InnerView_Software_Site_License_Annual_Subcription_Redacted.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
LSJ for InnerView Software Annual Subscription and Maintenance
Solicitation number
PRO0004095
Issued by

About this file

LSJ for InnerView SW Annual Subscription and Maintenance

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE

4-751 Swtlan.J Road Washnon DC 20395

Date: 16 Jul 2018

LIMITED SOURCE JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL (LSJ)

1. IDENTIFICATION OF REQUESTING AGENCY AND CONTRACTING OFFICE:

a. Agency Name:

Naval Intelligence Agency (NIA) 701 S. Courthouse Rd Arlington, VA 22204

b. Contracting Activity:

Naval Intelligence Agency (NIA) 701 S. Courthouse Rd Arlington, VA 22204

2, NATURE AND/OR DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION BEING APPROVED:

This Limited Source Justification (LSJ) is for procurement of the InnerView Software Licenses Annual Subscription Renewal.

3. A DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED TO MEET THE AGENCY NEED

(INCLUDING THE ESTIMATED VALUE):

Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) requires the renewal of Innerview (previously called Sureview) licenses which includes maintenance and support. The software is an integral part of the Intrusion and Detection System (lADS) project in support of ODNI mandate lCD 500-27. lADS is a computer network security system comprised of computer hardware and software to monitor and detect the unauthorized disclosure and misuse of information. Annual Subscription renewal for InnerViews 5000 agent site license is estimated at

4. IDENTIFICATION OF JUSTIFICATION RATIONALE (SEE 8.405-6(a) & (b) OR 16.505 (b)(2)(i)(A)

TO (E)) AND, IF APPLICABLE, A DEMONSTRATION OF THE PROPOSED CONTRACTOR'S

UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SUPPLY OR SERVICE. IN

ACCORDANCE WITH:

(Check the appropriate FAR citation/title permitting other than full and open competition:)

I. FAR 8.405-6 (b)(1) - An item peculiar to one manufacturer (e.g., a particular brand name, product, or a feature of a product, peculiar to one manufacturer).

ii. FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A) - An urgent and compelling need exists, and following the ordering procedures would result in unacceptable delays.

iii. FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B) - Only one source is capable of responding to the unique or specialized nature of the work.

iv. FAR 8.405-6(a)(1 )(i)(C) - The new work is a logical follow-on to an original Federal Supply Schedule order or BPA. (Note: The original order must have been placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures. The original order must not have been previously issued under sole source or limited source procedures)

Page 1 of

V. DFARS 208.405-70(b) - Each order exceeding ¶150,000 shall be placed on a competitive basis ri in accordance with DFARS 208.405-70(c), unless this requirement is waived on the basis of a justification that is prepared and approved in accordance with FAR 8,405-6 and includes a written determination that--

(1) A statute expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified source; or

(2) One of the circumstances described at FAR 16.505(b)( )(i)(A) through (E) applies tothe order. Follow the procedures at PGI 216.505-70 if FAR 16.505(b) (2)(i)(B) or (C) is deemed to apply.

vi. FAR 16.505(b)(2)1i)(A) - The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays;

vii. FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(B) - Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized;

viii. FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C) - The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of fl economy and efficiency as a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.

ix. FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(D) - The order is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.

x. FAR 16,505(b)(2)(i)(E) - For orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, a statute expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified source.

xi. DFARS 216.505-70(b) Each order exceeding $150,000 shall be placed on a competitive basis ri in accordance with DFARS 216.505-70(c), unless this requirement is waived on the basis of a justification that is prepared and approved in accordance with FAR 8,405-6 and includes a written determination that --

(1) A statute expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified source: or;

(2) One of the circumstances described at FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A) through (E) applies to the order, Follow t4 procedures at PGI 216.505-70 if FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(B) or (C) is deemed to apply.

5. IF PURSUING AN EXCEPTION PER FAR 8.405-6 (b)(1) NAME BRAND DESCRIBE IN DETAIL

WHY A PARTICULAR BRAND NAME, PRODUCT, OR A FEATURE OF A PRODUCT, PECULIAR

TO ONE MANUFACTURER MUST BE USED. IF PURSUING AND EXCEPTION PER FAR 16.505,

PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION AND RATIONALE FOR USING THE AUTHORITY, THIS IS DIFFERENT

FROM THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUIREMENT. DESCRIBE HOW THIS ACTION

REQUIRES THE USE OF THE AUTHORITY CITED. IF APPLICABLE, IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED

OR POTENTIAL CONTRACTOR(S), AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED

CONTRACTOR'S UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SUPPLY OR

SERVICE.

FAR 8.405-6(b)(1) only one source capable of responding to the unique or specialized nature of the work. This application was selected as the Intelligence Community (IC) standard to support the Office of the Director of National Intelligence Mandate lCD 500-27, and is an integral component of NIA's compliance with the mandate under the initial procurement. InnerView provides unique capabilities that other applications do not provide such as; full motion video, a cross domain solution that can monitor several security networks to a single view, the ability to create a person(s) record that can receive feeds from other disparate data sources, the ability to audit large amounts of data for anomaly detection and user trends analysis, and finally alerts to both internal as well as from external cyber security threats. Innerview annual software license subscription is proprietary to ForcePoint Federal LLC (formerly Raytheon Oakley Systems).

Page 2of4

6. DETERMINATION BY THE ORDERING ACTIVITY CONTRACTING OFFICER THAT THE ORDER

REPRESENTS THE BEST VALUE (FAR Part 8) OR FAIR AND REASONABLE (FAR Part 16):

lnnerView annual software license subscription renewal is available on GSA. The requirement will be posted in GSA ebuy. Pricing will be determined fair and reasonable and the best value to the government.

7. DESCRIPTION OF MARKET RESEARCH CONDUCTED AMONG SCHEDULE HOLDERS AND

RESULTS,

-OR-

STATEMENT OF REASON MARKET RESEARCH WAS NOT CONDUCTED:

NIA participated in an evaluation of multiple software solutions during the original acquisition phase for this system. It was determined that only the InnerView system met ONIs requirements, Market research has determined that ForcePoint Federal LLC is the sole manufacturer of the lnnerView system.

8. OTHER FACTS SUPPORTING JUSTIFICATION:

N/A

9. ACTIONS THE AGENCY MAY TAKE TO REMOVE OR OVERCOME ANY BARRIERS THAT LED

TO THE RESTRICTED CONSIDERATION BEFORE ANY SUBSEQUENT ACQUISITION FOR

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IS MADE:

1NIA will continue to participate in trade shows, conferences, and other forums to maintain situational awareness of the industry capabilities and potential for future opportunities for competition. Technical experts from the Intelligence Community (IC) participating in this program are continuing to research the software market and investigate any actions which could be taken in the future to enable competition for follow on technology. Any new solution would be competed fully and openly.

10. REFERENCE TO APPROVED ACQUISITION PLAN/STRATEGY:

a. An Acquisition Plan is not required. This acquisition is below the thresholds prescribed in L.J DFARS 207.103 for a written acquisition plan.

b. The Acquisition plan covering this requirement is attached, ONI requirement for service contracts over $15000000

Page 3of4

Phon Title: Contracting Officer

Title: Gary Khalil, Organization: ONI

Phone:

Code: OOJ

Organization: OfficeofNval Intelligence. N8 Contracts

V REVIEW BY OFFIcE 0 ONS EXCEEDING $150,000)

Code: N81

TECHNICAL AND REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY FAR 8.405-6(d) and/or FAR 16.505(b)(2) I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this justification and which form a basis for this justification are complete and accurate.

Technical Cognizance:

CARTE R.0 H RI STOPHE R. K. 1285506545 Digitally signed by CARTER.CHRISTOPHER,K. 1285506645 Date: 2018.07.1811:3614-0400

Title: Security Specialist Phone:

Organization: Naval Intelligence Activity Code: MA 1P2

CONTRACTING OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION:

FAR 8.405-6(d)(1): For a proposed order or BPA with an estimated value exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, but not exceeding $650000. I certify that this iustificadon is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(A): Orders exceeding $3,000. but not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, The contracting officer shall document the basis for using an exception to the fair opportunity process.

FAR 16.505 (b)(2)(ii)(C)(1): For proposed orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, but not ri exceeding $650000, the ordering activity contracting officer's certification that the justification is accurate L.J and complete to the best of the ordering activity contracting officers knowledge and belief will serve as approval, unless a higher approval level is established in accordance with agency procedures.

LANGDON . KAREN B. 1023346474 Digitally signed by LANODONKARENB1023346474 Date: 2018.08.16 06:28:45 -0400

U APPROVAL REQUIRED BY COMPETITION ADVOCATE

FAR 6.405-6(d)(2): For a proposed order or BPA with an estimated value exceeding $650,000, but not

U: exceeding $12.5 million, the justification must be approved by the competition advocate of the activity placing the order, i-, FAR 16,505 (b)(2)(ii)(C)(2) For a proposed order exceeding $650,000, but not exceeding $12.5 million, the U justification must be approved by the competition advocate of the activity placing the order.

Title: Phone:

Organization: Code:

File details come from the government source that posted it.