Performance Work Statement DRAFT.pdf
PDF 280 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Req242036 Underwater Minicam
- Solicitation number
- Req242036
About this file
This document is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC) to acquire a custom-designed underwater video camera system. The key objectives are to design and build a miniature underwater camera system that can be used to record marine mammal foraging behavior from animal-borne deployments and from mounting on longline fishing gear. The PWS outlines specific technical requirements for the camera system, including size, weight, depth rating, video quality, illumination, and other features. It also includes tasks for prototype development, testing, revisions, and delivery of six initial units followed by up to 10 additional units. The PWS references a related federal contract opportunity, a Sources Sought Notice, for this underwater camera requirement. The government anticipates awarding a firm-fixed price contract with a base year and two option years for additional units.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SSN for Minicam design.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Work Statement (PWS)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC)
Miniature Underwater Camera (MiniCam)
{Requirement 24-2036}
Section 1: Background
The Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC) requires underwater imaging systems to monitor foraging behavior of marine animals through both animal-borne and fishing gear mounted systems. To understand the foraging behavior of marine animals, researchers often rely on biotelemetry devices that record the animal’s movements and dive patterns at sea. Based on changes in behavior, researchers can identify when and where feeding occurs. Depredation of target fishing species by animals feeding off longline catch negatively impacts the fishing industry. Monitoring these activities at depth is necessary to understand and possibly mitigate the impact of predator foraging behavior.
In many biotelemetry studies there has been no confirmation that the identified behavior changes are associated with foraging, and in commercial fishing there is limited knowledge about depredation behavior. The gold standard for measuring actual foraging events is through animal-borne video recorders. Similarly, video observations of animal interactions with fishing gear can provide insights not possible with other types of data collection. However, in the past, battery and memory limitations have resulted in video cameras having insufficient recording abilities (e.g., duration, video quality) or they are too large for smaller marine species to carry or to be attached to gear without modifying how it fishes.
We require a custom-designed underwater video camera system that can be used to record marine mammal foraging behavior from animal-borne deployments and through mounting on longline fishing gear systems.
Section 2: Tasks
Section 2.1
Task 1. Prototyping and Design
2.1.1 The contractor shall design and build an underwater camera system to the specifications listed below. Design will be established in consultation with AFSC researchers. At appropriate stages of development, and in collaboration between the contractor and AFSC, one (1) open (not encapsulated) system and one (1) encapsulated prototype will be provided to the AFSC for early testing.
The contractor shall set up design consultation meetings. The contractor shall share progress on hardware design and manufacture through virtual meetings every two (2) months. The contractor shall conduct equipment testing for functionality, robustness, pressure rating, and durability. A report on testing parameters and outcomes shall be submitted to the COR for review. The contractor shall set up a demonstration meeting (virtual or in person) that can be attended by multiple NOAA program representatives to show developed products.
2.1.2 Minimum Technical Specifications are broken out by application and then followed by shared requirements:
Specification Animal Borne Application Longline
Maximum Outer
Dimensions (L x W x H)
12 cm x 8.5 cm x 4.5 cm 20 cm x 8.5 cm x 8.5 cm
Maximum weight 400 g 500 g
Minimum Depth
Rating
200 m 500 m
Field of View
(FoV)*
60° to 90° 130°
Illumination IR LED with illumination distance between ~75 and 250 cm
White LEDs with color temp between 5000
- 7000K , max 1000 lumens; red LEDs with
650-670 nm peak wavelength, max 2000 lumens. Adjustable intensity for both, Housing Containing a flat bottom surface, curved edges, and minimizing frontal surface area to reduce drag effects for animal attachment
Contain multiple attachment points for connecting to fishing gear and auxiliary lighting.
* FoV are not fully defined and will be refined during discussions with the contractor.
• Housing: resistant to impacts and able to withstand repeated temperature and pressure cycling.
• Minimum Temperature Rating: < 2° C
• Power:
o Rechargeable system o Battery: rechargeable with > 8 hr run time when capturing video continuous at max quality and resolution
• Camera Specifications:
o HD video o 1280 x 720p o 30 fps o Timestamped video frames
• Illumination:
o Customer specified LED (IR, red, white)
• Storage Capacity: 32GB Memory. Minicam should record the following types of data:
o Video at full resolution and quality for 8+ hrs o Depth (+/-) 0.1 m (minimum 1 sec sampling interval) o Time (real time clock)
• Peripheral Sensors:
o Light meter - to trigger lights at night or during deep dives o Conductivity - to determine wet/dry to turn on/off device
• Communication: Charge, configure, and download data over USB 3
• User Defined Configuration:
o Depth trigger: start/stop recording at specified depth (i.e., record only at depths below
10 meters) o Time trigger: Turn on/of at specified time (i.e., collect imagery between two user-specified times) o Duty cycle based on time (i.e., record for 15 minutes every hour) o Delayed start option: set minutes to start after activation (to avoid running on deck) o Light trigger option: start/stop recording based on light intensity o Lighting control:
▪ intensity
▪ on/off irrespective of video recording
▪ Turn-on and off based on ambient light intensity or time of day o Frame rate: variable frame rate(1 fps- 30 fps) o Video compression and format options
• Additional Capabilities: If possible while still meeting run-time, storage requirements, and size limitations, the collection of 3-axis accelerometer data at 16 hz is of interest. As well as logging temperature and light data. Achieving better video quality through increased frame rate or resolution would be beneficial but we wouldn’t want to reduce recording duration below eight
(8) hours.
• Ideally the electronics system should be designed so it can be repackaged in different enclosures based on deployment application. For example, if a greater depth rating was required it could be placed inside a more rugged housing.
o Power supply design provides capability to add additional cells as necessary
Section 2.2
Task 2. Testing, Evaluations and Revisions
Following development, the contractor shall deliver six (6) units to the AFSC for field testing, evaluation, and revision. The contractor shall provide written documentation to include full technical details, design drawings, CAD files, system and software specifications, and any and all source code necessary to allow the government the option to use, replicate, and/or modify the hardware and software developed for operation of the described camera system. The contractor shall also provide cost for additional units and the efficient manufacturing batch size.
Section 2.3
Task 3. Revisions and Technical Support
The contractor shall provide modifications and support based on AFSC feedback following field testing.
These modifications may be to the hardware, software, or firmware to address bugs, malfunction, add new features and provide upgraded units for testing. The contractor will provide technical support prior to, during, and after field deployments to address issues with setup, deployment, and data recovery. Task 3 shall be billed as Time and Materials and is not to exceed $90,000.
Section 2.4
Task 4. Delivery - Revised Units
The contractor shall deliver the upgraded six (6) units, in accordance with the revisions in Task 3, to the
Government within two (2) months of order.
Section 2.5
Task 5. Upgrades to Equipment
The Government may provide additional funding for upgrades to the equipment, including but not limited to:
• Updated cameras with latest available technology
• Upgrades to sensors
• Increased depth range
• Improved sampling duration (updated/upgraded battery system)
• Training on unit deployment
• Software upgrades and modification
• Modification to housing
Section 3. Options
Option 1: The contractor shall deliver up to ten (10) units, at the specifications determined at the option exercise to the AFSC within two (2) months of order.
Option 2: Order up to ten (10) units, at the specifications determined at the option exercise to the AFSC within two (2) months of order.
Section 4. Deliverables
Deliverable 1: The contractor shall provide meeting/logistics and administrative consulting services, including:
A. Set up design consultation meetings.
B. Share progress on hardware design and manufacture through virtual meetings every two months.
C. Conduct equipment testing for functionality, robustness, pressure rating, and durability. Provide a report on testing parameters and outcomes.
D. Set up a demonstration meeting (virtual or in person) that can be attended by multiple NOAA program representatives to show developed products.
E. Deliver one (1) housed and one (1) unhoused unit in development to the AFSC for bench testing.
Deliverable 2
A. Develop detailed specification documents for all hardware components
B. Deliver source code
C. Deliver six (6) prototype units to the AFSC for field testing.
Deliverable 3
A. Provide support and changes to the prototype unit(s) based on/and in consultation with AFSC researchers.
B.
Deliverable 4
A. Delivery of final six (6) upgraded units
Section 5: SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES
The following is a schedule of all deliverables, including administrative deliverables, required during the period of performance of this contract:
Deliverable Description Due Date Format
1A Design consultation meeting Within One (1) month of award Virtual
1B Progress meetings Every Two (2) months from 1A Virtual
1C Equipment testing report 6-8 months from 1A PDF
1D Demonstration meeting 8-10 months from 1A Virtual
1E In-dev units for testing/evaluation 10-12 months from 1A Ship to AFSC
2A Equipment specs documentation 12 months from 1A PDF, CAD
2B Source Code 12 months from 1A Repository
2C Six prototype units for field testing 15 months from 1A Ship to AFSC
4A Six upgraded units for deployment Two months from order Ship to AFSC
Option 1 10 upgraded units for deployment Two months from order Ship to AFSC
Option 2 10 upgraded units for deployment Two months from order Ship to AFSC
Section 6: Performance Requirements Summary
This contract includes a Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance
Plan (QASP). The PRS plays an integral role in the administration of the contract. In addition to any applicable inspection clauses or other related terms and conditions contained in the contract, the PRS shall serve as a primary tool for inspection and acceptance of services as facilitated by the Contracting
Officer’s Representative (COR). Evaluation of the Contractor’s overall performance shall be in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the PRS, and will be conducted by the COR. The
PRS constitutes a material aspect of the contract and will not be changed or otherwise modified without prior written approval of the Contracting Officer.
Required
Service and
Designation
Desired
Outcome
Performance
Standard
Acceptable
Quality Level
Monitoring
Method
Incentive/
Disincentive
Task 1 Deliverables
A, B, C, D and E
-Meetings are set up in a timely manner and accomplish required tasks
- Sufficient level of equipment testing conducted
- Successful demonstration of equipment to at least two NOAA programs
Performance standard met at least 95% of time
COR will solicit feedback from requesters; Use of email to determine request date and scheduling date; Review of items accomplished by the contractor
Material-poor performance evaluations;
corrective action plan
Task 2 Deliverables
A, B and C
- Documentation issued to the satisfaction of requestor
-Delivered camera units meet specifications as tested by NOAA staff
Delivery provided within
60 days of order
Performance standard met at least 95% of time
Performance standard met +/-
10 calendar days
COR will solicit feedback from requesters; Use of email to determine request date and scheduling date; Review of items accomplished by the contractor
Material-poor performance evaluations;
corrective action plan
Task 3
Support provided within a mutually agreed up time frame such that development and modifications
Performance standard met
95% of the time -or as otherwise agreed upon between the government
COR will solicit feedback from requesters; Use of email to determine request date and scheduling
Material-poor performance evaluations;
corrective
Required
Service and
Designation
Desired
Outcome
Performance
Standard
Acceptable
Quality Level
Monitoring
Method
Incentive/
Disincentive satisfy requestors technical representative, contracting officer and contractor.
date; Review of items accomplished by the contractor
Option 1
60 days of order
Performance standard met
95% of the time -or as otherwise agreed upon between the government technical representative, contracting officer and contractor.
COR will solicit feedback from requesters; Use of email to determine request date and scheduling date; Review of items accomplished by the contractor
Material-poor performance evaluations;
corrective
Option 2
60 days of order
Performance standard met
95% of the time -or as otherwise agreed upon between the government technical representative, contracting officer and contractor.
COR will solicit feedback from requesters; Use of email to determine request date and scheduling date; Review of items accomplished by the contractor
Material-poor performance evaluations;
corrective
Section 7: Additional Items
7.1 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
7.1.1 Confidentiality and Data Privacy
This contract may require that services contractors have access to Privacy Information. Services contractors are responsible for maintaining confidentiality of all subjects and materials and may be required to sign and adhere to a Non-disclosure Agreement (NDA).
7.1.2 Government Furnished Resources
The Government has pressure tanks available for testing support if needed by the contractor.
7.1.3 Place of Performance
Work will be conducted at other than the government facility (i.e. off-site), at the requirements of the contractor. Some testing can be done on-site at AFSC in Seattle,WA as deemed necessary through communication with thecontractor and the AFSC.
7.1.4 Overtime, Travel, and Training
Overtime and Training is not anticipated or authorized at this time. If overtime is required, a contract modification must be executed by the Contracting Officer prior to performance. Travel is authorized for field support for 2 weeks travel to Alaska.
7.1.5 Warranty, Licensing Information and Intellectual Property
The contractor will assign an open source license (e.g., GNU General Purpose License) as the licensing term for any firmware or software developed. In addition, the contractor will provide AFSC with the hardware specifications, schematics, drawings, or other engineering documents required to develop additional minicams, or to support new use cases (e.g., new enclosure, change in power source).
The intellectual property (IP) involved in this contract are the software and hardware design. The software
IP should be licensed under an open source license that allows for the distribution, modification, and implementation of the software as stipulated by the terms of the license. The open software/hardware design will enable other programs to build compatible systems, which will make it easier to share other developments such as data annotation/analysis tools. All data collected remains the Intellectual Property of the federal government.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .