QC): The contractor shall develop and maintain an effective QC Plan (QCP) to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The contractor’s QCP is the means by which it assures itself that its work complies with the requirements of the contract. As a minimum, the contractor shall develop QC procedures that address the areas identified in the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan(QASP).
1.4.4 Quality Assurance (QA): The Government will evaluate the contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). This plan is primarily focused on what the Government will do to ensure that the contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. It defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance, and acceptable quality level(s) or defect rate(s).
iii
1.4.5 Installation Access and Security Requirements. The contractor shall comply with all applicable installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures, which may be obtained from the COR. The contractor and all associated subcontractor employees shall provide all information required for background checks to meet installation access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services, or Security Office. The contractor shall ensure compliance with all personal identity verification requirements as directed by Department of Defense (DoD), Headquarters Department of Army (HQDA) and/or local policy (see PWS 6.0). Should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) change, the Government may require changes in contractor security matters or processes.
1.4.5.1 Reserved
1.4.5.2 For contractors that do not require a CAC, but require access to a DoD facility or installation: Contractor and all associated sub-contractors employees shall comply with adjudication standards and procedures using the National Crime Information Center Interstate Identification (NCIC-III) and Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB) (Army Directive 2014-05), and applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access, and local security policies and procedures (provided by a Government representative).
1.4.5.3 Awareness Training (AT) Level 1: All contractor employees, including subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities, and controlled access areas shall complete AT Level 1 training within 30 calendar days after contract start date and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance. The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor and subcontractor employee to the COR within 15 calendar days after completion of training by each employee or subcontractor personnel. AT Level 1 awareness training is available at the following website:
https://jko.jten.mil/courses/atl1/launch.html.
1.4.5.4 iWATCH Training: The contractor and all associated subcontractors with an area of performance within an Army-controlled installation, facilities or area shall brief all employees on the local iWATCH program (training standards provided by the requiring activity Antiterrorism Officer (ATO)). This local developed training shall be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the COR or the KO. This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance. The contractor shall report completion for each contractor employee and subcontractor employee to the COR within 15 calendar days after completion of training.
1.4.5.5 Communications Security/Information Technology (COMSEC/IT) Security. All communications with DoD organizations are subject to COMSEC review. All telephone communications networks are continually subject to intercept by unfriendly intelligence organizations. DoD has authorized the military departments to conduct COMSEC https://jko.jten.mil/courses/atl1/launch.html iv monitoring and recording of telephone calls originating from, or terminating at, DoD organizations. Therefore, the contractor is advised that any time contractor personnel place or receive a call they are subject to COMSEC procedures. The contractor shall ensure wide and frequent dissemination of the above information to all employees dealing with DoD information. The contractor shall abide by all Government regulations concerning the authorized use of the Government's computer network, including the restriction against using the network to recruit Government personnel or advertise job openings.
1.4.6 Physical Security. The contractor shall safeguard all Government property provided for contractor use. At the close of each work period, Government facilities, equipment and materials shall be secured.
1.4.7 Special Qualifications: The contractor shall ensure all employees possess all required licenses for operating machinery used in the performance of this contract. This does not include education or other qualifications for the position in which the contractor employee is performing, dress codes, or other information. (NOTE: The Government does not provide training to contractors. Contractors must ensure that any personnel performing under a contract are fully trained, licensed, certified, and otherwise qualified to provide services.)
1.4.8 Post Award Conference/Periodic Progress Meetings: The contractor agrees to attend any post award conference convened by the KO in accordance with FAR 42.5.
The KO, COR, and other Government personnel, as appropriate, may meet periodically with the contractor to review the contactor’s performance. At these meetings, the KO will apprise the contractor of how the Government views the contractor’s performance and the contractor shall apprise the Government of problems, if any, being experienced.
The contractor shall resolve outstanding issues raised by the Government. Contractor attendance at these meetings shall be at no additional cost to the Government.
1.4.9 Contract Manager (CM): The contractor shall designate a CM who shall ensure performance under this contract. The name of this person, and an alternate who shall act for the contractor when the CM is absent, shall be designated in writing to the KO.
The CM or alternate shall have full authority to act for the contractor on all contract matters relating to daily operation of this contract. The CM shall work through the COR, to resolve issues, receive technical instructions, and ensure adequate performance of services. The CM shall ensure that contractor employees do not perform any services outside the scope of the contract without an official modification issued by the KO. The CM shall ensure contractor employees understand that services performed outside the scope of the contract are performed wholly at the expense of the contractor.
1.4.10 Identification of Contractor Employees: All contractor personnel attending meetings, answering Government telephones and working in other situations where their contractor status is not obvious to third parties are required to identify themselves as such to avoid creating an impression that they are Government employees. The contractor shall ensure that all documents or reports produced by contractor personnel v are suitably marked as contractor products or that contractor participation is appropriately disclosed. The contractor’s status as a “contractor” shall be predominantly displayed in all correspondence types (to include signature blocks on e-mail) and dealings with Government or non-Government entities. Contractor personnel shall wear identification badges distinguishing themselves as such. The badges shall have the company name, employee name and the word “contractor” displayed.
1.4.10.1 The contractor shall retrieve all identification media (including vehicle passes) from its employees who depart employment for any reason. The contractor shall return all identification media (i.e., badges and vehicles passes) to the COR within 14 days of an employee’s departure.
1.4.11. Combating Trafficking in Persons: The United States Government has adopted a zero-tolerance policy regarding trafficking in persons. Contractors and contractor employees shall not engage in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of performance of the contract; procure commercial sex acts during the period of performance of the contract; or use forced labor in the performance of the contract. The Contractor shall notify its employees of the United States Government’s zero tolerance policy, the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of this policy. The contractor shall take appropriate action, up to and including termination, against employees or subcontractors that violate the US Government policy as described at
FAR 22.17.
1.4.12 Reserved
1.4.13 Reserved
1.4.14 Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI): The contractor and subcontractor personnel performing services under this contract may receive, have access to or participate in the development of proprietary or source selection information (e.g., cost or pricing information, budget information or analyses, specifications, or work statements, etc.) or perform evaluation services which may create a current or subsequent OCIs, as defined in FAR Subpart 9.5. The contractor shall notify the KO immediately whenever it becomes aware that such access or participation may result in any actual or potential OCI and shall promptly submit a plan to the KO to avoid or mitigate any such OCI. The contractor’s mitigation plan will be determined to be acceptable solely at the discretion of the KO. In the event the KO unilaterally determines that any such OCI cannot be satisfactorily avoided or mitigated, the KO may impose other remedies as he or she deems necessary, including prohibiting the contractor from participation in subsequent contracted requirements which may be affected by the OCI.
2.0 Definitions and Acronyms:
2.1 Definitions:
vi
2.1.1 Contractor: A supplier or vendor awarded a contract to provide specific supplies or service to the Government. The term used in this contract refers to the prime.
2.1.2 Defective Service: A service output that does not meet the standard of performance associated with the PWS.
2.1.3 Deliverable: Anything that can be physically delivered and includes non-manufactured things such as meeting minutes or reports.
2.1.4 Key Personnel: Contractor personnel that are evaluated in a source selection process and that may be required to be used in the performance of a contract by the PWS. When key personnel are used as an evaluation factor in best value procurement, an offer can be rejected if it does not have a firm commitment from the persons that are listed in the proposal.
2.1.5 Physical Security: Actions that prevent the loss or damage of Government property.
2.1.6 Quality Assurance: The Government procedures to verify that services being performed by the Contractor are performed according to acceptable standards.
2.1.7 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP): An organized written document specifying the surveillance methodology to be used for surveillance of contractor performance.
2.1.8 Quality Control: All necessary measures taken by the Contractor to ensure that the quality of an end product or service shall meet contract requirements.
2.1.9 Subcontractor: One that enters into a contract with a prime contractor. The Government does not have privity of contract with the subcontractor.
2.2 Acronyms:
CM Contract Manager DoD Department of Defense KO Contracting Officer MSARNG Mississippi Army National Guard PRS Performance Requirements Summary PWS Performance Work Statement QA Quality Assurance QASP Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan QC Quality Control vii
3.0 Government Furnished Property, Material, Equipment and Services (GFP/M/E/S):
The Government will provide the property, material, equipment, and/or services listed below solely for the purpose of performance under this contract:
3.1 Property: NONE
3.2 Materials: NONE
3.3 Equipment: NONE
3.4 Services: NONE
3.5 Utilities: All utilities in the facility will be available for the contactor’s use in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall instruct employees in utilities conservation practices. The contractor shall operate under conditions that preclude the waste of utilities, which include turning off the water faucets or valves after using the required amount.
4.0 Contractor Furnished Property, Materials, and Equipment (CFP/M/E): The contractor shall furnish all transportation, materials, equipment, tools, and supplies necessary to mechanically treat sites in accordance with the attached specifications, provisions, and clauses. These items will remain the property of the contractor after the contract ends.
4.1 General: Except for those items specifically stated to be Government-Furnished in Paragraph 3.0, the contractor shall furnish everything required to perform these services as indicated in Paragraph 1.1.
5.0 Requirements: The contractor shall:
5.1 Comply with Operation Parameters Requirements
5.1.1 The mulch/ construction/ maintenance of firebreaks will be a minimum of 15 feet wide unless trees >10 inches in diameter at breast height on both sides of the lane prevent this.
5.1.2 Damage to trees adjacent to firebreak will be minimized.
5.1.3 Water bars will be constructed or maintained at the head of all steep grades on the bladed firebreak.
5.1.4 A compacted water bar-berm shall be one foot in height when settled; have a minimum down cut below bladed firebreak surface of one-half foot; extend total width of firebreak; angled 30-45 degrees downgrade from the center of the bladed firebreak; and with lead outs extending to undisturbed forest soil.
viii
5.1.5 The berm shall be compacted by construction equipment tracking the length of the berm.
5.1.6 Debris will be removed from the berm.
5.1.7 Water bars shall be constructed and/or maintained in accordance with the percent grade and spacing listed in Table A below.
Percent Grade of Fire lane Minimum feet between Waterbars 0-4 212 4-8 148 8-12 110 12-16 95 16-22 84 22-30 60 30-40 35
5.1.8 The contractor should be made aware that this area could potentially have concrete, structural foundations, etc. located within the project area due to the site being a military installation founded in 1917.
5.2 Comply with Resources Protection Requirements
5.2.1 Gopher tortoise burrows could possibly be located within the treatment area, but none are known to MSARNG personnel on this area. Practices will be used to avoid causing damage to the burrow or disturbing the apron with equipment, such as maintaining a buffer of 25 feet around burrows. Burrows will be marked with orange posts and yellow “Restricted Area” signs or pink/black flagging. If an unmarked burrow or individual gopher tortoise is discovered, the contractor will notify the project officer and provide GPS coordinates.
5.2.2 Areas containing cogon grass will be avoided and a minimum 10-foot buffer shall be maintained around the area. Any new areas of cogon grass not previously flagged shall be flagged with ribbon by the contractor and location reported to MSARNG representative prior to submission of that month’s invoice. (Ribbon will be provided by the MSARNG upon request).
5.2.3 All water bodies will be kept free of contractor generated debris.
5.2.4 Equipment access is prohibited within wetland areas.
5.2.5 Machinery will not be operated when soil moisture conditions are such that excessive rutting or soil movement will occur. Clearance will be granted by Camp Shelby Environmental or Installation Forester.
ix
5.2.6 All vehicular equipment used to perform this contract will be operated in such a manner as to cause the least amount of soil disturbance.
5.3 Comply with Unexploded Ordnance Requirements
5.3.1 The possibility exists that unexploded ordnance will be encountered in the proposed areas of project. If any unknown metal object in located during this project, Camp Shelby Range Control shall be notified immediately at 601-558-2709 and all work shall cease until the area is cleared by Range Control personnel.
5.3.2 The contractor and all associated workers shall complete an Unexploded Ordnance Safety Brief prior to commencing work.
5.4 Comply with Spills/ Accidents/ Safety Requirements
5.4.1 The contractor shall have a list at the project site at all times of all the proper agencies to be notified along with their telephone numbers, in case of any herbicide, petroleum, oil or lubricant spills or accidents occurring during the project.
5.4.2 If an accident occurs, the contractor is responsible for notifying all proper agencies and the Camp Shelby Environmental Office immediately.
5.4.3 The contractor shall be solely responsible for the clean-up and restoration due to any accidents at no additional cost to the MSARNG.
5.4.4 The contractor shall have a chemical spill plan on board working equipment.
6.0 Applicable Publications:
Publication Date of Publication
Mandatory or Advisory
Website
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Current Mandatory https://www.acquisition.gov/?q=browsefar
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
Current Mandatory https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars
Mississippi Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Current Mandatory Mississippi Forestry Commission https://www.acquisition.gov/?q=browsefar https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars x
QUALITY ASSURANCE
SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
Firebreak Construction Services
For
Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center
Issued 29 July 2026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... i
1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................... i
1.2 Performance Management Approach............................................................................. i
1.3 Performance Management Strategy
2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................................................................... ii
2.1 The Contracting Officer ................................................................................................. ii
2.2 The Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative ...................................................... ii
3 IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS/QUALITY LEVELS ...... ii 4 METHODOLOGIES TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE .......................................................... ii
4.1 Surveillance Techniques
4.2 Customer Feedback
4.3 Acceptable Quality Levels
5 QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION
5.1 The Performance Management Feedback Loop
5.2 Monitoring Forms
6 ANALYSIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT
6.1 Determining Performance
6.2 Reporting
6.3 Reviews and Resolution
ATTACHMENT 1: PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT 2: DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE
ATTACHMENT 3: QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORING FORM
(Ver May 2018)
1. INTRODUCTION
This QASP is pursuant to the requirements listed in the performance work statement (PWS) entitled Firebreak Construction Services. This plan sets forth the procedures and guidelines the Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center will use in ensuring the required performance standards or services levels are achieved by the contractor.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed.
The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the contractor is meeting the performance standards/quality levels identified in the PWS and the contractor’s quality control plan (QCP), and to ensure that the government pays only for the level of services received.
This QASP defines the roles and responsibilities of all members of the integrated project team (IPT), identifies the performance objectives, defines the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the contractor’s performance, describes quality assurance documentation requirements, and describes the analysis of quality assurance monitoring results.
1.2 Performance Management Approach
The PWS structures the acquisition around “what” service or quality level is required, as opposed to “how” the contractor should perform the work (i.e., results, not compliance).
This QASP will define the performance management approach taken by Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center to monitor and manage the contractor’s performance to ensure the expected outcomes or performance objectives communicated in the PWS are achieved.
Performance management rests on developing a capability to review and analyze information generated through performance assessment. The ability to make decisions based on the analysis of performance data is the cornerstone of performance management; this analysis yields information that indicates whether expected outcomes for the project are being achieved by the contractor.
Performance management represents a significant shift from the more traditional quality assurance (QA) concepts in several ways. Performance management focuses on assessing whether outcomes are being achieved and to what extent. This approach migrates away from scrutiny of compliance with the processes and practices used to achieve the outcome. A performance-based approach enables the contractor to play a large role in how the work is performed, as long as the proposed processes are within the stated constraints. The only exceptions to process reviews are those required by law (federal, state, and local) and compelling business situations, such as safety and health. A “results” focus provides the contractor flexibility to continuously improve and innovate over the course of the contract as long as the critical outcomes expected are being achieved and/or the desired performance levels are being met.
1.3 Performance Management Strategy
The contractor is responsible for the quality of all work performed. The contractor measures that quality through the contractor’s own quality control (QC) program. QC is work output, not workers, and therefore includes all work performed under this contract regardless of whether the work is performed by contractor employees or by subcontractors. The contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS.
The contractor will develop and implement a performance management system with processes to assess and report its performance to the designated government representative. The contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS.This QASP enables the government to take advantage of the contractor’s QC program.
1.3.2 The Contracting Officer Representative/Contracting Officer Technical Representative (COR/COTR) will monitor performance and review performance reports furnished by the contractor to determine how the contractor is performing against communicated performance objectives. The contractor will be responsible for making required changes in processes and practices to ensure performance is managed effectively.
2. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1 The Contracting Officer
The Contracting Officer (KO) is responsible for monitoring contract compliance, contract administration, cost control and for resolving any differences between the observations documented by the COR/COTR and the contractor. The KO will designate one full-time COR/COTR as the government authority for performance management. The number of additional representatives serving as technical inspectors depends on the complexity of the services measured, as well as the contractor’s performance, and must be identified and designated by the KO.
2.2 The COR/COTR
The COR/COTR is designated in writing by the KO to act as his or her authorized representative to assist in administering a contract. COR/COTR limitations are contained in the written appointment letter. The COR/COTR is responsible for technical administration of the project and ensures proper government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR/COTR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the government’s behalf. Any changes that the contractor deems may affect contract price, terms, or conditions shall be referred to the KO for action. The COR/COTR will have the responsibility for completing QA monitoring forms used to document the inspection and evaluation of the contractor’s work performance. Government surveillance may occur under the inspection of services clause for any service relating to the contract.
3. IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS/QUALITY LEVELS
The required performance standards and/or quality levels are included in the PWS and in Attachment 1, Performance Requirements Summary. If the contractor meets the required service or performance level, it will be paid the monthly amount agreed on in the contract.
Failure to meet the required service or performance level will result in a deduction from the monthly amount.
4. METHODOLOGIES TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE
4.1 Surveillance Techniques
iii
In an effort to minimize the performance management burden, simplified surveillance methods shall be used by the government to evaluate contractor performance when appropriate. The primary methods of surveillance are:
Random monitoring, which shall be performed by the COR/COTR designated inspector.
Periodic Inspection – COR/COTR typically performs the periodic inspection on a monthly basis.
4.2 Customer Feedback
4.2.1 The contractor is expected to establish and maintain professional communication between its employees and customers. The primary objective of this communication is customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is the most significant external indicator of the success and effectiveness of all services provided and can be measured through customer complaints.
4.2.2 Performance management drives the contractor to be customer focused through initially and internally addressing customer complaints and investigating the issues and/or problems but the customer always has the option to communicate complaints to the COR/COTR as opposed to the contractor.
4.2.3 Customer complaints, to be considered valid, must set forth clearly and in writing. The detailed nature of the complaint must be stated, document signed and forwarded to the COR/COTR. Upon receipt of a complaint, the COR/COTR will investigate and document the findings on the monitoring form, Attachment 3 and in the COR file.
4.2.4 Customer feedback may also be obtained from the results of formal customer satisfaction surveys or random customer complaints.
4.3 Acceptable Quality Levels
The acceptable quality levels (AQLs) included in Attachment 1, Performance Requirements Summary Table, for contractor performance are structured to allow the contractor to manage how the work is performed while providing negative incentives for performance shortfalls. For certain critical activities such as those involving Firebreak Construction, the desired performance level is established at 100 percent. Other levels of performance are keyed to the relative importance of the task to the overall mission performance.
5. QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION
5.1 The Performance Management Feedback Loop
The performance management feedback loop begins with the communication of expected outcomes. Performance standards are expressed in the PWS and are assessed using the performance monitoring techniques shown in Attachment 1, Performance Requirements Summary.
5.2 Monitoring Forms
iv
The government’s QA surveillance, accomplished by the COR/COTR, will be reported using the monitoring form in Attachment 3. The form, when completed, will document the government’s assessment of the contractor’s performance under the contract to ensure that the required quality levels are being achieved. The COR/COTR will retain a copy of all completed QA surveillance forms.
6. ANALYSIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT
6.1 Determining Performance
The Government shall use the monitoring methods cited to determine whether the performance standards/service levels/AQLs have been met. If the contractor has not met the minimum requirements, it may be asked to develop a corrective action plan to show how and by what date it intends to bring performance up to the required levels. Failure to meet the AQL may result in a deduction from the monthly payment.
6.2 Reporting
At the end of each month, the COR will prepare a written report for the KO summarizing the overall results of the quality assurance surveillance of the contractor’s performance. This written report, which includes the completed quality assurance monitoring form (Attachment 3), will become part of the QA documentation and COR/COTR file. It will enable the government to demonstrate whether the contractor is meeting the stated objectives and/or performance standards, including cost/technical/scheduling objectives.
6.3 Reviews and Resolution
The COR/COTR may require the contractor’s project manager, or a designated alternate, to meet with the KO, COR/COTR and other government IPT personnel as deemed necessary to discuss performance evaluation. The COR/COTR will define a frequency of in-depth reviews with the contractor, including appropriate self-assessments by the contractor; however, if the need arises, the contractor will meet with the COR/COTR as often as required or per the contractor’s request. The agenda of the reviews may include:
Monthly performance assessment data and trend analysis Issues and concerns of both parties Projected outlook for upcoming months and progress against expected trends, including a corrective action plan analysis Recommendations for improved efficiency and/or effectiveness Issues arising from the performance monitoring processes
6.3.2 The COR/COTR must coordinate and communicate with the contractor to resolve issues and concerns regarding marginal or unacceptable performance.
6.3.3 The COR/COTR and contractor should jointly formulate tactical and long-term courses of action. Decisions regarding changes to metrics, thresholds, or service levels should be clearly documented. Changes to service levels, procedures, and metrics will be incorporated as a contract modification at the convenience of the KO.
v
ATTACHMENT 1: PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS)
This PRS includes performance objectives the Government will use to determine contractor performance and will compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL).
Performance
Objective Performance Standard Acceptable Quality
Levels (AQL) Surveillance Method / By
Whom 5.1.1
Firebreak mulch/ construction/ maintenance
The contractor shall prepare firebreaks a minimum of 15 feet wide with minimal damage to adjacent trees >10 inches in diameter at breast height.
Firebreak falls within PWS parameters
Periodic Inspection / COR
5.1.4 Water bar-berm
construction
The contractor shall construct water bar-berms
Water bar-berms fall within PWS parameters
Periodic Inspection / COR
5.1.7 Water bar-berm
location
The contractor shall construct water bar-berms in accordance with the specified percent grade and spacing
Water bar-berms are located according to
PWS parameters
Periodic Inspection / COR
5.2 Resource Protection
Contractor shall treat gopher tortoises, cogongrass, Buffers are maintained around resources
Periodic Inspection / COR
ATTACHMENT 2: DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE
PWS Reference / Deliverable Title
Frequency Number of Copies
Medium/Format Submit To
1.4.5.3 AT Level 1
Awareness Training
Certificates
Provide within 30calendar days after employee completes training.
1 Electronic Submission
COR
1.4.5.4 iWATCH Training Certificates
Provide within 30 calendar days after employee completes training.
1 Electronic Submission
COR
1.4.9 Contract Manager
Provide within 30 days of receiving contract.
1 Electronic Submission
COR
vi
ATTACHMENT 3: QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORING FORM
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE or STANDARD:
SURVEY PERIOD:
SURVEILLANCE METHOD (Check):
Random Sampling 100% Inspection Periodic Inspection Customer Complaint
LEVEL OF SURVEILLANCE (Check):
Monthly Quarterly As needed
PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS SAMPLED DURING SURVEY PERIOD: ______ %
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS:
Observed Service Provider Performance Measurement Rate: ______%
Service Provider’s Performance (Check): Meets Standards
Does Not Meet Standards
Narrative of Performance During Survey Period:
PREPARED BY: _____________________________ DATE: ________________________________
| 1. INTRODUCTION |
| 1.1 Purpose |
| The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed. The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the contractor is meeting the perf... |
| This QASP defines the roles and responsibilities of all members of the integrated project team (IPT), identifies the performance objectives, defines the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the contractor’s performance, describes quality assuran... |
| 1.2 Performance Management Approach |
| The PWS structures the acquisition around “what” service or quality level is required, as opposed to “how” the contractor should perform the work (i.e., results, not compliance). This QASP will define the performance management approach taken by Camp ... |
| Performance management represents a significant shift from the more traditional quality assurance (QA) concepts in several ways. Performance management focuses on assessing whether outcomes are being achieved and to what extent. This approach migrates... |
| 1.3 Performance Management Strategy |
| The contractor is responsible for the quality of all work performed. The contractor measures that quality through the contractor’s own quality control (QC) program. QC is work output, not workers, and therefore includes all work performed under this c... |
| 2. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES |
| 2.1 The Contracting Officer |
| 2.2 The COR/COTR |
| 3. IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS/QUALITY LEVELS |
| 4. METHODOLOGIES TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE |
| 4.1 Surveillance Techniques |
| 4.2 Customer Feedback |
| 4.3 Acceptable Quality Levels |
| 5. QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION |
| 5.1 The Performance Management Feedback Loop |
| 5.2 Monitoring Forms |
| 6. ANALYSIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT |
| 6.1 Determining Performance |
| The Government shall use the monitoring methods cited to determine whether the performance standards/service levels/AQLs have been met. If the contractor has not met the minimum requirements, it may be asked to develop a corrective action plan to show... |
| 6.2 Reporting |
| At the end of each month, the COR will prepare a written report for the KO summarizing the overall results of the quality assurance surveillance of the contractor’s performance. This written report, which includes the completed quality assurance moni... |
| 6.3 Reviews and Resolution |
| The COR/COTR may require the contractor’s project manager, or a designated alternate, to meet with the KO, COR/COTR and other government IPT personnel as deemed necessary to discuss performance evaluation. The COR/COTR will define a frequency of in-d... |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .