PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND EVALUATION NARRATIVE AND PLAN (PMENP) TEMPLATE Overseas.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Bolstering East Africa's Investigative Journalism Ecosystem
Opportunity number
DOS-NBO-PDS-FY24-005
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Performance Monitoring & Evaluation Narrative and Plan (PMENP) Template for a federal grant opportunity. It outlines the requirements for how the project's performance monitoring and evaluation will be carried out, including tracking progress toward objectives, data collection strategies, and coordination with local partners.

The related federal grant opportunity is titled "Bolstering East Africa's Investigative Journalism Ecosystem" and is offered by the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Embassy Nairobi. The program aims to support investigative journalism and build Nairobi as a hub for public interest journalism, including training on investigative techniques, artificial intelligence, and creating an independent Center for Investigative Reporting in Kenya. The funding is authorized under the Foreign Assistance Act. Applicants can apply through Grants.gov or by email to the U.S. Embassy Nairobi. The federal grant program under which this opportunity is assigned is State/African Regional - Other Economic Support Funds (ESF) Projects/Programs (CFDA 19.989).

Performance Monitoring Evaluation Narrative Plan Template

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NOFO - OVERSEAS - Nairobi CPIF 2024 v2.docx DOCX document
Timeline Template.docx DOCX document
BUDGET NARRATIVE TEMPLATE.docx DOCX document
Budget Guidance and Template for New Awards.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
NOFO APPLICATION PACKAGE CHECKLIST - OVERSEAS.docx DOCX document
SOW Template Overseas_Nairobi CPIF v2.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Monitoring & Evaluation Narrative and Plan – PMENP Template

Program Monitoring & Evaluation Narrative Provide narrative details on how the project’s Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (system) will be carried out and by whom:

· Explain how the project’s performance toward its objectives will be tracked over time;

· Provide a clear description of the approach and data collection strategies and tools to be employed (e.g., pre- and post-test surveys, interviews, focus groups)

· include how the applicant will track and document whether activities occurred (outputs) and the results or changes caused by these activities (outcomes); and

· Explain if an external evaluation will be included. (Evaluations, internal or external, should be systematic studies that use research methods to address specific questions about project performance. They should provide a valuable supplement to ongoing monitoring activities. Evaluation activities generally include baseline assessments, mid-term, and final evaluations.).

· If the project includes work with local partners or sub-partners, explain how performance monitoring and evaluation efforts will be coordinated amongst these organizations.

Performance Monitoring & Evaluation Plan The Program Monitoring & Evaluation Plan is generally structured as a table with output-based and outcome-based indicators. It explains how data will be collected (data collection methods) to show that certain changes occurred. It outlines baselines (where your project is starting) and quarterly or other milestone targets (what you would like to achieve) for each indicator. Draw on the objectives, activities and expected changes from the Scope of Work, and link those areas to indicators.

The project should monitor and report on performance indicators that are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Reasonable, and Time-bound). Establish, where possible, performance baseline data and expected performance targets for each expected result and include details on what sources of data will be used to document performance, how the indicators will be measured, frequency of measurement, and units of measure. Where possible, indicators should also allow for sex disaggregation. Indicators should reflect key project outputs or outcomes that reflect the primary goals or objectives of the project and that the applicant can collect with high quality data.

Applicant Name/Recipient Name
Name of Applicant Organization/Name of Recipient Organization
NOFO Title/Project Title
Funding Opportunity Title/Project Title
Federal Assistance Listing Number
19.XXX
Period of Performance
XX-XX months

Part 1: Project Context This project is intended to support the following strategic goals and objectives identified in the NOFO:

U.S. Embassy Program Strategic Goals and Objectives

The U.S. Department of State, U.S. Embassy XXXX announces an Open Competition or Limited Competition for organizations interested in submitting applications for projects that support Policy Objective.

(Must at a minimum include citations for authorizing statutes and regulations.)

U.S. Embassy Program Background and Description
XXX

(As appropriate, include any program history (e.g., whether this is a new program or a new or changed area of program emphasis). Describes the funding priorities or focus areas which the Bureau/Embassy intends to fund.)

Project Location
(Describes the funding location or area where the Bureau/Embassy intends to fund the project.) This may be general and revised after the Recipient is in negotiation phase of pre-award.

Part 2: Project Goals, Objectives, and Performance Indicators The applicant/recipient will be accountable for achieving the project-specific objectives listed below.

Project Goals and Objectives
Projects should XXX

(Insert Goals that meet the Policy Objectives)

Projects should be designed to achieve the following: XXX (insert expected Outcomes) Objective 1: XXX Objective 2: XXX Objective 3: XXX

Objectives of the program should be SMART:

· Specific: Detailed and specifies what will be achieved

· Measurable: have associated metrics or measurements of success

· Attainable: appropriately challenging, objectives can be reasonably attained give the available resources

· Relevant: align with the policy/program goal and appropriate within the country or beneficiary audience

· Time-Bound: achievable within the timeframe of the program

The applicant/recipient will report against the performance indicators listed below to measure progress towards achieving its project-specific objectives.

Performance Indicators
Data Source
Baseline
Expected Results
Inputs
Outputs
Targets
Completion Date

U.S. Embassy Policy Objective: (list policy objective)

Applicant Project Objective 1: (list policy objective)

Activity 1.1: (list activity)

Performance Indicators

Data Source

Baseline

Expected Results

Inputs

Outputs

Targets

Completion Date

Activity 1.2: (list activity)

Activity 1.3: (list activity)

Activity 1.4: (list activity)

Activity 1.5: (list activity)

Activity 1.6: (list activity)

Outcomes:

Sustainability:

U.S. Embassy Policy Objective: (list policy objective)

Applicant Project Objective 2: (list policy objective)

Activity 2.1: (list activity)

Performance Indicators

Data Source
Baseline
Expected Results

Inputs

Outputs

Targets

Completion Date

Activity 2.2: (list activity)

Activity 2.3: (list activity)

Activity 2.4: (list activity)

Activity 2.5: (list activity)

Activity 2.6: (list activity)

Outcomes:

Sustainability:

U.S. Embassy Policy Objective: (list policy objective)

Applicant Project Objective 3: (list policy objective)

Activity 3.1: (list activity)

Performance Indicators
Data Source
Baseline
Expected Results
Inputs
Outputs
Targets

Completion Date

Activity 3.2: (list activity)

Activity 3.3: (list activity)

Activity 3.4: (list activity)

Activity 3.5: (list activity)

Activity 3.6: (list activity)

Outcomes:

Sustainability:

- 2 -

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .