PKG00261106-instructions.pdf
PDF 329 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pacific Northwest Cultural Arts Program
- Opportunity number
- P20AS00063
About this file
Application Instructions
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| P20AS00063 NOI.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
This announcement is not a request for applications.
This announcement is to provide public notice of the National Park Service’s intention to award financial assistance for the following project activities. Refer to Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination.
ABSTRACT
Grants.gov Opportunity Number Project Title Recipient Anticipated Federal Funding Non-Federal Cost Share Total Anticipated Award Amount
Award Instrument
Anticipated Period of Performance
Legal Authority
CFDA # and Title
Single Source Justification Criteria
National Park Service Point of Contact
PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE
Section 1. Project Summary
Task Agreement Cooperative Agreement
Grant Agreement
Current as of 10/29/2018
STATEMENT OF WORK SUMMARY
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
A. The recipient shall be responsible for the following items under this agreement:
B. The NPS Responsibilities:
A task agreement is proposed;
A cooperative agreement is proposed;
therefore substantial involvement by NPS is anticipated during the period of performance of this agreement. In support of this agreement NPS will:
A grant agreement is proposed, therefore no substantial involvement on the part of the NPS is anticipated for the successful completion of the statement of work. It is anticipated that involvement will be limited to actions related to monitoring project performance and technical assistance at the request of the recipient.
Section 3. Single Source Justification
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
SINGLE SOURCE POLICY REQUIREMENTS
National Park Service Policy FAP&P 1443-2015-06 requires a written justification which explains why competition is not practicable. The justification must address one of the following criteria.
In order for an assistance award to be made without competition, the award must satisfy one or more of the following criteria:
(1) Unsolicited Proposal – The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited assistance application which represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach which is not the subject of a current or planned contract or assistance award, but which is deemed advantageous to the program objectives. The unsolicited proposal must demonstrate an innovative capability or concept not currently available to the government, and prepared without Government involvement. ;
(2) Continuation – The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of, an activity presently being funded, for which competition would have a significant adverse effect on the continuity or completion of the activity;
(3) Legislative intent – The language in the applicable authorizing legislation or legislative history clearly indicates Congress’ intent to restrict the award to a particular recipient of purpose;
(4) Unique Qualifications – The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based upon a variety of demonstrable factors such as location, property ownership, voluntary support capacity, technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications. Successful past performance, familiarity with existing requirements, capabilities that can be obtained or matched by a competitor, or a positive reputation, are not considered to be unique qualifications.
(5) Emergencies – Program/award where there is insufficient time available (due to a compelling and unusual urgency, or substantial danger to health or safety) for adequate competitive procedures to be followed.
NPS did not solicit full and open competition for this award based the following criteria:
Task Agreement issued under previously competed or single source master cooperative agreement per Section 2 above. Single Source Justification not applicable.
Continuation
Unique Qualifications
Unsolicited Proposal
Legislative Intent
Explanation of the proposed recipient’s qualifications or the criteria of the proposed project which requires use of the single source criteria cited.
Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination
Emergency
The National Park Service intends to award a task agreement under a previously competed or single source justified award.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified cooperative agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified grant agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
Section 4. Department of the Interior Secretary’s Priorities
This award will support the following DOI Secretary priority(ies):
Other Key Initiatives:
Employment of veterans.
Supporting DOI Infrastructure needs.
Creating jobs in the American economy.
Access to outdoor recreation opportunities.
Priority 1: Creating a conservation stewardship legacy second only to Teddy Roosevelt Utilize science to identify best practices to manage land and water resources and adapt to changes in the environment.
Examine land use planning process and land use designations that govern public use and access.
Revise and streamline the environmental and regulatory review process while maintaining environmental standards.
Review DOI water storage, transportation, and distribution systems to identify opportunities to resolve conflicts and expand capacity.
Foster relationships with conservation organizations advocating for balanced stewardship and use of public lands.
Identify and implement initiatives to expand access to DOI lands for hunting and fishing.
Shift the balance towards providing greater public access to public lands over restrictions to access.
Priority 2: Utilizing our natural resources Ensure American energy is available to meet our security and economic needs.
Ensure access to mineral resources, especially the critical and rare earth minerals.
Refocus timber programs to embrace the entire 'healthy forests' lifecycle.
Manage competition for grazing resources.
Priority 3: Restoring trust with local communities Be a better neighbor with those closest to our resources by improving dialogue and relationships with persons and entities bordering our lands.
Expand the lines of communication with Governors, state natural resource offices, Fish and Wildlife offices, water authorities, county commissioners, Tribes, and local communities.
Priority 4: Ensuring sovereignty means something Support tribal self-determination, self-governance, and sovereignty.
Solidify mutual interests between the U.S. and the freely associated states and territories.
Priority 5: Generating additional revenues to support DOI & National interests Ensure that the public receives the full market value for the natural resources produced on Federal lands.
Ensure that fees or costs levied for DOI services are reasonable and targeted to achieve cost recovery.
Consider the impact of DOI decisions on economic development and job creation.
Priority 6: Protecting our people and the border Actively support efforts to secure our southern border.
Ensure DOI law enforcement staffing addresses public safety risks anticipated on DOI land.
Promote a "public service" demeanor within our law enforcement community.
Priority 7: Striking a regulatory balance
Reduce the administrative and regulatory burden imposed on U.S.
industry and the public.
Ensure that Endangered Species Act decisions are based on strong science and thorough analysis.
Priority 8: Modernizing our infrastructure Support the White House Public/Private Partnership Initiative to modernize U.S. infrastructure.
Remove impediments to infrastructure development and facilitate private sector efforts to construct infrastructure projects serving American needs.
Prioritize DOI infrastructure needs to highlight:
1. Construction of infrastructure;
2. Cyclical maintenance;
3. Deferred maintenance.
Senior executives are expected to provide leadership in achieving goals of the President and the Secretary.
The Management Team is expected to:
1. Ensure cost-effective operations and quality service to the public;
2. Facilitate organizational cooperation and conflict resolution;
3. Ensure the workplace environment is conducive to employee productivity and safety;
4. Hold individuals accountable for actions that violate DOI policies and requirements.
Priority 10: Achieving our goals and leading our team forward
The proposed project does not support any of the DOI Secretary priorities, but the project is being funded for the following reasons:
Priority 9: Reorganizing for the next 100 years
Improve alignment and integration of the DOI organizational structure. Redistribute organizational resources (people and funding) to enhance mission achievement and improved public service.
Improve organizational alignment with Executive Branch counterparts with major land management assets or influence.
| PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES |
| STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE OF SUPPORT OR STIMULATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL AUTHORITY |
| PROJECT OVERVIEW |
| Grant: |
| gov number: P20AS00063 |
| Title: Pacific Northwest Cultural Arts Program |
| Funding: $1,500,000 |
| Cost share: $257,590 |
| Total funding: $1,757,590 |
| POP: June 1, 2020 - May 31, 2024 |
| Authority: 20 USC 4451 (b) Authorization of appropriations |
| CFDA: 15.946, Cultural Resource Management |
| SS: Legislative Intent |
| POC: Erica_Cordeiro@nps.gov |
| Goals: Funding from this grant will be used by the consortium of Sealaska Heritage Institute, the Institute for American Indian Arts, and the University of Alaska Southeast to develop and support the Northwest Coast Arts. Activities will include artist residencies, visiting artists, arts campus development, workshops, mentor/apprenticeships, art and museum scholarships, performing arts, a statewide artist meeting, and guidance committee meetings. |
| PP: Support for the cultural arts has been broadly recognized as desirable by all the federally-recognized Tribes in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, and by the former Governor of Alaska. Additionally, the National Park Service---both at the individual park level and the regional level---views the incorporation of native perspectives and cultural programming into ongoing interpretation and management of parks and other federally-protected lands as valuable to assure interpretive authenticity and land-management relevancy (NPS Management Policies 2006). Congress and the Executive Branch of government have generally viewed supporting the cultural arts of the sovereign Tribes and their citizens as an important part of preserving the mosaic of American people, a duty of the federal government, and desirable for the reasons described in this grant agreement and the program proposals advanced by grantees. |
| Overview: The recipient organization (Sealaska Heritage Institute) will implement measures consistent with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) among the Institute of American Indian Arts (IAIA), Sealaska Heritage Institute (SHI), and the University of Alaska Southeast (UAS). These include maintaining a Native Artists Committee, and continuing programs of Artists-in-Residence, Visiting Scholars, Visiting Scholars, Artist Workshops, Mentor/Apprentice Teams, Sustainable Arts, Performing Arts, Alaska Native Arts Research/Exhibition/Publication, Native Art and Museum Scholarships, Museum Studies and Native Art Internships, and the Sealaska Heritage Art Campus Design initiative. The three parties to the agreement have pledged to support each other and provide additional support to the program through commitments of institutional resources, including classroom and studio space, space for arts markets and other commercial venues, access to archives, museums, and collections that have traditional artworks and documentation of artworks within the Pacific Northwest Coast arts tradition, low-cost housing and subsistence support for visiting artists and arts students, and staff support for the program. |
| Recipient: Sealaska Heritage Institute |
| Sub Involv: |
| Justification: • Authorization to provide grants to nonprofit organizations or institutions pursuant to 20 USC 4451 (b) |
• National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 54 U.S.C 300.101 et sq.
Additionally, the following was incorporated into Senate Appropriations Committee Report 116-123, recommending the following for FY20:
Cultural Programs.—The Committee recommends $28,545,000 for cultural programs, an increase of $2,983,000 above the enacted level. The increase above the enacted level is provided pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 4451(b) for grants to nonprofit organizations or institutions for the purpose of supporting programs for Native Hawaiian or Alaska Native culture and arts development at a total program level of $1,500,000 as provided in the explanatory statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019. This program is a good example of a multi-State, multi-organizational collaboration as envisioned under the American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Culture and Art Development Act (20 U.S.C. Ch. 56) (Page 39).
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box26: Off |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box36: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box44: Off |
| Check Box45: Yes |
| Check Box46: Off |
| Check Box47: Off |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Check Box54: Off |
| Check Box55: Off |
| Check Box56: Off |
| Check: Choice 3 |
| CheckA: Choice 2 |
| NA: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Responsibilities: Be responsible for continuing to implement the following items initiated under Grants P18AP00112 and P19AP00037, under this agreement: The recipient organization (Sealaska Heritage Institute) will implement measures agreed-to in the Memorandum of Agreement for that organization, as well as report on the accomplishments of the two partner organizations (IAIA and UAS) in implementing the MOA. Specific items include the following: |
• Native Artists Committee -- This committee continues to guide the development and implementation of the SHI Northwest Coast and Alaska Native art programs as set forth in Agreement P19AP00037.
• Artists-in-Residency, Visiting Artists, and Faculty Exchanges -- This item supports bringing highly accomplished NW coast artists to IAIA, SHI, and UAS, for teaching, training, demonstration, studio work, and lectures.
• Art Classes and Workshops -- Workshops foster connections between artist-instructors and student artists and emerging Native Alaskan artists of the NW Coast and Native Alaskan arts traditions.
File details come from the government source that posted it.