PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ).docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USCG DRY DOCK REPAIRS FOR STA SABINE 45663
- Solicitation number
- 70Z04021QP3054700
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
8. EVALUATION: EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION, PHONE NUMBER AND ORGANIZATION:
Rating System for Past Performance Evaluation Factors
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the evaluation area being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the evaluation area being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Neutral |
| No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance rating. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information on the Offeror, key personnel, or subcontractors. This is neither a negative or positive assessment. |
Please rate the contractor’s performance per the factors above:
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards):
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the Technician for the project:
C. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities and the initiative displayed in solving unexpected problems:
D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract:
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs:
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”:
G. Overall Assessment:
H. Additional Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .