PKG00262014-instructions.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Opportunity number
- SFOP0006619
About this file
Application Instructions
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| APPENDIX 2 - Logic Model_2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| APPENDIX 3 - AC Application Guidance 7.01.19.pdf | ||
| APPENDIX 1- AC Budget Sample Template and Budget Narrative Guidance_2019.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Tunisia SAHA QA - 20200601.docx | DOCX document | |
| SAHA NOFO FINAL v2 - 20200601.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
U.S. Department of State Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
Office of Assistance Coordination
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 19.600
Tunisia Supporting Anti-Corruption in Healthcare Administration
(SAHA)
Opportunity Number: SFOP0006619
Key Information:
Announcement Type: New Date Opened: May 4, 2020 Deadline for Questions: May 18, 2020 Application Deadline: June 19, 2020 Expected Date of Notification: August 31, 2020 Federal Agency Contact: John Daniels
NEA-Grants@state.gov
Funding Opportunity Synopsis
The U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs Office of Assistance Coordination
(NEA/AC) and the United States Embassy in Tunisia, Assistance Unit announce a Notice of
Funding Opportunity (NOFO) to promote good governance in Tunisia’s Ministry of Health
(MoH) by improving transparency and management in public hospitals and the medicinal supply chain. This opportunity aims to advance U.S. foreign policy by supporting Tunisian government institutions to become more transparent, accountable, and responsive to citizens, especially in the context of future epidemics and public health emergencies.
NEA/AC and the Embassy Tunis Assistance Unit seek proposals that:
1. Enhance the tracking system for the medicinal supply chain through the acquisition, adaptation, and implementation of a transparent electronic platform that manages the flow of pharmaceutical products from importation and/or production to arrival at hospitals;
2. Strengthen the MoH’s regulatory framework to promote good governance and transparency in the health sector; and,
3. Upgrade the national network of training structures for the MoH to improve the implementation of good governance in public hospitals.
A successful project will result in more transparent and effective systems at the MoH, leading to a decrease in corruption and improved governance including a tracking system for the medicinal supply chain, improved quality of service in public hospitals, and better preparedness and response to public health crises.
Applications will be accepted only from organizations that have previously operated in the
Middle East & North Africa (MENA) region or have personnel who have previously worked in
Tunisia and can demonstrate the ability to work with the MoH.
All applications must be submitted in English. Complete information on how applicants can submit proposals for this opportunity can be found in Section VI below.
Applicants should read this NOFO in its entirety before writing their proposal and should refer to the full Evaluation Criteria provided in Section VII while drafting all materials.
Eligible Countries and Territories
In this announcement, we seek to support projects in Tunisia. Please note: Applications that focus on activities in countries and territories other than Tunisia will NOT be considered.
Background Information about NEA/AC
The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, Office of Assistance
Coordination (NEA/AC) offers Economic Support Fund (ESF) assistance to groups and individuals striving to bring about positive change in the Middle East-North Africa region. The
Assistance Coordination Office works in 20 countries and territories, partnering with governments, civil society organizations (CSOs), community leaders, youth and women activists, and private sector groups to advance their efforts. Competitively selected projects aim to foster participatory governance, economic reform, and educational advancement in response to local interest and needs.
Background Information about the U.S. Embassy in Tunisia The United States Embassy in Tunisia (Embassy Tunis) remains a committed partner to Tunisia by working with its government, private sector, and civil society as they lay the foundation for the country’s future. Since 2011, the United States has supported Tunisia’s democratic transition with economic, security, and governance assistance. U.S. support focuses on strengthening the
Tunisian business climate to support the growth of enterprises, jobs, and bilateral trade as well as fostering inclusive governance and human rights protections.
Table of Contents
FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT
B. ACHIEVABLE OBJECTIVES
C. PROJECT DESIGN
D. GENDER INTEGRATION
MEASUREMENT OF RESULTS
AWARD INFORMATION
SUBSTANTIAL INVOLVEMENT
ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
A. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS
B. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS
C. ADDITIONAL ELIGIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS
APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION
A. APPLICATION DOCUMENTS
B. APPLICATION FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS
C. SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
D. SUBMISSION DATES AND TIMES
FUNDING LIMITATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
E. AWARDS TO COMMERCIAL FIRMS OR FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
F. AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
G. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL FUNDING REGULATIONS AND DOS TERMS AND CONDITIONS ... 18
APPLICATION REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS
A. APPLICATION EVALUATION CRITERIA
B. REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS
ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
A. AWARD NOTICES
B. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
C. TRAVEL NOTIFICATIONS
D. BRANDING AND MARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTEES
E. UEI NUMBER REQUIREMENT FOR SUB AWARDEES
F. SUB AWARDEE REPORTING REQUIREMENT
AGENCY CONTACTS
DISCLAIMER
APPENDICES (Posted with NOFO)
APPENDIX 1— Budget Sample Template and Budget Narrative Guidance APPENDIX 2— Logic Model Template APPENDIX 3— Application Guidance
FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION
The Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs’ Office of Assistance Coordination (NEA/AC) and the
United States Embassy in Tunisia, Assistance Unit seek proposals that promote good governance in Tunisia’s Ministry of Health (MoH) by improving transparency and management in public hospitals and the medicinal supply chain.
Applications will be accepted only from organizations that have previously operated in the
MENA region and can demonstrate the ability to work with the MoH.
This programming responds to the U.S. Government priority to advance U.S. foreign policy by supporting Tunisian government institutions to become more transparent, accountable, and responsive to citizens. It falls under the mission’s Integrated Country Strategy (ICS) sub-objective 2.1.2: U.S. assistance and engagement result in improvements to Tunisia’s human rights and anti-corruption record.
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The deteriorating Tunisian public health system suffers from poor governance, failing to meet the needs of its citizens, a weakness that has become ever more apparent in light of the ongoing
COVID-19 epidemic. Three key issues complicating the health sector’s good governance ambitions are corruption concerns, a poor regulatory framework, and weak capacity among staff.
With Tunisians consistently listing corruption as one of their top concerns, particularly in the healthcare sector, the MoH needs assistance to address the issue. A December 2019 International
Republican Institute survey found that 15% of respondents personally experienced corruption at
Tunisian hospitals. According to a study by Grandes Ecoles de Communication, the greatest risk identified resides at the Directorate of Pharmacy and Medicines (DPM), the main department responsible for granting approval to sell imported drugs and medical devices. Corrupt actors are able to take advantage of the opaque system governing medicinal disbursements to seek bribes or manipulate procurement processes to benefit dishonest suppliers. A reliable, transparent medicinal supply chain is essential to ensure that medications are delivered to patients in a timely and affordable fashion, particularly during public health emergencies.
Despite the MoH’s rapid response to the COVID-19 outbreak and quick updating of its response plan for epidemic diseases, it reports that many of its regulations are outdated due to bureaucratic inefficiencies and frequent turnover at the ministerial level, ultimately constraining the government’s ability to deliver services to citizens and counter corruption. These outdated regulations have led to conditions in which bribery, fraud, problematic procurements, and absenteeism persist. In March 2019, the Prime Ministry, together with the World Health
Organization, organized a participatory debate on the health sector, involving more than 400 health professionals, as well as the Prime Minister and the then-acting Minister of Health. The debate identified multiple regulatory gaps in the health sector that remain unaddressed.
Furthermore, human resources within the MoH are depleted, restricting its capacity to respond to public health emergencies specifically, and governance issues more broadly. The MoH has approximately 85,000 employees throughout the country, divided among university doctors, physicians, pharmacists, paramedical staff, administrative staff, engineers, technicians, and other workers. Yearly, between 2,000 and 3,000 employees retire in the public healthcare sector without being replaced because of a government policy to reduce the total number of employees working in the public sector. Many recently graduated doctors and physicians’ assistants seek employment outside the country. In addition, highly skilled doctors and employees are leaving public hospitals in search of opportunities in the private sector. Meanwhile, those who remain on staff are ill-prepared to consistently implement procedures that are in line with good governance standards.
The lack of a reliable roster of qualified staff significantly hinders the MoH’s ability to respond to the health needs of Tunisians, a gap that has been further exposed and exacerbated during the
COVID-19 epidemic.
B. ACHIEVABLE OBJECTIVES
A successful project will result in:
1. An enhanced tracking system for the medicinal supply chain through the acquisition, adaptation, and implementation of a transparent electronic platform that manages the flow of pharmaceutical products from importation and/or production to arrival at hospitals;
2. A more effective regulatory framework for the MoH to promote good governance and transparency in the health sector; and
3. An upgraded national network of training structures for the MoH to improve the implementation of good governance in public hospitals.
C. PROJECT DESIGN
This solicitation invites applications in support of good governance in Tunisia’s health sector to improve the transparent management and delivery of services. The selected applicant must work closely with the MoH.
This notice identifies three Priority Areas. Successful applicants will address each Priority Area and all of the activities deemed required.
Electronic Medicinal Tracking Platform (Priority Area 1): In order to bolster the Tunisian health system’s capacity to effectively deliver products to citizens and reduce the illicit misdirection of pharmaceuticals, the MoH must enhance its tracking system for the medicinal supply chain. The first priority area therefore focuses on the acquisition and implementation of a transparent, electronic platform to manage, monitor, and report the inventory of medicinal products at each stage in the supply chain, from importation to arrival at hospitals, with a focus on better linking the MoH with the central pharmacy. As part of this platform, there should be a component that allows select hospitals to track the delivery of pharmaceuticals to patients. As this is a pilot project, additional hospitals may be included in the future based on project results and pending availability of additional funds. Successful applicants shall develop additional activities, but those listed below are required:
a. Assessment of current medicinal supply chain and tracking system, with particular attention on how distribution is managed during public health emergencies;
b. Acquisition, adaptation, and management of an electronic tracking platform to manage the inventory and logistical flow of pharmaceutical products at each stage, from importation and/or production to arrival at hospitals across the country (the platform should include an additional component as well that tracks the delivery to patients when necessary);
c. Capacity building sessions for MoH staff and development of institutional resources to allow the MoH to manage the platform independently after the end of the project; and
d. Review of the MoH’s regulatory framework to ensure laws/procedures enforce the mandate and governance of the tracking system (in coordination with Priority Area 2).
Regulatory Framework (Priority Area 2): The MoH requires an updated regulatory framework and streamlined procedures in order to address inefficiencies that restrict their ability to deliver essential services to citizens and create opportunities for corrupt practices within the public health sector. Therefore, the second priority area seeks to promote the adoption of laws, decrees, and procedures that fill regulatory gaps that have allowed illicit activities to persist and make it easier to provide services to the public, particularly in response to health emergencies such as
COVID-19. Successful applicants shall develop additional activities, but those listed below are required:
a. Provide expertise and lead a consultative process to empower the MoH to identify, update, and draft key regulations related to good governance including those on managing and tracking the medicinal supply chain, the training certification process, and preparing and responding to public health crises; and
b. Support the MoH with the implementation of key regulations once they are adopted or created.
National Training Structures (Priority Area 3): In order for the MoH to properly address the corruption concerns it faces, it must be equipped with staff that are properly trained to execute good governance procedures. The third priority area focuses on upgrading the MoH’s national training structures to ensure they have a roster of prepared and available staff to consistently manage and implement efficient processes in public health institutions. This includes strengthening staff capacities and their responses to the many technical dimensions and various stages of an epidemic. Successful applicants shall develop additional activities, but those listed below are required:
a. Establish an e-learning platform and video-conference infrastructure to enable health care practitioners to exchange knowledge without missing workdays due to travel to Tunis;
b. Upgrade the training materials in the seventeen (17) MoH training schools around the country to better focus on best practices in good governance and accountability, including emergency preparedness and response;
c. Put in place mandatory certification and re-certification systems for health professionals
(in coordination with Priority Area 2); and
d. Develop a coordination mechanism in collaboration with the MoH to create synergy between the e-learning platform and the training schools.
The following activities and costs are NOT ALLOWED under this announcement:
Exchange activities with other countries or territories;
Social welfare projects;
Paying to complete activities begun with other funds;
Activities that appear partisan or that support individual or party electoral campaigns;
Academic or analytical research (if not necessary as part of a larger project);
One-time events, such as stand-alone conferences and one-off round tables;
Medical and psychological research and clinical studies;
Projects of a commercial or profit-making nature;
Cultural presentations, cultural research, cultural clubs, or festivals, etc.; and
Entertainment costs (e.g., receptions, social activities, ceremonies, alcoholic beverages, guided tours).
NOTE: Applications that include any of these activities or costs above may be eliminated at the
Technical Eligibility Review stage and will not advance to the Merit Review Panel.
Key Deliverables:
To clearly assess successful execution and completion of proposed projects, results should achieve the following:
An online platform that tracks the medicinal supply chain from importation and/or production to arrival at hospitals across the country and in some cases patients;
A 20% reduction in illegal diversion of pharmaceuticals within the MoH;
An enhanced regulatory framework for the MoH that fills legal and procedural gaps that have allowed corrupt actors to thrive;
An upgraded national network of the MoH training structures, including a distance learning platform and modernized training schools; and
A health crisis management procedural manual that includes response plans to epidemic based on lessons learnt during the COVID-19 crisis.
D. GENDER INTEGRATION
NEA/AC requires that all activities fully address gender considerations, ensuring that both men and women benefit from support where applicable and that gender awareness is a built-in component of project activities. This should be documented through gender analysis in the project narrative that identifies any relevant gender gaps and ways the proposed activities will address those gaps. Proposals should demonstrate how addressing relevant gender gaps will enhance the project’s goals and objectives. Applicants who are unfamiliar with integrating gender in foreign assistance programming should view the training video located here:
https://encompassworld.com/elearningfiles/DOS/DOS_Gender_Integration_E-
Course/story_html5.html https://encompassworld.com/elearningfiles/DOS/DOS_Gender_Integration_E-Course/story_html5.html https://encompassworld.com/elearningfiles/DOS/DOS_Gender_Integration_E-Course/story_html5.html
MEASUREMENT OF RESULTS
Applicants shall provide a logic model or a theory of change to demonstrate how the proposed project (including activities, the project design, and the surrounding context) will achieve the stated objectives. The logic model or theory of change statements can be generated using the template in Appendix II. Please see Section VI below for more information.
Successful applicants will work with the NEA/AC program and monitoring and evaluation
(M&E) teams to create a plan based on the proposed logic model/theory of change to measure qualitative and quantitative indicators as part of the award negotiations process. The successful applicants will be responsible for collecting data against these indicators, which will be monitored throughout the period of performance of the award to gauge necessary modifications to the project’s design and assess the results of the project’s success in meeting expected outcomes.
All projects funded as a result of this NOFO will be required to complete a mid-term and final evaluation. The final evaluation at the project assessing the entire period of performance with technical support from the NEA/AC M&E team. Successful applicants will dedicate between
3% and 5% of their total budget to monitoring, evaluation, and learning.
Selected applicants are required to have project information available for up to twelve months after the project closeout for the NEA/AC team to evaluate long-term outcomes.
AWARD INFORMATION
Funding Mechanism Type: Cooperative Agreement
Estimated Number of Awards: 1
Estimated Initial Project Funding: $5,000,000
Estimated Initial Award Ceiling: $5,000,000
Estimated Initial Award Floor: $4,000,000
Cost-Sharing or Matching: Encouraged, not required
Estimated Length of Initial Project Period: Three years
Maximum Length of Project Period with Option Year(s): Five years
Estimated Award Ceiling for the Option Year(s): $1,500,000
Estimated Award Total with the Option Year(s): $6,500,000
Contingent on the availability of funds, approximately $5,000,000 in Economic Support Funds for approximately 1 award will be award through this announcement. If selected to receive an award, an applicant will be awarded funds for up to three years, depending on the activities proposed. The estimated start date for this project is no later than October 1, 2020.
Please note that option year documents are required as part of this NOFO. Option years are subject to negotiation and availability of funds.
NEA/AC and Embassy Tunis reserve the right to award more or less than the estimated program funding and reserves the right to award funding under this announcement for a period of up to two years after the announcement’s close date.
This request for full applications does not constitute an award or commitment on the part of the
U.S. government to make any awards, nor does it commit the U.S. government to pay for costs incurred in the preparation and submission of an application.
SUBSTANTIAL INVOLVEMENT
Activities that NEA/AC and Embassy Tunis will be substantially involved include:
The selection of public hospitals included in the project
The validation of the online tracking platform
The selection of targeted laws and regulations to be updated or drafted
ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
All applicants will be screened by NEA/AC and Embassy Tunis to determine whether they meet all of the program eligibility requirements detailed below.
NOTE: Applications that do not demonstrate that they meet all of the eligibility requirements in Section A and Section B will not advance past the Technical Eligibility
Review stage and may be deemed ineligible for funding under this announcement. Nothing can be added to an application once the competition deadline has passed.
A. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS
Eligible applicants include:
- U.S. or foreign o Non-profit organizations;
o For-profit organizations;
o Private institutions of higher education;
o Public or state institutions of higher education;
o Public international organizations;
o Small businesses with function and regional experience in the areas of: good governance, regulatory policies and reform, anti-corruption, or organization strengthening in the MENA and Africa regions.
A.1. Prime Applicant
To be considered for funding under this opportunity, applicants SHALL:
Have demonstrable previous experience working in the MENA region
Have demonstrable previous experience working with government ministries and partners on good governance issues
Have demonstrable previous experience working with government ministries and partners on electronic solutions
Have demonstrable experience strengthening institutional crisis preparedness and response
Meet ALL of the registration requirements listed below
Meet the requirements of the government of Tunisia to conduct programmatic activities within the country
Meet any requirements listed as MANDATORY in Additional Eligibility Considerations, below
B. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS
To apply for NEA/AC (Federal) funding, organizations, whether based in or outside the
U.S., must have a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number, currently referred to as a DUNS number, and an active account with the System for Award Management (SAM). Applicants who do not meet all registration requirements are NOT eligible for funding under the opportunity.
UEI Number
The UEI number is a nine-digit number established and assigned by Dun and Bradstreet, Inc.
(D&B) to uniquely identify business entities.
All applicants must have a UEI number. To obtain a UEI number, please follow the steps below:
Go to http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform/pages/CCRSearch.jsp.
Select the country or territory where your organization is physically located. Complete and submit the form. Organizations will need to provide basic information, including physical and mailing addresses, name and title of the chief executive, primary Standard Industrial Code (SIC)
(https://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/sic_manual.html), and annual revenue.
For technical difficulties in obtaining this number, please contact D&B at: govt@dnb.com.
System for Award Management (SAM)
SAM is a U.S. government wide registry of vendors doing business with the Federal government and requires annual renewal. The system centralizes information about grant applicants/recipients, and provides a central location for grant applicants/recipients to change organizational information.
Further, each applicant must maintain an active account, with current information, while its application is under consideration for funding. To keep an active SAM.gov account, an applicant must renew it at least once each year. If an organization’s account expires, the organization cannot submit a grant application until it is renewed.
To create a new account, please follow the steps below:
Go to http://www.sam.gov.
Log In to complete authentication and create an account. On the My SAM page, select Entity
Registrations from the sub-navigation menu and select Register New Entity.
Organizations must have a UEI number and a CAGE number (US Domestic Organizations) or a
NCAGE number (Foreign Organizations), to create an account.
Complete and submit the online form. If the applying organization already has the necessary information on hand (see the SAM Quick Start Guide for Grant Registration:
https://sam.gov/SAM/transcript/Quick_Guide_for_Grants_Registrations.pdf), the online form takes approximately one hour to complete, depending upon the size and complexity of the applying entity. Because of the different steps in the process, it might take anywhere from 12 -
15 business days to complete the process of creating an account with the system.
For help with SAM.gov, please visit their support page at https://www.fsd.gov or contact them at: 866-606-8220 (U.S.) or +1-334-206-7828 (international).
C. ADDITIONAL ELIGIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS
Cost-Sharing or Matching
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this competition. However, NEA/AC encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION
A. APPLICATION DOCUMENTS
All applications must include the application components detailed below. All application documents must be submitted in English. Applicants may submit only 1 application.
Please refer to Section B below for additional submissions guidance and requirements.
NOTE: Applications that do not include all the required documentation described in
Section 1 below will not advance past the Technical Eligibility Review stage. Further, applications that exceed the allowable page limits will not be reviewed by the review panel.
Applicants may not add any materials to an application once it has been submitted and the competition deadline has passed.
A.1. Required Documents
Federal Assistance Application Forms (SF-424, SF424a, and SF-424b)
Applicants must complete each of these forms online to be considered for funding. The SF-424B is only required for those applicants who a) have not registered in SAM.gov or b) have not recertified their registration in SAM.gov since February 2, 2019.
If an organization has an active registration in SAM.gov that was either created or updated on or after 2/2/2019, then the applicant does NOT need to submit the SF-424B because their registration or recertification will have included the necessary information.
Guidance on how to complete the SF-424 and SF424a is provided in Appendix III. NOTE:
In addition to following all guidance outlined below regarding application materials, applicants are strongly encouraged to review the Application Evaluation Criteria section of this NOFO closely as they prepare their proposal. The Evaluation Criteria section is the rubric by which each application will be scored.
Project Narrative
The Project Narrative describes the efforts the applicant will undertake to address the priorities and goals of this announcement. It may be no longer than 15 pages. More details on preparing the Project Narrative are provided in Appendix III. Applicants are strongly encouraged to review Appendix III before preparing their Narrative.
Option Years Project Narrative:
The Option Years Narrative describes the efforts the applicant would propose to undertake during the option year period(s) of up to two years (for up to a total five-year project period) in order to meet the objectives, priorities, and goals outlined in the funding description section of this NOFO. This section may not exceed three (3) pages
Budget & Budget Narrative Submission
Applicants must provide the following four elements as part of their budget submission:
Summary Budget
Detailed Line Item Budget
Budget Narrative
Option Years Budget: A detailed budget for the initial project period is required, and a notional budget and brief budget narrative for option year funding up to two (2) additional years for up to an additional one million five hundred thousand dollars
($1,500,000).
Key staff members must be clearly identified in both the detailed budget and budget narrative documents.
There is no page limit for this section of an application. A sample fillable template can be found in Appendix 1. This template includes three tabs: The first tab includes written guidance on preparing the Budget Narrative. Applicants are strongly encouraged to create their
Budget Narrative in Word and submit as either a Word Doc or PDF file. Please note that the
Budget Narrative should include designations of who is considered Key Personnel for this project. As defined in the Department of State Standard Terms and Conditions (for assistance awards, Key Personnel means, “…key professional and supervisory personnel; i.e., the members of the professional staff in a program supervisory position engaged for or assigned to duties under the award.” The second tab has the template for the Summary Budget. This tab will auto-fill as you complete the Detailed Line Item Budget, which can be found on the third tab. The third tab is where you can fill in the template for the Detailed Line Item Budget as stated above.
NOTE: Applicants are strongly encouraged to use the same format as provided in the template, and to submit summary and detailed line item budgets in Excel form, and the
Budget Narrative as either a PDF or Word file. If the applicant does not use the template, the applicant must ensure that their submission includes all elements outlined in the sample. The template, which includes more detailed instructions, can be found in Appendix 1. Applicants are strongly encouraged to review Appendix 1 before preparing their Budget and Budget
Narrative.
Logic Model
Applicants shall provide a logic model or theory of change to demonstrate how the proposed project (including activities, the project design, and the surrounding context) will achieve the stated objectives. The logic model or theory of change statements can be generated using the template in Appendix II. NOTE: Applicants are strongly encouraged to use the same format as found in the sample. If the applicant does not use the template, the applicant must ensure that their submission includes all elements outlined in the sample. This section may be no longer than 3 pages.
Project Timeline
Applicants must provide an overall breakdown of the order and timeframe in which all project activities will take place. This item should provide a macro snapshot of what will take place from beginning to end of the project. Applicants must ensure that the timeline of activities/events corresponds with details provided in the Project Narrative and Logic Model /
Theory of Change. This section may not exceed 2 pages.
Job Descriptions / Biographical Info for Key Personnel Positions
For each position designated as key personnel for this project, applicants must provide the following:
1. If the position is already filled: Provide brief biographical information summarizing the person’s qualifications, as well as a brief description of the roles or responsibilities pertaining to this project.
OR
2. If the person to fill a key position has not yet been hired: Provide a brief summary of the job description, which should include a description of the roles and responsibilities pertaining to this project, as well as a description of qualifications of eligible candidates.
NOTE: Key staff members must also be clearly identified in both the detailed budget and budget narrative documents.
NOTE: If an applicant is proposing sub grant partner(s) as part of their project design, Key
Personnel/Positions of the sub grantee must also be included. This section of the application may not exceed 5 pages.
Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement
Applicants proposing indirect costs in the Budget greater than a 10% de minimis rate must provide a copy of their Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA). This item will not be counted toward any page limits.
Sustainability Plan
The sustainability plan outlines how the proposed project will be sustained beyond the initial award period. More information on preparing the Sustainability Plan is provided in Appendix 3.
Sustainability Plans may not exceed 2 pages.
Security, Risk Mitigation, & Contingency Planning Summary
This item should provide detail regarding the applicant’s intended due diligence to assess and mitigate risks and implement adequate security measures to ensure the safety and well-being of project staff, participants, and partners, if applicable. This should include specific actions by the applicant to ensure risks are adequately and routinely assessed, and that security measures are commensurate with operational concerns specific to the locale. The applicant should also include a contingency plan that highlights potential challenges and limitations to project implementation in the operating environment and propose contingency plans should program activities be impacted. Please note that this section should not be limited to physical security and risk but should cover any applicable factors relevant to the given operating environment. This section may not exceed 5 pages.
Letters of Agreement or Letters of Intent: Applicants must include Letters of Intent or Letters of Agreement from the MoH and any other proposed partners.
A.2. Optional Documents
Applicants may submit additional documents for consideration with their application. These documents are not required and there is a 10-page limit for this section of the application. Some examples of additional documents an applicant may wish to submit include but are not limited to organizational chart, organogram etc.
NOTE: Applicants must adhere to all maximum allowed page counts. Applications that exceed any of the allowable page limits will not advance past the Technical Eligibility
Review stage.
B. APPLICATION FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS
The required font is 12-point, Times New Roman. All application documents must be single spaced, with all margins (left, right, top, and bottom) of at least one inch each. Also, applicants should ensure all pages in the application package are numbered consecutively and meet the page limit requirements outlined in Section VI above. The Standard Forms 424 (SF-424, SF-424a, and SF-424b) are excluded from the page numbering.
It is strongly recommended that applicants submit grant applications using Microsoft
Office. If applicants do not have access to Microsoft Office products, Adobe PDF files may be submitted.
C. SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
Applicants must submit their application electronically using either Grants.gov OR SAMS
Domestic. Both systems require that the applying organization have an account with the system and both require a UEI number and SAM.gov account as detailed in Section V. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure they have an active account and will be able to submit its application. Applicants must select one of these systems to submit their application; do not submit an application through both systems. NEA/AC is not in a position to grant exceptions to these requirements.
Grants.gov
Grants.gov is a single portal for applicants to find and apply to U.S. government funding opportunities. Creating an account with this system is a five-step process: 1) obtain a UEI number; 2) create an account with the System for Award Management; 3) create a profile, including username and password; 4) obtain Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) authorization; and 5) track AOR status. This process can take 10 business days or longer, even if all the steps are completed in a timely manner. To create an account, go to www.grants.gov and click on the “Register” link, located at the top, right-hand side of the page.
SAMS Domestic
SAMS Domestic is a comprehensive grants management system that allows applicants to apply for, manage, and report on the use of U.S. government funds for multiple programs, accessed online at mygrants.service-now.com.
To create an account, go to http://mygrants.service-now.com, and click the “create an account” hyperlink, located above the user name prompt. Users will be directed to a page entitled “User Registration Request;” complete the online form and click the “Submit” button.
Users will receive an activation email entitled “Verify Your Grants Account Registration;” click the activation link within the email to receive a username and password.
SAMS Domestic has Quick Tours available to educate users about the system. These documents can be found on the Support tab upon logging into the system.
D. SUBMISSION DATES AND TIMES
Applications must be time stamped before 17:00:00 eastern time (ET) on June 19, 2020.
There will be no grace period, and any application not received by the application deadline will be deemed ineligible and will not advance to be reviewed. Each applicant is encouraged to submit an application far enough in advance of the deadline so that the applicant can alert
NEA/AC (nea-grants@state.gov) of any technical difficulties and allow sufficient time to resolve difficulties before the deadline. Although NEA/AC will work with applicants to resolve technical issues, it is not in a position to grant exceptions to the submission requirements outlined in this announcement.
FUNDING LIMITATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND OTHER
CONSIDERATIONS
E. AWARDS TO COMMERCIAL FIRMS OR FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
The Department of State prohibits profit under its assistance awards to commercial organizations. No funds will be paid as profit to any recipient that is a commercial organization.
Profit is defined as any amount in excess of allowable direct and indirect costs. The allowability of costs incurred by commercial organizations is determined in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR Part 31. Program income earned by the recipient may be:
added to the total of the amount of this award, including the required cost sharing or matching, and use it to further eligible project objectives;
used to meet the Recipient’s cost sharing or matching requirement;
OR deducted from the total project or program allowable cost in determining the net allowable costs on which the federal share of costs is based.
F. AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
Domestic and foreign organizations that expend $750,000 or more in a fiscal year in federal assistance must perform an independent, recipient-contracted Single Audit or Program Specific
Audit. [Program-specific Audit means an audit of one Federal award program. Single Audit means an audit which includes both the entity’s financial statements and the Federal Awards to be conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards
(GAGAS).] The audits must be independently and professionally executed in accordance with
GAGAS either prescribed by a government’s Supreme Audit Institution with auditing standards approved by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the host country’s laws or adopted by the host country’s public accountants or associations of public accountants, together with generally accepted international auditing standards. However, foreign entity audits consistent with International Standards for Auditing or other auditing standards are acceptable with the
Grants Officer’s approval. More information can be found at https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/693136.pdf
For sub-non-Federal entities expending $750,000 or more in Department of State award funding during their fiscal year, Department of State standard audit provisions require that Prime non-
Federal entities certify that audits of sub-non-Federal entities are performed annually and according to the standards described above. The cost of audits required under this policy may be charged either as an allowable direct cost to the award OR included in the organizations established indirect costs in the award’s detailed budget.
G. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL FUNDING REGULATIONS AND DOS
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Payment of funds awarded under this Notice of Funding Opportunity will not be disbursed until the DOS has been assured that the Recipient’s financial management system will provide effective control over and accountability for all Federal funds in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and
2 CFR 600 as applicable. Awards issued under this NOFO are subject to the Department of State
Standard Terms and Conditions (https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/U.S.-
Department-of-State-Standard-Terms-and-Conditions-10-01-2019508.pdf) and 2 CFR 200 and 2
CFR 600 as applicable.
APPLICATION REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS
A. APPLICATION EVALUATION CRITERIA
Achievable Objectives (20 points)
Each of the project objectives listed above (in Section I) are clearly addressed.
Impact and Effectiveness: The applicant describes the project’s potential contribution to solving the problem addressed in the problem statement and achieving results
Timeframe: The applicant describes realistic results to be accomplished within the timeframe of the proposed award.
Beneficiaries: The applicant clearly identifies the anticipated beneficiaries and explains how the project’s objectives will positively affect them.
Milestones: The applicant provides realistic milestones to indicate progress toward goals and objectives as described in the program announcement.
M&E: The applicant explains how monitoring and evaluation activities will be carried out throughout the award’s period of performance and who will be responsible for them.
The applicant includes a mid-term and final evaluations of the project of the award.
Project Design (35 points)
The applicant clearly describes how each proposed project activity will address each of the objectives outlined in the requested priority area above (Section I).
Responsiveness to NOFO: Explain how the proposed activities respond to the objectives listed in the NOFO.
Rationale: To justify how the proposed activities will achieve the above objectives in this context.
Project Management: Clear description of how the project will be managed in terms of initiation, planning, implementation and closing.
Partnerships and Buy-ins: The applicant addresses how the project will engage or obtain support from relevant stakeholders and identifies any local partners; the applicant demonstrates an understanding of the issues the MoH faces.
Feasibility: The applicant proposes activities that are feasible, and are also practical, and/or experiential in nature to encourage innovation.
Beneficiaries Selection Criteria and Process: The applicant explains how participants will be selected (e.g., criteria for selection, selection process).
Duplication: The applicant acknowledges if activities similar to those proposed are already taking, or have taken place previously, and provides an explanation as to how proposed new activities will not duplicate or merely add to existing/recent activities.
Contingency Plan: The applicant articulates programming assumptions and potential challenges to project implementation and proposes contingency plans.
Division of Labor: The application describes the division of labor among the applicant and any partners.
Marginalized Populations: The applicant identifies and addresses support for marginalized populations in all proposed activities and objectives and provides specific means for their inclusion.
Gender Considerations: The applicant includes gender analysis in the project narrative that identifies relevant gender gaps and ways the proposed activities will address those gaps. Proposals should demonstrate how addressing relevant gender gaps will enhance the program’s goals and objectives and how the project will benefit both men and women.
Program Logic: Is it theoretically sound? Do all elements of the logic model fit together showing plausible pathways to achieving project outcomes? Have all the key assumptions been identified and their potential influences described? Are the risks to implementation (external factors) fully accounted for and described?
Organizational Capacity (30 points)
The applicant demonstrates experience (e.g., has previously worked and/or has established contacts/partners) in the MENA region, Tunisia in particular
The applicant demonstrates an institutional record of successful programs in good governance, anti-corruption, and administrative reform
The applicant and/or partners demonstrates an institutional record of successful programs implementing online government platforms, especially those that track medicinal supply chains or similar technical systems
The applicant and/or partners demonstrates experience working in the health sector, especially in the MENA region
The applicant demonstrates capacity for responsible fiscal management of donor funding
(e.g., successful management of a previous sub-award or grant).
The applicant demonstrates the ability to meet monitoring and evaluation requirements.
The applicant has adequate staffing and demonstrates the capacity to manage the proposed project.
The applicant includes letters of intent/commitment/agreement from the MoH and any proposed partners.
Staff and Position Specifications (15 points)
Pre-identified key staff members, including volunteers, demonstrate experience working in the country/territory/region proposed, in the proposed content area, and with participants from that area (e.g., language skills, cultural understanding).
A description of the roles of each person or position on the project – whether staff, partner, consultant, or volunteer – demonstrating that the project will be sufficiently staffed but will avoid redundancy or duplication of effort.
A job description, including hiring criteria, is provided for each open key position.
Applicant and/or partner staff have relevant language competencies.
Budget & Budget Narrative (Acceptable or Not Acceptable)
The costs proposed are reasonable in relation to the proposed activities and anticipated results, which are clearly explained in the budget narrative.
The budget provides details of calculations, including estimation methods, quantities, unit costs, and other similar quantitative detail sufficient for the calculation to be duplicated.
The preponderance of the budget is spent on supporting the project participants/activities in country.
The budget includes costs dedicated to management, monitoring, and evaluation, and any costs needed for further gender analysis and for addressing gender gaps.
Adequate travel costs are proposed.
Additional sources (cost-share or matching) for project funding are proposed, as well as an explanation of how those additional sources will be used.
The budget demonstrates a reasonable cost per participant.
The budget accounts for monitoring and evaluation costs.
B. REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS
NEA/AC is committed to ensuring a competitive and standardized process for awarding funding.
Applications will be screened initially in a Technical Eligibility Review stage to determine whether applicants meet the eligibility requirements outlined in Section V and have submitted all required documents outlined in Section VI. Applications that do not meet these requirements will not advance beyond the Technical Eligibility Review stage and will be deemed ineligible for funding under this NOFO.
NEA/AC reserves the right to have all applications deemed to be technically eligible undergo a
Subject Matter Expert (SME) review prior to the Merit Review Panel. Applications that do not pass SME review will not proceed to the Merit Review Panel.
All applications that proceed to the Merit Review Panel will be evaluated by U.S. government and non-governmental subject matter and/or country-specific experts and will be rated on a 100-point scale. Point values for individual elements of the application are presented in Section VIII.
Panel Reviewers’ ratings, and any resulting recommendations, are advisory.
Final award decisions will be influenced by whether the application meets NEA/AC’s programmatic goals and objectives, how it supports the Department’s overarching foreign policy priorities, and the geographic distribution of the top-ranking applications.
ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
A. AWARD NOTICES
Applicants who do not advance beyond the Technical Eligibility Review stage will be notified 30 business days after the closing of the announcement. The authorized representative and program point of contact listed on the SF-424 will receive the notification via email. If an applicant does not receive such a notification, their submission was put forward for review.
NEA/AC expects to notify applicants who proceeded past the Technical Eligibility Review stage about the status of their application by August 31, 2020. Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from the bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with subsequent modifications
(if applicable) shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S.
Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer and transmitted to the recipient’s responsible officer identified in the application. NEA/AC reserves the right to award funding to applicants under this announcement for a period of up to two years after the announcement’s close date.
B. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Reporting is critical to effective program management and oversight. Reports are required as a means of evaluating the recipient’s progress and utilization of resources. They are divided between a performance progress report and a financial status report.
Recipients will, at a minimum, be required to submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) and a Quarterly Financial Report (QFR).
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.