Past Performance Survey.pdf
PDF 12 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C26124Q0267
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey for evaluation of a company providing biohazardous and infectious waste disposal services, as well as the statement of work for a solicitation from the Department of Veterans Affairs for biohazard and infectious waste disposal at the American Samoa Community Based Outpatient Clinic.
The solicitation requires pick-up of biohazardous and infectious waste on a bi-weekly basis from the clinic located in American Samoa. The contractor must properly dispose of all waste in accordance with statutes and maintain necessary permits. The base period of performance is one year with four optional years. The contractor must submit waste manifests and safety data sheets on a regular basis and notify the contracting officer of any changes to disinfectants used. The contractor will also provide supplies such as liners, sharps containers and labels to the clinic.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26124Q0267_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Survey
OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: A separate survey must be completed for each reference. The completed surveys must be included with the quote.
EVALUATOR INSTRUCTIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs is considering the company listed below for award of a VA contract. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance. The name of the individuals providing reference information is confidential and will not be released or made publicly available.
Name of Company being evaluated:
Evaluator’s Name:
Evaluator’s Company Name, Address and Phone number:
Indicate what contracts did this company provided for you? Provide the total contract amount, dates of performance, and contract number.
Evaluation Questions Please rate the overall quality of work using a scale of (Excellent, Good, Fair, Marginal, Unacceptable). Comments in support of the rating are welcome.
Were there any performance issues/concerns? If so, how were they handled?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .