PKG00260802-instructions.pdf
PDF 331 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- P20AS00053
About this file
Application Instructions
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| P20AS00053 NOI.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
This announcement is not a request for applications.
This announcement is to provide public notice of the National Park Service’s intention to award financial assistance for the following project activities. Refer to Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination.
ABSTRACT
Grants.gov Opportunity Number Project Title Recipient Anticipated Federal Funding Non-Federal Cost Share Total Anticipated Award Amount
Award Instrument
Anticipated Period of Performance
Legal Authority
CFDA # and Title
Single Source Justification Criteria
National Park Service Point of Contact
PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE
Section 1. Project Summary
Task Agreement Cooperative Agreement
Grant Agreement
Current as of 10/29/2018
STATEMENT OF WORK SUMMARY
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
A. The recipient shall be responsible for the following items under this agreement:
B. The NPS Responsibilities:
A task agreement is proposed;
A cooperative agreement is proposed;
therefore substantial involvement by NPS is anticipated during the period of performance of this agreement. In support of this agreement NPS will:
A grant agreement is proposed, therefore no substantial involvement on the part of the NPS is anticipated for the successful completion of the statement of work. It is anticipated that involvement will be limited to actions related to monitoring project performance and technical assistance at the request of the recipient.
Section 3. Single Source Justification
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
SINGLE SOURCE POLICY REQUIREMENTS
National Park Service Policy FAP&P 1443-2015-06 requires a written justification which explains why competition is not practicable. The justification must address one of the following criteria.
In order for an assistance award to be made without competition, the award must satisfy one or more of the following criteria:
(1) Unsolicited Proposal – The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited assistance application which represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach which is not the subject of a current or planned contract or assistance award, but which is deemed advantageous to the program objectives. The unsolicited proposal must demonstrate an innovative capability or concept not currently available to the government, and prepared without Government involvement. ;
(2) Continuation – The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of, an activity presently being funded, for which competition would have a significant adverse effect on the continuity or completion of the activity;
(3) Legislative intent – The language in the applicable authorizing legislation or legislative history clearly indicates Congress’ intent to restrict the award to a particular recipient of purpose;
(4) Unique Qualifications – The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based upon a variety of demonstrable factors such as location, property ownership, voluntary support capacity, technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications. Successful past performance, familiarity with existing requirements, capabilities that can be obtained or matched by a competitor, or a positive reputation, are not considered to be unique qualifications.
(5) Emergencies – Program/award where there is insufficient time available (due to a compelling and unusual urgency, or substantial danger to health or safety) for adequate competitive procedures to be followed.
NPS did not solicit full and open competition for this award based the following criteria:
Task Agreement issued under previously competed or single source master cooperative agreement per Section 2 above. Single Source Justification not applicable.
Continuation
Unique Qualifications
Unsolicited Proposal
Legislative Intent
Explanation of the proposed recipient’s qualifications or the criteria of the proposed project which requires use of the single source criteria cited.
Section 2. Grants.gov Posting Determination
Emergency
The National Park Service intends to award a task agreement under a previously competed or single source justified award.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified cooperative agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
The National Park Service intends to award a single source justified grant agreement. Refer to Section 3 Single Source Justification.
Section 4. Department of the Interior Secretary’s Priorities
This award will support the following DOI Secretary priority(ies):
Other Key Initiatives:
Employment of veterans.
Supporting DOI Infrastructure needs.
Creating jobs in the American economy.
Access to outdoor recreation opportunities.
Priority 1: Creating a conservation stewardship legacy second only to Teddy Roosevelt Utilize science to identify best practices to manage land and water resources and adapt to changes in the environment.
Examine land use planning process and land use designations that govern public use and access.
Revise and streamline the environmental and regulatory review process while maintaining environmental standards.
Review DOI water storage, transportation, and distribution systems to identify opportunities to resolve conflicts and expand capacity.
Foster relationships with conservation organizations advocating for balanced stewardship and use of public lands.
Identify and implement initiatives to expand access to DOI lands for hunting and fishing.
Shift the balance towards providing greater public access to public lands over restrictions to access.
Priority 2: Utilizing our natural resources Ensure American energy is available to meet our security and economic needs.
Ensure access to mineral resources, especially the critical and rare earth minerals.
Refocus timber programs to embrace the entire 'healthy forests' lifecycle.
Manage competition for grazing resources.
Priority 3: Restoring trust with local communities Be a better neighbor with those closest to our resources by improving dialogue and relationships with persons and entities bordering our lands.
Expand the lines of communication with Governors, state natural resource offices, Fish and Wildlife offices, water authorities, county commissioners, Tribes, and local communities.
Priority 4: Ensuring sovereignty means something Support tribal self-determination, self-governance, and sovereignty.
Solidify mutual interests between the U.S. and the freely associated states and territories.
Priority 5: Generating additional revenues to support DOI & National interests Ensure that the public receives the full market value for the natural resources produced on Federal lands.
Ensure that fees or costs levied for DOI services are reasonable and targeted to achieve cost recovery.
Consider the impact of DOI decisions on economic development and job creation.
Priority 6: Protecting our people and the border Actively support efforts to secure our southern border.
Ensure DOI law enforcement staffing addresses public safety risks anticipated on DOI land.
Promote a "public service" demeanor within our law enforcement community.
Priority 7: Striking a regulatory balance
Reduce the administrative and regulatory burden imposed on U.S.
industry and the public.
Ensure that Endangered Species Act decisions are based on strong science and thorough analysis.
Priority 8: Modernizing our infrastructure Support the White House Public/Private Partnership Initiative to modernize U.S. infrastructure.
Remove impediments to infrastructure development and facilitate private sector efforts to construct infrastructure projects serving American needs.
Prioritize DOI infrastructure needs to highlight:
1. Construction of infrastructure;
2. Cyclical maintenance;
3. Deferred maintenance.
Senior executives are expected to provide leadership in achieving goals of the President and the Secretary.
The Management Team is expected to:
1. Ensure cost-effective operations and quality service to the public;
2. Facilitate organizational cooperation and conflict resolution;
3. Ensure the workplace environment is conducive to employee productivity and safety;
4. Hold individuals accountable for actions that violate DOI policies and requirements.
Priority 10: Achieving our goals and leading our team forward
The proposed project does not support any of the DOI Secretary priorities, but the project is being funded for the following reasons:
Priority 9: Reorganizing for the next 100 years
Improve alignment and integration of the DOI organizational structure. Redistribute organizational resources (people and funding) to enhance mission achievement and improved public service.
Improve organizational alignment with Executive Branch counterparts with major land management assets or influence.
| PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES |
| STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE OF SUPPORT OR STIMULATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL AUTHORITY |
| PROJECT OVERVIEW |
| Grant: |
| gov number: P20AS00053 |
| Title: Monitoring Glacier Change in Alaska’s National Parks |
| Funding: $125,740 |
| Cost share: 0.00 |
| Total funding: $130,000 |
| POP: April 18, 2020 - April 17, 2021 |
| Authority: 54 USC §101702. Cooperative agreements |
| CFDA: 15.945 Cooperative Research and Training Programs |
| SS: Unique Qualifications |
| POC: Erica_Cordeiro@nps.gov |
| Goals: A. Project Goals – To inventory the status (surface elevations, areas, and other metrics) and trends (rates of shrinkage or growth) of glaciers in the Alaskan National Parks, with potential additional focus on glaciers of high interest. |
B. Project Objectives –
a. Update an existing time series of glacier surface elevations, using aircraft-based laser altimetry measurements, to assess modern rates of change of a subset of park glaciers.
b. Develop, document, and implement a methodology for incorporating satellite-based glacier surface elevation measurements into ongoing monitoring efforts, with particular focus on use of ICESat-2 data
c. Report delivery of electronically archived data, a technical report, and an internal whitepaper.
| PP: This project addresses a fundamental public purpose as it seeks to utilize science for a better understanding of factors affecting both the conservation and visitor use mandates of the NPS. Within Alaska, over 7500 glaciers are partly or wholly within lands administered by the National Park Service; together they comprise 30,910 km2 of glacierized park land. Between the 1950s and about 2010, collaborative work by UAF faculty and NPS researchers confirmed that these “park glaciers” thinned significantly, and collectively shrank by 3725 km2. Because glaciers are a central component of the visitor experience for many Alaskan parks, because the complicated relationship between glaciers, humans, and the climate system constitutes a significant interpretive challenge for NPS staff, and because glacier changes affect hydrology, wildlife, vegetation, and hazards to persons and infrastructure, these ongoing—and in most cases accelerating—glacier changes pose diverse challenges throughout the Alaska Region. The information gathered from this project will be shared with many scientists, park managers, and through interpretation specialists—the public. |
| Overview: Under this agreement, NPS and University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) scientists will work together to develop a comprehensive understanding of modern rates of glacier surface elevation change. They will analyze existing data, collect new data, and develop new workflows for use in future monitoring. The work described here is part of a larger effort to inventory the status and trends of glaciers throughout the Alaskan National Parks. This effort deemed Glacier Status and Trends 2.0 (GST2.0), follows on the heels of the successful prior collaboration between NPS scientists and UAF Geophysical Institute (GI) staff on an earlier glacier inventory (GST1.0). |
| Recipient: University of Alaska Fairbanks |
| Sub Involv: 1. In consultation with the Recipient, document Inventory and Monitoring Program goals, resources, and constraints pertinent to glacier surface elevation change monitoring. This documentation will include provision of existing historic glacier surface elevation data, assessment of regulatory requirements and constraints on use of open-source data and code, and collaborative determination of the best practice for balancing use of emerging technologies against strategic development of stable long-term protocols. |
2. Monitor data collection, quality control, and documentation, and provide feedback to the Recipient, as needed. The NPS shall participate actively in data analysis, change detection, and evaluation. Such activities will require travel to Fairbanks to meet with the Recipient; NPS will cover costs of travel and provide meeting and computing resources at the Fairbanks NPS office, as needed.
| Justification: Since the first NPS glacier inventory was completed in 2010, Dr. Larsen has continued (with NASA IceBridge funding) to collect sub-decadal lidar measurements along 59 glaciers. This proposed project will determine elevation changes on NPS glaciers by comparing new surface profiles with historic data and will rely heavily on data already collected by Dr. Larson. Working with Dr. Larson provides the advantages of comparable datasets and established workflows. Dr. Fahnestock, a colleague of Dr. Larsen's, specializes in satellite-based observations of Alaskan glaciers. He has a significant body of work pertinent to this proposal which he has in the past voluntarily shared components of with NPS. Dr. Fahnestock's role in this project builds on his existing skills, workflows, and data. |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box26: Yes |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box36: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box44: Off |
| Check Box45: Off |
| Check Box46: Off |
| Check Box47: Off |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Check Box54: Off |
| Check Box55: Off |
| Check Box56: Off |
| Check: Choice 2 |
| CheckA: Choice 4 |
| NA: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Responsibilities: 1. Recruit and retain a technician to assemble all existing aircraft-based lidar (and Structure from Motion Data (SfM), where applicable) measurements of surface elevations collected by UAF researchers for glaciers within the Alaskan National Park boundaries (“park glaciers”). These will include historic data (presented within Glacier Status and Trends 1.0) and all measurements made since that time, up to and including the summer of 2020. These data will be processed, quality-checked, and organized into an electronic directory with appropriate metadata. |
2. In collaboration with NPS, develop a workflow and code (using matlab, python, or other software mutually agreed upon) to analyze aircraft-based surface elevation data, conduct change analysis, and estimate errors using the time-series of available measurement epochs for each glacier. Data and code used for this analysis shall be documented with metadata sufficient for archival purposes.
3. Assemble all existing satellite-based elevation data determined suitable for measurement of glacier surface elevations of park glaciers.
File details come from the government source that posted it.