Performance Work Statement.pdf

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

SECTION A – GENERAL INFORMATION

NOTE: The terms “solicitation” and “Request for Proposal (RFP)” are used interchangeably throughout the entire Global Tires Program 2.0 (GTP 2.0) Standard Form (SF) 1449 and its Attachments.

A.1 INTRODUCTION

A.1.1 The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Land and Maritime (L&M) Strategic Acquisition Programs Directorate (SAPD), currently manages the GTP (reference https://www.dla.mil/Land-and-Maritime/Business/Selling/Global- Tires-Program/) requirements contract in support of DLA managed aircraft and ground tires.

A.1.2 These efforts will be fulfilled under a requirements contract (RC) that will be known as GTP 2.0. GTP 2.0 will provide tire support for the Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, Marines, Navy and Foreign Military Sales (FMS). The Government will pursue an acquisition strategy by establishing Vendor Long Term Contracts, Vendor Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDCs), or other contractual instruments as directed by the Contracting Officer, hereby referred to as Vendor Contracts, with Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and dealers for tires, hereby referred to as Contract Vendors. The acquisition strategy requires the GTP 2.0 Integrator to utilize the DLA L&M established Vendor Contracts for its supply of tires for supply chain management and to provide responsive global supply support to military customers.

A.1.3 The GTP 2.0 Integrator, the Government and industry counterparts will be working together to support DLA’s military customers by providing aircraft and ground tire support. The GTP 2.0 Integrator and Vendor(s) are required to meet all terms and conditions in their respective contract(s) and shall put forth its best efforts and always deal in good faith with one another in executing GTP 2.0 support. The GTP 2.0 Integrator is required to utilize the Government established Vendor Contracts for the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s inventory and replenishment of new and retreadable tires. The Vendor(s) shall fill and deliver orders to the GTP 2.0 Integrator.

A.1.4 The GTP 2.0 RFP is for a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12, RC for the supply and supply chain management support of certain tires, rubber treads, and other consumable rubber tire and track components, which may be identified by NSN or other means, and are managed by DLA outlined in Section C, C.2.0 “Scope” and its subparts.

A.1.5 The GTP 2.0 RFP Attachments will NOT be posted to the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Internet Bid Board System (DIBBS) and are ONLY available upon request. The GTP 2.0 RFP Attachments will be transmitted using https://safe.apps.mil/. Interested parties shall send their request for the GTP 2.0 RFP Attachments to charles.mielkeii@dla.mil with the following information in Microsoft Excel format as hereby shown:

Requestor Last Name

Requestor First Name

Requestor Title

Company Name

Company Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code

Requestor Phone Number

Requestor Email Address

A.2 ACCESS

A.2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator may require access to the following Government Systems, including but not limited to:

AFAST Aviation Financial Analysis Support Tool Asset VizAsset Visibility

ASSIST Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System CPARS Contractor Performance Assessment Report System CRIF Cargo Routing Information File DAASINQ DLA Transaction Services Defense Automatic Addressing System Inquiry (System) DLA Logistics Tools Defense Logistics Agency Logistics Tools DoD Emall Department of Defense Electronic Mall DoD Federal Mall Department of Defense Federal Mall EDI Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Transactions and Resource Guide eRMS eRetrograde Management System eSRS Electronic Software Requirements Specifications GIDEP Government Industry Data Exchange Program (cooperative Government / industry activity to reduce expenditures of resources) ILSMS Integrated Logistics Support Management System JDRS Joint Deficiency Reporting System JPAS Joint Personnel Adjudication System NALDA Naval Aviation Logistics Data Analysis NITA Navy in Transit Accountability One Touch One Touch Support OOMA / Deckplate Decision Knowledge Programming for Logistics Analysis and Technical Evaluation P700 Common Naval Packaging PCARS Point Credit Accounting Record System PDREP Product Data Reporting and Evaluation Program PMA299 Server SPRS Supplier Performance Risk System SIR – DCMA Shipping Instructions Request – Defense Contract Management Agency VSM Vendor Shipment Module WAWF Wide Area Work-Flow WebCAV based Commercial Asset Visibility WebFLIS Federal Logistic Information System

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES OR COSTS

SECTION B – SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT SUPPORT AND

PRICES

B.1 The GTP 2.0 Contract Line-Item Number (CLIN) structure is as follows:

CLIN 0001 – Tire Price CLIN 0002 – Supply Chain Management Fee [Contiguous United States (CONUS)] CLIN 0003 – Supply Chain Management Fee [Outside the Contiguous United States (OCONUS)] CLIN 0004 – Supply Chain Management Fee (FMS) CLIN 0005 – Scrap / Disposal Management Fee CLIN 0006 – CONUS Retread Management Fee CLIN 0007 – OCONUS Retread Management Fee CLIN 0008 – Surge and Sustainment (S&S) Tire Price CLIN 0009 – Reconciliation CLIN 0010 – GTP to GTP 2.0 Implementation Fee

B.2 The Section B – Pricing Spreadsheet and Instructions is found in the GTP 2.0 RFP as Attachment 1.

NOTE: Each Estimated Annual Demand Quantity (EADQ) contained in the Section B – Pricing Spreadsheet is the Government’s best estimate of the annual demand based on information available to the Government at the time of release of the GTP 2.0 RFP and as such may not reflect the quantities realized during the GTP 2.0 contract performance.

NOTE: Within the Section B Pricing Spreadsheet, the tab titles may not reflect the full title for each sheet. The full title for each sheet is located in the header for each tab.

NOTE: BASE PERIOD YEAR 1 pricing will include the four-month (4-month) GTP to GTP 2.0 Implementation period if an order is required to be fulfilled by the GTP 2.0 Integrator.

B.2.1 For planning purposes for GTP 2.0, the GTP 2.0 Vendor Contract Pricing and Lead times and the GTP 2.0 Delivery Orders (DOs) are found at GTP 2.0 RFP Attachments 2 and 3 respectively. The data provided in these Attachments relate to tire demand projections based on recent historical demand and operating conditions, which may not reflect the conditions that the GTP 2.0 Integrator will encounter.

B.3 All awarded GTP 2.0 contract prices shall be made publicly available. By submitting an offer, the resulting GTP

2.0 Integrator agrees to the publication of its unit prices for each CLIN outlined in Section B, B.1.

SECTION C - SPECIFICATIONS/SOW/SOO/ORD

SECTION C – DESCRIPTION, SPECIFICATIONS, PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

C.1.0 General

C.1.1 Section C of the GTP 2.0 RFP defines the effort required to implement GTP 2.0 of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Land and Maritime (L&M). The GTP 2.0 scope of work is detailed in Section C.2.0 and its subparts.

C.1.2 The Government will pursue an acquisition strategy by establishing Vendor Contracts with Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and dealers for tires. The acquisition strategy requires the GTP 2.0 Integrator to utilize DLA L&M established Vendor Contracts for its supply of tires for supply chain management and to provide responsive global supply support to military customers. Currently, total supply chain management and support of tires is managed by the DLA L&M Tires Successor GTP contract. The resulting GTP 2.0 contract will result in a single supply chain management process that will support the GTP 2.0 scope of work.

C.1.3 The GTP 2.0 Integrator is required to comply with the implementation period requirements set forth in the resulting GTP contract and as detailed at Section P1 – 3.0, 4.0 and their subparts.

C.2.0 Scope

C.2.1 The GTP 2.0 scope of work is for the supply and supply chain management support of certain tires, rubber treads, other consumable rubber tire and track components and tire wheel assemblies, which may be identified by NSN or other means, and are managed by DLA. Additional items within contract scope may be added via Defense Logistics Agency Directive (DLAD) Procurement Note L27 “Addition and Deletion of Items”, reference Section P2 – 17.0 and its subparts. The current tire / NSN listing subject to GTP 2.0 Integrator support is identified at Attachment 4. The tires / NSNs supplied will support aircraft and ground systems worldwide. The Government Fiscal Years 2011-2025 requisition history is located at Attachment 5 to illustrate recent historical delivery locations.

C.2.2 The GTP 2.0 will be used to support current and future Department of Defense (DoD) customers [to include Foreign Military Sales (FMS)] of tires and the war fighter’s readiness by relying on the private sector’s ability to manage and perform all responsibilities required under the supply chain for tires. The Government shall establish Vendor Contracts for all tires / NSNs to be supported under the GTP 2.0 by the GTP 2.0 Integrator. The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall utilize these Government established Vendor Contracts for its supply of tires in support of GTP 2.0 requirements.

C.2.3 Pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 51, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall utilize the Government established Vendor Contracts identified by the Contracting Officer, reference Section P2 - 3.0 and its subparts for additional information.

C.2.4 For future requirements relating to new aircraft and ground system tire demands requiring the supply of tires by the DLA, the Government reserves the right to not include the requirement under the GTP 2.0 contract.

C.2.5 The GTP 2.0 RFP outlines the following areas of responsibility that the GTP 2.0 Integrator will be required to execute:

C.2.5.1 Demand Planning

C.2.5.2 Forecasting Orders to Tire Suppliers

C.2.5.3 Purchasing (from Government directed sources)

C.2.5.4 Order Processing and Fulfillment

C.2.5.5 Reconciliation

C.2.5.6 Supplier Management

C.2.5.7 Finance (GTP 2.0 Integrator owned inventory)

C.2.5.8 Item Management (i.e., stock levels and locations)

C.2.5.9 Quality

C.2.5.10 Management of Retreads and Tire Carcass Disposal (applicable NSNs)

C.2.5.11 Distribution and Transportation Management and Execution

C.2.5.12 Packaging and Shipment Preparation

C.2.5.13 United States (U.S.) and Foreign Customs Clearance

C.2.5.14 Obsolescence Management

C.2.5.15 Customer Support Services

C.2.5.16 Data Management

C.2.5.17 Global Contiguous United States (CONUS) and Outside the Contiguous United States (OCONUS) Support

C.2.5.18 FMS Support

C.2.5.19 Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) matters relating to the above services

C.2.5.20 Warehouse Management and Operations, to include Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) for a customer when determined appropriate by both parties and will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis.

C.2.6 Per DLAD 17.204(e)(1), the potential maximum GTP 2.0 ordering period of performance is for 10 years;

this includes up to a four- month (4-month) implementation period, a five-year (5-year) base period and two (2), two-year (2-year) option periods, plus four (4), two-month (2-month) option periods in the GTP 2.0 contract exit phase. Option periods are exercised at the discretion of the Government. The period of performance shall commence upon the date found in block 3 of the resulting GTP 2.0 contract.

C.2.7 The GTP 2.0 shall be performed in three (3) phases as shown below. All phases of the PWS apply to GTP

2.0 in its entirety unless otherwise stated. This includes the GTP 2.0 Contractor Furnished Material (CFM) implementation period occurring in Phase I. The following sections and subparts are identified by the applicable phase of GTP performance and the appropriate numbering system for reference:

P1 – PWS FOR PHASE I, GTP 2.0 TRANSITION

P2 – PWS FOR PHASE II, GTP 2.0 EXECUTION

P3 – PWS FOR PHASE III, GTP 2.0 CONTRACT EXIT

C.2.8 Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Utilization

C.2.8.1 In addition to Quality Assurance efforts as required by FMS origin inspection requirements identified herein, the Government anticipates utilizing the DCMA, as delegated by the Contracting Officer, for contract administration support during the GTP 2.0 Integrator performance.

C.2.9 Unless expressly stated otherwise herein, the terms “days” and “hours” refers to calendar days.

C.2.10 The GTP 2.0 Contract Line-Item Number (CLIN) structure is as follows:

CLIN 0001 – Tire Price: this is a pass-through cost that reflects the tire price in the applicable Vendor Contract, which is the GTP 2.0 Integrator purchase price under the GTP 2.0 construct. This CLIN shall not contain any additional pricing other than the actual tire price in the applicable Vendor Contract. Any price adjustments applied to the Vendor Contract via contract modification shall apply to the GTP 2.0 Integrator purchase price from the Vendor Contract and shall be reflected in this CLIN 0001 tire price by a contract modification to the GTP 2.0 contract.

NOTE: If Surge and Sustainment (S&S) is invoked by the Government, the GTP 2.0 Integrator will invoice under CLIN 0008, and no costs shall be made under CLIN 0001.

CLIN 0002 Supply Chain Management Fee (CONUS): shall include costs associated with the supply chain management / logistics performance requirements set forth within the GTP 2.0 RFP for shipments to a CONUS customer or Consolidation and Containerization Point (CCP). It shall include costs associated with the palletization of tires. Refer to the requirements at Section P2 – 24.3 and its subparts.

CLIN 0003 Supply Chain Management Fee (OCONUS): shall include costs associated with the supply chain management / logistics performance requirements set forth within the GTP 2.0 RFP for shipments to an OCONUS customer. It shall include costs associated with the palletization of tires. Refer to the requirements at Section P2 – 24.3 and its subparts.

CLIN 0004 Supply Chain Management Fee (FMS): shall include costs associated with the supply chain management / logistics performance requirements set forth within the GTP 2.0 RFP for FMS. Refer to the requirements at Section P2 – 7.0 and its subparts. It shall include costs associated with the palletization of tires. Refer to the requirements at Section P2 – 24.3 and its subparts.

CLIN 0005 Scrap / Disposal Management Fee: CONUS scrap and disposal management and execution of the tire carcass / scrap disposal of tire(s) / NSN(s). Shall include costs associated with the execution of the requirements at Section P2 – 5.0 and its subparts.

CLIN 0006 CONUS Retread Management Fee: shall include costs associated with the execution of the requirements at Section P2 – 4.0 and its subparts for retread tires identified at Attachment 6. It shall include costs associated with the palletization of tires. Refer to the requirements at Section P2 – 24.3 and its subparts.

CLIN 0007 OCONUS Retread Management Fee: shall include costs associated with the execution of the requirements at Section P2 – 4.3 and its subparts for retread tires identified at Attachment 6. It shall include costs associated with the palletization of tires. Refer to the requirements at Section P2 – 24.3 and its subparts.

CLIN 0008 Surge and Sustainment (S&S) Tire Price: this is a pass-through cost that reflects the S&S tire price in the applicable Vendor Contract (if S&S is invoked by the Government), which is the GTP 2.0 Integrator S&S tire purchase price under the GTP 2.0 construct. This CLIN shall not contain any additional pricing other than the actual S&S tire price in the applicable Vendor Contract (if S&S is invoked by the Government). The S&S tire price for CLIN 0008 will include the CLIN 0001 tire price plus any additional S&S pricing as identified in the Vendor Contract(s). Any S&S price adjustments applied to the Vendor Contract via contract modification shall apply to the GTP 2.0 Integrator S&S purchase price from the Vendor Contract and shall be reflected in this CLIN 0008 S&S tire price by a contract modification to the GTP 2.0 contract. Refer to the requirements at Section P2 – 10.1 and its subparts. NOTE: If S&S is not invoked by the Government, the GTP 2.0 Integrator will invoice under CLIN 0001, and no costs shall be made under CLIN 0008.

CLIN 0009 Reconciliation: for CLINs 0001 and 0008 reconciliation payment. Refer to the requirements at Section P2 – 16.3 and its subpart.

CLIN 0010 GTP to GTP 2.0 Implementation Fee: This CLIN shall be paid out in one (1) lump payment for the GTP to the GTP 2.0. The GTP to the GTP 2.0 implementation period shall include costs associated with the implementation elements as set forth in Section P1 of the PWS that is a one (1) time implementation period cost that is limited to the GTP implementation costs and does not include any recurring cost that occurs outside of the GTP to the GTP 2.0 implementation period. This cost shall NOT include the cost to purchase the GTP CFM from the current GTP Contractor. The GTP is addressed in detail at Sections C.1.2 and C.1.3 and the GTP CFM is defined in detail at Section P1 – 3.0 and its subparts.

C.2.10.1 All CLINs are Firm Fixed Price.

P1 – PWS FOR PHASE I, TRANSITION

P1 – 1.0 Introduction

P1 – 1.1 The total length of Phase I shall not exceed four-months (4-months) after the GTP 2.0 contract award date.

P1 – 1.2 Implementation Reporting

P1 – 1.2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall submit Implementation Status Reports to update the Contracting Officer on its implementation progress during the transition period. Status reports are to be submitted, in writing to the Contracting Officer, at the minimum frequency:

P1 – 1.2.1.1 Every 30 days from GTP 2.0 contract award date;

P1 – 1.2.1.2 Every 15 days for the last two (2) months prior to full execution; and, P1 – 1.2.1.3 Every week of the last month prior to full execution.

P1 – 1.2.1.4 Implementation Status Reports must be kept current to reflect progress and actual completion of events toward implementation (i.e., those chronological events and milestones listed in the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s Implementation Plan) such that the Contracting Officer can form a reasonable belief that full GTP 2.0 performance will be achieved by the end of the Implementation period and that the corresponding reporting of completion has been achieved at each milestone.

P1 – 1.2.1.5 During the implementation period, the Government reserves the right to request additional implementation status reports, at no additional cost to the Government.

P1 – 2.0 Phase I Activities

P1 – 2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall comply with the data reporting requirements in accordance with Section P2 –

16.0 and its subparts.

P1 – 2.2 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall establish Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) capability in accordance with Section P2 – 16.2.3.

P1 – 2.3 Within 60 days after the GTP 2.0 contract award date, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall make its warehouse(s) available for inspection. The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall perform any effort necessary to meet all requirements set forth in the PWS for Phase I, to include any corrective actions needed to the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s warehouse(s) to ensure a proper storage environment.

P1 – 2.4 Within 75 days after the GTP 2.0 contract award date, the GTP 2.0 Integrator will complete coordination of the Government identified system, connectivity via EDI transactions. Coordination will be conducted through the Contracting Officer. Within 75 days after the GTP 2.0 contract award date, the GTP 2.0 Integrator will complete coordination of the Government identified system, connectivity via EDI transactions. Coordination will be conducted through the Contracting Officer.

a. The existing GTP contract requires the Integrator’s coordination of connectivity via EDI transactions with a system named Enterprise Linked Logistics Information Source (ELLIS), which will no longer be the required system at the time of the award.

b. The new Government identified system was not available at the time of this drafting.

c. For the purposes of this drafting and throughout this drafting it will be referred to as the Government identified system.

d. Some of the possible replacement systems are:

i. ACTR (Advanced Contract Tracking and Reporting)

ii. RAPTR (Real-time Acquisition Performance Tracking and Reporting)

iii. VCAL (Vendor Contract Award Logistics)

P1 – 2.5 Within 90 days after the GTP 2.0 contract award date, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall put in place the infrastructure, material, systems, including full EDI capabilities, customer service, and business partnerships necessary to enable the GTP 2.0 Integrator to meet the Government’s performance requirements for Phase II, GTP

2.0 Execution.

P1 – 2.6 Performance Review Boards (PRBs)

P1 – 2.6.1 The initial PRB will be held at 90 days after the GTP 2.0 contract award date. PRBs are defined in detail at Section P2 – 2.2 and its subparts.

P1 – 3.0 GTP to GTP 2.0 Implementation

P1 – 3.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator Purchase of GTP Ready for Issue (RFI) CFM Inventory

P1 – 3.1.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall purchase aircraft and ground tires from the GTP Contractor [ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics, LLC (ASRC), CAGE code 79343] a three (3) month inventory target of RFI tires as established in the GTP contract, known as CFM. This three (3) month inventory is computed as three (3) times the average monthly demand of a previous 12-month consecutive period, mutually agreed upon by the Government and GTP Integrator. This implementation shall be invoiced under CLIN 0010. This RFI CFM is a three (3) month level based on a demand period established in the GTP contract and therefore, it is expected that some tires / NSNs will have more or less than a three (3) month target value. The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall be provided with the option to inspect the GTP RFI CFM inventory prior to any purchase with any disputes to be reconciled by the Contracting Officer.

P1 – 3.1.1.1 The GTP RFI CFM not supported via the GTP 2.0 contract is not required to be purchased by the GTP

2.0 Integrator.

P1 – 3.1.2 For purposes of GTP 2.0 financing and proposal preparation, the estimated value of the said GTP 2.0 Integrator GTP RFI CFM inventory purchase is between $51M, for an estimate of 60,000 tires (see Attachment 7).

P1 – 3.1.3 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall only purchase ground GTP RFI CFM tires that have no less than nine (9) months of shelf life at the time of receipt into the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s warehouse and upon GTP 2.0 Integrator acceptance of inspection of said tires, as stated at P1 – 3.1.1.

P1 – 3.1.4 The GTP 2.0 Integrator will establish and maintain appropriate credit for the GTP RFI CFM purchase as described in the offeror’s proposal, Volume II, subfactor 3.

P1 – 3.1.5 The purchase of the GTP RFI CFM inventory shall occur in two (2) stages; Stage One (1) and Stage Two (2).

P1 – 3.1.5.1 Stage One (1) requires the GTP 2.0 Integrator to purchase one-half of the GTP RFI CFM identified by the Government, by tire / NSN. The GTP RFI CFM inventory may be purchased as early as 60 days prior to the end of the GTP contract but shall be completed no later than 15 days prior to the end of the GTP contract on 8 November 2028.

P1 – 3.1.5.2 Upon completion of Stage One (1), Stage Two (2) requires the GTP 2.0 Integrator to purchase the remaining balance of the GTP RFI CFM identified by the Government, by tire / NSN. No later than 30 days after the end of the GTP contract, the GTP 2.0 Integrator GTP RFI CFM Stage 2 purchase shall be completed.

P1 – 3.1.5.3 The GTP 2.0 Integrator is not responsible for arranging shipping and transportation for the GTP RFI CFM purchase and therefore, those costs shall not be included in any GTP 2.0 Integrator proposal.

P1 – 3.1.5.4 During the GTP to the GTP 2.0 implementation period, the GTP Contractor is expected to support customer demands. However, in the event the GTP Contractor cannot fill a tire demand during this implementation period, the Government will provide the GTP 2.0 Integrator the opportunity to support customer demands. The GTP Contractor shall not receive Delivery Orders (DOs) beyond 11:59:59 post meridiem (p.m.) Eastern Standard Time (EST) at GTP contract expiration date.

P1 – 3.1.5.4.1 If the GTP 2.0 Integrator fulfills such order, the GTP 2.0 Integrator will receive payment based on the awarded prices for base year one (1).

P1 – 3.2 The GTP 2.0 Integrator Purchase of the GTP Not Ready for Issue (NRFI) Tires.

P1 – 3.2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall purchase any NRFI tires as early as 60 days prior to the end of the GTP contract, also referred to as retreadable tire carcasses, available under the GTP contract at 2% of the applicable NSN unit price in the GTP contract. The Contracting Officer will update the GTP NRFI data, by NSN, dollar value and tonnage, no less than quarterly. The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall be provided with the option to inspect the GTP NRFI inventory prior to any purchase with any disputes to be reconciled by the Contracting Officer.

P1 – 3.2.1.1 NRFI refers to retrograde tires carcasses received through the tire contract retreading process, reference Section P2 – 4.0 and its subparts.

P1 – 3.2.2 For purposes of GTP 2.0 financing and proposal preparation, the estimated value of the GTP 2.0 Integrator GTP NRFI inventory purchase is approximately $168,440.66, for a total of 4,267 tire carcasses at a weight of 620,091 pounds as of August 2025 (see Attachment 7).

P1 – 3.2.3 The GTP 2.0 Integrator is not responsible for arranging shipping and transportation for the NRFI tire purchase and therefore, those costs shall not be included in any GTP 2.0 Integrator proposal.

P1 – 3.2.4 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall purchase the GTP NRFI beginning as early as 60 days prior to the end of the GTP contract, but purchases must be completed before the end of the GTP contract. Payment terms shall be NET 30.

P1 – 3.3 GTP 2.0 Used / Scrap Tire Program

P1 – 3.3.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator is responsible for supplying trailers (e.g. rent, borrow, lease or own) during Phase I at the designated customer sites (Attachment 8), referenced at Section P2 – 5.0 and its subparts.

P1 – 3.3.2 Visitor Notification Process

P1 – 3.3.2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator is responsible for following the policy at each designated customer site for installation access.

P1 – 3.4 Disputes

P1 – 3.4.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall exercise its best effort to resolve any issue or controversy that arises between the GTP 2.0 Integrator and the GTP Contractor relating to implementation of performance responsibilities.

A best effort attempt to resolve an issue, or controversy shall include prompt and informed engagement by the appropriate level of management by the GTP 2.0 Integrator with the GTP Contractor. A best effort attempt also involves presenting good faith, proactive proposals and solutions to resolve the matter on terms acceptable to both parties. In the event, the GTP 2.0 Integrator believes it will not be able to acceptably resolve such an issue or controversy before it impacts the implementation of performance, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall promptly raise the issue to the Contracting Officer to offer the Contracting Officer the opportunity to resolve the issue.

P1 – 3.5 GTP 2.0 Integrator Depletion of GTP CFM

P1 – 3.5.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall fill GTP 2.0 DOs during all phases with GTP CFM until it exhausts the inventory of GTP CFM by NSN. Upon supply of GTP CFM, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall invoice for the GTP CFM price under CLIN 0001, which is the tire / NSN unit price the GTP 2.0 Integrator paid the GTP Contractor for said tire / NSN (limited to GTP CLIN 0001), plus the GTP 2.0 CLIN 0002 (or CLIN 0003 or CLIN 0004 and / or other applicable GTP 2.0 CLIN pricing. The GTP 2.0 Integrator is not permitted to invoice for any other costs under CLIN 0001. Upon depletion of the GTP CFM from GTP 2.0 Integrator inventory, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall supply the Vendor Contract tires and invoice for the applicable Vendor Contract unit prices in accordance with the revised CLIN 0001, plus GTP 2.0 CLIN 0002 (or CLIN 0003 or CLIN 0004) and / or other applicable CLIN pricing for supply chain management costs.

P1 – 3.5.2 When filling orders with the GTP CFM that has a shelf-life expiration date, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall fill orders with the oldest tires first, unless otherwise authorized by the Contracting Officer. The Government bears no financial responsibility for GTP CFM that the GTP 2.0 Integrator is unable to deplete due to shelf-life expiration.

P1 – 3.5.2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shelf-life requirement at Section P2 – 25.3.1 and its subpart does not apply to the GTP CFM inventory defined in P1 – 3.1. The GTP 2.0 Integrator is permitted to fill a customer demand with CFM that has no less than six (6) months of shelf life.

P1 – 3.5.2.2 When GTP CFM, as defined in P1 – 3.1, cannot be issued due to insufficient shelf life remaining, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall dispose of the tire(s) in accordance with the scrap disposal requirements set forth at Section P2 – 5.0 and its subparts.

P1 – 4.0 Vendor Contract Utilization

P1 – 4.1 Upon the GTP 2.0 contract award date, the Contracting Officer will provide a list of all active tire(s) / NSN(s) to the GTP 2.0 Integrator where a Vendor Contract award has been established. That list shall outline the NSN, source of supply, contact information, price, delivery / production lead time, split order requirements (as applicable) and any DO minimum or maximum figures (as applicable). The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall use this list when ordering its supply of tires. The Contracting Officer will provide the list of Vendor Contracts to the GTP

2.0 Integrator. The GTP 2.0 Integrator will receive the Vendor Contracts and consolidate the contract information and maintain the Source of Supply (SoS) spreadsheet. The Integrator will provide the SoS spreadsheet and updates to the Contracting Officer when there are changes.

P1 – 4.2 When additional Vendor Contracts are established, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall be immediately notified by contract modification or other written notification by the Contracting Officer. If such time occurs where the lack of a Government identified Vendor Contract will impact the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s inventory levels to endanger a successful implementation, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall notify the Contracting Officer of the potential inventory shortfall immediately.

P1 – 4.3 GTP 2.0 Integrator Sourcing Logic to Vendor Contract

P1 – 4.3.1 When split awards exist [i.e., two (2) contracts were established for the same NSN via a percentage split; 70 / 30 or 50 / 50], the Vendor Contract will state the applicable percentage split figures for the GTP 2.0 Integrator. The list of split award NSNs are identified in Attachment 2.

P1 – 4.3.1.1 When the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s planning system identifies that an order must be placed between the split award Vendor Contracts to execute the GTP 2.0 requirements, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall issue its DO to both Vendor Contract split awardees, in accordance with the applicable allocations / percentages of support identified in the Vendor Contract(s) (i.e., 70 / 30 or 50 / 50) and in accordance with the ordering procedures of the applicable Vendor Contract(s). The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall be responsible for any costs (see Section P1 – 4.3.3.1 below) incurred because of failure to meet split award sourcing requirements by the applicable Vendor Contract expiration. If allocations / percentages are not possible due to retread tire carcass limitations, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall make best efforts to place a series of orders over time that most closely maintains the split logic as orders are placed, and the cost for this situation may be waived by the Contracting Officer.

P1 – 4.3.1.2 Based on the sourcing logic above, if the appropriate Vendor is unable to meet the production demands of the GTP 2.0 Integrator / Government in accordance with the applicable Vendor Contract’s percentage of support (i.e., 70 / 30 or 50 / 50) or the Vendor(s) nonperformance / nonconformance exists, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, that it is unable to utilize the appropriate split award Vendor Contract. At this time, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall furnish to the Contracting Officer, any information it has regarding the applicable Vendor’s inability to perform, if known, and the Government will work with the Vendor to develop an anticipated “get well” date to reestablish capacity and / or conformance. If not previously confirmed by the Vendor, the Government will contact the Vendor to verify / validate information provided to the GTP 2.0 Integrator.

P1 – 4.3.1.2.1 If it is confirmed that a Vendor is unable to perform, the GTP 2.0 Integrator will propose to the Contracting Officer an appropriate quantity order with the other, split award Vendor. If authorized by the Contracting Officer, the GTP 2.0 Integrator may issue an order to the other split award Vendor that is more than the contracted percentage split allocation. Additional orders to the other split award Vendor must also be authorized by the Contracting Officer, until the Contracting Officer has notified the GTP 2.0 Integrator that the nonperforming Vendor has been reestablished for receipt of orders or that the Vendor has been terminated from the GTP 2.0. Orders authorized under this paragraph to a single Vendor shall not count towards the percentage allocation requirements otherwise applicable to the two (2) Vendor Contracts. The total amount to be invoiced for each tire delivered will follow the reconciliation process as detailed at Section P2 – 16.3 and its subpart.

P1 – 4.3.1.3 Split Award Candidate NSNs: For tire(s) / NSN(s) awarded to multiple Vendor sources, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall execute split award sourcing logic in accordance with Section C, P1 – 4.3 and its subparts. The list of NSNs that are currently identified as “split award candidates” are located in Attachment 2.

The CLIN 0001 or CLIN 0008 tire price for split award NSNs are subject to reconciliation, reference Section P2 – 16.3.

P1 – 4.3.2 Sourcing Logic Compliance Report

P1 – 4.3.2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide monthly, no later than the 14th day after the end of the previous month, the Sourcing Logic Compliance Report to indicate the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s compliance with the Vendor Contract support percentages, as specified.

P1 – 4.3.2.1.1 At a minimum, the Sourcing Logic Compliance Report shall contain a listing, by split award NSN, of all Vendor Contract Purchase Orders (POs) issued by the GTP 2.0 Integrator in the reporting month to include the following: the date and quantity of the GTP 2.0 Integrator order, the Vendor the order was issued to, and the Vendor Contract delivered quantity, if any. Each monthly report shall identify, by Vendor, the cumulative total of tires ordered by the GTP 2.0 Integrator and delivered to the GTP 2.0 Integrator to demonstrate its to date performance in executing the Vendor Contract percentage allocation of support. Finally, the report shall outline the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s ordering projections to demonstrate compliance or how it will comply with the percentage allocation requirements for the applicable split award NSN Vendor Contract(s).

P1 – 4.3.2.1.2 If no orders were issued for that NSN during the reporting month, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall identify such on the Sourcing Logic Compliance Report.

P1 – 4.3.3 Sourcing Logic Noncompliance

P1 – 4.3.3.1 Should the GTP 2.0 Integrator violate the split award sourcing logic defined herein, payments to the GTP 2.0 Integrator may be offset on a case-by-case basis by the Government to recover any additional monies paid by the Government to the GTP 2.0 Integrator because of the violation, plus all interest charges and a 10% administrative fee to cover the Government’s costs of the overpayment value. This shall be done by the expiration of each Vendor Contract.

P1 – 4.4 The Government may unilaterally modify the percentage split detailed at Section P1 – 4.3.1, at no additional cost to the Government. The Contracting Officer shall provide the GTP 2.0 Integrator with the newly established Vendor Contract percentage splits, and all future orders shall comply with the modified splits. The GTP 2.0 Integrator may not issue orders to the previously identified splits after such notification, but existing orders may remain open for fulfillment, unless otherwise directed by the Contracting Officer.

P1 – 4.5 Vendor Scorecard

P1 – 4.5.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall maintain a Scorecard for each Vendor. The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide, in writing and upon request of the Contracting Officer, the Vendor Scorecards in addition to the requirements detailed at Section P2 – 2.2.5. Vendors may request their respective Scorecard from the Government. Quality Scorecards shall include at a minimum the following information.

P1 – 4.5.1.1 Vendor supplier name

P1 – 4.5.1.2 Number of tires received by GTP 2.0 Integrator DO and NSN

P1 – 4.5.1.3 Number of tires delivered by GTP 2.0 Integrator DO and NSN

P1 – 4.5.1.4 Number of tires delivered on time by GTP 2.0 Integrator DO and NSN

P1 – 4.5.1.5 Percent of on time delivery per Vendor Contract for all tires

P1 – 4.5.1.6 Number of nonconforming tires

P1 – 4.5.1.7 Acceptance rate of tires per Vendor Contract

P1 – 4.5.1.8 The Contracting Officer may request additional information be added to the Vendor Scorecard at no additional cost to the Government.

P1 – 4.6 Vendor Contract Scorecard

P1 – 4.6.1 GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide the Vendor Contract Scorecard annually to the Contracting Officer per Vendor Contract no later than two (2) days after a Vendor Contract’s yearly anniversary or completion date.

P1 – 4.6.1.1 For example, if a Vendor Contract was awarded on April 1st, 2028, then two days after one-year of contract performance (March 31st , 2029 would be the last day in that period of performance in this example) the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide the information listed under section P1-4.6.2. In this example, the Vendor Contract Scorecard would be due April 2nd, 2029.

P1 – 4.6.2 Vendor Contract Scorecards shall at a minimum include the following information:

P1 – 4.6.2.1 Vendor Contract number

P1 – 4.6.2.2 Vendor name

P1 – 4.6.2.3 The total number of DOs issued

P1 – 4.6.2.4 The total number of tires that were ordered

P1 – 4.6.2.5 The total number of tires that were delivered

P1 – 4.6.2.6 The total number of DOs that were due

P1 – 4.6.2.7 The total number of on-time* DOs. *For this on-time calculation we would like you to add a 7 day “grace period”. If a DO is 7 days or less late, still consider it on-time.

P1 – 4.6.2.8 The total number of late DOs.

P1 – 4.6.2.9 The on-time delivery percentage

P1 – 4.6.2.10 The total dollar spend on the contract to date

P1 – 4.6.2.11 The total dollar spend on the contract during the period of performance

P1 – 4.6.2.12 Were there any “Kind”, “Count”, or “Condition” nonconformances in accordance with P2 – 3.3.3.1.2 or P2 – 3.3.3.1.3 during this during the period of performance?

P1 – 4.6.2.13 If the answer to P1 – 4.6.2.12 is yes, then the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide details of each Vendor Contract nonconformance for the current period of performance as listed in P2 – 3.3.3.1.2 or P2 – 3.3.3.1.3.

P1 – 5.0 Completion of Implementation Period

P1 – 5.1 Upon completion of the implementation period, the following events will occur:

P1 – 5.1.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall comply with Section C, Phase II of the PWS for all required tires / NSNs included in the GTP 2.0.

P1 – 5.1.2 Unless otherwise determined by the Contracting Officer under Section P2 – 1.2, the Government will route all GTP 2.0 tire requisitions to the GTP 2.0 Integrator.

P2 – PWS FOR PHASE II, FULL GTP 2.0 IMPLEMENTATION

P2 – 1.0 Introduction

P2 – 1.1 Except as noted under Section P1, Phase II Activities shall begin four-months (4-months) after the GTP

2.0 contract award date, unless the Contracting Officer determines it to be in the best interest of the Government to delay the start of Phase II activities for all or a particular tire / NSN.

P2 – 1.2 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall utilize the designated Government established Vendor Contracts (see Section P2 – 3.0 and its subparts) identified by the Contracting Officer as the exclusive sources of tires except as specifically noted hereafter in Section P2 – 3.9 and its subparts.

P2 – 1.2.1 While the Government makes no guarantee as to the number of Vendor Contracts resulting from these requirements, it is anticipated that approximately 30 Vendor Contracts may result, with a number of those Vendor Contracts being awarded to the same Vendor(s). In utilizing these Vendor Contracts, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall supply tires that comply with the following technical requirements: Cooperative Tire Qualification Program (CTQP) Cooperative Approved Tire List (CATL) 1922, CTQP CATL 1923, Air Force Qualified Product List (QPL) MIL-DTL-5041, Revision L (September 2019) for new tires and QPL MIL-DTL-7726, Revision L (September 2019) for reparable tires, Air Force QPL for specification MIL-DTL-5041, Aircraft Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code and Part Number tires per the Purchase Order Text (POT), Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) performance standard J-2014 “Pneumatic Tires for Military Tactical Wheeled Vehicles” (SAE-J-2014), (July 2022) identified by the approved CAGE Code and Part Numbers, Ground CAGE Code and Part Number tires per the POT, and ZZ-T specification tires. Technical requirements for tires are subject to change.

P2 – 1.2.2 Complete technical requirements for the tire requirements are outlined in the Vendor Contracts issued in support of the GTP 2.0 contract.

P2 – 2.0 Phase II Activities

P2 – 2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide all support and management effort necessary to perform in accordance with all Phase II requirements.

P2 – 2.2 Performance Review Boards (PRBs)

P2 – 2.2.1 PRBs will be held at 150 days and 210 days after the GTP 2.0 contract award date, and at least semiannually thereafter as scheduled by the Contracting Officer, to monitor and assess GTP 2.0 Integrator performance, to coordinate responses and to foster solutions to problems encountered during and after GTP 2.0 implementation.

P2 – 2.2.2 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide status of schedules, program goals, and any process improvement initiatives. The reviews shall provide the Government with the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s progress and performance on all tasks defined in the GTP 2.0 RFP.

P2 – 2.2.3 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall host PRBs at locations to encourage maximum participation from the Government. The Government is willing to alternate hosting PRBs at the Government’s chosen facility.

P2 – 2.2.4 The PRB will be co-chaired by the DLA L&M Contracting Officer and an authorized representative of the GTP 2.0 Integrator. The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall develop an agenda and distribute the agenda to perspective attendees no later than 15 days before the PRB. Meeting slides and resulting minutes for these reviews shall be submitted in the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s format and made available in electronic format by email or access through the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s secure website to the attendees only. Slides and minutes shall not be marked as proprietary and shall become Government property upon submission.

P2 – 2.2.5 During the PRB, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide status on the following GTP 2.0 elements:

P2 – 2.2.5.1 Program Overview – to include overall schedule status, and for the preceding six- and twelve-month period, provide the number of tires delivered, number of delivery orders issued, and total amount spent.

P2 – 2.2.5.2 GTP 2.0 Implementation Issues, Delays, Concerns

P2 – 2.2.5.3 On Time Delivery Issues

P2 – 2.2.5.4 Quality / Safety Issues

P2 – 2.2.5.5 Configuration Management Issues

P2 – 2.2.5.6 Quality Assurance Issues

P2 – 2.2.5.7 Customer Support Service

P2 – 2.2.5.8 Repair Issues

P2 – 2.2.5.9 DO Extension Request and Reason

P2 – 2.2.5.10 Forecast Accuracy

P2 – 2.2.5.11 Vendor Contract Issues, to include Vendor Scorecards

P2 – 2.2.5.12 Known Production Issues (Retread / New)

P2 – 2.2.5.13 Return (Casings / Disposal) Issues

P2 – 2.2.5.14 Transportation Issues to include Vendor Contract and DLA Distribution Issues (OCONUS support issues)

P2 – 2.2.5.15 Depot Issues

P2 – 2.2.5.16 FMS Issues (if applicable)

P2 – 2.2.5.17 Demand Data by NSN and Location

P2 – 2.2.5.18 Stock Out or Potential Stock Out

P2 – 2.2.5.19 12 Month Forecast

P2 – 2.2.5.20 Material Acceptance Rate (MAR)

P2 – 2.2.5.21 Acceptance Rate of Vendor Contract Material

P2 – 2.2.5.22 Retread Program

P2 – 2.2.5.23 Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Program Status

P2 – 2.2.5.24 Other Issues, as approved by the Contracting Officer

P2 – 2.2.5.25 Previous PRB Open Action Items / New Action Item

P2 – 2.2.5.26 Reconciliation

P2 – 2.2.5.27 Audit Readiness

P2 – 2.2.5.28 Warehousing Issues

P2 – 2.2.6 The GTP 2.0 Integrator will submit PRB minutes for approval by the Contracting Officer within 14 days after each PRB. While not anticipated, other program reviews may be conducted as mutually agreed upon between the Government and the GTP 2.0 Integrator.

P2 – 2.2.7 Executive PRBs, to include the DLA L&M Commander, Deputy and / or Acquisition Executive, will be conducted as determined appropriate by the Contracting Officer. The GTP 2.0 Integrator cannot request additional Executive PRBs.

P2 – 2.3 The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall provide the complete tire supply chain solution for DLA L&M’s managed tires to support demand, retread and scrap / disposal requirements in accordance with the provisions of the GTP

2.0 PWS, as well as applicable terms in the GTP 2.0 RFP and resulting contract. The GTP 2.0 performance strategy seeks a low risk yet streamlined operation that has the capability to provide an integrated product life cycle approach to lowering the cost of ownership over time. All tires shall be shipped from the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s warehouse via the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s shipping system (except as specifically provided otherwise hereafter).

P2 – 2.4 Notwithstanding any term in the GTP 2.0 contract to the contrary, should the DLA depot system receive unauthorized customer returns or an inventory gain of RFI tires, DLA is permitted to fill requisitions even after the GTP 2.0 contract is in place, without liability to the GTP 2.0 Integrator. This would result in temporarily decreased demand to the GTP 2.0 Integrator. The Government will provide a report of all unauthorized returns of record for the GTP 2.0 Integrator to adjust forecasting / demand planning records, as necessary.

P2 – 3.0 Utilizing Government Vendor Contracts

P2 – 3.1 As identified in Section C.2.0 and its subparts the Government will negotiate and award Vendor Contracts for all tires to be supplied under this requirement to include the split award NSNs referenced in Section P1 –

4.3.1.3. The GTP 2.0 Integrator is authorized and required to use these Vendor Contracts in accordance with the terms of a written authorization, reference Section P2 – 3.2 below, that will be issued by the Contracting Officer in accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procurement Guidance and Information (PGI) 251.102 and pursuant to FAR 51.101(a) “Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources”. In accordance with DAG 51.101, the FAR Deviation, 17-02 dated April 1, 2017, from FAR 51.1 “Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources”, DLA Contracting Officers are permitted to authorize DLA contractors to use Government supply sources for DLA managed National Stock Numbered or Part Numbered items in the performance of other than cost-reimbursement contracts. This Class Deviation expires April 1, 2020---it has been updated but will need to check again on the correct date, however, contracts written to incorporate the deviation prior to its expiration incorporate the deviation for the entire period of performance of the contract, to include option periods. Therefore, this deviation applies to GTP 2.0 over the period of performance of the contract.

P2 – 3.2 At the time of GTP 2.0 contract award, the Contracting Officer shall provide written authorization in accordance with DFARS PGI 251.102 (Attachment 9 is provided as a sample). This shall serve as the written authorization to the GTP 2.0 Integrator to purchase its inventory from the Vendor Contracts established by the Government to execute GTP 2.0. The written authorization will include the Vendor Contract Number, NSN, Base Contract End Date and Expiration Date with Option (inclusive of option period).

P2 – 3.2.1 In performing GTP 2.0 support, the GTP 2.0 Integrator shall only purchase tires through the Vendor Contracts identified by the Government. In addition, the Contracting Officer shall provide a copy of each Vendor Contract that is awarded to the GTP 2.0 Integrator.

P2 – 3.3 GTP 2.0 Execution: GTP 2.0 Integrator and the Vendor Relationship

P2 – 3.3.1 Upon the GTP 2.0 Integrator award date, the GTP 2.0 Integrator is required to utilize the Vendor Contracts established by the Government for the GTP 2.0 Integrator’s inventory / replenishment of new and retread tires. The Vendor Contracts will be Firm Fixed Price depending on market research results for each Vendor Contract solicitation. The GTP 2.0 Integrator and the Vendor(s) are expected and required to meet all terms and conditions as outlined in their applicable Vendor Contract(s). The Vendor shall fill and deliver the GTP 2.0 Integrator orders at the price and delivery terms in the Vendor Contract. The GTP 2.0 Integrator is partnering with the Government and industry counterparts to support DLA’s military customers. The GTP 2.0 Integrator shall put forth its best effort and always deal in good faith with all Vendors in executing GTP 2.0 support.

P2 – 3.3.2 Ordering, Pricing and Delivery

P2 – 3.3.2.1 The GTP 2.0 Integrator is authorized and required to place orders under the Vendor Contracts as the exclusive sources of tires for use…