STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXPANDED LETTER OF RESPONSE

375-030-23

PROCUREMENT

08/25

Advertisement No.: 27344 DOT FM Number: 44905516201

Submittal Date: 8/10/2026 Project Name: CEI CR 278 over Chipola River Bridge No.

530026

Consultant’s Name: Metric Engineering LLC (Firm must use the name shown on the Consultant’s qualification letter.)

Street Address: 1343 Brickyard Rd

City: Chipley State: FL Zip: 32428

Office Location: Chipley Contact person: Michael McCrary

Phone: (850) 845-0076 Contact email: michael.mccrary@metriceng.com By submittal of this letter the Consultant certifies that all information provided in the letter is true and accurate. The Consultant further certifies that staff proposed are currently employed by the firm(s) identified, or the Consultant shall provide a statement indicating when staff will become employed by the identified firm(s).

Please refer to project advertisement for evaluation criteria. Other required submittals are specified in the advertisement.

Consultants: Please be aware that all font (including font in graphics, tables, and captions on photos) must be standard Arial Narrow, 11 point, single line spacing with no modification of font or spacing allowed. ½” clear margin on all sides must be maintained on all pages. It is the Consultant’s responsibility, due to font and format restrictions within this form, to work within the constraints of the form and its format. Character styling such as use of color, bold, and italics is allowed. Use of a table is recommended for text boxes. The page layout may be modified to add columns, tables, graphics, and photos. All graphics and photos must be created in a clean, blank word document and the “text wrapping square” option applied before cutting and pasting into this form. Consultants may add their logo at the top of the first page (directly underneath the header), however, the Consultant shall not extend the form beyond the pages allocated for the Letter to accommodate insertion of the logo. Consultants are not permitted to insert any other information in the header other than the logo. After pasting your letter into this form, highlight all text and ensure the font size of Arial Narrow, 11 point was retained. Once your content is inserted, delete any additional blank pages that are generated by pressing your delete key after the last word in the Letter of Response. Recreation of the form in another software application to modify the form format is not permitted. This form works best when saved with a .docx extension. *Please retain the source document as it may be requested at a later date in the procurement, to verify adherence with aforementioned restrictions. Note: You may begin typing on this page.

Metric Engineering LLC (Metric) is pleased to submit this Expanded Letter of Response (ELOR) outlining our qualifications and availability to serve the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 3 (D3), as the consultant for the CEI CR 278 over Chipola River Bridge No. 530026 project. Our proposed team fully satisfies the requirements of the Scope of Services (SOS) and brings the experience, resources, and capacity necessary to deliver exceptional Construction, Engineering, and Inspection (CEI) and contract administration services. To further strengthen our capabilities, Metric is supported by a highly qualified group of subconsultants, including ABC Group Communications Solutions (ABC) (SBE), Multivista Systems LLC (Multivista) (SBE), T2 UES, Inc. (T2), and Underwater Engineering Services, Inc. (UESI).

Metric’s proposed staff is highly familiar with the work types associated with this project and brings extensive experience in all tasks required under this contract. In preparation for this assignment, Metric has thoroughly reviewed the contract documents; conducted multiple site visits; met with FDOT representatives, Kevin Fussell, Zach Goodwin, James Barfield, Eric Wells, Linda Melvin, and Lucas Corbin; evaluated critical work elements, and identified potential areas of concern and project challenges. We fully support the Department’s “Target Zero” safety initiative and are committed to maintaining a culture where safety is always prioritized.

Our proposed team is proficient in all relevant disciplines outlined in the SOS, including the Materials Acceptance and Certification (MAC) system, Final Estimates, and State Construction Office Collaboration (SCOC). They meet the required personnel qualifications for bridge construction, asphalt paving, earthwork, and Trimble Business Center – Heavy Construction Edition for surface-to-surface comparison and rover use. Metric and our subconsultants possess the personnel, construction expertise, and technical capabilities necessary to provide a CEI team that will ensure the successful delivery of a high-quality project for D3.

375-030-23

PROCUREMENT

1. AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE

UNDERSTANDING OF INTENT AND SCOPE OF

CONSTRUCTION PROJECT

Our understanding of the project scope and intent is based on our review of the following documents provided by the Department at our request: Roadway plans, dated 6/10/2026, Signing and Pavement Marking (S&PM) Plans, dated 6/08/2026, Structure Plans, dated 5/8/2026, Estimated Quantities Report, dated 6/18/2026, and Specifications Package, dated 7/6/2026. This project consists primarily of roadway and pavement reconstruction, guardrail, drainage improvements, removal of existing bridge no.

530026, construction of new bridge no. 534203 (the new bridge will be 43.33’ north of the existing bridge), and S&PM on CR 278 Peacock Bridge Rd over Chipola River Bridge. Peacock Bridge consists of two (2) 112’ x 42’ 8” bridge spans and one (1) 126’ x 42’ 8” bridge span (total bridge length 350’), 42” diameter drilled shafts (three (3) per bent for a total of 12 drilled shafts), 54”-thick pier caps, Florida I-45 Beams (five [5] per span for a total of 15 beams), a 8 ½”-thick cast in place concrete deck, and 36” single slope traffic railing. David “Doc” Cook, Sr. (Metric) will be the Senior Inspector for the drilled shafts on this project. Mr. Cook was the Senior Inspector on the SR 20 over Chipola River Bridge that was similar to this project, and he drilled the shafts while working with F&W Construction Company on Juniper Creek Bridge in Blackwater Forest. There are also two (2) 30’ approach slabs comprised of Optional Base Group 10 and 1 ¾” Traffic B Friction Course FC-12.5 (PG 76-22) (Standard Plans Index 400-090). The roadway portion of the project consists of three (3) typical sections.

Typical Section 1: This typical section details milling and resurfacing (M&R) CR 278 (STA 100+55.00 to STA 105+60.00 and STA 137+60.00 to STA 143+82.00):

Travel Lane Milling and Resurfacing:

Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement (1 ¼” Ave. Depth) Friction Course FC-9.5 (Traffic B) (PG 76-22) (1 ¼”)

Typical Section 2: This typical section details new construction and shoulder pavement (STA 105+60.00 to STA 116+50.00 and STA 130+50.00 to STA 137+60.00):

New Construction:

Type B Stabilization Optional Base Group 6 Type SP Structural Course (Traffic B) (PG 76-22) (2”) Friction Course FC-9.5 (Traffic B) (PG 76-22) (1 ¼”)

Shoulder Pavement:

Type B Stabilization Optional Base Group 1 Friction Course FC-9.5 (Traffic B) (PG 76-22) (1 ¼”)

Typical Section 3: This typical section details new construction and shoulder pavement (STA 116+50.00 to STA 122+50.00 and STA 126+00.00 to STA 130+50.00):

New Construction:

Type B Stabilization Optional Base Group 6 Type SP Structural Course (Traffic B) (PG 76-22) (2”)

Friction Course FC-9.5 (Traffic B) (PG 76-22) (1 ¼”) Shoulder Pavement:

Type B Stabilization Optional Base Group 1 Friction Course FC-9.5 (Traffic B) (PG 76-22) (1 ¼”) Shoulder Gutter Misc. Asphalt (2”) Guardrail

The intent of this contract is for the CEI Team to operate as an extension of the Department’s staff, delivering comprehensive CEI services for the resurfacing and associated roadway improvements.

In this capacity, we will support the Department by making timely decisions and providing prompt, accurate guidance to the Contractor. Metric’s foremost priority is SAFETY FIRST and is ALWAYS, followed closely by an emphasis on environmental compliance, quality construction and effective contract administration. Given the project’s location and the nature of the work, our team will take a proactive, hands‑on approach in coordinating with the Contractor and engaging with the public to reinforce and promote a strong, consistent safety culture and promote environmental stewardship.

UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT ISSUES

Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Issues and Solutions ISSUE: MOT and safety being emphasized on the project.

SOLUTION: Our field personnel understand the significance of safety for the travelling public, contractor personnel, and inspection personnel. We will put safety first and work diligently to ensure that the Temporary Traffic Control Plans (TTCPs) are implemented and maintained in accordance with contract requirements. Should our inspectors observe non-compliance or other safety issues, they will immediately call it to the attention of the contractor, document the issue, and work with the contractor to resolve the issue in a timely manner.

ISSUE: The plans state that the boat ramp driveway (Fishery Dirt Road) and boat ramp access will be maintained during construction. Our field inspection showed the boat ramp is on the south side of the existing bridge but could be impacted by the bridge and roadway construction on the north side of the existing bridge.

Furthermore, the road is a dirt road that has pot holes and very slick when it rains. SOLUTION: Metric will discuss this requirement at the pre-construction conference and also include the requirement in our project status meetings to ensure that the requirement is not forgotten during construction. The plans indicate that commercial material for temporary driveway will be placed on the road.

Earthwork Issues and Solutions ISSUE: The location of this project is in an area for a possible KARST formation wherein the underlying limestone has been partly dissolved by slightly acidic groundwater. Thus, there is the potential for possible sinks or voids. SOLUTION: Metric has encountered this issue on previous projects and worked with the contractor and FDOT to successfully fill in the voided areas.

Asphalt Issues and Solutions

ISSUE: The new roadway will tie into the existing roadway at each end of the project. During our site visit we noticed that where the tie ins occur there will probably need to be some asphalt overbuild needed to make a smooth transition to the new roadway from the old roadway. SOLUTION: Metric is very familiar with the requirements for previous projects and will work closely with the contractor to put the overbuild in with the friction asphalt layer. This process makes a much smoother transition.

ISSUE: There have been noticeable increases in lawsuits filed against the Department regarding contractor laydown/staging areas on private property, mainly due to inadequate documentation of agreements between property owners and contractors.

SOLUTION: Metric will recommend that the contractor furnish us a copy of their agreement with the owner to ensure proper documentation and mitigate any potential legal disputes. We will also video the laydown yard prior to and after completion of use so that any potential discrepancies can be effectively addressed.

Bridge Issues and Solutions ISSUE: The existing bridge is steel H piling that are encased in concrete (two of the bents are in the river channel). Therefore, removal has been difficult on past projects getting the removal to the correct depth of removal. SOLUTION: Metric has been on many similar projects where the old bridge with H piling encased in concrete were to be removed. We will ensure that the piling and encasements are removed as per specification so that navigation of the river will not be impacted.

ISSUE: The paint coating samples on the existing H-Piles contain lead above laboratory detectable levels and above the Federal Standard by weight and therefore will require special protection and disposal during the removal process. SOLUTION: Metric has been on many similar projects where lead in paint is present. Both our project administrator and senior inspector will have the certifications required for the proper inspection of the removal and disposal process.

ISSUE: Accurately determining the depth (elevation) where the top of rock socket begins in weathered limestone is difficult.

SOLUTION: On the SR 20 over Chipola River Bridge project, we verified the depth via pilot holes, and the plan minimum tip elevation was lowered.

ISSUE: On previous project, the contractor’s means and methods did not provide the proper depth of rock socket. SOLUTION: Metric will discuss the contractor’s means and methods at the pre-drill shaft meeting and ensure that the means and methods provide the proper depth of rock socket as well as ensure that it is clean prior to concrete placement. We will also ensure that the rate of concrete placement into the drill shaft during construction is sufficient to overcome possible water infiltration due to hydrostatic pressure from the outside.

ISSUE: The Chipola River is a protected river and no concrete overflow from the shaft can be allowed to get into the river.

SOLUTION: On the SR 20 over Chipola River Bridge project, we installed turbidity curtains around all the piers and used an oversized steel ring box set over the shaft casing to catch any overpour from the concrete pour.

ISSUE: Access to the channel of the river has to be maintained.

The issue is with the construction of the work bridge not restricting the channel. SOLUTION: Metric worked with the contractor and the work bridge had a “drop in/drop out” section. We will also ensure that any work bridge over the channel will have amber warning (marker) lights installed and maintained.

Environmental Issues and Solutions ISSUE: The Contractor will be responsible for submitting and maintaining a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that will be comprehensive and practical to maintain and address all the requirements of the Project Plans and NPDES and other permit requirements. This plan will be required to address major soil disturbing activities, erosion and sediment controls measures, stabilization practices (both temporary and permanent), and maintenance schedules and practices. SOLUTION: Metric will check all locations where soil disturbing activities occur and ensure that required stormwater management practices are employed and that appropriate and effective erosion and sediment control devices and measures are employed and properly maintained. Although not required by the CEI scope of services, Metric will perform SWPPP construction inspections weekly and within 24 hours after storm events producing 0.5” of rain or more. We will advise the contractor of any SWPPP deficiencies and verify that all corrections are made.

ISSUE: The special provisions in the contract indicate the Florida black bear, eastern indigo snake may occur within the project limits.

Also, four Federally listed mussel species (Chipola Slabshell, Gulf Moccasinshell, Oval Pigtoe, and Shinyrayed Pocketbook) associated with the project will be monitored and any specimens killed are required to be preserved in 100% ethanol and deposited to the Service’s Panama City Field office. SOLUTION: Metric will cover the special provision requirements thoroughly at the pre-construction. Usually Mr. John Smith, the D3 Construction Environmental Engineer, will provide a presentation at the pre-construction conference that covers all three of the endangered species. We will ensure that an adequate supply of 100% ethanol is onsite during the construction in case there are any of the four

(4) mussel specimens killed.

ISSUE: Industry-wide material shortages and shortages of delivery trucks. SOLUTION: On behalf of the Department, Metric will work to mitigate delays associated with potential shortages ahead of time and will consider the use of alternative aggregates or other materials. Additionally, we will document the contractor’s efforts to mitigate delays and keep accurate records as to the actual delay and costs related to the project.

ISSUE: The construction contract includes a provision that allows 120 calendar days after the Notice to Proceed (NTP) is issued to provide the contractor time to adjust work forces, equipment, schedules, and for the procurement of materials. Contract time will begin when this 120-day period ends or on the actual day the contractor begins work, whichever is earlier. This has been an issue on other projects where the contractor has wanted to start work immediately after the NTP was issued, but work required to adjust/relocate site prior to the start of construction had not been completed, project inspection personnel were not available, or permits required had not been obtained. SOLUTION: Upon receiving the CEI consultant NTP, Metric will immediately begin monitoring the progress of any utility relocation or other third-party work, the status of permits, etc., that are required prior to construction start to ensure the contractor can begin work as soon as the construction NTP is issued if they elect to begin work prior to the 120-day period ending. Also, all CEI personnel assigned to the project will be available when the consultant NTP is issued.

Potential Cost Saving Initiatives (CSI): Metric is well-versed in the CSI submittal and review process and has actively participated in multiple CSI evaluations throughout D3. While rural bridge replacement projects typically provide fewer opportunities for Contractors to develop viable CSIs – given the prescriptive nature of major structural components – Metric fully recognizes the Department’s commitment to cost efficiency. Accordingly, we will thoroughly evaluate any CSI proposal submitted by the contractor to determine feasibility, cost impacts, benefits to the Department, and compliance with contract requirements.

QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC)

Metric conducts routine CEI QA Reviews to ensure that all CEI staff

– including subconsultants – perform their duties in substantial conformance with FDOT CEI procedures, the Construction Project Administration Manual (CPAM), the Metric QA/QC Plan, and the CEI contract requirements. These reviews help verify that documentation, contract administration, inspection practices, and project controls consistently meet FDOT standards. For this project, Metric’s QA team will include:

● Darrel Burnett, PE – QA Team Leader (Senior Project Engineer [SPE] Review)

● Johnathan Taylor – QA Team Member (Project Administrator [PA] Review)

● Debbie Lark – QA Team Member (Contract Support Specialist [CSS], Preconstruction, and Electronic Document Management System [EDMS] Review)

● June Curry – QA Team Member (Resident Compliance Specialist [RCS] Review)

These QA team members are not involved in the daily management or direct oversight of the project. By remaining independent of day-to-day operations, they can provide objective, unbiased evaluations of CEI performance and ensure full compliance with FDOT expectations.

Management of Subconsultants / Accountability: Metric’s QA/QC process extends beyond project-level construction oversight and includes rigorous management of the CEI agreement itself. By continuously monitoring contract expenditures, remaining funds, and anticipated effort, Metric proactively coordinates with the Construction Project Manager to identify the need for any supplemental agreements or time extensions well in advance, ensuring uninterrupted CEI services and full contractual compliance. Metric also maintains an established internal process for managing subconsultant budgets.

This process ensures that all subconsultants remain on track financially and that Small Business Enterprise (SBE) commitments are met throughout the duration of the project.

Department Documents / Office Automation / Field Office / Vehicles / Equipment and Licensing: Metric will provide all items required by the SOS, along with additional resources that enhance operational efficiency, accuracy, and safety for both field and office staff. For this project, we propose to use our field office located at: 1607 Highway 90, Chipley, FL 32405. This facility is fully equipped to support CEI operations. Should the Department want an office closer to the project, we have four (4) potential office locations in Marianna.

Liaison / Performance of Consultant: Metric is committed to providing proactive, reliable, and responsive communication throughout the life of the project. Our team will promptly evaluate all issues that arise and deliver timely, well-supported recommendations and responses to the contractor to help maintain steady progress and prevent avoidable delays. It is Metric’s standard practice to inform, involve, and seek input from the FDOT Project Manager (PM), Mr. Lucas Corbin, on all project-related matters. For each issue, Metric will: clearly present the circumstances and relevant background; provide our evaluation and recommended course of action; identify any contract requirements or specifications related to the issue; and coordinate closely with Mr. Corbin before offering direction or interpretation to the contractor. Metric firmly believes that open, consistent, and transparent communication among all parties - the Department, contractor, and CEI teams are essential for project success. We will maintain strong liaison practices to ensure alignment, avoid misunderstandings, and support efficient decision-making.

General Requirements: Coleman Hatcher, PE, Metric’s proposed (SPE), and Donnie Jackson, Metric’s proposed Project Administrator (PA), will maintain continuous communication and coordination with the FDOT PM on all major project activities. Their responsibilities will include communicating all key construction operations and upcoming work activities; coordinating construction contract changes, Supplemental Agreements (SAs), Task Work Orders (TWOs), and all outstanding project issues as they arise; and ensuring that the PM is informed of any concerns requiring interpretation, direction, or Department decision-making.

We will ensure that all project records, including EDMS documentation, diaries, density logs, work orders, and correspondence, are complete, accurate, and always audit-ready.

On Site Inspection / Sampling and Testing / Engineering Services / Resident Compliance: Mr. Jackson will review all sampling and testing requirements to ensure all activities are performed, verified, and recorded prior to the monthly estimate cutoff. Metric will provide the necessary personnel to attend and/or conduct the Pre-Services Meeting with Mr. Corbin; the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Pre-Construction Meeting and Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Compliance meeting with the Contractor and Mrs. Briana Mitchell; the Final Estimate (FE) Informational Meeting with Mr. Robby Stone; the EDMS Meeting with Ms. Cheryl Ross; and the Environmental Impacts Meeting with Mr. John Smith and Ms. Shannon Chamberlain.

Public Involvement (PI): Metric proposes to utilize ABC as our PI subconsultant for this project. CR 278 Peacock Bridge Road serves as a link between SR 73 and SR 71 south of the interstate in Jackson County, providing an essential connection for residents and emergency services. The replacement of the roadway and Peacock Bridge is vital to maintaining safe, reliable access for daily travel. Given the project’s rural setting, key stakeholders include recreational users of Chipola River, local residents, and the traveling public. Metric, in partnership with ABC, will implement a robust and proactive public information strategy tailored to the project’s unique stakeholder base. This will include: Frequently canvassing the surrounding area to develop and maintain an accurate database of visitors, residents, and recurring recreational users; Using this database to more effectively distribute weekly news releases, construction updates, traffic advisories, and other PI materials; Maintaining continuous communication channels to ensure that stakeholders receive accurate and timely information regarding lane closures, construction schedules, and environmental considerations; and Coordinating with FDOT, local agencies, and the contractor to ensure consistent, unified messaging throughout the project. This approach ensures that public outreach is targeted, efficient, and responsive to the needs of the community and the individuals who regularly use the Chipola River area.

Certification of Final Estimates (FEs): Metric’s internal QA reviews throughout the life of this project include reviews of each pay item for monthly and final estimates. We have submitted over 45 FEs in a row without errors and assured that the Materials Certification from SMO for each project was achieved in a timely manner. Within 30 days of final acceptance, we will submit the FE and Final As-Built Plans documenting the contractor’s work in accordance with Construction Project Administration Manual (CPAM) and prepare the Offer of Final Payment.

CEI Contract and Agreement Management: Metric will prepare invoices monthly for CEI services and submit them to Mr. Corbin for his review and approval.

DBE/SBE Utilization – CEI and Contractor: Although the FDOT DBE program is currently suspended statewide, Metric remains fully committed to supporting SBE participation until the Department’s new DBE program is developed and implemented.

Metric values the role of small businesses in delivering high-quality CEI services and will continue to utilize qualified SBE subconsultants throughout the life of this project. Metric has worked extensively with all proposed SBE subconsultants listed on our team. Each has consistently demonstrated strong performance, technical competence, and reliability, with no issues or concerns regarding work quality or responsiveness. Our continued partnership with these firms ensures the Department receives exceptional service while maintaining opportunities for small business participation.

2. STAFFING/TECHNICAL PLAN

PROPOSED STAFF QUALITY

The proposed personnel for this project have ALL the required certifications and have experience of other projects like in the specific types for this project. Please refer to the attached resumes for more information concerning their certifications and experience.

Highlights of Key Staff Quality:

Coleman Hatcher, PE (SPE) (Metric) – has more than 40 years of CEI and construction project management experience on bridge replacement and resurfacing projects. He is currently SPE on the SR 8 (I-10) from west of SR 81 to the Choctawhatchee River (scheduled for completion in August 2026), SR 20 over Econfina Creek Bridge Replacement, and SR 77 in Wausau (scheduled for completion in March 2027).

Donnie Jackson (PA) (Metric) – has over 31 years of road and bridge construction experience. He currently serves as the Project Administrator on SR 77 in Wausau (scheduled for completion in March 2027) and SR 8 (I-10) from west of SR 81 to the Choctawhatchee River (scheduled for completion in August 2026).

Bobby Taunton (Senior Inspector) (Metric) – has nearly a decade of construction inspection experience. He is currently working on the SR 77 project from the Bay County line to north of SR 279 in Washington County (bridges are scheduled to be completed in September 2026).

David “Doc” Cook, Sr. (Senior Inspector) (Metric) – has over 44 years of experience delivering roadway and bridge construction experience throughout FDOT D3. He has completed numerous drill shaft projects both as a senior inspector with Metric as well as crane operator with the contractor.

Phillip “Wayne” Gainer, Jr. (CEI CSS) (Metric) – has 13 years of experience delivering roadway and bridge construction projects throughout FDOT D3. He is currently serving as the CSS on the SR 77 project in Wausau (scheduled for completion in March 2027), the SR 8 (I-10) project from west of SR 81 to the Choctawhatchee River (scheduled for completion in August 2026), A=and SR 20 over Econfina Creek bridge replacement.

PROPOSED STAFF AVAILABILITY

Coleman Hatcher, PE (SPE) – 35% (85% in April 2027) Donnie Jackson (PA) – 50% (100% in April 2027) Bobby Taunton (SI) – 100% David “Doc” Cook, Sr. (SI) – 100% Phillip “Wayne” Gainer, Jr. (CSS) – 50% (65% in April

2027)

EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR PROJECTS

Metric has a 50-year history of providing CEI services to FDOT and numerous other state and local agencies. With extensive experience across a wide range of transportation infrastructure projects, Metric brings the staffing depth, availability, and construction expertise necessary to confidently “take possession” of this project and deliver a high-quality product for D3. Metric’s longstanding presence in the region, combined with our proven track record on similar roadway and interstate projects, demonstrates our commitment to excellence and our ability to successfully oversee complex construction operations from start to finish. Following are a few of the many similar projects by Metric:

• SR 20 over Chipola River Bridge (Mr. Cook was Senior

Inspector)

• Jupiter Creek Bridge in Blackwater Forest (Mr. Cook was working for F&W and Metric was CEI)

• SR 10 (US 90) over Choctawhatchee River Bridge (Mr.

Jackson was Drill Shaft Inspector)

• SR 2 over Choctawhatchee River Bridge (Mr. Jackson was

Drill Shaft Inspector)

• SR 77 in Wausau (Mr. Taunton was Senior Inspector) This history of successful delivery on similar corridor and interstate resurfacing projects reflects Metric’s strong familiarity with D3 expectations, standards, and procedures. We appreciate the opportunity to submit our qualifications and experience for your consideration, and we look forward to continuing to provide high-quality CEI services to FDOT D3.

Prequalification of Prime Consultant and any proposed Subconsultants by advertised type(s) of work:

Consultant Name Project Advertised Major & Minor Work Types

10.1 10.4 SB

Prime Metric Engineering LLC

S u b co n su lt a n ts

ABC Group Communication Solutions

Multivista Systems LLC

T2 UES, Inc.

Underwater Engineering Services Inc.

SB = Small Business

Michael McCrary 1 Principal-in-ChargeCEI Senior Project Engineer

Coleman Hatcher, PE 1

CEI Senior Inspectors Bobby Taunton 1

David “Doc” Cook, Sr. (Drill Shaft) 1

Darrel Burnett, PE 1 – CEI Senior Project Engineer Johnathan Taylor 1 – CEI Project Administrator Debra Lark 1 – CEI Contract Support Specialist

June Curry 1 – CEI Resident Compliance Specialist

QA/QC Team

CEI Contract Support Specialist Phillip “Wayne” Gainer, Jr. 1

Public Information Officers Michelle Hill 2

Lindsey Harrell 2

Survey Earl Stanbridge 4

Kaleb Stanbridge 4 Matthew Spencer 4

Aerial Photography Adam LaCoste 3 Aaron Hapner 3

CEI Project Administrator Donnie Jackson 1

CEI Resident Compliance Specialist Angie Byers 1

CEI Inspectors Rylan Williams 1

Hunter Park 1 Caden Mercer 1

CEI Asphalt Plant Inspectors Joey Kennington 1 Shannon Tapia 1

CEI Inspector’s Aide Austin Culbreth 1

27344 – CEI CR 278 over Chipola River Bridge No. 530026 | 44905516201

1. Metric Engineering LLC

2. ABC Group Communication Solutions (SBE)

3. Multivista Systems LLC (SBE)

4. T2 UES, Inc.

5. Underwater Engineering Services, Inc.

METRIC TEAM

Underwater Bridge Inspection Jeffrey O’Connor, PE, SE, LEED AP 5

Alex Kraeger 5

Letting Pre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Post

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.32 4.32 5.22 4.72 5.22 4.72 5.22 4.82 5.22 4.22 5.22 4.22 5.22 4.32 5.22 4.22 5.22 2.27

4.50 742.50

Team: Metric Engineering LLC (Metric) | ABC Group Communication Solutions (ABC) | Multivista Systems LLC (Multivista) | T2 UES, Inc. (T2) | Underwater Engineering Services, Inc. (UESI)

247.50

356.40

Total

0.00 0.00

CEI Senior Inspector - Bobby Taunton (Metric) 17.00 2805.00

0.85 140.25

0.15

82.91 13680.15

Survey - Earl Stanbridge (T2)

CEI Resident Compliance Specialist - Angie Byers (Metric) 2.16

2640.00

Staff Hour Estimate - (27344) CR 278 over Chipola River Bridge No. 530026

CEI Project Administrator - Donnie Jackson (Metric) 9.00 1485.00

Personnel Classifications

CEI Senior Project Engineer - Coleman Hatcher, PE (Metric) 5.40 891.00

FPID 449055-1-62-01 (CR 278 Peacock Bridge Road over Chipola River Bridge No. 530026)

Total Months Total Hours

CEI Senior Inspector (Drill Shaft) - David "Doc" Cook, Sr. (Metric) 1.50

2027 20282026

Public Information Officer - Michelle Hill (ABC)

CEI Inspector - Hunter Park (Metric) CEI Inspector - Rylan Williams (Metric)

CEI Contract Support Specialist - Phillip "Wayne" Gainer, Jr. (Metric)

0.00CEI Inspector - Caden Mercer (Metric)

Aerial Photos (Value-Add) - Aaron Hapner (Multivista) 0.00 Aerial Photos (Value-Add) - Adam LaCoste (Multivista) 9.00

16.00

0.00

Underwater Bridge Inspection - Jeffrey O'Connor, PE, SE, LEED AP (UESI) 24.75

Public Information Officer - Lindsey Harrell (ABC)

Survey - Kaleb Stanbridge (T2) 0.40 66.00

0.40 66.00

0.00 1485.00

0.00

CEI Inspector's Aide - Austin Culbreth (Metric) 10.00 1650.00

Survey - Matthew Spencer (T2) 0.40 66.00

24.750.15Underwater Bridge Inspection - Alex Kraeger (UESI)

CEI Asphalt Plant Inspector - Shannon Tapia (Metric) 0.00

990.00 0.00

CEI Asphalt Plant Inspector - Joey Kennington (Metric) 0.00

6.00

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMITMENT FORM

375-030-83

Submit this form as required in the Request for Proposal or alternatively, at the time of Expanded Letter of Response is due:

Contract/Advertisement No.: 27344 Prime Consultant: Metric Engineering LLC

Project Description: CEI CR 278 over Chipola River Bridge No. 530026

Expected percentage of contract fees to be utilized by Small Businesses 12 %. (Combine Small Business Prime and Small Business subconsultants, if applicable).

The proposed Prime and subconsultants/subvendors’ work is as follows:

Prime Type of Work

(List each type of work separately, only one type of work per line) of overall contract amount

Small Business

Non Small

Business

Metric Engineering LLC 10.1 43

10.4 43

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Subconsultant/Subvendor

(List each type of work separately, only one type of work per line) of overall contract amount

Small Business

Non Small

Business

ABC Group Communication Solutions Non-Professional Service Firm 1

Multivista Systems LLC Non-Professional Service Firm 11

T2 UES, Inc. 8.2 1.5

Underwater Enineering Services, Inc. 5.4 0.5

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

375-030-83

Subconsultant/Subvendor

(List each type of work separately, only one type of work per line) of overall contract amount

Small Business

Non Small

Business

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

375-030-83

PROCUREMENT

08/25

Subconsultant/Subvendor Type of Work

(List each type of work separately, only one type of work per line) of overall contract amount

Small Business

Non Small

Business

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Choose an item.

Total percent for Prime and Subs committed:

(Note to Consultants: should be 100% when submitted to FDOT) 100

Total percent for Prime and Subs remaining to be committed:

(Note to Consultants: should be 0% when submitted to FDOT) 0

The percentage column must total 100% for Prime and all subs.

Small Business status for Non-Professional Services firms can be found here:

https://ssrs.fdot.gov/Reports/report/PDA Reports/Public Reports/SmallBusinessCertificationReport

Small Business status for Professional Services firms is located here:

https://www.fdot.gov/procurement/InternetReports.shtm#qual

By: Michael McCrary Title: VP, Director of Business Operations CEI/EMS Date: 8/10/2026

TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATION

375-030-30

PROCUREMENT

11/25

Pursuant to Section 287.055(5)(a), Florida Statutes, for any lump-sum or cost-plus-a-fixed fee professional services contract over the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes for CATEGORY FOUR, the Department of Transportation (Department) requires the Consultant to execute this certificate and include it with the submittal of the Technical Proposal, or as prescribed in the contract advertisement.

The Consultant hereby certifies, covenants, and warrants that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation for this project’s agreement are accurate, complete, and current at the time of contracting.

The Consultant further agrees that the original agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the Department determines the agreement price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such agreement adjustments shall be made within (1) year following the end of the contract. For purposes of this certificate, the end of the agreement shall be deemed to be the date of final billing or acceptance of the work by the Department, whichever is later.

Metric Engineering LLC Name of Consultant

By: 8/10/2026 Date

Michael McCrary - VP, Director of Business Operations CEI/EMS

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION,

INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION-

LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS FOR FEDERAL AID CONTRACTS

(Compliance with 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200)

375-030-32

PROCUREMENT

11/15

It is certified that neither the below identified firm nor its principals are presently suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency.

Name of Consultant/Contractor: Metric Engineering LLC

By:

Date: 8/10/2026

Title: VP, Director of Business Operations CEI/EMS

Instructions for Certification

Instructions for Certification - Lower Tier Participants:

(Applicable to all subcontracts, purchase orders and other lower tier transactions requiring prior FHWA approval or estimated to cost $25,000 or more - 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200)

a. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier is providing the certification set out below.

b. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department, or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.

c. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

d. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "participant," "person," "principal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to which this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. “First Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction between a grantee or subgrantee of Federal funds and a participant (such as the prime or general contract). “Lower Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction under a First Tier Covered Transaction (such as subcontracts).

“First Tier Participant” refers to the participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a grantee or subgrantee of Federal funds (such as the prime or general contractor). “Lower Tier Participant” refers any participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a First Tier Participant or other Lower Tier Participants (such as subcontractors and suppliers).

e. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

f. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include this clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions exceeding the $25,000 threshold.

g. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any lower tier prospective participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the Excluded Parties List System website (https://www.epls.gov/), which is compiled by the General Services Administration.

h. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

i. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph e of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.

Michael McCrary

CERTIFICATION FOR DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING

ACTIVITIES

ON FEDERAL-AID CONTRACTS

(Compliance with 49CFR, Section 20.100 (b))

375-030-33

PROCUREMENT

11/25

The prospective participant certifies, by signing this certification, that to the best of his or her knowledge and belief:

(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities", in accordance with its instructions.

(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

Name of Consultant: Metric Engineering LLC

By: Michael McCrary Date: 8/10/2026

Authorized Signature:

Title: VP, Director of Business Operations CEI/EMS

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

375-030-34

PROCUREMENT

11/25

Is this form applicable to your firm?

If no, then please complete section 4 below for “Prime”

YES NO

1. Type of Federal Action:

a. contract

b. grant

c. cooperative agreement

d. loan

e. loan guarantee

f. loan insurance

2. Status of Federal Action:

a. bid/offer/application

b. initial award

c. post-award

3. Report Type:

a. initial filing

b. material change

For Material Change Only:

Year: Quarter:

Date of last report:

(mm/dd/yyyy)

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity:

Prime Subawardee

Tier , if known:

Metric Engineering LLC 1343 Brickyard Rd Chipley, FL 32428

Congressional District, if known: 4c

5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is a Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Congressional District, if known:

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

Assistance Listing Number (ALN), if applicable:

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant (if individual, last name, first name, MI):

b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if different from No. 10a) (last name, first name, MI):

11. Information requested through this form is authorized by title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when this transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352.

This information will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Signature: ____________________________________________

Print Name: Michael McCrary

Title: VP, Director of Business Operations CEI/EMS

Telephone No.: (850) 845-0076 Date (mm/dd/yyyy):…