Previous RFI 70SBUR25I00000003 - Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 135 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USCIS Contact Center Tier 1 (CCT1)
- Solicitation number
- 70SBUR25I00000003-V2
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) for USCIS Contact Center Tier 1 Support Services, Solicitation Number 70SBUR25I00000003. The RFI includes responses to nine vendor questions covering operational details for a contact center support contract. Key details include historical service volume data showing 3,449,735 calls answered in FY23, with total agents typically staffed between 475-550 personnel. The government anticipates decreasing call volumes as customers increasingly use chat and secure messaging channels, with potential surge requirements due to administrative policy changes affecting immigration services.
The RFI provides insights into contract expectations, including a four-week initial training and nesting period, a Process Improvement Council involving contractor participation, and a firm fixed unit pricing approach that includes all training and overhead costs. The government will evaluate process improvement proposals using metrics like average handling time reduction, and contractors are expected to collaborate with USCIS Office of Information Technology (OIT) and Program Office to test and implement efficiency suggestions. Incumbent pricing information is protected under FOIA and will not be disclosed without formal request processes.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USCIS Contact Center Tier 1 Support Services Request for Information 70SBUR25I00000003
Questions Received and Answers
1. What specific metrics will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of RPA and AI implementation for process improvement? USCIS Office of Information Technology (OIT) and the Program Office will evaluate the process improvement proposals and work with the vendor test and implement. For example, if the vendor presents a suggestion that by using X, Y and Z automations, it can reduce average handling time by 1 minute, we may test the claim to see is it is accurate.
2. Could the Government provide historical data on call/chat/webform volume fluctuations to help bidders better understand the scalability requirements?
FY 25
FY23 FY24 (Oct-Dec)
Calls answered 3,449,735 3,479,993 733,067 Average Handling Time (minutes) 9.8 7.7 8
Chats answered 887,008 1,118,658 424,533 Average Handling Time (minutes) 14.4 11.6 12.8
Webform/secure message 745,858 600,198 64,590 Average Handling Time (minutes) 6 6 6
3. Can the Government share more details on the current staffing distribution across channels (phone, chat, email) to help with workforce planning? Total agents are generally staffed between 475-550 with the fluctuations coinciding with the volume changes throughout the year.
4. Could the Government provide more information on the Process Improvement Council mentioned in the PWS and expectations for contractor participation? The contractor Process Improvement Manager would participate in a working group made up of Program Office officials to include OIT, the COR, the CO and others who have an interest in the process improvement suggestions offered.
5. We assume that the 4-week initial training and nesting period reflects one week of training and three weeks of nesting. Can the Government confirm or correct this assumption? We have seen two weeks of training and two weeks of nesting and in some cases 2 weeks of training and up to 4 weeks of nesting.
6. What is the average AHT and/or current occupancy for the projected call volume? See the previous answer provided under question 2.
7. Can you share the 30 minute call arrival patterns for the past 60 months? Past call arrival patterns are not indicative of future call arrival patterns. This service is not cylinical in nature. It is anticipated that the volume of calls over the course of this contract will likely decrease in correlation to increases in the chat and secure message channels as the public is increasingly turning to chat and secure messaging. Additionally, there will likely be instances requiring surge due to unforeseen events such as changes to administrative policy that affects immigration services. Relying on past call arrival patterns may lead to a mis-representation of service needed in the future.
8. Can you share with me the current billable rate per call, per chat, and per message based on the projected volumes provided? Incumbent pricing information is generally protected under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4). We would not release the incumbent’s pricing information without going to the FOIA process.
9. Is the initial agent training billable? We do not intend on providing a Labor Hour or Cost type pricing arrangement for contractors to training for agent training. The contractors shall include all initial and recurring training costs and other overhead expenses in their firm fixed unit price for each service. A firm fixed unit price ensures that the contractor creates an efficient process for training and encourages employee retention to minimize disruption of service.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .