Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 161 KB Posted
- Attached to
- REHAB NIKE MISSILE HANGAR DOORS
- Solicitation number
- 140P5425R0025
About this file
This Past Performance Questionnaire is for a National Park Service contract (Solicitation #140P5425R0025) to rehabilitate Nike Missile Site Hangar Doors at Everglades National Park. The document is designed for a previous client or contractor to provide detailed performance feedback about a contractor's past work, with the completed questionnaire due to Contracting Officer William Vazquez by 1:00 p.m. ET on August 21, 2025. The evaluation form includes comprehensive rating criteria across five key performance areas: overall performance ability, timeliness, ability to resolve issues, quality of work, and an overall performance rating, with assessment levels ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and optional narrative comments for each evaluation category, with the questionnaire to be submitted directly from a corporate or government email account.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_and_Answers_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5425R0025_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Drawings_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5425R0025.pdf | ||
| Statement_of_Work.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5425R0025
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov
Currently, we are preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, ConOps East, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5425R0025 to Rehabilitate Nike Missile Site Hangar Doors at Everglades National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 p.m. ET on August 21, 2025. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR:
Phone:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided: ______________________________________________
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Company: __________________________________________________________
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.
Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Issues
Question 4. Quality of Work
The Contractor’s ability to meet task requirements and the work’s overall quality.
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Evaluation Definitions |
| The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance. |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .