PT-1 Property Tags 3-23.docx
DOCX document 317 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PT-1 PROPERTY TAGS
- Solicitation number
- RFQ - 171 - 230000000381
- Issued by
- Ingham County, Lansing City, Michigan
About this file
This document is a Printing Services Bid Request from the Michigan Department of Technology, Management & Budget for PT-1 Property Tags. The requested quantity is 50,000 tags with a specified finish size of 5 1/4 x 2 5/8. The tags are to be printed in black ink on #6 13 pt. Manilla Tag with a 1/4" hole, fiber reinforced eye, and metal wire tie. The vendor must provide a detailed quote letter, and a color PDF proof is required for approval prior to production. The bid will be awarded based on best price and value to the state, and only prequalified vendors will be considered.
The related state and local contract opportunity involves Ingham County and the City of Lansing. Pricing terms, set asides, incumbent information, funding requirements, and other salient details are not provided in the given document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| State of Michigan Print Mail Management Terms Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| PT-1 Property Tags Sample 3-23.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & BUDGET
PRINTING SERVICES
BID REQUEST
JOB DESCRIPTION
Title: PT-1 Property Tags
| Quantity: 50,000 |
| COMMENTS |
Finish Size: 5 1/4 x 2 5/8
Electronic file provided, Color PDF proof required for approval prior to production.
*Vendor must attach a detailed quote letter(s). Failure to do so will result in bid disqualification.
Ink(s): Black 1 Side
Cover: #6 13 pt. Manilla Tag
Text:
Bindery: 1/4" hole, fiber reinforced eye, Metal wire tied thru eyelet
Packing: Wrap in 100's. Carton pack. No more then 40 lbs.
File:
Sample:
Proof: Required
The Department of Technology, Management & Budget awards bids on best price and value to the state. In some situations, the lowest bidder may not receive an award because the bid does not provide best value. Examples include past quality concerns or inability to meet requirements. Only prequalified vendors will be considered.
image1.jpeg image10.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .