Past Performance Surveys.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C26123Q0894
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey template and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance survey template requests evaluators to rate and comment on the overall quality of work a company provided on previous contracts. Details are solicited about contract amounts, dates of performance, and issues or concerns handled.
The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for developing tools to support dialysis decision-making issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration. It is a total small business set-aside seeking responses in accordance with the stated statement of work. The solicitation number and additional identifying details are provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26123Q0894.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Survey
OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: A separate survey must be completed for each reference. The completed surveys must be included with the quote.
EVALUATOR INSTRUCTIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs is considering the company listed below for award of a VA contract. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance. The name of the individuals providing reference information is confidential and will not be released or made publicly available.
Name of Company being evaluated:
Evaluator’s Name:
Evaluator’s Company Name, Address and Phone number:
Indicate what contracts did this company provided for you? Provide the total contract amount, dates of performance, and contract number.
Evaluation Questions
Please rate the overall quality of work using a scale of (Excellent, Good, Fair, Marginal, Unacceptable). Comments in support of the rating are welcome.
Were there any performance issues/concerns? If so, how were they handled?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .