PKG00262989-instructions.pdf

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)

Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction: Academic Research Initiative (ARI)

NOTE: If you are going to apply for this funding opportunity and have not obtained a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and/or are not currently registered in the System for Award Management (SAM), please take immediate action to obtain a DUNS Number, if applicable, and then to register immediately in SAM. It may take 4 weeks or more after you submit your SAM registration before your registration is active in SAM, then an additional 24 hours for Grants.gov to recognize your information. Information on obtaining a DUNS number and registering in SAM is available from Grants.gov at:

http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html. Detailed information regarding DUNS and SAM is also provided in Section D of this NOFO, subsection, Content and Form of Application Submission.

A. Program Description

1. Issued By U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Research and Development Division

2. Assistance Listings (formerly Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number) 97.077

3. Assistance Listings Title (formerly CFDA Title) Homeland Security, Research, Development, Testing, Evaluation, and Demonstration of Technologies Related to Nuclear Threat Detection

4. Funding Opportunity Title

Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction: Academic Research Initiative (ARI)

5. Funding Opportunity Number

DHS-20- CWMD-077-001

6. Authorizing Authority for Program Homeland Security Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. §§ 101, 592 (a)(6), 596 (amended 2018) as construed by Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115- 387, 132 Stat. 5162, 5166 (b)(2) (2018).

7. Appropriation Authority for Program http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-93), Division D – Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2020, Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office, Research and Development

8. Announcement Type

Initial

9. Program Overview, Objectives, and Priorities

Overview

The ARI program addresses the security, prevention and protection per the Presidential Policy Directive #8 (PPD-8) by seeking novel cross-cutting research that will enhance national security’s capability to detect and prevent the illicit entry, transport, assembly, or potential use within the United States of unauthorized chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) materials, devices or agents and otherwise help protect against an attack using such materials, devices, or agents.

Objectives

The ARI Program has two primary objectives: 1) Engage the academic community to advance fundamental knowledge for CBRN sciences applicable to Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) with emphasis on fundamental research to solve long-term, high-risk challenges and 2) Develop human capital for the CBRN science and engineering profession. Further, the program works to sustain a long-term commitment to basic research in this field and coordinates research efforts across the federal government.

Priorities

Each grant application will be evaluated based on the criteria provided in Evaluation Criteria under the Application Review Information section. The research topics in this announcement will address each of the following challenges listed below. The solicitation research topics are listed in Appendix A.

• Chokepoint Optimization: Technologies to improve the ability to scan conveyances for threats and other anomalous activities at chokepoints (ports-of-entry, rail scanning) through development of new capabilities to optimize chokepoint operations or to improve performance of currently deployed sensors for scanning conveyances at chokepoints.

• Nuclear Sensing: Technologies to provide cross-cutting improvements to nuclear threat detection through dramatically improved performance or reduced costs when compared to Commercial off the Shelf technology.

• Chemical and Biological Detection: Provide increased capability to detect and identify chemical and biological threats in response to emerging operational needs.

Expected Outcomes

The topic(s) listed in Appendix A have defined overall project goals. These are developed to push the state-of-the-art in the performance, cost effectiveness, and/or operational risk reduction in the priorities described above. Proposal submissions must clearly define intermediate targets and goals (quantitatively as much as possible) for each budget year.

Progress toward goals will be a consideration for continuation during project evaluation, in addition to project costs and schedule. Project evaluation includes, but is not limited to, information provided during three project reviews during the year, as well as monthly and annual reporting.

In accordance with the Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M-20-12, these outcomes support effective program evaluation. The outcomes provide information that is relevant to the CWMD mission and strategic plans and conveyed in an actionable manner to inform stakeholder buy-in, program improvement, and budget planning. The Program Managers in CWMD assessing the outcomes for the program evaluations are Subject Matter Experts in CBRN related fields who will provide an objective, ethical.

and independent evaluation of the outcomes.

Program Structure

Project Budget It is understood that as the project matures, additional funding from the applicant is likely necessary for development. Additionally, time is required to recruit students to work on the project. The proposed budget should be structured to account for these considerations.

Project Metrics The ARI program requires reporting of various project metrics to allow for adequate project oversight. These metrics will be reported during any project review and submitted reports. Templates for reporting can be requested after awards are made.

These metrics include: 1) progress toward intermediate project specific quantitative targets and goals in advancing fundamental knowledge for CBRN sciences applicable to CWMD to include the following by topic -

Photofission Nuclear Data for Active Interrogation

Collect data on photofission for Uranium-235, Uranium-238, and Plutonium-239 at relevant x-ray energies to improve nuclear data for photofission cross sections, angular distribution, and energy spectra. Submit the improved data to relevant databases to improve modeling capabilities for DHS application and to provide better nuclear data for broader nuclear community.

Near Real-Time Biothreat Sensor Using Fluid-Based Mechanisms Development of a near-real time fluid-based biothreat sensor that demonstrates aerosol particle capture in an automatic fluid-based mechanism (e.g. microfluid channel array or other container carrying fluid) and algorithms or other appropriate analytical methods that can identify biothreat agents in the environment including but not limited to, counting and sorting bio-particles based on size, shape, protein and genetic material.

Alternative Signatures for Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction Investigate alternative signatures over traditional detection techniques for biological weapons of mass destruction in aerosols. Approaches should include a study into alternative signatures leading to a feasibility evaluation of identified potential signatures to include limited experimentation demonstrating the potential merit of such signatures. Approaches should focus on signatures that are readily available to enable near real time detection of biothreats.

Perovskites and Ceramics for X-Ray Radiography Develop and evaluate perovskite and/or ceramic based materials for use in x- ray radiography. Proposed materials that perform better than state-of-the-art at similar or lower cost must achieve or exceed all of the following performance metrics:

• Responsive to x-ray energy between 0.5-9 MeV

• If scintillator, greater than 10,000 photons /MeV

• Radiation hardness of 500 MRad or greater over a time period of 5 years

• Non-hygroscopic preferred unless encapsulation does not affect detector pitch

• Producible in moderate to large detector voxels (>10 mm x >10 mm x

>25 mm = >2.5 cm3)

• Less than 1% afterglow @ 2 milliseconds

• Less than 100 microsecond rise time with < 1 millisecond fall time

For materials that perform as well as the state-of-the-art but at lower cost, some combination of the above performance metrics must be achieved. Materials developed under the topic should have a lower cost objective of ~$3.50 per cm3 initially and ~$2.50 per cm3 after optimization.

2) student participation reported as number of students who are directly supported (funded) or involved in the project and degree of participation of underrepresented groups (e.g. gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.);

3) dissemination of results to broadly enhance scientific and technological understanding that may be beneficial to the homeland security enterprise and operators, academic community, and society such as through publications, conference presentations, and intellectual property resulting from the project; and 4) financial status for work in progress.

B. Federal Award Information

1. Available Funding for the NOFO: $3.3M

2. Projected number of Awards (Optional): 7

3. Period of Performance: Up to 60 months DHS anticipates the period of performance of awards to range from 36-60 months, encompassing three to five program years. DHS anticipates each program year will be 12 months. Extensions – Refer to Section H.

Projected Budget Period of Performance Start Date(s): 09/01/2020

Projected Budget Period of Performance End Date(s): 08/31/2021

4. Projected Period of Performance Start Date(s): 09/01/2020

5. Projected Period of Performance End Date(s): up to 60 months

09/31/2025

Funding Instrument Type: Cooperative Agreement

The Program Office will have substantial involvement in the administration of the award(s) including tracking research progress toward defined objectives and goals, funding levels and expenditures, and tracking of project publications, patents, and student participants. The recipient will be required to maintain close and regular interaction with the Program Office, including: a) meetings 3 times per year at recipient site, CWMD office, virtually, and/or a neutral site (such as industrial partner), b) monthly teleconferences (roughly 1 hr) to report on progress (including financial status), c) an annual report that details the work completed in a given year.

C. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

The application below was selected and approved for funding under Open Broad Agency Announcement (OBAA) Research and Development in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction OBAA/Solicitation No. 70RDND19R00000003. The entities below are the only entities eligible to apply:

• Duke University

• Iowa State University

• Purdue University

• Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc.

• University of Virginia

• University of Central Florida

• University of Tennessee, Knoxville

2. Applicant Eligibility Criteria

The above applicants were selected and approved for funding as part of the Open Broad Agency Announcement (OBAA) Research and Development in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction OBAA/Solicitation No. 70RDND19R00000003. These awards went through the OBAA merit review process in accordance with the Technical Evaluation Plan.

3. Other Eligibility Criteria Applicants are required to submit a formal application through Grants.gov.

4. Maintenance of Effort (MOE)

Not Applicable.

5. Cost Share or Match

Cost Share or Match is not required in this NOFO.

D. Application and Submission Information

1. Key Dates and Times

a. Application Start Date: 08/13/2020

b. Application Submission Deadline: 08/27/2020 at 11:59:59 PM Eastern

Note: Late applications will not be reviewed.

c. Anticipated Funding Selection Date (Optional): No later than 8/31/2020

d. Anticipated Award Date (Optional): No later than 09/1/2020

2. Agreeing to Terms and Conditions of the Award

By submitting an application, applicants agree to comply with the requirements of this NOFO and the terms and conditions of the award, should they receive an award.

3. Address to Request Application Package

Application forms and instructions are available at Grants.gov. To access these materials, go to http://www.grants.gov ; select “Applicants” then “Apply for Grants.” In order to obtain the application package select “Download a Grant Application Package.” Enter the CFDA and/or the funding opportunity number located on the cover of this NOFO, select “Download Package,” and then follow the prompts to download the application package.

For a hardcopy of the full NOFO, please write or fax a request to:

Janet Bailey Office of Procurement Operations (MGMT I OPO) 245 Murray Lane SW, Mail Stop 0115 Washington, D.C. 20528-0115 Office: (202) 447-0362 Email: janet.bailey@hq.dhs.gov

Applications will be processed through the Grants.gov portal. All applications are time stamped by the Grants.gov system when submitted and recipients are notified accordingly. The federal will download all applications that are received by the deadline date and time as indicated on the NOFO.

4. Steps Required to Submit an Application, Unique Entity Identifier, and System for Award Management (SAM)

To apply for an award under this program, all applicants must:

a. Apply for, update, or verify their Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)

Number from Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) and Employer ID Number (EIN)

b. In the application, provide a valid Data Universal Numbering System DUNS number, which is currently the unique entity identifier;

c. Have an account with login.gov;

d. Register for, update, or verify their SAM account and ensure the account is active before submitting the application;

http://www.grants.gov/ mailto:janet.bailey@hq.dhs.gov https://www.login.gov/

e. Create a Grants.gov account;

f. Add a profile to a Grants.gov account;

a. Establish an Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) in Grants.gov;

b. Submit application in Grants.gov; and

g. Continue to maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active federal award or an application or plan under consideration by a federal awarding agency.

Applicants are advised that DHS may not make a federal award until the applicant has complied with all applicable DUNS and SAM requirements. Therefore, an applicant’s SAM registration must be active not only at the time of application, but also during the application review period and when DHS is ready to make a federal award. Further, as noted above, an applicant’s or recipient’s SAM registration must remain active for the duration of an active federal award. If an applicant’s SAM registration is expired at the time of application, expires during application review, or expires any other time before award, DHS may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a federal award and use that determination as a basis for making a federal award to another applicant.

The Standard Language for Using Grants.gov to Apply is provided to aid in fulfilling these requirements (if applicable), based off of https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/grantors/grantor-standard-language.html:

5. Electronic Delivery

DHS is participating in the Grants.gov initiative to provide the grant community with a single site to find and apply for grant funding opportunities. DHS encourages or requires applicants to submit their applications online through Grants.gov, depending on the funding opportunity. For this funding opportunity, the CWMD requires applicants to submit applications through Grants.gov.

6. How to Register to Apply through Grants.gov

a. Instructions: Registering in Grants.gov is a multi-step process. Read the instructions below about registering to apply for DHS funds. Applicants should read the registration instructions carefully and prepare the information requested before beginning the registration process. Reviewing and assembling the required information before beginning the registration process will alleviate last-minute searches for required information.

The registration process can take up to four weeks to complete. Therefore, registration should be done in sufficient time to ensure it does not impact your ability to meet required application submission deadlines.

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/grantors/grantor-standard-language.html

Organizations must have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number, active System for Award Management (SAM) registration, and Grants.gov account to apply for grants. If individual applicants are eligible to apply for this grant funding opportunity, then you may begin with step 3, Create a Grants.gov account, listed below.

Creating a Grants.gov account can be completed online in minutes, but DUNS and SAM registrations may take several weeks. Therefore, an organization's registration should be done in sufficient time to ensure it does not impact the entity's ability to meet required application submission deadlines. Complete organization instructions can be found on Grants.gov here:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/organization-registration.html

1) Obtain a DUNS Number: All entities applying for funding, including renewal funding, must have a DUNS number from Dun & Bradstreet (D&B). Applicants must enter the DUNS number in the data entry field labeled "Organizational DUNS" on the SF-424 form.

For more detailed instructions for obtaining a DUNS number, refer to:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/organization-registration/step-1-obtain-duns-number.html

2) Register with SAM: All organizations applying online through Grants.gov must register with the System for Award Management (SAM). Failure to register with SAM will prevent your organization from applying through Grants.gov. SAM registration must be renewed annually.

For more detailed instructions for registering with SAM, refer to:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/organization-registration/step-2-register-with-sam.html

3) Create a Grants.gov Account: The next step is to register an account with Grants.gov. Follow the on-screen instructions or refer to the detailed instructions here: https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/registration.html

4) Add a Profile to a Grants.gov Account: A profile in Grants.gov corresponds to a single applicant organization the user represents (i.e., an applicant) or an individual applicant. If you work for or consult with multiple organizations and have a profile for each, you may log in to one Grants.gov account to access all of your grant applications. To add an organizational profile to your Grants.gov account, enter the DUNS Number for the organization in the DUNS field while adding a profile.

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/organization-registration.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/organization-registration/step-1-obtain-duns-number.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/organization-registration/step-1-obtain-duns-number.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/organization-registration/step-2-register-with-sam.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/organization-registration/step-2-register-with-sam.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/registration.html

For more detailed instructions about creating a profile on Grants.gov, refer to:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/registration/add-profile.html

5) EBiz POC Authorized Profile Roles: After you register with Grants.gov and create an Organization Applicant Profile, the organization applicant's request for Grants.gov roles and access is sent to the EBiz POC. The EBiz POC will then log in to Grants.gov and authorize the appropriate roles, which may include the AOR role, thereby giving you permission to complete and submit applications on behalf of the organization. You will be able to submit your application online any time after you have been assigned the AOR role.

For more detailed instructions about creating a profile on Grants.gov, refer to:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/registration/authorize-roles.html

6) Track Role Status: To track your role request, refer to:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/registration/track-role-status.html

7) Electronic Signature: When applications are submitted through Grants.gov, the name of the organization applicant with the AOR role that submitted the application is inserted into the signature line of the application, serving as the electronic signature. The EBiz POC must authorize people who are able to make legally binding commitments on behalf of the organization as a user with the AOR role; this step is often missed, and it is crucial for valid and timely submissions.

7. How to Submit an Application to DHS via Grants.gov

Grants.gov applicants can apply online using Workspace. Workspace is a shared, online environment where members of a grant team may simultaneously access and edit different webforms within an application. For each NOFO, you can create individual instances of a workspace.

Below is an overview of applying on Grants.gov. For access to complete instructions on how to apply for opportunities using Workspace, refer to:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/workspace-overview.html

a. Create a Workspace: Creating a workspace allows you to complete it online and route it through your organization for review before submitting.

b. Complete a Workspace: Add participants to the workspace to work on the application together, complete all the required forms online or by downloading PDF versions, and check for errors before submission. The Workspace progress bar will display the state of your application process as you apply. As you apply using Workspace, you may https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/registration/add-profile.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/registration/authorize-roles.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/registration/track-role-status.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/workspace-overview.html click the blue question mark icon near the upper-right corner of each page to access context-sensitive help.

c. Adobe Reader: If you decide not to apply by filling out webforms you can download individual PDF forms in Workspace. The individual PDF forms can be downloaded and saved to your local device storage, network drive(s), or external drives, then accessed through Adobe Reader.

NOTE: Visit the Adobe Software Compatibility page on Grants.gov to download the appropriate version of the software at:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/adobe-software-compatibility.html

d. Mandatory Fields in Forms: In the forms, you will note fields marked with an asterisk and a different background color. These fields are mandatory fields that must be completed to successfully submit your application.

e. Complete SF-424 Fields First: The forms are designed to fill in common required fields across other forms, such as the applicant name, address, and DUNS number.

To trigger this feature, an applicant must complete the SF-424 information first.

Once it is completed, the information will transfer to the other forms.

f. Submit a Workspace: An application may be submitted through workspace by clicking the Sign and Submit button on the Manage Workspace page, under the Forms tab. Grants.gov recommends submitting your application package at least 24- 48 hours prior to the close date to provide you with time to correct any potential technical issues that may disrupt the application submission.

g. Track a Workspace Submission: After successfully submitting a workspace application, a Grants.gov Tracking Number (GRANTXXXXXXXX) is automatically assigned to the application. The number will be listed on the Confirmation page that is generated after submission. Using the tracking number, access the Track My Application page under the Applicants tab or the Details tab in the submitted workspace.

For additional training resources, including video tutorials, refer to:

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/applicant-training.html

Applicant Support: Grants.gov provides applicants 24/7 support via the toll-free number 1-800-518-4726 and email at support@grants.gov. For questions related to the specific grant opportunity, contact the number listed in the application package of the grant you are applying for.

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/adobe-software-compatibility.html https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/applicant-training.html mailto:support@grants.gov

If you are experiencing difficulties with your submission, it is best to call the Grants.gov Support Center and get a ticket number. The Support Center ticket number will assist DHS with tracking your issue and understanding background information on the issue.

8. Submitting the Final Application in [another grant system]

9. Timely Receipt Requirements and Proof of Timely Submission

a. Online Submission. All applications must be received by 11:59:59 PM Eastern time on the due date established for each program. Proof of timely submission is automatically recorded by Grants.gov. An electronic date/time stamp is generated within the system when the application is successfully received by Grants.gov. The applicant with the AOR role who submitted the application will receive an acknowledgement of receipt and a tracking number (GRANTXXXXXXXX) from Grants.gov with the successful transmission of their application. This applicant with the AOR role will also receive the official date/time stamp and Grants.gov Tracking number in an email serving as proof of their timely submission.

When DHS successfully retrieves the application from Grants.gov, and acknowledges the download of submissions, Grants.gov will provide an electronic acknowledgment of receipt of the application to the email address of the applicant with the AOR role who submitted the application. Again, proof of timely submission shall be the official date and time that Grants.gov receives your application. Applications received by Grants.gov after the established due date for the program will be considered late and will not be considered for funding by DHS.

Applicants using slow internet, such as dial-up connections, should be aware that transmission can take some time before Grants.gov receives your application. Again, Grants.gov will provide either an error or a successfully received transmission in the form of an email sent to the applicant with the AOR role attempting to submit the application. The Grants.gov Support Center reports that some applicants end the transmission because they think that nothing is occurring during the transmission process. Please be patient and give the system time to process the application.

10. Content and Form of Application Submission

• SF424 (R&R) Application for Federal Assistance (SF424-V2.0)

Please complete this form in its entirety. If you fill this form out first, other required forms will populate with basic data such as name, address, etc. Signature and date will auto-fill when you submit the application package through Grants.gov.

a. Block 1, Type of Submission – Please check “Application.”

b. Block 8, Type of Application – Please check “New.”

c. Block 12, Proposed Project – Enter Dates of Entire Project Period

d. Block 15a, Estimated Project Funding – This amount should correspond to your

R&R Budget form’s total and budget justification total for the requested budget period.

e. Block 16, E.O. 12372 review question – Please check “No.”

f. Block 17 - By submitting this application, your organization is providing certifications and assurances regarding:

i. Drug-Free Workplace Requirements

ii. Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters—Primary Covered Transactions

iii. Assurance that your organization is not delinquent on any Federal debt.

• Research & Related (R&R) Budget An R&R Budget is required for ALL applications. Please ensure that the total amount requested corresponds to Block 15.a on the SF 424 R&R form. Include up to three to five annual budgets, one for each year of the duration of the award; a cumulative budget will be automatically generated by Grants.gov. A detailed budget justification (up to three pages) should document proposed expenses. Multi- institutional proposals should use the award-sub award proposal mechanisms.

Mention if any government-furnished equipment (GFE, e.g. specific radioactive sources to calibrate or test detector systems) is required. Attach an expanded equipment list (see item C on R&R Budget Form) if necessary.

An annual grantees review will enable the investigators of grants awarded through this solicitation to review progress, exchange information, and promote collaborations. The PI, all co-PIs, and at least one of the students supported from each funded grant will be required to participate. Representatives of CWMD, DHS Science and Technology, other Federal agencies, and various National Laboratories and industry are also expected to be present at this annual review to provide an expanded opportunity for collaboration and information sharing. Funds must be included in each year of the proposal budget for attendance at this annual workshop. For budgetary purposes, the workshop may be assumed to be in the U.S. and be of three days duration. This workshop will be a primary mechanism for the CWMD program managers to assess progress and thus to adjust the future funding profiles for individual projects.

• Budget Justification A Budget Justification is required for ALL applications. Please ensure that items listed in the budget justification correspond to the funds requested in Volume III, Cost Proposal. Please use the following cost categories to group items of cost in your budget justification.

PERSONNEL

FRINGE BENEFITS

TRAVEL

EQUIPMENT

SUPPLIES

CONTRACTUAL

OTHER DIRECT COSTS

INDIRECT COSTS

If you wish to display your budget justification by task, please ensure that you supply a total for each of the cost categories listed above for the proposed budget period in your application.

Research & Related Project/Performance Site Location(s) Please provide information for every site (including subcontractors and outside vendors, with sub-awards or subcontracts of $25,000 or more) in your project.

Research & Related Senior/Key Personnel Profile Please supply biographical information on key personnel.

Research & Related Other Project Information Please define any technical terminology that is discipline-specific. Be concise and direct in descriptions. Tips: Write for a general audience.

Government Furnished Equipment Mention if any government-furnished equipment (GFE, e.g. specific radioactive sources to calibrate or test detector systems) is required.

Proposal Preparation Instructions:

1. Cover Sheet:

The cover sheet information is shown below. Note: for a proposal ID, please follow the following naming convention:

ARINOFO20-XXXX-YYYY-TA-0#-0##

XXXX = four letter (maximum 4 letter) character shortcut for organization name YYYY = four letter (maximum 4 letter) character shortcut for department/division name # = Topic Area number ## = number of proposal submission.

Example: Organization A, Dept. B’s submission for its first proposal to topic 01 would have the ID listed: ARINOFO20-ORGA-DEPB-TA-01-001

The cover sheet should describe:

- Overall project information (Requested budget for this period, project duration, project title)

- Primary Organization Information (Name and address, DUNS+4, TIN/EIN)

- Principal Investigator information (Name and address, phone, email, Co-PI information if applicable)

- Contact information for any organization involved in a collaborative effort, if applicable.

For a fillable .pdf copy of the cover sheet, please send a request to cwmd.tsi@hq.dhs.gov

2. Quad Chart:

The quad chart provides a single page summary of the effort and should include a picture, graphic or artist's conception of the effort in the top left, a summary of intellectual merit in the bottom left, a summary of broader impact on the top right, and a summary of schedule and proposed budget in the bottom right.

For a quad chart template, please send a request to cwmd.tsi@hq.dhs.gov

3. Proposed Research: Narrative consisting of the following items:

• An explanation of the scientific context, intellectual merit, relevance to the

Topic Solicitation, its potential long-term impact and timeliness of the proposed project;

• A detailed description of the proposed research, its goals, objectives and milestones, how it compares to the current state-of-the-art, and any substantive risks and risk mitigation strategies;

• A brief summary of prior research in this area and how the proposed research differs from this prior research;

• A discussion of the broader impacts of the proposed work;

mailto:cwmd.tsi@hq.dhs.gov

• If appropriate, a justification for why an effort involving at least two investigators is necessary to carry out the proposed project;

• If appropriate, a discussion of the multidisciplinary approach taken and its proposed benefits;

• A description of the contribution to be made by each senior investigator; and

• A timeline for the planned work.

4. Modes of Dissemination and Education: Narrative describing:

• The mode of training undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers, including co-mentorship or other collaborative training; and

• Plans for dissemination and education/outreach/publications including any pilot activities. Where possible, results from the research should be made publicly available to enable dissemination of results to broadly enhance scientific and technological understanding that may be beneficial to the homeland security enterprise and operators, academic community, and society such as through publications, conference presentations, and intellectual property resulting from the project.

5. Management Plan: If appropriate, narrative describing:

• How the group effort will be coordinated, including the role of industry and/or national laboratory partners;

• How decisions will be made regarding the conduct of the project; and

• How collaboration will be evaluated.

6. References Cited:

References should include full titles of articles and book chapters cited. This section should include bibliographic citations only and must not be used to provide parenthetical information outside of the project description. Indicate with an asterisk (*) references co-authored by two or more proposal investigators.

7. Formatting: The format applies to items 2-7 above:

• Proposal submission shall not exceed sixteen (16) pages of standard size (8.5” by 11”) using 1” margins. Proposals for which Volume I exceeds the 16 page limit will have any pages above the 16 page limit removed and those pages will not be reviewed or evaluated.

• 12 point fonts or larger for text

• 9 point fonts or larger for pictures, figures, tables and charts

11. Other Submission Requirements

All files submitted in the application shall be in .pdf format. Limit filenames to 50 characters. Do not password-protect files.

12. Intergovernmental Review An intergovernmental review may be required. Applicants must contact their state’s Single Point of Contact (SPOC) to comply with the state’s process under Executive Order 12372.

(See https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12372.html;

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SPOC-February-2019.pdf).

13. Funding Restrictions

Award Size: DHS intends to make 7 awards in FY 2020.

For the purposes of this announcement, applicants should account for time to ramp up research including finding students to work on the project. Budgets for the first year will likely be lower than for future years when the team is fully formed and the project it at a more mature stage of development.

Students: Students supported (funded) under this project are classified as trainees and must be citizens or permanent residents of the U.S., its territories or its possessions.

Students who are not citizens or permanent residents of the U.S., its territories, or its possessions may be involved in the project, but not funded.

Kick-Off Review: This meeting will be held remotely or on-site to discuss in detail the technical and programmatic aspects of the proposed research.

Project Reviews and Updates: The ARI requires 3 meetings each year and can take place at the awardee site, CWMD office, virtually, and/or partner site. These meetings will go over project progress to date and allow for in depth discussions of the project, as well as opportunities for students to participate. Each month there will also be a teleconference to go over project updates.

Publications and Press Releases: All public-facing materials which discuss work completed under the ARI including, but not limited to, publications, abstracts, presentations, media releases, and interviews, must be approved for public release by the Program Office. The Program Office requires 10 business days to review any material in advance of submission.

Foreign Travel: Foreign travel required in the performance of the duties approved in this Award must be approved by DHS in advance and in writing and comply with the applicable OMB Cost Principles Circular. Requests for foreign travel identifying the https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12372.html https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SPOC-February-2019.pdf traveler, the purpose, the destination, and the estimated travel costs must be submitted to the DHS Grants Officer 60 days prior to the commencement of travel.

14. Allowable Costs

a. Pre-Award Costs

b. Management and Administration (M&A) Costs

M&A are not operational costs but are necessary costs incurred in direct support of the grant or cooperative agreement or as a consequence of it, such as travel, meeting-related expenses, and salaries of full/part-time staff in direct support of the program.

As such these can be itemized in financial reports.

c. Indirect Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Costs Indirect Cost (IDC) is allowable by the recipient and sub-recipients. IDC is based on a federally approved and negotiated rate. Please provide a copy of the negotiated rate approved by the applicant’s cognizant agency at the time of application. Indirect costs on sub-awards are limited to the first $25,000 of direct costs.

E. Application Review Information

1. Application Evaluation Criteria

a. Programmatic Criteria The evaluation of proposals submitted in response to this NOFO will be accomplished through an independent technical review using the following criteria, which are of equal importance:

Criteria I: Intellectual Merit and Technical Approach The following elements will be considered upon technical evaluation:

• The intellectual merit of the proposed research activity will serve to advance knowledge and understanding within the related technical field and/or across multiple related disciplines.

• The proposed team (including industry or laboratory partner, if any) has the experience (include prior, if available) and expertise to conduct the proposed research.

• The proposed technical plan is clear and complete and addresses cost/schedule, technical strategies, and resources.

• The appropriateness and reasonableness of the proposed costs.

Criteria II: Transformational Impact The following additional elements will be considered upon technical evaluation, as applicable:

• The relevance of the application toward the Topic Solicitation requirements/objectives and the CWMD mission.

• The success of the proposed research addresses operator needs in the CWMD mission space.

• The proposed research activity exhibits creative, original (non-duplicative), innovative, and/or transformative concepts.

Criteria III: Broader Impact The following elements will be considered upon technical evaluation:

• The research activity will advance knowledge and understanding in CWMD related solutions while promoting teaching, training, and learning to support fostering the next generation scientists and engineers.

• The degree of undergraduate and/or graduate student participation in the proposed research.

• The proposed activity will broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.).

• The dissemination of the results will broadly enhance scientific and technological understanding of CBRN threats, beneficial to homeland security, the academic community, and the broader society.

b. Financial Integrity Criteria

Prior to making a federal award, the CWMD is required by 31 U.S.C. § 3321 note, 41 U.S.C. § 2313, and 2 C.F.R. § 200.205 to review information available through any OMB-designated repositories of government wide eligibility qualification or financial integrity information. Therefore, application evaluation criteria may include the following risk-based considerations of the applicant:

1) Financial stability.

2) Quality of management systems and ability to meet management standards.

3) History of performance in managing federal award.

4) Reports and findings from audits.

5) Ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements.

c. Supplemental Financial Integrity Criteria and Review

Prior to making a federal award where the anticipated total federal share will be greater than the simplified acquisition threshold, currently $250,000 (see Section 805 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-91, OMB Memorandum M-18-18 at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/M-18-18.pdf):

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/M-18-18.pdf https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/M-18-18.pdf

1) CWMD is required to review and consider any information about the applicant that is in the designated integrity and performance system accessible through SAM, which is currently the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) and is accessible through the SAM website.

2) An applicant, at its option, may review information in FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a federal awarding agency previously entered.

3) CWMD will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to the other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgment about the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants as described in 2 C.F.R. § 200.205.

2. Review and Selection Process

This is for an initial award of Cooperative Agreements from the applications below that were selected and approved for funding as part of the Open Broad Agency Announcement (OBAA) Research and Development in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction OBAA/Solicitation No. 70RDND19R00000003.

1. Duke University – Topic Solicitation No. 4: 70RWMD20R00000005 - Photofission Nuclear Data for Active Interrogation – Solicitation:

70RDND19R00000003

2. Iowa State University – Topic Solicitation No. 5: 70RWMD20R00000007 – Near Real-Time Biothreat Sensor Using Fluid-Based Mechanisms – Solicitation:

70RDND19R00000003

3. Purdue University – Topic Solicitation No. 6: 70RWMD20R00000009 – Alternative Signatures for Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction – Solicitation: 70RDND19R00000003

4. Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. – Topic Solicitation No. 7:

70RWMD20R00000006 – Perovskites and Ceramics X-Ray Radiography – Solicitation: 70RDND19R00000003

5. University of Virginia – Topic Solicitation No. 7: 70RWMD20R00000006 – Perovskites and Ceramics X-Ray Radiography – Solicitation:

70RDND19R00000003

6. University of Central Florida – Topic Solicitation No. 7: 70RWMD20R00000006

– Perovskites and Ceramics X-Ray Radiography – Solicitation:

70RDND19R00000003

7. University of Tennessee, Knoxville – Topic Solicitation No. 7:

70RWMD20R00000006 – Perovskites and Ceramics X-Ray Radiography – Solicitation: 70RDND19R00000003 https://www.fapiis.gov/fapiis/index.action https://www.fapiis.gov/fapiis/index.action https://www.sam.gov/SAM/

Each proposal will be evaluated on the merit and relevance of the proposal as it relates to the specific OBAA Topic Solicitation, rather than against other proposals, since no common work statement exists. Awards will be made based on proposal evaluation against the above criteria and funds availability. Selection for award constitutes commitment of funding for the initial phase, while funding for the subsequent phases will depend on the performance of the preceding phase and availability of funds.

CWMD reserves the right to enter into exchanges with any Offeror through the Grants Officer, if needed, to (a) clarify our understanding of that Offeror’s proposal, and/or (b) to address any areas of concern in an otherwise highly meritorious proposal. Such exchanges, if they occur, may result in amended proposals from the affected Offeror(s).

However, if CWMD initiates exchanges with one Offeror, this does not obligate CWMD to conduct exchanges with or obtain amended proposals from other Offerors.

Proposals will be reviewed against three (3) criteria of equal importance: Intellectual Merit and Technical Approach, Transformational Impact, and Broader Impact which are described above.

Evaluators will assess the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies and assign an adjectival rating for each of the above criteria. The adjectival ratings are as follows:

Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, and Unacceptable.

F. Federal Award Administration Information

1. Notice of Award Before accepting the award, the AOR and recipient should carefully read the award package. The award package includes instructions on administering the grant award and the terms and conditions associated with responsibilities under federal awards.

Recipients must accept all conditions in this NOFO as well as any special terms and conditions in the Notice of Award to receive an award under this program.

Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization via email by a Grants Officer in the Grants and Financial Assistance Division. Notification may be made prior the award being completed. The notification of award is not an authorization to begin performance. Award documentation, signed by the grants officer, is the authorizing document. The award documentation will also have period of performance dates.

Applications that were not selected for award will be notified by a Grants Officer via e-mail in the Grants and Financial Assistance Division in a timely manner. The Applicant will receive feedback comments from the consensus reviews. The feedback comments will not include the identities of the panelists and reviewers.

2. Pass-Through Requirements

3. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

All successful applicants for DHS grant and cooperative agreements are required to comply with DHS Standard Terms and Conditions, which are available online at: DHS Standard Terms and Conditions.

The applicable DHS Standard Terms and Conditions will be those in effect at the time the award was made, unless the application is for a continuation award. In that event, the terms and conditions in effect at the time the original award was made will generally apply. What terms and conditions will apply for the award will be clearly stated in the award package at the time of award.

4. Reporting

a. Federal Financial Reporting Requirements

The Federal Financial Report (FFR) form is available online at: SF-425 OMB #4040-

A. Quarterly Federal Financial Reports (Cash Transaction) – The Recipient shall submit the FFR (SF 425) Federal Cash Transaction Report to the Department of Health and Human Services, Payment Management System, Smartlink. Quarterly Cash Transaction reports shall be submitted no later than 1/30, 4/30, 7/30 and 10/30.

B. Annual Federal Financial Report – The Recipient shall submit an annual Federal Financial Report (SF 425) to the DHS Grants Officer no later than 90 days after the Budget Period end date. The report must be submitted via email to DHS- GrantReports@dhs.gov and dndoari.del@hq.dhs.gov. Be sure to include the grant program name and number in the subject line.

C. Final Federal Financial Report – the Recipient shall submit the final Federal Financial Report (SF425) to the DHS Grants Officer no later than 90 days after the end of the Project Period end date. The report must be submitted via email to DHS- GrantReports@dhs.gov and dndoari.del@hq.dhs.gov. Be sure to include the grant program name and number in the subject line.

b. Programmatic Performance Reporting Requirements

Deliverables will include the following:

A. Monthly Project Reporting: A monthly report will be submitted each month to provide project updates. The due date is no later than the 15th of the month following the month being reported. For example, a monthly report for June will be http://www.dhs.gov/publication/fy15-dhs-standard-terms-and-conditions http://www.dhs.gov/publication/fy15-dhs-standard-terms-and-conditions https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/post-award-reporting-forms.html#sortby=1 https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/post-award-reporting-forms.html#sortby=1 mailto:GrantReports@dhs.gov mailto:dndoari.del@hq.dhs.gov mailto:GrantReports@dhs.gov mailto:dndoari.del@hq.dhs.gov due no later than July 15th. A monthly report template will be provided by the program office.

B. Annual Project Report and Accomplishments: A detailed annual report shall be submitted no later than 30 days after the budget period end date. The report shall include an updated project quad chart and summary of fiscal year accomplishments.

C. Final (End of Program) Performance Report Final Federal Financial Report – The Recipient shall submit the final Federal Financial Report (SF425) to the DHS Grants Officer no later than 90 days after the end of the Project Period end date.

The report must be submitted via email to DHS-GrantReports@dhs.gov and cwmd.tsi@hq.dhs.gov. Be sure to include the grant program name and number in the subject line.

c. Additional Performance Reporting Requirements

The Program Office will have substantial…