Pre-Qual_List_IFB_JOC_for_Roofing_Services.pdf

PDF 92 KB Posted

Attached to
JOB ORDER CONTRACT (JOC) FOR ROOFING SERVICES
Solicitation number
IFB-080-2533206-JM
Issued by
Orange County, San Francisco City, California

About this file

This document is a Pre-Qualified List for Invitation for Bid (IFB) #080-2533206-JM issued by the County of Orange, California for a Job Order Contract (JOC) for Roofing Services. Six contractors have been pre-qualified for this opportunity: AME Builders, Inc., BEST Contracting Services, Inc., Bishop, Inc., Exbon Development, Letner Roofing Company, and SJD&B, Inc. The contract has a maximum value of $3,500,000, with the County potentially awarding to multiple contractors. Key dates include a mandatory pre-bid meeting webinar on December 05, 2023, questions due by December 08, 2023, and bids due by December 13, 2023 at 2:00 P.M. through the County's online bidding system, OpenGov.

Bidders must hold an active California Class C-39 roofing license and be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. The successful bidder will be required to provide a performance bond and payment bond, each for $1,000,000. Contractors must comply with prevailing wage requirements and all labor code provisions. Bid security of at least 10% of the bid amount is required, which can be a certified or cashier's check, cash, or an original bidder's bond. The contract will be fully electronic, with only online submissions accepted, and bidders are advised to carefully review the County's terms, conditions, and insurance requirements before submitting a bid.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Pre-Qualified List

IFB #080-2533206-JM (PQ)

JOC for Roofing Services

Respondents Qualified

AME Builders, Inc. Yes

BEST Contracting Services, Inc. Yes

Bishop, Inc. Yes

Exbon Development Yes

Letner Roofing Company Yes

SJD&B, Inc. Yes

Notes:

All of the above firms met the pre-qualification guidelines

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .