Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 156 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STABILIZE STAFFORD CHIMNEYS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P5421R0018
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor submitting a proposal for solicitation number 140P5421R0018 to stabilize chimneys at Cumberland Island National Seashore for the National Park Service. The contractor is required to provide references from previous relevant contracts who will be contacted to provide feedback on the contractor's performance, including on criteria such as meeting requirements, schedule, and price. The completed questionnaire must be submitted to William Vazquez at the National Park Service by 1:00 PM EST on September 03, 2021 directly from a corporate or government email account.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P5421R0018_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Bid_Sheet.pdf | ||
| Stafford_1402_Report.pdf | ||
| Masonry_Materials_Analsyis_Report.pdf | ||
| Drawings.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5421R0018.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Project_Specifications.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5421R0018
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5421R0018 for the Stabilization of Stafford Chimneys at Cumberland Island National Seashore. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 PM EST on September 03, 2021.
Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
If you will not be available on September 03, 2021 for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contacting officer to contact.
Alternate POC name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________
Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company:
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Work
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Evaluation Definitions |
| The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance. |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .