Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 329 KB Posted

Attached to
Counter-IED Program and Training Expert/Expertise for Development and Sustainment
Solicitation number
95332423Q0070
Issued by

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor responding to solicitation number 95332423Q0070 from the Millennium Challenge Corporation. The solicitation seeks counter-IED program and training expertise for development and sustainment. The past performance questionnaire collects ratings and narratives on seven assessment elements for a contractor's previous relevant contract: cost/price control, schedule adherence, performance, quality, business relations, personnel qualifications, and an overall rating. It requests the reference provide the contractor's strengths, weaknesses, and whether they would award to this contractor again. The reference must certify the accuracy of the responses.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation #: 95332423Q0070 Offeror Name:

Name of Reference:

Title/Role:

Email:

Phone:

Agency/Company:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract #:

Total Contract Value ($):

Period of Performance:

Was the Offeror the Prime or Sub?

Description of product/service provided:

RATING CATEGORIES:

RATING CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

Very Good VG Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds several requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Satisfactory S Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal M Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unacceptable U Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable NA Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:

Using the rating categories above, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.

ATTACHMENT J.1.

(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price.

Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).

VG S M U NA

Supporting Narrative:

(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?

(3) Performance – Rate the contractor's ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.

(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?

(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems? Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.

(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.

(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?

(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.

(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.

(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?

CERTIFICATION:

I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Typed Name of Reference Date

Reference Signature

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

VG_2: Off
S_2: Off
M_2: Off
U_2: Off
NA_2: Off
Supporting Narrative 1:
Supporting Narrative 2:
Supporting Narrative 3:
VG_3: Off
S_3: Off
M_3: Off
U_3: Off
NA_3: Off
Supporting Narrative 1_2:
Supporting Narrative 2_2:
Supporting Narrative 3_2:
VG_4: Off
S_4: Off
M_4: Off
U_4: Off
NA_4: Off
Supporting Narrative 1_3:
Supporting Narrative 2_3:
Supporting Narrative 3_3:
VG_5: Off
S_5: Off
M_5: Off
U_5: Off
NA_5: Off
Supporting Narrative 1_4:
Supporting Narrative 2_4:
Supporting Narrative 3_4:
VG_6: Off
S_6: Off
M_6: Off
U_6: Off
NA_6: Off
Supporting Narrative 1_5:
Supporting Narrative 2_5:
Supporting Narrative 3_5:
VG_7: Off
S_7: Off
M_7: Off
U_7: Off
NA_7: Off
Supporting Narrative 1_6:
Supporting Narrative 2_6:
VG_8: Off
S_8: Off
M_8: Off
U_8: Off
NA_8: Off
2:
Please identify the contractors strengths 1:
Please identify the contractors strengths 2:
Please identify the contractors strengths 3:
Please identify the contractors weaknesses 1:
Please identify the contractors weaknesses 2:
Please identify the contractors weaknesses 3:
10 Given the choice would you award to this contractor again Why 1:
10 Given the choice would you award to this contractor again Why 2:
10 Given the choice would you award to this contractor again Why 3:
accurate to the best of my knowledge:
1_2:
Supporting Narrative 3_6:
Solicitation:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .