Past Performance Surveys.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- J041--Liebert HVAC Units Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C26125Q0030
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Survey template for a federal contract opportunity. The survey is to be completed by an evaluator who has previously worked with the company being considered for award of a VA contract. The evaluator is asked to provide details on the contracts the company previously performed, rate the overall quality of work, and note any performance issues or concerns. The related federal contract opportunity is for the maintenance of Liebert HVAC units, solicited by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Veterans Integrated Service Network 21. The survey is a required component to be included with the quote for this opportunity.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto WD.pdf | ||
| 36C26125Q0030_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Survey
OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: A separate survey must be completed for each reference. The completed surveys must be included with the quote.
EVALUATOR INSTRUCTIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs is considering the company listed below for award of a VA contract. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance. The name of the individuals providing reference information is confidential and will not be released or made publicly available.
Name of Company being evaluated:
Evaluator’s Name:
Evaluator’s Company Name, Address and Phone number:
Indicate what contracts did this company provided for you? Provide the total contract amount, dates of performance, and contract number.
Evaluation Questions
Please rate the overall quality of work using a scale of (Excellent, Good, Fair, Marginal, Unacceptable). Comments in support of the rating are welcome.
Were there any performance issues/concerns? If so, how were they handled?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .