PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ).docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70Z04021QP3000400
About this file
This document contains a Past Performance Questionnaire template and information about a federal solicitation from the United States Coast Guard. The Past Performance Questionnaire is a template used to collect evaluations on a contractor's previous work performance on factors such as quality, schedule, cost control, and customer satisfaction. It includes a rating system to evaluate performance.
The federal solicitation from the Coast Guard is for drydock repairs at Station Panama City, Florida in fiscal year 2021. Interested contractors must submit any requests for drawings or clarifications by October 5th, 2020. The combined synopsis and solicitation will close on October 14th, 2020. The work will be performed for the Department of Homeland Security and United States Coast Guard.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SPECIFICATION (45633) REV-0 27 JULY 2020.pdf | ||
| Solicitation 70Z04021QP3000400.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
8. EVALUATION: EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION, PHONE NUMBER AND ORGANIZATION:
Rating System for Past Performance Evaluation Factors
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the evaluation area being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the evaluation area being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Neutral |
| No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance rating. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information on the Offeror, key personnel, or subcontractors. This is neither a negative or positive assessment. |
Please rate the contractor’s performance per the factors above:
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards):
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the Technician for the project:
C. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities and the initiative displayed in solving unexpected problems:
D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract:
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs:
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”:
G. Overall Assessment:
H. Additional Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .